JFK Assassination Forum

JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate => JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate => Topic started by: Lance Payette on January 21, 2026, 05:40:55 PM

Title: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Lance Payette on January 21, 2026, 05:40:55 PM
Is anyone other than Tom able to follow the logic of what I lovingly call the “KGB stuff?" It quickly loses me.

As I understand it (while not pretending to actually understand it) ...

LHO is dispatched to the USSR, apparently unwittingly, to ferret out moles (I love saying that!  :D). While there, he attends the mysterious “KGB school” in Minsk and is somehow trained for an eventual mission (what mission?) in the U.S., even though those closest to him have absolutely no clue that this is going on. He returns to the U.S., presumably at the behest of his KGB masters, with his KGB-indoctrinated wife Marina (indoctrinated when and for what purpose?), and they proceed to live pretty much like impoverished bums (their KGB cover?).

LHO then engages in activities and writes things that are hard to square with any KBG mission (proof of just how clever the KGB is?). The time finally arrives for LHO to assassinate JFK (for what KGB-related purpose?), and Marina then lives the next 60+ years in pretty thorough Texas-housewife obscurity (for what KGB-related purpose?), evolving from a veritable LNer to a CTer (for what KGB-related purpose? was this her KGB mission?).

The supermen of the KGB then spend the next 50+ years destroying America from within via their infiltration of the CIA, the proverbial “long march through the institutions” and whatnot (and having rather astonishing success as far as I can tell). The chaotic Monty Python skit that calls itself the “JFKA research community” is apparently part of this dastardly plot (how? why?).

In 2016, the KGB, or at least KGB guy Putin, then causes Kremlin stooge The Donald to defeat Hillary Clinton, even though Hillary is a card-carrying "Rules for Radicals" sort of leftie and The Donald’s platform consists mostly of promises to unravel all that the KGB has accomplished over the past 50+ years (how does that work?). But wait, then Putin and the supermen of the KGB fumble the ball and Team Biden is somehow elected in 2020 (what the heck?). Team Biden, which apparently doesn't grasp the KGB's new Trumpian agenda, then does its best to restore the long march through the institutions, doing quite an excellent job of it, and Team Kamala promises to pretty well finish off the destruction of America (why would Putin and the supermen of the KGB not want this?).

But, no, Vladimir and the gang once again step in and cause their stooge The Donald to be elected in 2024, even though The Donald is now even more hellbent to stop the long march through the institutions and restore America to its former glory as a chest-thumping, war-mongering capitalist state and may be slightly unhinged to boot (the KGB wants this – why?).

Perhaps I’m just not seeing the Big Picture. Or perhaps I'm actually an unwitting KGB stooge, sent here to ferret out moles! I have literally no idea what the “KGB stuff” is all about or how it makes any sense at all. Anyone seeing it more clearly than I am?
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Tom Graves on January 21, 2026, 07:01:32 PM
Is anyone other than Tom able to follow the logic of what I lovingly call the “KGB stuff?" It quickly loses me. (Don’t bother, TG. You’re on Eternal Ignore. I now wear a COVID mask to avoid being exposed to even the tiniest micro-nuttiness from your invisible posts. I’m just wondering if anyone else can actually follow whatever it is TG is talking about.)

As I understand it (while not pretending to actually understand it) ...

LHO is dispatched to the USSR, apparently unwittingly, to ferret out moles (I love saying that!  :D). While there, he attends the mysterious “KGB school” in Minsk and is somehow trained for an eventual mission (what mission?) in the U.S., even though those closest to him have absolutely no clue that this is going on. He returns to the U.S., presumably at the behest of his KGB masters, with his KGB-indoctrinated wife Marina (indoctrinated when and for what purpose?), and they proceed to live pretty much like impoverished bums (their KGB cover?).

LHO then engages in activities and writes things that are hard to square with any KBG mission (proof of just how clever the KGB is?). The time finally arrives for LHO to assassinate JFK (for what KGB-related purpose?), and Marina then lives the next 60+ years in pretty thorough Texas-housewife obscurity (for what KGB-related purpose?), evolving from a veritable LNer to a CTer (for what KGB-related purpose? was this her KGB mission?).

The supermen of the KGB then spend the next 50+ years destroying America from within via their infiltration of the CIA, the proverbial “long march through the institutions” and whatnot (and having rather astonishing success as far as I can tell). The chaotic Monty Python skit that calls itself the “JFKA research community” is apparently part of this dastardly plot (how? why?).

In 2016, the KGB, or at least KGB guy Putin, then causes Kremlin stooge The Donald to defeat Hillary Clinton, even though Hillary is a card-carrying "Rules for Radicals" sort of leftie and The Donald’s platform consists mostly of promises to unravel all that the KGB has accomplished over the past 50+ years (how does that work?). But wait, then Putin and the supermen of the KGB fumble the ball and Team Biden is somehow elected in 2020 (what the heck?). Team Biden, which apparently doesn't grasp the KGB's new Trumpian agenda, then does its best to restore the long march through the institutions, doing quite an excellent job of it, and Team Kamala promises to pretty well finish off the destruction of America (why would Putin and the supermen of the KGB not want this?).

But, no, Vladimir and the gang once again step in and cause their stooge The Donald to be elected in 2024, even though The Donald is now even more hellbent to stop the long march through the institutions and restore America to its former glory as a chest-thumping, war-mongering capitalist state and may be slightly unhinged to boot (the KGB wants this – why?).

Perhaps I’m just not seeing the Big Picture. Or perhaps I'm actually an unwitting KGB stooge, sent here to ferret out moles! I have literally no idea what the “KGB stuff” is all about or how it makes any sense at all. Anyone seeing it more clearly than I am?

Dear FPR,

All you've got to do is read Tennent H. Bagley's 2007 Yale University Press book, Spy Wars: Moles, Mysteries, and Deadly Games, his 2014 follow-up article, "Ghosts of the Spy Wars," and John M. Newman's 2022 book, Uncovering Popov's Mole (but disregard the part where he says high-level military officers killed JFK because he refused to nuke Peking and Moscow in 1963).

https://archive.org/details/SpyWarsMolesMysteriesAndDeadlyGames

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08850607.2014.962362

Newman and I believe that James Angleton's confidant, mentor, and mole-hunting superior in the mole-hunting Office of Security, Bruce Leonard Solie, instead of recently-fired-by-CIA Edward Ellis Smith, was the mole who betrayed CIA's spy, GRU Lt. Col. Pyotr Popov, to KGB General Vladislav Kovshuk (aka Vladimir Komarov) in early 1957 in D.C. movie houses. Newman believes Smith (who went on to become a scholar at the Hoover Institution and a San Francisco banker) and James McCord (of future Watergate notoriety) provided logistical support to Solie.

Factoid: False defector-in-place in Geneva in June 1962 Yuri Nosenko, a putative KGB staff officer, said to Bagley during their first meeting that the most important thing he could tell him was that his putative boss, Kovshuk, had made a special two-week trip to the U.S. in early 1957 to "reestablish contact with 'Andrey,'" a cipher machine mechanic he'd recruited in Moscow in "1949 or 1950." Problem is, it turns out that Kovshuk was in Washington (as a "diplomat" on a two-year gig) for ten months and waited until the ninth one to visit "Andrey" -- burnt out Army Seargent Dayle W. Smith -- whose phone number and address were in the phone book and who never did have access to the cipher machines' rotors or any other classified information.

Newman believes Solie also gave the Soviets the U-2's top-secret specifications in those D.C. movie houses, and that when Popov told his handler in West Berlin in April 1958 that he'd heard a drunken GRU colonel brag at a New Years Eve party that the Kremlin had the U-2's secrets, Solie decided to send someone like (unwitting as to the true nature of the mission) Oswald to Moscow as an ostensible "dangle" in a planned to-fail hunt for "Popov's U-2 Mole" (Solie) in the wrong part of the CIA -- the Soviet Russia Division.

The only problem I have with that part of Newman's theory is that there's an eighteen month gap between the betrayal of Popov and Oswald's arrival in Moscow (ironically(?) on the same day that Popov was publicly arrested after being "played back" against the CIA for a year) where all he had to do was toss his passport on Richard Snyder's desk, announce that he wanted to renounce his American citizenship, become a USSR citizen, and declare to Snyder and the microphones in the walls that he planned to commit espionage against the U.S. -- including telling the Soviets "something of special interest." Newman's reasoning for such a long hiatus is that Solie first had to screen for and recruit Oswald and then Oswald had to learn Russian, but I don't see how being fluent in Russian was a prerequisite for the simple tasks I mentioned above.

Unless, perhaps, Solie intended Oswald to stay in The Worker's Paradise for an extended period of time.

Perhaps . . . gasp . . . within half-a-mile of a KGB school in Minsk.


-- Tom
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Lance Payette on January 21, 2026, 07:42:13 PM
Obviously, the "KGB stuff" makes sense to TG, which is not to say that it makes sense to anyone else. My question is: Does it?

We could expand the discussion - if there is to be any discussion - to the larger topic of what percentage of posts by the most active members of this forum strike you as literally making no sense at all? 70%, 80%, higher? (If you'd like to increase the percentage by including my posts, be my guest.)
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Fred Litwin on January 21, 2026, 08:00:27 PM
Tom explained it but I still don't understand it.

fred
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Tom Graves on January 21, 2026, 08:17:42 PM
Tom explained it but I still don't understand it.

fred

Dear Fred,

I admit that it's complicated (that's the nature of KGB versus CIA counterintelligence) but is internally consistent and I can explain it to you.

What would you like to know?

Fire away.

-- Tom
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Lance Payette on January 21, 2026, 08:55:46 PM
Tom explained it but I still don't understand it.

fred
Well, that's one vote for my sanity.

To TG: I am not interested in being "convinced." I am not interested in how the KGB stuff makes sense to you, because that would tell me nothing.

I simply wish to know if this KGB stuff actually makes sense to anyone else and, if so, whether that individual would care to explain it in 200 words or less of plain English, without reference to Bagley, Solie and the rest of TG's pantheon.

Here, I'll make it easy: We will assume arguendo, for purposes of this post only, that everything TG says is absolutely true. Please, just connect the dots in plain English in a way that makes any rational sense at all. Just do that. What would it have looked like, out there in the real world? How would it have worked, out there in the real world?

This is pretty much the challenge I issue to every Gee-Whiz True Believer in some notion that strikes me as nonsense.
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Tom Graves on January 21, 2026, 09:49:24 PM
Is anyone other than Tom able to follow the logic of what I lovingly call the “KGB stuff?" It quickly loses me. (Don’t bother, TG. You’re on Eternal Ignore. I now wear a COVID mask to avoid being exposed to even the tiniest micro-nuttiness from your invisible posts. I’m just wondering if anyone else can actually follow whatever it is TG is talking about.)

As I understand it (while not pretending to actually understand it) ...

