JFK Assassination Forum
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate => JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate => Topic started by: Benjamin Cole on March 27, 2026, 12:18:47 AM
-
Monika Wiesak has authored a couple of blah-blah books in the JFKA, echoing the earlier leftist, inaccurate, skewed tome by John Douglass.
I happen to be a JFK fan, and regard him as America's best public speaker in the postwar era. JFK was also an ardent anti-communist, and wanted the world to migrate to Western liberal democratic government, especially the former colonies.
Wiesak "adds" to Douglass' twisted JFK history by suggesting Mossad waxed JFK---that is the hip thing today in certain demented leftist JFKA circles.
But who is Wiesak? Who finances her work?
One clue is the squalid posthumous hagiography Wiesak recently authored on the pederast Michael Jackson. Yes, Michael Jackson, the celebrity singer who pegged boys.
This is the blurb Wiesak wrote on her book on Jackson:
Michael Jackson was globally famous yet misunderstood by many. He was loved by his fans and demonized by the corporate press. He became famous at a young age and soared to superstardom as a young adult. As he matured, so did his music. He sang of unity, peace, and harmony, and against war and injustice. He created his beloved Neverland Ranch to serve as a healing escape for others. As the years went on, the press attacks grew more vicious. Then, the molestation allegations began. The media spoke of the accusations as if copious evidence backed them up. However, a closer look reveals that they fall apart under scrutiny.
This book details the story of Michael Jackson, from his youth through long past his death. It explores the false rumors spread over the years and sheds light on who the man truly was. It also offers a revealing look at the world of power, media, and entertainment.
Wiesak wrote this book in 2024. No excuses, the book did not precede any revelations on Jackson.
"He (Jackson) sang of unity, peace, and harmony, and against war and injustice."--Wiesak.
Egads. This is embarrassing.
A good bet is Wiesak was given an advance by parties trying to rehabilitate the Jackson name, and gain some extra mileage out of the Jackson catalog.
In Wiesak's world, pederasts are admirable, and Mossad waxed JFK.
That is state of $-JFKA research.
(https://i.postimg.cc/ZK4TCm77/Screen-Shot-2569-03-27-at-11-41-29.png)
-
Monika Wiesak has authored a couple of blah-blah books in the JFKA, echoing the earlier leftist, inaccurate, skewed tome by John Douglass.
I happen to be a JFK fan, and regard him as America's best public speaker in the postwar era. JFK was also an ardent anti-communist, and wanted the world to migrate to Western liberal democratic government, especially the former colonies.
Wiesak "adds" to Douglass' twisted JFK history by suggesting Mossad waxed JFK---that is the hip thing today in certain demented leftist JFKA circles.
Maybe the KGB* encourages people like Wiesak to blame the JFKA on Mossad, because in so doing they are wittingly or unwittingly framing the CIA's "Israeli Account" holder, James JESUS Angleton, as the evil, evil mastermind, when in fact Angleton was duped by a probable KGB mole by the name of Bruce Leonard Solie (look him up), whom John M. Newman tells us in his 2022 book, Uncovering Popov's Mole, not only "cleared" false defector Yuri Nosenko in October 1968 but very likely sent Lee Harvey Oswald to Moscow in 1959 as an ostensible "dangle" in a planned-to-fail mole hunt in the wrong part of the CIA -- the Soviet Russia Division.
*Today's SVR and FSB
-
TG-
I have little doubt Putin and Tehran money is active in JFKA social influencer circles, and funding book projects and the like.
The $links between Putin and Oliver Stone are no secret.
The Hunt Letter was exposed, and as you accurately point out, elements within the CIA sure look like they were compromised by the KGB, including possibly LHO (says John Newman).
LHO leads to G2-KGB, like links to anyone, were snuffed out by the WC.
Wiesak sure looks like a pen-for-hire.
If only the US would appease dictators globally, then there were be worldwide peace.
Here is Wiesak pimping for Jackson music sales, a recent post on "X."
(https://i.postimg.cc/ZK4TCm77/Screen-Shot-2569-03-27-at-11-41-29.png)
-
TG-
I have little doubt Putin and Tehran money is active in JFKA social influencer circles, and funding book projects and the like.
The $links between Putin and Oliver Stone are no secret.
The Hunt Letter was exposed, and as you accurately point out, elements within the CIA sure look like they were compromised by the KGB, including possibly LHO (says John Newman).
LHO leads to G2-KGB, like links to anyone, were snuffed out by the WC.
Wiesak sure looks like a pen-for-hire.
If only the US would appease dictators globally, then there were be worldwide peace.