LHO is dispatched to the USSR, apparently unwittingly, to ferret out moles (I love saying that!  :D). While there, he attends the mysterious “KGB school” in Minsk and is somehow trained for an eventual mission (what mission?) in the U.S., even though those closest to him have absolutely no clue that this is going on. He returns to the U.S., presumably at the behest of his KGB masters, with his KGB-indoctrinated wife Marina (indoctrinated when and for what purpose?), and they proceed to live pretty much like impoverished bums (their KGB cover?).

LHO then engages in activities and writes things that are hard to square with any KBG mission (proof of just how clever the KGB is?). The time finally arrives for LHO to assassinate JFK (for what KGB-related purpose?), and Marina then lives the next 60+ years in pretty thorough Texas-housewife obscurity (for what KGB-related purpose?), evolving from a veritable LNer to a CTer (for what KGB-related purpose? was this her KGB mission?).

The supermen of the KGB then spend the next 50+ years destroying America from within via their infiltration of the CIA, the proverbial “long march through the institutions” and whatnot (and having rather astonishing success as far as I can tell). The chaotic Monty Python skit that calls itself the “JFKA research community” is apparently part of this dastardly plot (how? why?).

In 2016, the KGB, or at least KGB guy Putin, then causes Kremlin stooge The Donald to defeat Hillary Clinton, even though Hillary is a card-carrying "Rules for Radicals" sort of leftie and The Donald’s platform consists mostly of promises to unravel all that the KGB has accomplished over the past 50+ years (how does that work?). But wait, then Putin and the supermen of the KGB fumble the ball and Team Biden is somehow elected in 2020 (what the heck?). Team Biden, which apparently doesn't grasp the KGB's new Trumpian agenda, then does its best to restore the long march through the institutions, doing quite an excellent job of it, and Team Kamala promises to pretty well finish off the destruction of America (why would Putin and the supermen of the KGB not want this?).

But, no, Vladimir and the gang once again step in and cause their stooge The Donald to be elected in 2024, even though The Donald is now even more hellbent to stop the long march through the institutions and restore America to its former glory as a chest-thumping, war-mongering capitalist state and may be slightly unhinged to boot (the KGB wants this – why?).

Perhaps I’m just not seeing the Big Picture. Or perhaps I'm actually an unwitting KGB stooge, sent here to ferret out moles! I have literally no idea what the “KGB stuff” is all about or how it makes any sense at all. Anyone seeing it more clearly than I am?

Dear FPR,

All you've got to do is read Tennent H. Bagley's 2007 Yale University Press book, Spy Wars: Moles, Mysteries, and Deadly Games, his 2014 follow-up article, "Ghosts of the Spy Wars," and John M. Newman's 2022 book, Uncovering Popov's Mole (but disregard the part where he says high-level military officers killed JFK because he refused to nuke Peking and Moscow in 1963).

https://archive.org/details/SpyWarsMolesMysteriesAndDeadlyGames

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08850607.2014.962362

Bagley, who was Yuri Nosenko’s primary case officer from June 1962 to September 1967, details how he came to realize that Nosenko was a false defector-in-place in Geneva in June 1962, sent to the CIA there to discredit what a recent true defector, Anatoliy Golitsyn, was telling James Angleton about possible KGB penetrations of the CIA, the FBI, and the intelligence services of our NATO allies and thereby protect a high-level mole or two in the Agency.

Are you with me so far?

Although the CIA believed Nosenko was fake -- after Bagley had been given the opportunity right after the 1962 meetings to read Golitsyn’s thick file and realized in-so-doing that Nosenko had said many things that overlapped what Golitsyn had said six months earlier (even though they had worked in different parts of the highly compartmentalized KGB) and that what Nosenko said invariably contradicted what Golitsyn had said -- it allowed him to physically defect to the U.S. when he recontacted Bagley and (probable mole, imho) George Kisevalter in Geneva in February 1964 because he claimed to have read Oswald’s file on four different occasions and especially because he claimed he’d just received a “Return To Moscow Immediately” telegram from KGB headquarters (Nosenko later admitted that he’d “made it up to improve my chances of being allowed to go to the U.S.” after NSA had determined that no such cable had been sent).

The reason all of this is important – British researcher Malcolm Blunt says “Nosenko is MEGA” – is because the mole or moles Nosenko was protecting were never uncovered, and because lots of other false defectors and Kremlin-loyal double and triple agents were sent to the U.S. or otherwise contacted the CIA and/or the FBI over the years in order to “verify,” in a multi-tasking kind of way, Nosenko’s bona fides.

That, and the fact that Nosenko was eventually “cleared” by the very same "probable" mole he'd been sent to the CIA in 1962 to protect -- the aforementioned Bruce Solie -- via a bogus polygraph exam and a specious report, and was . . . yep . . . hired by the Agency a few years later to teach “counterintelligence” to its and the FBI’s new recruits.

Any questions so far?

In addition to the warnings that the aforementioned true defector, KGB Major Anatoliy Golitsyn, tried to give to the CIA and the FBI (and to MI5 and MI6 in late 1962) about possible KGB penetrations of those services and the intelligence services of our NATO allies, he also tried to warn them about the KGB’s 1959-on deception-based “Master Plan,” which Nosenko-protectors came to derisively refer to as the “Monster Plot.”

Said “Master Plan” is explained in Golitsyn’s book, New Lies for Old, and in Edward J. Epstein’s book, Deception.

https://archive.org/details/newliesforoldcom0000goli/mode/2up

https://archive.org/details/Deception-TheInvisibleWarBetweenTheKGBAndTheCIA

It was created in the late 1950s in the KGB “think tank” that Golitsyn worked in, and it involved a return to Sun Tzu’s strategy of defeating one’s enemies through deception, as Operation Trust had done so effectively in the 1920s and WiN had done in Poland in the early 1950s, i.e., to defeat them by getting them to tear themselves apart. Under this new “Master Plan,” the KGB set up a top-secret deception-based Department D in the First Chief Directorate (today’s SVR) to wage disinformation, “active measures,” and mole-based strategic deception counterintelligence operations against the U.S. and our NATO allies. Not to be outdone, General Oleg Gribanov, head of the Second Chief Directorate (today’s FSB) set up Department 14 in that part of the KGB, and as soon as CIA’s spy Lt. Col. Oleg Penkovsky had been “trapped like a bear in its cave” in Moscow in such a way that wouldn’t  reveal  who in the CIA or British Intelligence had betrayed him in April 1961, sent GRU Lt. Col. Dmitry Polyakov and KGB Major Aleksei Kulak to the FBI’s NYC field office to “volunteer” to spy for it at the U.N. Golitsyn and Angleton realized the “Master Plan” included  the idea that feedback loops would be established between Kremlin-loyal triple agents like Polyakov and Kulak and a mole or two (Solie and Leonard V. McCoy?) so that the KGB could constantly modify what those “outside men” were telling their CIA case officers and ensure that the KGB would effectively control the CIA by telling it what the CIA wanted to hear.

Earlier I said that the 1959-on “Master Plan” involved waging disinformation and “active measures” ops against the U.S. and its NATO allies so as to defeat them by getting them to tear themselves apart.

Several examples of these kinds of ops have been identified. Operation INFEKTION, for example.

Another example was when a KGB article was published in a Communist-owned Italian newspaper, Paese Sera, four days after Jim Garrison had arrested Clay Shaw on suspicion of organizing a “homosexual thrill-kill” assassination of JFK.* Said article motivated Garrison to change his theory against Shaw to “he organized it for the CIA.”

Oliver Stone partially based his 1991 anti-Military Industrial Intelligence-Community Complex film, “JFK,” on Garrison’s book, On the Trail of the Assassins. That movie, which Stone admitted was mythological (“to counteract the myth of the Warren Report”) was instrumental in my becoming, for several years, a tinfoil-hat JFKA conspiracy theorist, and I believe it had a similar effect on millions of other people.

I believe that the effect of the disinformation and “active measures” ops the KGB has waged against us since late 1961 (when Gribanov sent Polyakov to the FBI) have had such a deleterious effect on our body politic that it enabled “former” SVR counterintelligence officer Vladimir Putin to install, with help from even more disinformation and “active measures” ops, "spotted"-by-KGB-in-1980 Donald J. Trump as our “president” in January 2017 and January 2025, which helps to explain why we find ourselves in an Incipient Civil War II / Incipient NATO-Unraveling / Incipient Avian Flu Pandemic moment as I type this.

-- Tom

*The last time I mentioned this to you, you were incredulous that Garrison would actually consider charging anyone with conspiring in a homosexual "thrill-kill." The following is a conversation I just now had with GROK on the subject. Note that our very own Fred Litwin is mentioned.

Me: In which book can we read about Jim Garrison and his original intention to charge Clay Shaw with organizing a homosexual thrill-kill assassination of JFK?

GROK: The specific claim—that Garrison originally intended to charge Clay Shaw (or framed his suspicions around Shaw) with organizing a homosexual thrill-kill assassination of JFK—stems from contemporary reporting on Garrison's private statements during the early phase of his investigation (around late 1966 to early 1967, before the formal charges shifted emphasis).This is most directly and prominently documented in journalist James Phelan's accounts. Phelan, who met with Garrison in Las Vegas to discuss the case, quoted him describing the assassination as a "homosexual thrill killing," akin to the Loeb-Leopold murder, motivated by envy of JFK's virility and the thrill of a perfect crime, involving figures like David Ferrie, Clay Shaw, and Jack Ruby (all alleged to be homosexual in Garrison's view at the time). Phelan's recollection appears in his writings, including articles for "The Saturday Evening Post" (where he published on Garrison) and later referenced in books and critiques of the Garrison probe.

This anecdote is widely cited in secondary sources analyzing Garrison's investigation, such as:

•   Dave Reitzes' detailed essay "Jim Garrison's Bizarre Behavior — JFK Assassination a Homosexual Thrill Killing" (on jfk-assassination.net), which quotes Phelan extensively and contextualizes it as Garrison's early fixation before "sanitizing" it in favor of the CIA narrative.

•   Fred Litwin's On the Trail of Delusion: Jim Garrison—The Great Accuser (2020), which discusses this phase of Garrison's thinking.

•   Other critical works like Patricia Lambert's False Witness or discussions in Wikipedia entries and articles (e.g., Newsweek, New York Times pieces on the Shaw trial) that reference Phelan's quote to highlight the homophobic and speculative origins of the probe.

Garrison's public and published case evolved away from this (especially after Perry Russo's testimony and the arrest of Shaw in March 1967), focusing instead on conspiracy with intelligence ties. The "thrill-kill" phrasing does not appear in Garrison's books like On the Trail of the Assassins or A Heritage of Stone (1970), which omit or downplay it.

For primary sourcing on this original intention/motive attribution, look to Phelan's contemporaneous reporting and interviews rather than a single book by Garrison. If seeking a book-length treatment covering this detail critically, Reitzes' analysis or Litwin's On the Trail of Delusion captures it well.

. . . . . . .


Tangentially,

Given the fact that Kim Philby started spying for the NKVD in England in 1934 and was soon followed by Guy Burgess, Donald MacLean, Anthony Blunt, John Cairncross, and, in 1950-51, George Blake, do you think they did any damage to British and U.S. Intelligence, or do you think it was just a big “hoot” for everybody?

Concomitantly, do you think there were probably some moles in the CIA before Aldrich Ames started spying for the KGB in 1985?

If not, why not?

Do you find it interesting that a false defector-in-place in Geneva in June 1962 and false (or perhaps “rogue”) physical defector to the U.S. in February 1964, Yuri Nosenko, told his CIA case officers and interrogators and the HSCA that the KGB didn’t even interview Oswald during the two-and-a-half years he lived in the USSR, but Oleg Nechiporenko (who had allegedly met with Oswald in Mexico City in September 1963) wrote in his book, Passport to Assassination, that the KGB interviewed Oswald twice in Moscow?



-- Tom



Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Lance Payette on January 21, 2026, 11:54:15 PM
Now that I think about it, this is the virtue of the LN narrative: It actually makes sense, from A to Z. It is quite easy to state in 200 or so words of plain English. The "problems" tend to be technical/forensic ones within the context of Dealey Plaza - the timing and number of shots, the holes in the clothing vis-a-vis the throat wound, the SBT, etc., etc. None of those is an absolute LN deal-breaker, and the overarching LN narrative simply makes sense, with the need for an absolute minimum of speculation, mental gyrations and implausible, non-real-world aspects. Even such cover-up as their actually was makes entire sense for reasons that do no damage to the LN narrative (an epiphany for which I must give credit to Larry Hancock).

Ditto with the LN+ narrative: It's merely the LN narrative with Oswald perhaps having been encouraged by or even having "conspired" with one or more fellow pro-Castroites. It makes as much sense (perhaps more) than the LN narrative, but the "conspiracy" aspects are pure speculatiion and probably always will be.

One step down is my Marcello/Mafia scenario with Oswald as a pro-Castro patsy. Tidy as this is, it EXPONENTIALLY increases the complexity and risk. It has VASTLY more problems than the LN scenario (and, of course, bumps its head on the very things that make the LN narrative most plausible).

EVERY OTHER conspiracy scenario, it seems to me, borders on science fiction: Utterly implausible in any real-world sense, filled with fantastic risks at every turn, and just simply not the way a Presidential assassination would ever have been carried out by anyone this side of the Three Stooges. These scenarios inevitably involve massive cover-up activities that are simply silly. Even a more limited scenario such as Larry Hancock apparently posits would have been exponentially more complex and risky than even my Mafia scenario, and it posits events in Dealey Plaza for which there is simply no good evidence.

To the extent I understand the KGB stuff at all, the JFKA doesn't really seem to have been a conspiracy per se. It was more just an LN cog in a Monster Plot dating back to long before the JFKA and extending to the election of Trump, with the entire 62-year JFKA "conspiracy" brouhaha likewise being mostly just a KGB-fueled cog in the Plot. As with many conspiracy theories, this more-or-less LN scenario strikes me as more in the vein of science fiction and simply not plausible.

Ergo, my little Bayesian probability analysis says something like LN = 60% probability; LN+ = 36%; Mafia = 4%; everything else, including the KGB stuff = fuggedaboudit.
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Lance Payette on January 22, 2026, 12:47:07 AM
Once again quoting myself - the sincerist form of flattery - but I was struck by how apt this post from six months ago still is.

Ah, what a small world it is. Tom embarked on what eventually became his KGB mania in 2007, when Douglas Caddy posted at the Ed Forum a Washington Post review of Bagley’s book Spy Wars. "Interesting stuff!" Tom said back then. Ironically, the review concluded “Take a stroll with Bagley down paranoia lane …” Even more ironically, Caddy is the leading proponent of the theory that JFK knew the dark truth about UFOs and was killed because he was going to reveal the Alien Secret. But now Tom takes his little dig at my longtime interest in UFOs. And so it goes.

I know the rudiments of the Nosenko affair and the Angleton/Bagley KGB paranoia. I have no idea what Nosenko was all about and really don't care. My guess would be, a genuine defector who pretended to be more than he was. He certainly didn’t defect for any reason directly related to the JFKA.

Regardless of what, if anything, Nosenko actually knew about Oswald, what he had to say is surely pretty close to the truth even if he was operating on the basis of nothing more than common sense and guesswork. In the preparation of Oswald’s Tale, Norman Mailer spoke with KGB officers and viewed KGB files. The portrait of Oswald that emerged was entirely consistent with what Nosenko said and what common sense would tell us: The KGB quickly realized Oswald was a pathetic loser, of no conceivable intelligence use.

Certainly, the KGB would have assessed and monitored Oswald. Pretty much everyone from Rimma (his Intourist guide) on down had some KGB affiliation. Were there really no formal intelligence-type interviews, as Nosenko said? Quite possibly. Oswald had nothing to offer them about the U-2 program they didn’t already know; their only puzzle was how to reach, with aircraft or missiles, the height at which they knew the U-2 was flying. Apart from the U-2 stuff they already knew, Oswald had nothing to offer them. Indeed, he was such unlikely intelligence material that the KGB at one point speculated as to whether weirdos like him were some new CIA program (so obviously not intelligence material that he actually was intelligence material!).

Does it make any rational sense that the Soviets would send a false defector, and that Nosenko would endure all he endured (dying as a U.S. citizen in 2008), to spread the tale that “We really had no interest in Oswald” when pretty much no one thought they did? Since Nosenko defected at just about the time the WC was getting rolling, I would assume he included his Oswald material because he knew ears would perk up.

When I first joined this forum several months ago, I and my especially my wife, who lived in Minsk for decades and was in a responsible position with the city until 2008, helped Tom identify the KGB school that Oswald supposedly lived near. It was a graduate-level training academy that began in Gomel in 1946 for those who wanted to join the KGB in any capacity. It was not a school for spies. There is a description of it beginning on page 20 of this document: https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/docid-32989481.pdf.

My wife tells me it’s “invisible” in the sense that Minsk citizens like her never give it a thought (she didn’t even know what the building was until she started trying to help Tom!). Ernst Titovets said in a fairly recent interview that he had no awareness of it and that it had only been brought to his attention in connection with questions about Oswald. No one – Marina, Titovets or anyone else in Minsk – has ever suggested any connection whatsoever between Oswald and this school.

Yet, all over the internet, Tom continues to trumpet the fact that “Oswald lived within a half mile of a KGB school” as though this were some major smoking gun. The fact is, Oswald was given an extremely nice (by Soviet standards) apartment near the Svisloch River (yes, I’ve seen it). It’s in midtown Minsk. One walks from the apartment, across Victory Square (which is the center of Minsk), and either walks or takes the bus down the main street to the radio factory (two bus stops down the road but within easy walking distance). The KGB school is on the other side of the main street – i.e., separated from Oswald’s apartment by Victory Square.

This would be like saying that everyone living within a half mile of the J. Edgar Hoover FBI Building in Washington is somehow suspicious, with utterly no connection apart from the bare fact of this proximity. Or, as CTers are wont to do, like saying that someone whose distant second-cousin Shirley is a secretary in building maintenance at Langley has, on this basis alone, “suspicious CIA connections.”

Tom, I now realize, is in the grip of some obsessive KGB fixation that I was not aware of when I joined. This is a different Tom than I had encountered at the Ed Forum years ago, who was goofy but kind of fun (like me!). I find his KGB mania boring and slightly scary.

Here’s the school in its present incarnation as the National Security Academy. They even have a website: https://aml.university/en/uchastniki-aml/akademiya-nacional-noy-bezopasnosti-respubliki-belarus. If you visit, tell them Comrade Lance sent you.

(https://avatars.mds.yandex.net/get-altay/5106183/2a000001807f270ed13877881b7a968e737a/L_height)
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Charles Collins on January 22, 2026, 12:52:17 AM
Now that I think about it, this is the virtue of the LN narrative: It actually makes sense, from A to Z. It is quite easy to state in 200 or so words of plain English. The "problems" tend to be technical/forensic ones within the context of Dealey Plaza - the timing and number of shots, the holes in the clothing vis-a-vis the throat wound, the SBT, etc., etc. None of those is an absolute LN deal-breaker, and the overarching LN narrative simply makes sense, with the need for an absolute minimum of speculation, mental gyrations and implausible, non-real-world aspects. Even such cover-up as their actually was makes entire sense for reasons that do no damage to the LN narrative (an epiphany for which I must give credit to Larry Hancock).

Ditto with the LN+ narrative: It's merely the LN narrative with Oswald perhaps having been encouraged by or even having "conspired" with one or more fellow pro-Castroites. It makes as much sense (perhaps more) than the LN narrative, but the "conspiracy" aspects are pure speculatiion and probably always will be.

One step down is my Marcello/Mafia scenario with Oswald as a pro-Castro patsy. Tidy as this is, it EXPONENTIALLY increases the complexity and risk. It has VASTLY more problems than the LN scenario (and, of course, bumps its head on the very things that make the LN narrative most plausible).

EVERY OTHER conspiracy scenario, it seems to me, borders on science fiction: Utterly implausible in any real-world sense, filled with fantastic risks at every turn, and just simply not the way a Presidential assassination would ever have been carried out by anyone this side of the Three Stooges. These scenarios inevitably involve massive cover-up activities that are simply silly. Even a more limited scenario such as Larry Hancock apparently posits would have been exponentially more complex and risky than even my Mafia scenario, and it posits events in Dealey Plaza for which there is simply no good evidence.

To the extent I understand the KGB stuff at all, the JFKA doesn't really seem to have been a conspiracy per se. It was more just an LN cog in a Monster Plot dating back to long before the JFKA and extending to the election of Trump, with the entire 62-year JFKA "conspiracy" brouhaha likewise being mostly just a KGB-fueled cog in the Plot. As with many conspiracy theories, this more-or-less LN scenario strikes me as more in the vein of science fiction and simply not plausible.

Ergo, my little Bayesian probability analysis says something like LN = 60% probability; LN+ = 26%; Mafia = 14%; everything else, including the KGB stuff = fuggedaboudit.



Trying to make the location selection of Dealey Plaza make sense seems problematic to me for anyone other than LHO to be involved. I doubt that anyone else would have chosen Dealey Plaza for a hit. There were way too many people and law enforcement officers present. However, since he worked there, it makes perfect sense for LHO. It just seems to have been a coincidence that everything essentially fell into LHO’s lap. I do give LHO credit for planning and executing an effective surprise ambush from behind and above.
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Benjamin Cole on January 22, 2026, 08:08:19 AM
LP--

I admire TG's command of all things KGB, and he is a tonic to all the lefties that usually flood the JFKA zone.

I have refreshed my understanding of G2/KGB thanks to TG, reviewing Tennent Bagley, Gus Russo and John Newman, and TG's writing.