Is it just my imagination, or do lots of Angleton-blaming / CIA-blaming tinfoil-hat JFKA conspiracy theorists have . . . gasp . . . Jewish names?
-
TG--
No doubt, some do.
But James DiEugenio?
Monika Wiesak is a recent migrant from Poland, where there are few, few Jews (Poles are great people, btw).
Jefferson Morley?
Tucker Carlson?
Michael Piper?
Laurent Guyénot (French anti-Semitic crackpot, published in Unz website).
And the most lurid, pinheaded loser of the bunch, Dr Bill "The Quack" Niederhut?
Unz is Jewish, by birth.
I heard said, "Unz may be ashamed to be Jewish, but we are even more ashamed that he is."
-
TG--
No doubt, some do.
But James DiEugenio?
Monika Wiesak is a recent migrant from Poland, where there are few, few Jews (Poles are great people, btw).
Jefferson Morley?
Tucker Carlson?
Michael Piper?
Laurent Guyénot (French anti-Semitic crackpot, published in Unz website).
And the most lurid, pinheaded loser of the bunch, Dr Bill "The Quack" Niederhut?
Unz is Jewish, by birth.
I heard said, "Unz may be ashamed to be Jewish, but we are even more ashamed that he is."
Dear "BC,"
Regardless, do you think January 6 was a Deep State op against Trump?
-- "TG"
-
TG-
No. AFAIK, not a Deep State action.
Ray Epps is a mysterious guy, and the fact that Mr Buffalo Horns was solicitously ushered around the US Capital was odd. Great photo ops, no?
The Oath Keepers and Proud Boys were heavily infiltrated by feds.
Evidently, there were 200+feds in the crowd on Jan. 6, and Capitol Police at one point mysteriously stood down, and allowed the crowd into the Capitol. None of that makes sense.
Maybe Jan 6 was just a scrum. Maybe just bad decisions made everywhere.
The Donk-run Jan. 6 committee was a kangaroo court show trial.
I have suspicions about Trump's relations to Putin, but nothing solid.
It should be noted Trump has kneecapped Putin in Cuba, Venezuela and Iran. Even while Putin has exhausted his military in Ukraine, with the US supporting Ukraine through Europe.
With luck, we could see the IRGC and Putin go down this year.
Let's ask Monika Wiesak what to think. She says Michael Jackson's pederasty is not important. Jackson sang songs about social justice.
-
[...]
ME: Is the following statement true? "There were 200-plus federal agents in the crowd on Jan. 6, and the Capitol Police at one point mysteriously stood down and allowed the crowd into the Capitol."
GROK: No, the statement is not accurate as phrased. It combines elements of documented facts, exaggerations, and unproven implications into a misleading claim.
Federal Agents in the Crowd
There is no credible evidence of "200-plus federal agents" embedded in the crowd on January 6, 2021, acting as provocateurs or undercover operatives during the initial breach. A December 2024 Justice Department Inspector General (DOJ OIG) report found that the FBI had no undercover employees in the protest crowds or at the Capitol that day.
pbs.org
The same report documented 26 FBI confidential human sources (informants, not agents) in Washington, D.C., in connection with the events. Of these, only three were tasked by the FBI to report on specific domestic terrorism subjects. Four informants (across the group) entered the Capitol, and others entered restricted areas, but none were authorized by the FBI to do so, break the law, or encourage violence. Most of the 26 attended on their own initiative.
congress.gov
Claims of "274 plainclothes FBI agents" in the crowd stem from later clarifications (e.g., by then-FBI Director Kash Patel in 2025), but these refer to agents responding after the riot was declared—primarily for crowd control, pipe bomb investigations, or post-breach support—not pre-placed infiltrators inciting the crowd.
foxnews.com
Broader "federal agents" claims (including from other agencies) lack substantiation for the "200-plus" figure in the sense of orchestrated presence. Official investigations, including the DOJ OIG review, have repeatedly debunked theories of FBI or other federal orchestration of the riot.
Capitol Police "Standing Down"
Capitol Police did not "mysteriously stand down" in an orchestrated or suspicious manner to deliberately allow entry. The response involved documented security failures, poor planning, intelligence shortcomings, and being overwhelmed by the crowd size and violence—not a deliberate stand-down order.