I still don't know who perped the JFKA, and I still suspect a very small conspiracy, literally three guys, including LHO. No one above them.

However, whereas before I tended to lean towards Alpha 66, I am now open to a G2-KGB (likely, lower level dudes) plot.

Interestingly, many Cuban exiles were thought to be double agents, including Rolando Cubela.

That leaves open the possibility of G2 assets, who appeared to anti-Castro exiles, linking up with LHO.

I advise TG to be more civil in his commentary, and avoid current-day politics, but there are far worse, such as the leftist anti-Semitic crackpots running the Education Forum.

I will take TG by a country mile over the Education Forum ghouls.



Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Tom Graves on January 22, 2026, 09:19:02 AM
I admire TG's command of all things KGB, and he is a tonic to all the lefties that usually flood the JFKA zone.

And all of the Far-Righties here who don't have the courage to contemplate the possibility that the KGB* (and the GRU) is so powerful that it could, in order to get us to tear ourselves apart, install The Traitorous Orange Bird (rhymes with "Xxxx") as our "president."

(Sorry, "BC," I couldn't help it.)

*Today's SVR and FSB
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Lance Payette on January 22, 2026, 12:52:53 PM
LP--

I admire TG's command of all things KGB, and he is a tonic to all the lefties that usually flood the JFKA zone.

I have refreshed my understanding of G2/KGB thanks to TG, reviewing Tennent Bagley, Gus Russo and John Newman, and TG's writing.

I still don't know who perped the JFKA, and I still suspect a very small conspiracy, literally three guys, including LHO. No one above them.

However, whereas before I tended to lean towards Alpha 66, I am now open to a G2-KGB (likely, lower level dudes) plot.

Interestingly, many Cuban exiles were thought to be double agents, including Rolando Cubela.

That leaves open the possibility of G2 assets, who appeared to anti-Castro exiles, linking up with LHO.

I advise TG to be more civil in his commentary, and avoid current-day politics, but there are far worse, such as the leftist anti-Semitic crackpots running the Education Forum.

I will take TG by a country mile over the Education Forum ghouls.
To paraphrase: You have no idea what he's talking about either.

TG's "grasp of all things KGB" is, of course, completely at odds with the CIA's own analyses in 1976 (Hart) and 2011 (Royden), as well as the many CIA colleagues who derided Angleton and Bagley's obsession with the imaginary "Monster Plot," and is derived almost entirely from the dubious sources he cites ad nauseam, which are rejected by the majority of intelligence scholars. I don't see that they add anything whatsoever to an analsysis of the JFKA.

Oswald was sent to Moscow to ferret out moles: Pure speculation. Oswald engaged heavily with the KGB in Russia: Pure speculation and at odds with all known facts. Oswald came back to the U.S. for some KGB-related purpose: Pure speculation. Marina was a KGB sleeper agent: Pure speculation and at odds with all known facts. The election of The Donald was somehow Putin-orchestrated and The Donald's presidency is in furtherance of some KGB objective extending back to the origin of the Monster Plot: Patent nonsense.

I submit that absolutely no one can actually articulate a version of TG's narrative, from the Angleton years through the Trump presidency, that comes close to making sense. If someone can, go for it! That's the challenge posed by this thread.

The KGB folks were and are rather nasty specimens: Sure, no breaking news there. They would have loved to, and surely did, plant moles in the CIA: Sure. They attempted to ferret out CIA moles in their organization: Sure. They made use of events like the JFKA to foment unrest and plant disinformation that served their purposes: Undoubtedly.

I see no substantive difference between the CIA and KGB in respect to these things, and it is absurd to think the KGB had "10 feet tall" superhuman abilities that the CIA lacked.

I see nothing in TG's posts that actually has anything at all to do with Oswald or the JFKA, except in the most tangential sense (e.g., the "Dear Mr. Hunt" KGB ploy). TG's posts seem to me virtually NOTHING but expressions of his TDS. A not-completely-irrational description of his KGB stuff might have been possible if he had focused his wrath on Clinton, Obama, Biden and Harris as examples of the KGB's efforts, but to try to fit Trump into this narrative seems just flat-out nutty. He must do this, however, because his TDS is his overriding motivation; everything else flows backwards from that. (All IMHO, of course, and I invite anyone who cares to dispute it to do so.)

At the Ed Forum this morning, Sean Coleman (a devout CTer, as I recall) posted the following - which, thanks to TG, is equally apt here:

This is not JFK.
This is political pie throwing.
It’s left wing spouting. Soap box shouting.
Opinionated bluff.
If we want this tripe we’ll watch the news, read the papers, catch up on our devices.

John [Simkin], this is your doing. Since you returned to comment you have strayed from the wonders of the assassination and gone all non relevant massively left wing biased political. I suppose this is your site though.
 
Again, I mention “Theories on the assassination” is parked in the waiting room, all Trump/Epstein crap gets centre stage!!?? Wrong way round innit!!
 
I think I’ve donated 150 to 250 clams to this site over the years because of its awesomeness. Which has gone.
 
Ps. My political views span both L & R. I subscribe to neither. More logical realist than rabid politico.
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Lance Payette on January 22, 2026, 01:10:53 PM


Trying to make the location selection of Dealey Plaza make sense seems problematic to me for anyone other than LHO to be involved. I doubt that anyone else would have chosen Dealey Plaza for a hit. There were way too many people and law enforcement officers present. However, since he worked there, it makes perfect sense for LHO. It just seems to have been a coincidence that everything essentially fell into LHO’s lap. I do give LHO credit for planning and executing an effective surprise ambush from behind and above.

Charles, you underestimate the KGB's abilities! They chose Dealey Plaza precisely BECAUSE it was so unlikely!  :D :D :D (See what I did there? Of course, you do - because it's what CTers do with every inconvenient fact.)

If I put on my CT propeller beanie, it would have to be some plan (we'll say Mafia) where Oswald was on the radar screen by virtue of his activities in New Orleans, the plan started to come together after his employment at the TSBD and the announcement of JFK's trip to Texas, and the plan crystallized at the last minute when it became clear JFK would pass directly in front of the TSBD. Then, Dealey Plaza with Oswald in the TSBD and a pro in the Dal Tex or County Records building wouldn't be too bad.

Alas, the obstacles in trying to make that scenario plausible are near-insurmountable. It really just doesn't work, which requires CTers to expand the scenario to Oswald being "planted" in the TSBD, JFK's motorcade route being "manipulated" to pass in front of the TSBD, yada yada. John Orr cleverly avoids most obstacles by having Oswald being in active cooperation with the Mafia - but this itself is (to me) an insurmountable obstacle. Moreover, I really can't think of ANY plausible CT scenario that has Oswald going to Ruth Paine's with Frazier to retrieve his rifle the evening before the assassination (hence CTer's enthusiasm for the curtain rods tale - which then requires Oswald to be a completely unknowing patsy, and off we go).

Always, always, always, the fly in the CT ointment is the actual man Lee Harvey Oswald. He really just doesn't "work" as either a conspirator or a patsy, with the exception of a small, genuinely pro-Castro plot (LN+, as I call it). Pro-Castro incitement actually makes sense; KGB incitement, even in isolation completely apart from TG's grand narrative, simply does not.
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Tom Graves on January 22, 2026, 01:29:07 PM
[Tom's] "grasp of all things KGB" is, of course, completely at odds with the CIA's own analyses in 1976 (Hart) and 2011 (Royden), as well as the many CIA colleagues who derided Angleton and Bagley's obsession with the imaginary "Monster Plot," and is derived almost entirely from the dubious sources he cites ad nauseam, which are rejected by the majority of intelligence scholars.

Dear FPL,

John L. Hart, former COS Saigon and the guy for whom Tennent H. Bagley "ripped a new one" during his HSCA testimony?

That John L. Hart?

https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/docid-32273600.pdf


-- Tom


PS "Mr. X" is KGB Major Anatoliy Golitsyn who defected to the U.S. on 15 December 1961.

PPS You should check out my new post at my Substack page, "How the KGB Zombified the CIA and the FBI."

It's titled "Fancy Pants gets a whuppin'"
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Lance Payette on January 22, 2026, 02:59:22 PM
Hey, hey, hey, people, Serious Researcher Lance has done what we serious researcher types do: I went to the Ed Forum and quickly skimmed all 405 posts in which the term "Bagley" is mentioned. I even found a few by me, in which I (in 2018) apparently knew more about this Bagley-Nosenko-KGB stuff than I recall now. I pointed out that the CT enthusiasm for Bagley seems almost entirely to relate to his very latter-day revelations to Blunt and Newman that Oswald was a "witting asset" of the CIA, which he (Bagley) seemed to know nothing about while he was employed by the CIA or, indeed, until he encountered Blunt at age 85.

Overall, the enthusiasm for Bagley at the Ed Forum was distinctly muted. Some enthusiasm, yes (on the part of "witting asset" fans), but little for the Monster Plot and even considerable skepticism that Bagley himself was a disinformation agent. My skepticism relates primarily to the reality that (1) he had pretty obvious monetary incentives for the bombshells he revealed long after he had been given the boot by the CIA, and (2) it's pretty easy to view those bombshells as late-in-life grudge-settling efforts. But I digress ...

What I found was the VERY FIRST thread in which TG floated his "KGB stuff." It was in 2018, and he called it a "Theory in Progress." The responses were not kind. Jim Di dismissed it as "Tommy's mole madness." Kirk G. said any KGB theory was way out of the ballpark because the Soviets had "no motive." But I disgress again ...

The value is that TG actually explained his fledgling theory fairly succinctly, as set forth below. I now understand the Trump tie-in. It seems goofy to me, but at least I understand it.

Here ya go, from the keyboard of TG in 2018:

Now let me ask YOU a question:

*IF* there was a mole or a network of embedded KGB-types, would they have been willing to kill JFK (or any other U.S. president for that matter) if they had been instructed by their KGB / GRU handler(s) to do so, to enable ever-increasing KGB / GRU influence on our country through "active measures counterintelligence operations" (which started in 1921) and "strategic deception operations" (which started in 1959), thereby giving rise to paralyzing, cancer-like propaganda and disinformation (e.g., "The evil, evil CIA killed JFK," and "The evil, evil CIA killed JFK via the 'Harvey & Lee and Two Marguerites Program,'" and "The evil, evil CIA and the Mafia ... ")?

So that, you know, ..... EVENTUALLY a Russian Mafia-compromised (and therefore eminently blackmail-able) anti-NATO "useful idiot" like Donald James Trump could be installed as our president?

(Or do you believe that some disgruntled DNC or NSA insider not only hacked the DNC's and Podesta's e-mails, but gave said e-mails to Julian Assange and DNCLeaks? And that Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear and Guccifer 2.0 are just an evil, evil CIA "cover story" or "fantasy"?)

LOL

--  Tommy

PS:  I would suggest that pieces of the puzzle lie in Bill Simpich's "State Secret," John Newman's "Oswald and the CIA," and Tennent H. Bagley's "Spy Wars" and "Ghosts of the Spy Wars," and Mark Riebling's "Wedge".


Still, someone needs to clarify for me: First, what did the KGB gain by offing JFK in favor of LBJ? Second, if the KGB had been almost fantastically successful over a period of more than 100 years in virtually deconstructing America, culminating in the election of a left-leaning president like Obama and the candidacies of lefties like Hillary and Kamala, why would said KGB have done an about-face and blessed us with The Donald? Why would Hillary, Biden and Harris not have meshed perfectly with the deconstruction of America via the continuing long march through the institutions? If the KGB actually thought installing The Donald would advance their deconstruction agenda more than Hillary and Kamala, one can only conclude that, far from being supermen, they were dolts.

Is it possible I'm just not clever enough to grasp the nuances of TG's KGB stuff?
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Lance Payette on January 22, 2026, 03:37:38 PM
No, wait, there's more! The genesis of TG's theory actually predates the election of The Donald.

Here is TG floating his "joint KGB / CIA assassination" theory in 2012:

Did They "Do It" Together?

I mean, of course, the KGB and the CIA and the assassination of JFK, not something of a kinkier nature, you naughty boys and girls!

You know, maybe they had some common "vested interests" --- that sort of thing?

Or, maybe it was a case of "You scratch my back and I'll scratch yours, and we'll both get filthy rich ...

... or at least a shiny new Lada / Ferrari and a dacha / house on the Black Sea / in La Jolla!)".

--Tommy


David Josephs of Harvey & Lee fame then fleshed it out, to which TG replied "Exactly!":

Hold up a second Robert [Morrow, who had described TG's idea as having a one-in-a-trillion chance of being correct] ...

Are you trying to tell us that you cannot see how HAWKS in the KGB as well as the ruling economic elite in Russia (yes virginia, there really are wealthy people in communist nations) would not want to perpetuate the Cold War and avoid peace at all costs...? Yet you have no problem with the HAWKS of the USA, in the Military and CIA, to perpetuate the Cold War?

I think you are missing the role of the emerging global corporations, financed by the international banks and the benefit derived by the constant state of Cold (and Hot) War.

Billions upon billions of "officially spent money" was lost in Russia when the Cold War finally ended... Where the US government & companies just shifted focus from the WAR on Communism to the WAR on Terrorism and continued to spend accordingly, the Russian economy was corrupted by organized crime taking on all shapes and persona.

Richard Case Nagell was not even sure which side was ordering him to kill Oswald...

I believe if you step back and see the overriding focus was on MONEY and POWER... and that the groups that desired control of such things continue regardless of ideology, theology, political party or any other such nonsense... AND add that the CIA as well as a number of other agencies were choked full of "communists" who thought it crucial NEVER to give in to the USA..

It is not such a stretch to see cooperation among thieves to keep their livlihoods AND organizations intact.

To dovetail back to your thesis - LBJ - he cooperated cause of all the money involved, and his freedom. "None Dare Call It a Conspiracy" helps in this question to see that the CIA and KGD were in the same business... perpetuate the organization, protect the organization, expand the organization so that a state of fear persists and people will be more and more willing to give up personal freedoms and liberty to FEEL protected...

JFK's future dictated that these two agencies would no longer be needed - or at least be seriously curtailed... and they both knew it.

And this is why men like Dub'ya Bush do not get executed... He's one of THEM.


Now you can see where I have gone awry: Silly me thought TG's notion of the superman-level success of the KGB in deconstructing America related to the long march through the institutions and the election of lefties such as Obama, Biden, Hillary and Kamala. Silly me thought it had something to do with advancing Marxist/socialist ideology and that sort of thing. No, no, no - it was all about the Benjamins from the get-go - or at least that was the theory in 2012 - and Dubya was as much of a useful idiot as The Donald.

I can't even begin to keep this stuff straight. I won't bore you further. If it all makes sense to you, keep it to yourself because I no longer care.

Breaking news: Jim Di started a thread specifically to deal (not kindly) with TG's KGB stuff. It isn't worth reading, but at last I understand: EVERYTHING THAT HAS HAPPENDED IN AMERICA since 1921 has been KGB-orchestrated. Trump, Biden, the collapse of the educational system, my Milwaukee Braves winning the World Series in 1957, everything. At least that narrows it down.
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Tom Graves on January 22, 2026, 05:40:25 PM
Hey, hey, hey, people, Serious Researcher Lance has done what we serious researcher types do: I went to the Ed Forum and quickly skimmed all 405 posts in which the term "Bagley" is mentioned. I even found a few by me, in which I (in 2018) apparently knew more about this Bagley-Nosenko-KGB stuff than I recall now. I pointed out that the CT enthusiasm for Bagley seems almost entirely to relate to his very latter-day revelations to Blunt and Newman that Oswald was a "witting asset" of the CIA, which he (Bagley) seemed to know nothing about while he was employed by the CIA or, indeed, until he encountered Blunt at age 85.

Overall, the enthusiasm for Bagley at the Ed Forum was distinctly muted. Some enthusiasm, yes (on the part of "witting asset" fans), but little for the Monster Plot and even considerable skepticism that Bagley himself was a disinformation agent. My skepticism relates primarily to the reality that (1) he had pretty obvious monetary incentives for the bombshells he revealed long after he had been given the boot by the CIA, and (2) it's pretty easy to view those bombshells as late-in-life grudge-settling efforts. But I digress ...

What I found was the VERY FIRST thread in which TG floated his "KGB stuff." It was in 2018, and he called it a "Theory in Progress." The responses were not kind. Jim Di dismissed it as "Tommy's mole madness." Kirk G. said any KGB theory was way out of the ballpark because the Soviets had "no motive." But I disgress again ...

The value is that TG actually explained his fledgling theory fairly succinctly, as set forth below. I now understand the Trump tie-in. Yeah, it's nuts, but at least I understand it. As you can see, TDS was the motivating factor from the get-go.

Here ya go, from the keyboard of TG in 2018:

Now let me ask YOU a question:

*IF* there was a mole or a network of embedded KGB-types, would they have been willing to kill JFK (or any other U.S. president for that matter) if they had been instructed by their KGB / GRU handler(s) to do so, to enable ever-increasing KGB / GRU influence on our country through "active measures counterintelligence operations" (which started in 1921) and "strategic deception operations" (which started in 1959), thereby giving rise to paralyzing, cancer-like propaganda and disinformation (e.g., "The evil, evil CIA killed JFK," and "The evil, evil CIA killed JFK via the 'Harvey & Lee and Two Marguerites Program,'" and "The evil, evil CIA and the Mafia ... ")?

So that, you know, ..... EVENTUALLY a Russian Mafia-compromised (and therefore eminently blackmail-able) anti-NATO "useful idiot" like Donald James Trump could be installed as our president?

(Or do you believe that some disgruntled DNC or NSA insider not only hacked the DNC's and Podesta's e-mails, but gave said e-mails to Julian Assange and DNCLeaks? And that Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear and Guccifer 2.0 are just an evil, evil CIA "cover story" or "fantasy"?)

LOL

--  Tommy

PS:  I would suggest that pieces of the puzzle lie in Bill Simpich's "State Secret," John Newman's "Oswald and the CIA," and Tennent H. Bagley's "Spy Wars" and "Ghosts of the Spy Wars," and Mark Riebling's "Wedge".


Still, someone needs to clarify for me: First, what did the KGB gain by offing JFK in favor of LBJ? Second, if the KGB had been almost fantastically successful over a period of more than 100 years in virtually deconstructing America, culminating in the election of a left-leaning president like Obama and the candidacies of lefties like Hillary and Kamala, why would said KGB have done an about-face and blessed us with The Donald? Why would Hillary, Biden and Harris not have meshed perfectly with the deconstruction of America via the continuing long march through the institutions? If the KGB actually thought installing The Donald would advance their deconstruction agenda more than Hillary and Kamala, one can only conclude that, far from being supermen, they are in fact more like - yep - the Three Stooges.

Is it possible I'm just not clever enough to grasp the nuances of TG's KGB stuff?

Dear Fancy Pants Rants,

Why didn't you include the first two sentences (in bold, below) in my reply to Sandy Larsen (RIP) on 15 January 2018 at the so-called JFK Assassination Debate - Education Forum when he asked me,

Tommy,

What makes you think that a mole might have had something to do with the assassination? Or with Oswald? Or is this sheer speculation?

[Dear Sandy,]

Pure speculation in a wilderness of mirrors, Sandy.

All hypothetical at this point, but a paradigm that might help to explain some apparent anomalies ...


Now let me ask YOU a question:

IF there was a mole or a network of embedded KGB-types, would they have been willing to kill JFK (or any other U.S. president for that matter) if they had been instructed by their KGB / GRU handler(s) to do so, to enable ever-increasing KGB / GRU influence on our country through "active measures counterintelligence operations" (which started in 1921) and "strategic deception operations" (which started in 1959), thereby giving rise to paralyzing, cancer-like propaganda and disinformation (e.g., "The evil, evil CIA killed JFK," and "The evil, evil CIA killed JFK via the 'Harvey & Lee and Two Marguerites Program,'" and "The evil, evil CIA and the Mafia ... ")?

So that, you know, ..... eventually a Russian Mafia-compromised (and therefore eminently blackmail-able) anti-NATO "useful idiot" like Donald James Trump could be installed as our president?

Or do you believe that some disgruntled DNC or NSA insider not only hacked the DNC's and Podesta's e-mails, but gave said e-mails to Julian Assange and DNCLeaks? And that Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear and Guccifer 2.0 are just an evil, evil CIA "cover story" or "fantasy"?

LOL

--  Tommy

PS:  I would suggest that pieces of the puzzle lie in Bill Simpich's "State Secret," John Newman's "Oswald and the CIA," and Tennent H. Bagley's "Spy Wars" and "Ghosts of the Spy Wars," and Mark Riebling's "Wedge".

. . . . . . .

Fancy Pants Rants asks:

Still, someone needs to clarify for me: First, what did the KGB gain by offing JFK in favor of LBJ? Second, if the KGB had been almost fantastically successful over a period of more than 100 years in virtually deconstructing America, culminating in the election of a left-leaning president like Obama and the candidacies of lefties like Hillary and Kamala, why would said KGB have done an about-face and blessed us with The Donald? Why would Hillary, Biden and Harris not have meshed perfectly with the deconstruction of America via the continuing long march through the institutions? If the KGB actually thought installing The Donald would advance their deconstruction agenda more than Hillary and Kamala, one can only conclude that, far from being supermen, they are in fact more like - yep - the Three Stooges.

Fancy Pants Rants should google the words "riebling" "wedge" and "archive" simultaneously, click on "Full Text", then press on "ctrl" and "F" simultaneously and enter the word "sinister" in the search box and press on the down arrow a few times until he gets to "Chapter 11: Sinister Implications" and read the whole chapter, but especially the paragraph that begins with the sentence, "But what would the Soviets possibly gain from Kennedy’s death that would be worth the risk of U.S. retaliation?" and the paragraphs following it.