Officers faced a large, surging crowd that breached outer perimeters around 1:00–2:00 p.m. Some videos show officers appearing to step aside, open barriers, or not aggressively resist at certain points (e.g., at specific doors or after initial breaches). In context, this often occurred because officers were outnumbered, exhausted, injured, or following de-escalation amid chaos; some rioters later claimed they believed they had implicit permission.
politifact.com
Internal reviews and Senate reports highlighted leadership failures: inadequate preparation despite warnings, restrictions on less-lethal weapons for some units, delayed requests for National Guard support, and command issues. For example, Capitol Police leadership ordered lockdowns and evacuations as breaches occurred, but resources were stretched thin (including due to pipe bomb distractions).
en.wikipedia.org
A Capitol Police internal watchdog report noted orders limiting aggressive crowd-control tools in some cases, and officers were suspended or investigated afterward. However, this reflects operational breakdowns and hesitation under pressure, not a mysterious conspiracy to invite entry. Multiple investigations (Senate, House, DOJ) described it as a "monumental security failure" due to intelligence lapses and poor coordination, not intentional facilitation.
washingtonpost.com
Videos of officers interacting with the crowd (e.g., waving people in or forming lines that later retreated) have been widely circulated and interpreted in partisan ways, but fact-checks and timelines show no evidence of a pre-planned "stand-down" to enable the breach. The initial breaches involved forced entry, broken windows, assaults on officers, and bear spray/pepper spray use against police.
Overall Context
January 6 involved real security and intelligence failures across agencies (FBI, Capitol Police, Pentagon/D.C. National Guard response delays). Thousands entered the Capitol unlawfully, leading to violence, deaths (including a rioter shot by police and officers who died later), and over 1,000+ prosecutions. Investigations found no evidence of a "fed-surrection" or federal agents orchestrating the event.
The statement overstates unproven elements ("200-plus federal agents" in the crowd as infiltrators) while framing routine chaos and documented lapses as "mysterious" stand-downs. Partial truths about informants present and police inconsistencies exist, but the claim as a whole does not hold up under scrutiny from official reports.
-
I dunno...essentially AI citing official sources, or PBS?
I saw videos myself of Capitol Police standing aside and letting the crowd into the Capitol.
Mr Buffalo Horns?
Ray Epps?
Feds embedded in ProudBoys and Oath Keepers?
Like I said, likely just a scrum on Jan. 6, with a multitude of bad decisions made. Maybe too many for comfort, and it makes one wonder.
I mean, Capitol Police Officers attempting to unlock doors for Mr Buffalo Horns? And then solicitously escorting him to the Senate chambers? Huh? That's on video. What explains that behavior?
The Jan. 6 committee was a show trial-kangaroo court.
Your guess is as good as mine. Draw your own conclusions. Or ask Monika Wiesak.
Michale Jackson used to shop at Sears a lot.
That had sales: "Boy Pants, Half-Off!"
-
Many modern liberals, and probably conservatives too, would be surprised to know how conservative the Kennedy clan was in post-WWII America. JFK and Nixon struck up a friendship as freshmen congressmen following their elections in 1946. JFK went so far as to donate $1000 to Nixon's Senate campaign in 1950 against actress Helen Douglas, wife of actor Melvyn Douglas. Nixon had branded Douglas as the Pink Lady and it appears JFK concurred.
The Kennedys were close allies of Joe McCarthy even though they were from opposing parties. RFK stormed out of a Washington Jaycees meeting in protest when Edward R. Murrow was introduced as the featured speaker. joe McCarthy dated one of the Kennedy sisters and was godfather to RFK's first born.
In 1960, JFK was staunchly opposed by the liberal wing of the Democrat Party. He ran against Hubert Humphrey in the primaries and when he flamed out, they turned to Stuart Syminton. Some even supported giving Adlai Stevenson a third bite of the apple. Both Harry Truman and Eleanor Roosevelt opposed JFK's nomination and Roosevelt refused to endorse JFK in the general election until very late when she gave him a very lukewarm endorsement.
-
TG-
No. AFAIK, not a Deep State action.
Ray Epps is a mysterious guy, and the fact that Mr Buffalo Horns was solicitously ushered around the US Capital was odd. Great photo ops, no?
The Oath Keepers and Proud Boys were heavily infiltrated by feds.
Evidently, there were 200+feds in the crowd on Jan. 6, and Capitol Police at one point mysteriously stood down, and allowed the crowd into the Capitol. None of that makes sense.
Maybe Jan 6 was just a scrum. Maybe just bad decisions made everywhere.
The Donk-run Jan. 6 committee was a kangaroo court show trial.
Dear "BC,"
In other words, you DO think it was a Deep State op.
-- "TG"
-
TG-
No, I do not think Jan. 6 was a Deep State op, or a Trumperian op to take over America.
Most likely just a scrum and a black comedy of errors.
The news coverage afterwards was Deep State-ish, maybe you can say that.