If Fancy Pants Rants had read my reply to Sandy Larsen more carefully, he would have realized that I'd already referred to Riebling's 1994 book, Wedge: The Secret War Between the FBI and CIA, and he might even have read it and actually learned something,

But I doubt it.


Fancy Pants Rants makes the brilliant observation:

[My comments are in brackets.]


The CT enthusiasm for Bagley ...

[at the CT-dominated Ed Forum]

... seems almost entirely to relate to his very latter-day revelations to Blunt and Newman that Oswald was a "witting asset"...

[sic; Bagley told Blunt that Oswald had to be a "witting defector," not a "witting asset," and did so upon reading some CIA documents that Blunt volunteered to him that he hadn't been privy to in 1959 and 1960 -- which documents showed that all of the incoming non-CIA cables on his defection were sent to Bruce Solie's office in the Office of Security instead of where they would normally go -- the Soviet Russia Division -- suggesting that someone in Solie's office had arranged in advance with the Records Integration Division and the Office of Mail Logistics for them to be routed that way, which in turn suggests that the person who requested said rerouting knew that Oswald would be "defecting"]

... of the CIA, which he (Bagley) seemed to know nothing about while he was employed by the CIA or, indeed, until he encountered Blunt at age 85.

[sic; since Bagley was born on 11 November 1925 and met Blunt at the March 2008 Raleigh Spy Conference, he was 82 years old when he "encountered Blunt"]

Overall, the enthusiasm for Bagley at the Ed Forum was distinctly muted.

[What do you expect?]

Some enthusiasm, yes (on the part of "witting asset"...

[sic; see above]

... fans), but little for The Monster Plot and even considerable skepticism ...

[by whom?]

... that Bagley himself was a disinformation agent.

[Sounds like typical paranoia of tinfoil-hat JFKA conspiracy theorists, be they far-left or far-right]

My skepticism relates primarily to the reality that (1) he had pretty obvious monetary incentives for the bombshells he revealed long after he had been given the boot by the CIA, and (2) it's pretty easy to view those bombshells as late-in-life grudge-settling efforts

[I suspect that you're projecting your character onto Bagley, Fancy Pants Rants].


-- Tom
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Lance Payette on January 22, 2026, 05:59:11 PM
TG has apparently spoken. Did he say anything I should know?

Discerning readers may note that I went back through all my posts on this thread and removed most of the TG-oriented snarkiness. This thread is not about TG per se, although he does seem to be the only purveyor of what I have called the KGB stuff and shall henceforth call the KGB Deconstruction of America, Including Without Limitation the JFKA. We lawyers love to say "including without limitation" almost as much as "ferret out moles."

Carry on, TG. I am forced to conclude that no one else, without limitation, has a clear grasp of what you're talking about either. I see that you appear to still be an active member at the Ed Forum, albeit limited to two posts per day. Perhaps you could reintroduce the KGB stuff there and see if anyone bites.
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Tom Graves on January 22, 2026, 06:35:00 PM
TG has apparently spoken. Did he say anything I should know?

Dear Fancy Pants Rants,

Knowing you, you'll get so antsy that you'll have to read this:

Why didn't you include the first two sentences (in bold, below) in my reply to Sandy Larsen (RIP) on 15 January 2018 at the so-called JFK Assassination Debate - Education Forum when he asked me,

Tommy,

What makes you think that a mole might have had something to do with the assassination? Or with Oswald? Or is this sheer speculation?

[Dear Sandy,]

Pure speculation in a wilderness of mirrors, Sandy.

All hypothetical at this point, but a paradigm that might help to explain some apparent anomalies ...


Now let me ask YOU a question:

IF there was a mole or a network of embedded KGB-types, would they have been willing to kill JFK (or any other U.S. president for that matter) if they had been instructed by their KGB / GRU handler(s) to do so, to enable ever-increasing KGB / GRU influence on our country through "active measures counterintelligence operations" (which started in 1921) and "strategic deception operations" (which started in 1959), thereby giving rise to paralyzing, cancer-like propaganda and disinformation (e.g., "The evil, evil CIA killed JFK," and "The evil, evil CIA killed JFK via the 'Harvey & Lee and Two Marguerites Program,'" and "The evil, evil CIA and the Mafia ... ")?

So that, you know, ..... eventually a Russian Mafia-compromised (and therefore eminently blackmail-able) anti-NATO "useful idiot" like Donald James Trump could be installed as our president?

Or do you believe that some disgruntled DNC or NSA insider not only hacked the DNC's and Podesta's e-mails, but gave said e-mails to Julian Assange and DNCLeaks? And that Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear and Guccifer 2.0 are just an evil, evil CIA "cover story" or "fantasy"?

LOL

--  Tommy

PS:  I would suggest that pieces of the puzzle lie in Bill Simpich's "State Secret," John Newman's "Oswald and the CIA," and Tennent H. Bagley's "Spy Wars" and "Ghosts of the Spy Wars," and Mark Riebling's "Wedge".

. . . . . . .

Fancy Pants Rants asks:

Still, someone needs to clarify for me: First, what did the KGB gain by offing JFK in favor of LBJ? Second, if the KGB had been almost fantastically successful over a period of more than 100 years in virtually deconstructing America, culminating in the election of a left-leaning president like Obama and the candidacies of lefties like Hillary and Kamala, why would said KGB have done an about-face and blessed us with The Donald? Why would Hillary, Biden and Harris not have meshed perfectly with the deconstruction of America via the continuing long march through the institutions? If the KGB actually thought installing The Donald would advance their deconstruction agenda more than Hillary and Kamala, one can only conclude that, far from being supermen, they are in fact more like - yep - the Three Stooges.

Fancy Pants Rants should google the words "riebling" "wedge" and "archive" simultaneously, click on "Full Text", then press on "ctrl" and "F" simultaneously and enter the word "sinister" in the search box and press on the down arrow a few times until he gets to "Chapter 11: Sinister Implications" and read the whole chapter, but especially the paragraph that begins with the sentence, "But what would the Soviets possibly gain from Kennedy’s death that would be worth the risk of U.S. retaliation?" and the paragraphs following it.

If Fancy Pants Rants had read my reply to Sandy Larsen more carefully, he would have realized that I'd already referred to Riebling's 1994 book, Wedge: The Secret War Between the FBI and CIA, and he might even have read it and actually learned something,

But I doubt it.


Fancy Pants Rants makes the brilliant observation:

[My comments are in brackets.]


The CT enthusiasm for Bagley ...

[at the CT-dominated Ed Forum]

... seems almost entirely to relate to his very latter-day revelations to Blunt and Newman that Oswald was a "witting asset"...

[sic; Bagley told Blunt that Oswald had to be a "witting defector," not a "witting asset," and did so upon reading some CIA documents that Blunt provided to him that he hadn't been privy to in 1959 and 1960 -- which documents showed that all of the incoming non-CIA cables on Oswald's defection were sent to Bruce Solie's office in the Office of Security instead of where they would normally go -- the Soviet Russia Division -- suggesting that someone in Solie's office had arranged in advance with the Records Integration Division and the Office of Mail Logistics for them to be routed that way, which in turn suggests that the person who requested said rerouting knew in advance that Oswald would be "defecting"]

... of the CIA, which he (Bagley) seemed to know nothing about while he was employed by the CIA or, indeed, until he encountered Blunt at age 85.

[sic; since Bagley was born on 11 November 1925 and met Blunt at the March 2008 Raleigh Spy Conference, he was 82 years old when he "encountered Blunt"]

Overall, the enthusiasm for Bagley at the Ed Forum was distinctly muted.

[What do you expect?]

Some enthusiasm, yes (on the part of "witting asset"...

[sic; see above]

... fans), but little for The Monster Plot and even considerable skepticism ...

[How many and whom?]

That Bagley himself was a disinformation agent.

[Sounds like typical paranoia of tinfoil-hat JFKA conspiracy theorists, be they far-left or far-right]

My skepticism relates primarily to the reality that (1) he had pretty obvious monetary incentives for the bombshells he revealed long after he had been given the boot by the CIA, and (2) it's pretty easy to view those bombshells as late-in-life grudge-settling efforts

[I suspect that you're projecting your character onto Bagley, Fancy Pants Rants].


-- Tom
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Lance Payette on January 22, 2026, 08:30:56 PM
Since TG just keeps posting, he is quite correct: I did look at this post and will respond as follows to the following. Then I, at least, am done.

Dear Fancy Pants Rants,

Knowing you, you'll get so antsy that you'll have to read this:

Why didn't you include the first two sentences (in bold, below) in my reply to Sandy Larsen (RIP) on 15 January 2018 at the so-called JFK Assassination Debate - Education Forum when he asked me,

Tommy,

What makes you think that a mole might have had something to do with the assassination? Or with Oswald? Or is this sheer speculation?

[Dear Sandy,]

Pure speculation in a wilderness of mirrors, Sandy.

All hypothetical at this point, but a paradigm that might help to explain some apparent anomalies ...

Well, let's see: TG's exchange with the late Sandy was in 2018, more than eight years ago. Since the KGB stuff - oops, sorry, the KGB Deconstruction of America, Including Without Limitation the JFKA stuff - now appears to occupy TG's every waking hour, I assumed he would no longer characterize it as "pure speculation."

If he does still characterize it as pure speculation ... well, I for one am heartened to learn this.

Now we are really done. My current fascination is with Royell's One Glove Cop, which would make a great name for a rock group or perhaps a rapper: "Appearing together, one night only, Bad Bunny and One Glove Cop." Yeah, I like it.
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Tom Graves on January 22, 2026, 08:57:06 PM
No, wait, there's more! The genesis of TG's theory actually predates the election of The Donald.

Here is TG floating his "joint KGB / CIA assassination" theory in 2012:

Did They "Do It" Together?

I mean, of course, the KGB and the CIA and the assassination of JFK, not something of a kinkier nature, you naughty boys and girls!

You know, maybe they had some common "vested interests" --- that sort of thing?

Or, maybe it was a case of "You scratch my back and I'll scratch yours, and we'll both get filthy rich ...

... or at least a shiny new Lada / Ferrari and a dacha / house on the Black Sea / in La Jolla!)".

--Tommy


David Josephs of Harvey & Lee fame then fleshed it out, to which TG replied "Exactly!":

Hold up a second Robert [Morrow, who had described TG's idea as having a one-in-a-trillion chance of being correct] ...

Are you trying to tell us that you cannot see how HAWKS in the KGB as well as the ruling economic elite in Russia (yes virginia, there really are wealthy people in communist nations) would not want to perpetuate the Cold War and avoid peace at all costs...? Yet you have no problem with the HAWKS of the USA, in the Military and CIA, to perpetuate the Cold War?

I think you are missing the role of the emerging global corporations, financed by the international banks and the benefit derived by the constant state of Cold (and Hot) War.

Billions upon billions of "officially spent money" was lost in Russia when the Cold War finally ended... Where the US government & companies just shifted focus from the WAR on Communism to the WAR on Terrorism and continued to spend accordingly, the Russian economy was corrupted by organized crime taking on all shapes and persona.

Richard Case Nagell was not even sure which side was ordering him to kill Oswald...

I believe if you step back and see the overriding focus was on MONEY and POWER... and that the groups that desired control of such things continue regardless of ideology, theology, political party or any other such nonsense... AND add that the CIA as well as a number of other agencies were choked full of "communists" who thought it crucial NEVER to give in to the USA..

It is not such a stretch to see cooperation among thieves to keep their livlihoods AND organizations intact.

To dovetail back to your thesis - LBJ - he cooperated cause of all the money involved, and his freedom. "None Dare Call It a Conspiracy" helps in this question to see that the CIA and KGD were in the same business... perpetuate the organization, protect the organization, expand the organization so that a state of fear persists and people will be more and more willing to give up personal freedoms and liberty to FEEL protected...

JFK's future dictated that these two agencies would no longer be needed - or at least be seriously curtailed... and they both knew it.

And this is why men like Dub'ya Bush do not get executed... He's one of THEM.


Now you can see where I have gone awry: Silly me thought TG's notion of the superman-level success of the KGB in deconstructing America related to the long march through the institutions and the election of lefties such as Obama, Biden, Hillary and Kamala. Silly me thought it had something to do with advancing Marxist/socialist ideology and that sort of thing. No, no, no - it was all about the Benjamins from the get-go - or at least that was the theory in 2012 - and Dubya was as much of a useful idiot as The Donald.

I can't even begin to keep this stuff straight. I won't bore you further. If it all makes sense to you, keep it to yourself because I no longer care.

Breaking news: Jim Di started a thread specifically to deal (not kindly) with TG's KGB stuff. It isn't worth reading, but at last I understand: EVERYTHING THAT HAS HAPPENDED IN AMERICA since 1921 has been KGB-orchestrated. Trump, Biden, the collapse of the educational system, my Milwaukee Braves winning the World Series in 1957, everything. At least that narrows it down.

Dear Fancy Pants Rants,

As I've already revealed, Oliver Stone's self-described mythological ("to counter the myth of the Warren Report") film "JFK" (the genesis of which was a KGB article published in the Communist-owned Italian newspaper, Paese Sera, four days after overly ambitious, scandal plagued, and revengeful Jim Garrison arrested Clay Shaw on suspicion of having organized a homosexual "thrill-kill" assassination of JFK) had a big influence on me . . . as it did, unfortunately, on millions of other impressionable Americans.

Although I started to "see the light" when a West-looking Ukrainian politician, Viktor Yuschenko, was poisoned with dioxin in 2004, it took me a long time to get over that bit of 1991 KGB-encouraged celluloid disinformation, and my return to "sanity" was slowed down considerably by my naively joining, in 2005, the far-left JFKA CT web site ironically called the JFK Assassination Debate - Education Forum, where I fell under the influence of the likes of Comrade Jim DiEugenio and all of the other far-left CTs who were there at that time, and most of whose names I no longer remember (although I must say that Dawn Meridith and a few others do come to mind).

The fact that by 2012, as evidenced above, I no longer thought the evil, evil, evil CIA-Mafia alone had killed JFK, but that the hit may have been a joint op between them and your beloved (or at least de-emphasized) KGB* is evidence that I'd actually come a long way, baby.

What's ironic is that I now think it's possible that the assassination was a joint effort by a KGB*-controlled part of the CIA and the KGB*, proper.

How you like Dem apples, Fancy Pants Rants?

*Today's SVR and FSB

-- Tom
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Tom Graves on January 22, 2026, 09:18:01 PM
Since TG just keeps posting, he is quite correct: I did look at this post and will respond as follows to the following. Then I, at least, am done.

Well, let's see: TG's exchange with the late Sandy was in 2018, more than eight years ago. Since the KGB stuff - oops, sorry, the KGB Deconstruction of America, Including Without Limitation the JFKA stuff - now appears to occupy TG's every waking hour, I assumed he would no longer characterize it as "pure speculation."

If he does still characterize it as pure speculation ... well, I for one am heartened to learn this.


I hate to bum you out, Fancy Pants Rants, but I hadn't yet read John M. Newman's 2022 book, Uncovering Popov's Mole (which he dedicated to your bugbear, Tennent H, Bagley, btw), which I highly suggest that YOU read (but disregard the part where he says some high-level military officers killed JFK because he refused to nuke Peking and Moscow in 1963).

Whether or not the Ruskies were behind the JFKA, I like Newman's idea that Bruce Solie sent LHO to Moscow as an ostensible "dangle" in a (unbeknownst to Angleton and Oswald) planned-to-fail hunt for "Popov's U-2 Mole" in the wrong part of the CIA.

-- Tom
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Benjamin Cole on January 23, 2026, 01:00:17 AM
LP-

You may have overstated the case against Bagley/Angleton. There were (and are?) plenty of people in the CIA skeptical about Nosenko.

In addition, John Newman is a serious researcher, and he has posited Bruce Solie was a KGB mole and running LHO.

There was a KGB'er in Minsk who said he was running LHO, but stopped once LHO returned to the US, and that yes, Marina was a "swallow." She lso stopped being of service upon departing the SU.

LHO contacted not only KGB, but G2 assets in Mexico City. LHO spoke of assassinating JFK while in MC. Castro spoke of revenge assassination attempts on the Kennedy brothers, in September of 1963.

TG is roughly right that the KGB, or other Soviet assets, have been running disinformation campaigns in the US during the entire postwar era, and surely they often manipulated left-wing assets in doing so.

TG now contends Moscow is manipulating right-wing assets also. Tucker Carlson anyone?

As to any particular arcane detail about the KGB in the postwar era, or some obscure name or reference...sure, I may be lost.

I agree with the summation of Sean Coleman on the Ed Forum, and even worse, it has an anti-Semitic crackpot, William N. as its primary "moderator." How low can you go?

I rather suspect John Simkin is in his dotage....like deep into his dotage....
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Tom Graves on January 23, 2026, 05:36:49 AM
[LP] may have overstated the case against Bagley/Angleton. There were (and are?) plenty of people in the CIA skeptical about Nosenko.

FPR thinks Bagley, a PhD'd former Marine Lieutenant during WW II whose father and two older brothers were Admirals, whose Great Uncle on his mother's side was Fleet Admiral William D. Leahy, who received a medal when he retired from the Agency, and whom Richard Helms said in so many words was on the fast track to become Director of CIA until putative KGB staff officer Yuri Nosenko defected to the U.S. -- was a scam artist.

Perhaps FPL is a scam artist, himself, and projects his defective character onto anyone, dead or alive, who appears to him to challenge the legitimacy of The Traitorous Orange Bird (rhymes with "Xxxx")?

FPR doesn't want to learn about said mole-protecting putative KGB staff officer / false defector-in-place in Geneva in June 1962 / false (or perhaps rogue) physical defector to the U.S. in February 1964 Yuri Nosenko because Nosenko isn't a "hoot" and because he intuits that if he did learn about him, he'd have to consider the possibility that the KGB* really DID install The Traitorous Orange Bird (rhymes with "Xxxx") as our "president."

*Today's SVR and FSB

Quote
John Newman is a serious researcher, and he has posited Bruce Solie was a KGB mole and running LHO.

Dear "BC,"

Please remember to say, "Probable KGB mole Bruce Leonard Solie (look him up) in the mole-hunting Office of Security was father-figure-requiring James Angleton's confidant, mentor, and mole hunting superior."

-- "TG"

Quote
LHO spoke of assassinating JFK while in MC.

Correction:

The allegation that Oswald spoke in Mexico City of killing JFK comes from the two Russia-born "triple agents," Morris and Jack Childs, after egg-on-face gumshoe J. Edgar Hoover had sent them to Havana six months after the assassination to find out if Castro was involved in it.

Quote
Tom is roughly right that the KGB, or other Soviet assets, have been running disinformation campaigns in the US during the entire postwar era, and surely they often manipulated left-wing assets in doing so.

"Roughly right"?

Quote
Tom now contends Moscow is manipulating right-wing assets also. Tucker Carlson anyone?

The KGB* has been manipulating everyone for several decades, e.g., Oliver Stone AND us through his self-described mythological ("to counter for the myth of the Warren Report") movie (sic), "JFK."

*Today's SVR and FSB

Quote
I rather suspect John Simkin is deep into his dotage.

I rather suspect John Simkin is an aging Trotskyite.
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Benjamin Cole on January 23, 2026, 11:43:28 AM
TG--Good points.
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Lance Payette on January 23, 2026, 01:01:11 PM
BC -

I understand, you feel sorry for TG and want to show at least a bit of appreciation as he keeps embarrassing himself. I actually feel sorry for him, too, which is why I have edited many of my posts to remove my snarkier comments. Not sorry enough to read any more of his posts, but I am sympathetic to his mental plight.

LP-

You may have overstated the case against Bagley/Angleton. There were (and are?) plenty of people in the CIA skeptical about Nosenko.

"Skeptical about Nosenko" is one thing. "Skeptical about Nosenko" scarcely describes the Angleton/Bagley paranoia that came to be called the Monster Plot. "Skeptical about Nosenko" scarcely describes the breadth and depth of TG's KGB stuff insofar as the CIA is concerned. "Skeptical about Nosenko" greatly understates the reality.

Do we actually know there were and are "plenty" of people in the CIA (as opposed to the CT community) skeptical about Noskenko? Were there protests against the Hart Report or Royden's peer-reviewed article in Studies in Intelligence? One can certainly be skeptical that Nosenko was all he said he was and knew all he said he did without thinking he was a KGB-sponsored false defector. There was essentially no suspicion the Soviets were responsible for the JFKA, so why would the KGB and Nosenko himself undertake this fantastically risky mission - and why would Nosenko endure the ghastly treatment he received?

Quote
In addition, John Newman is a serious researcher, and he has posited Bruce Solie was a KGB mole and running LHO.

One thing I have been struck by, and was struck by yesterday when I reviewed all 405 "Bagley" posts at the Ed Forum, was how far Newman's stock seems to have fallen. A few years ago, folks were waiting breathlessly for him to bring his theories to Dealey Plaza and wrap it all up. Now, not so much. At least on the Bagley threads, his acceptance of Bagley's latter-day tales hook, line and sinker was viewed with surprising dismay by some fairly prominent participants.