-
Most likely just a scrum and a black comedy of errors.
You're full of beans.
Trump: The
Trump: "Come to Washington. It will be wild."
Bannon: "All hell is going to break loose tomorrow."
Trump: "If you don't fight like hell, you're going to lose your country."
GROK: Donald Trump repeatedly and publicly claimed before January 6, 2021, that the 2020 presidential election had been stolen from him, primarily by Democrats through widespread fraud, rigged voting processes (especially mail-in ballots), and other irregularities. He began raising doubts well before Election Day and intensified them dramatically after November 3, 2020, framing the results as illegitimate in speeches, tweets, press conferences, rallies, and calls with officials.
npr.org
Pre-Election Warnings (2020)
Trump frequently warned that the only way he could lose was if the election was "rigged," focusing on mail-in voting expanded due to COVID-19. Examples include:
April 7, 2020: "Mail ballots are a very dangerous thing for this country, because they're cheaters. They go and collect them. They're fraudulent in many cases."
npr.org
August 2020 (RNC acceptance speech): "The only way they can take this election away from us is if this is a rigged election." He also said Democrats were "trying to rig this election."
politico.com
May 24, 2020 (tweet): "The Democrats are trying to Rig the 2020 Election, plain and simple!"
archive.amarkfoundation.org
He and allies like Steve Bannon discussed a strategy where Trump would declare victory early on election night, and if trailing later (due to mail ballots), claim "they stole it."
youtube.com
Post-Election Claims (November 2020–January 5, 2021)
After Biden was projected the winner, Trump refused to concede and made hundreds of statements alleging fraud. Key examples:
November 4, 2020 (early morning tweet, while results were still being counted): "We are up BIG, but they are trying to STEAL the Election. We will never let them do it. Votes cannot be cast after the Polls are closed!" He also said in a White House speech: "This is a fraud on the American public... we did win this election."
issueone.org
November 5, 2020 (tweet): "STOP THE COUNT!"
November 15, 2020 (tweet): "He only won in the eyes of the FAKE NEWS MEDIA. I concede NOTHING! ... This was a RIGGED ELECTION!"
issueone.org
December 2020 (tweet): "This Fake Election can no longer stand. Get moving Republicans." And: "I WON THE ELECTION IN A LANDSLIDE, but remember, I only think in terms of legal votes, not all of the fake voters and fraud..." He claimed "hundreds of thousands of ballots mysteriously flowing into Swing States very late at night."
congress.gov
Trump promoted specific unsubstantiated theories, including:
Dominion voting machines flipping votes (sometimes tied to Venezuela or foreign interference).
Massive illegal ballots, dead people voting, non-citizens voting, and more votes cast than registered voters in key areas.
Poll watchers being blocked and "suitcases" of ballots in Georgia.
Late-night ballot dumps in Democratic strongholds.
He repeated these in rallies (e.g., in Georgia), interviews, and a January 2, 2021, call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, where he urged officials to "find 11,780 votes" and claimed he won Georgia "by hundreds of thousands of votes."
en.wikipedia.org
On January 5, 2021 (the day before the Capitol events), Trump continued pushing the narrative in statements and planning for the next day's objections in Congress.
Scale and Impact
Trump made these claims hundreds of times via Twitter alone in the post-election period (e.g., "rigged" dozens of times, "stolen" dozens more, "I won" repeatedly). His January 6 Ellipse speech (on the day itself) compiled many of the same points, urging supporters to "stop the steal." Supporters and some Republican lawmakers echoed the rhetoric, leading to objections during the electoral vote certification.
issueone.org
Context and Counterpoints
These claims were investigated extensively: over 60 lawsuits (many dismissed, including by Trump-appointed judges), audits, recounts, and statements from Trump's own officials (e.g., Attorney General William Barr said no fraud on a scale that could change the outcome). No evidence emerged of widespread fraud sufficient to alter the results in any state. Courts repeatedly rejected the allegations for lack of evidence. Trump and allies were told internally by campaign staff, DOJ, and others that the claims lacked merit, though Trump maintained he believed (or acted as if) the election was stolen.
campaignlegal.org
Trump framed the fight as protecting the Constitution and "legal votes," often calling for Republican lawmakers to act. Critics argue the sustained rhetoric undermined confidence in elections and contributed to the events of January 6; supporters view it as legitimate questioning of procedures amid pandemic changes and alleged irregularities.
In summary, Trump's pre-January 6 statements consistently and forcefully asserted that Democrats (and others) had stolen the election through fraud and rigging. These formed a central theme of his post-election messaging.
Do you think the 2020 election was stolen from Trump?