Catty of me, but I always feel an obligation to remind folks that Newman is also the author of QUEST FOR THE KINGDOM: THE SECRET TEACHINGS OF JESUS IN LIGHT OF YOGIC MYSTICISM. Written in his capacity as a yoga master, it was published in 2011 - so it isn't some dissertation from his days as 20-year-old hippie (if he in fact was). I have bought and read it - or at least 75%. Far from what you might expect, it is EXTREMELY scholarly. Newman knows his New Testament and his Hindu scriptures inside and out. PRECISELY in the way his JFKA stuff is fascinating, it's fascinating. Also like his JFKA stuff, it's clearly the product of an obsessive mind that sees too much that isn't there and makes connections that no one else sees. If anyone cares to read it, it provides valuable insights into the way Newman's mind works. It caused nary a ripple - literally nary a ripple - among Christian scholars. (One of the few reviews on Amazon - not by me - noted that it is a classic example of "conspiracy" thinking.)

Quote
There was a KGB'er in Minsk who said he was running LHO, but stopped once LHO returned to the US, and that yes, Marina was a "swallow." She lso stopped being of service upon departing the SU.

"A KGB'er?" Not one friend, romantic partner or coworker has ever suggested such a thing, then or now. The KGB files do not reflect this. All of these wacky theories require Oswald to have had about 72 hours in a day, because we have a pretty good idea what he was doing in Minsk with the 24 hours available to the rest of us. Peter Vronsky, who went over there with the idea of making a documentary that would expose the WC fraud once and for all, and who spoke to lots and lots of people who knew Oswald, abandoned the documentary and told me he came back believing "the WC basically got it right."

Quote
LHO contacted not only KGB, but G2 assets in Mexico City. LHO spoke of assassinating JFK while in MC. Castro spoke of revenge assassination attempts on the Kennedy brothers, in September of 1963.

Your first two statements are supported by thin gruel. Obviously there were KGB folks in the Soviet Embassy, but what basis is there for thinking Oswald even understood he was talking to KGB folks? Is that how they introduced themselves to this frantic, whacked-out American with a handgun? Oswald speaking of assassinating JFK is supported, insofar as I know, by virtually nothing. Lastly, yes, Castro spoke of revenge assassination and that was published in American newspapers immediately before Oswald left for MC. I have no problem with thinking Oswald may have believed he was doing Castro a favor, or even with him being encouraged to believe that. The KGB? No way, makes no sense at all.

Quote
TG is roughly right that the KGB, or other Soviet assets, have been running disinformation campaigns in the US during the entire postwar era, and surely they often manipulated left-wing assets in doing so.

Again, you vastly understate what TG is claiming. What you are describing is nothing more than what intelligence agencies, including the CIA and Mossad and M16, do every day. This is not the Monster Plot. This is not the deconstruction of America. This is not the election of KGB stooges to the Presidency.

Quote
I rather suspect John Simkin is in his dotage....like deep into his dotage....

He's only a few years older than I, so let's hope he's not "deep" into his dotage!  :D Almost everyone but my wife agrees I'm still in the wading end of the dotage pool.
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Tom Graves on January 23, 2026, 01:16:15 PM
"Skeptical about Nosenko" is one thing. "Skeptical about Nosenko" scarcely describes the Angleton/Bagley paranoia that came to be called the Monster Plot. "Skeptical about Nosenko" scarcely describes the breadth and depth of TG's KGB stuff insofar as the CIA is concerned. "Skeptical about Nosenko" greatly understates the reality. Do we actually know there were and are "plenty" of people in the CIA (as opposed to the CT community) skeptical about Noskenko [sic]? Were there protests against the Hart Report or Royden's peer-reviewed article in Studies in Intelligence? One can certainly be skeptical that Nosenko was all he said he was and knew all he said he did without thinking he was a KGB-sponsored false defector. There was essentially no suspicion the Soviets were responsible for the JFKA, so why would the KGB and Nosenko himself undertake this fantastically risky mission - and why would Nosenko endure the ghastly treatment he received? (emphasis added by T.G.)

Sez Trump-loving Fancy Pants Rants, who evidently doesn't have the gonads or the horse sense to read Tennent H. Bagley's 2007 Yale University Press book, Spy Wars: Moles, Mysteries, and Deadly Games, or even his 2014 follow-up article, "Ghosts of the Spy Wars," but would rather take KGB-and-Trump-approved cheap shots at Bagley, Angleton, and Golitsyn from the Fancy Pants Peanut Gallery.

https://archive.org/details/SpyWarsMolesMysteriesAndDeadlyGames

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08850607.2014.962362

(It's funny that Fancy Pants keeps referencing HSCA perjurer John L. Hart, even after I showed him Bagley's 170-page HSCA testimony in which he ripped Hart the proverbial new one. Here it is again: https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/docid-32273600.pdf )

As I said in a previous post,

FPR thinks Bagley, a PhD'd former Marine Lieutenant during WW II whose father and two older brothers were Admirals, whose Great Uncle on his mother's side was Fleet Admiral William D. Leahy, who received a medal when he retired from the Agency, and whom Richard Helms said, in so many words, was on the fast track to become Director of CIA until putative KGB staff officer Yuri Nosenko physically defected to the U.S. -- was a scam artist.

Perhaps FPL is a scam artist, himself, and projects his defective character onto anyone, dead or alive, who appears to him to challenge the legitimacy of The Traitorous Orange Bird (rhymes with "Xxxx")?

FPR doesn't want to learn about said mole-protecting putative KGB staff officer / false defector-in-place in Geneva in June 1962 / false (or perhaps rogue) physical defector to the U.S. in February 1964 Yuri Nosenko because Nosenko isn't a "hoot," and because he intuits that if he did learn about him, he'd have to consider the possibility that the KGB* really DID install The Traitorous Orange Bird (rhymes with "Xxxx") as our "president."

*Today's SVR and FSB


Bagley wrote the following in Spy Wars:


There is no indication that CIA ever answered the extraordinary and unprecedented number of questions that arose about the defector Yuri Nosenko. Here is a sample of thirty of them, with references to the pages where they are discussed in Spy Wars.

Nosenko claimed that through the entire years 1960-61 he was deputy chief of the American-Embassy section of the American department of the Second Chief Directorate (SCD) of the KGB. It was this post (especially his claim to have there personally supervised all KGB work against the embassy's code clerks and security officer) that gave him access to all the most important information he gave CIA.

1. Why then, while supervising this top-priority work, was Nosenko performing low-level tasks for a different department? (Spy Wars pp. 94-95, 160-62, 235, 250, 280)

[He himself described his activity during this period, handling street-level homosexual provocateurs of the Tourist Department, recruiting homosexual tourists (one as far away as Sofia), helping the Tourist Department chief in meeting a visiting American travel agent, and traveling abroad repeatedly as watchdog for Soviet industrial delegations.]

2. Why did at least three KGB insiders later state that Nosenko never held that position? [They included i) a visitor to that section at the time, ii) a former member of the section itself, and iii) a former head of foreign counterintelligence, Oleg Kalugin.

3. How does one explain Nosenko's many changes of stories about his KGB career, even about when and how he entered service, and the evidence that the stories were false? (pp. 93, 160-62, 235, 248-50) .[Not a single KGB source during or after the Cold War, even among those who insisted that Nosenko genuinely defected, has confirmed the dates and assignments of his claimed KGB career.]

4. How does one explain Nosenko's authoritative claim that, up to the time he defected, the KGB did not recruit any American Embassy code clerk? (pp. 156-59, 241-42)

[in fact that section of the KGB recruited at least one code clerk and there were compelling signs that Nosenko was hiding the truth about two others.]

5. Why was Nosenko unaware of the operational mission to Helsinki during that period of his direct subordinate Kosolapov as part of a promising attempt to recruit an American Embassy cipher clerk? (pp. 157-60, 242)

6. How could Nosenko err by an entire year - and thus destroy his story about holding this job - by reporting i) that under his supervision KGB surveillants had spotted the American Embassy security officer visiting a certain dead drop site in late 1960 and ii) that for many weeks thereafter, as supervisor, he had received regular reports on the KGB's stakeout of that site. (pp. 88-89, 147-50, 186, 203-4)

[The visit actually happened in late 1961, so any stakeout would have been conducted after Nosenko left the job.]

7. Why did Nosenko fail to mention that dead drop visit when he was telling CIA in 1962 about his coverage of the security officer? (pp. 16, 147, 203)

8. If Nosenko was personally watching over the American Embassy's security officer, why did he not know that the officer traveled from Moscow to his ancestral homeland, Armenia? (Nosenko himself recognized that his failure to answer this question undermined his whole life story.) (pp. 186-87)

Nosenko preserved and brought to Geneva in 1964 the KGB's authorization for his travel in December 1963 to search for a fleeing KGB officer, Vladimir Cherepanov. (pp. 87, 167-68, 250-51)

9. How did he keep this document and why did he bring it to Geneva, whereas KGB regulations - as Nosenko agreed -- required that it be turned in before the next payday and before any further official travel could be authorized?

10. Why was that travel authorization (signed by the SCD chief Gribanov) made out to "Lt. Col. Nosenko", the rank he claimed, whereas under detailed questioning he admitted having been only a captain (as even the KGB now confirms)?

11. Is it mere coincidence that in 1962, long before this erroneous travel authorization, he was already lying about his rank, then calling himself a major,?

12. Why was it "Colonel" Nosenko's story that a Soviet official journalist tried to peddle to the Western press shortly after Nosenko's defection in 1964? (page 163)

13. And why would Nosenko be sent out to search for Cherepanov if, as suggested in questions 1-7 above, Nosenko was not deputy chief of the SCD's American-Embassy section?

Nosenko in 1962 volunteered information that his boss Kovshuk had traveled to the United States five years earlier to restore contact with a KGB-recruited American cipher-machine mechanic codenamed "Andrey." [it became evident that the real reason for Kovshuk's travel was to exploit the KGB recruitment of a CIA officer.] (pp. 67-71, 185)

14. Is it mere coincidence that just when Nosenko was telling CIA about Kovshuk's trip, the two KGB officers closest to him in Geneva, his sole KGB companion there, Yuri Guk, and his hotel roommate Kislov, were precisely the two KGB operatives who had worked with Kovshuk on that trip?

15. Why did Nosenko, having read Kislov's KGB file, certify to CIA that Kislov had no connection with the KGB? (pp. 65-67)

16. Why did Nosenko in 1962 say (and repeat) that "Andrey" was recruited in "1949¬1950" but later, in 1964, report that he himself had been in the KGB (entered 1953) while "Andrey" was still in Moscow?

17. Nosenko told CIA in 1962 that he had personally participated in the KGB Moscow attempt to recruit CIA officer Edward Ellis Smith. Why then did he in 1964 deny any knowledge of the name or the case? (p. 188)

Other questions:

18. Why did he refer in 1962 to KGB relations with the Finnish president, but then in 1964 deny any knowledge of it? (p. 186)

19. How does one explain Nosenko's mention in 1962 of the name "Zepp" - which at that moment was of intense interest to KGB counterintelligence - and his failure to recognize the name by early 1964? (pp. 15-16, 150-55, 162, 203)

20. If Nosenko was really in Geneva in 1962 and 1964 as the security watchdog of a Soviet conference delegation, as he claimed, why did even his KGB bosses say, after the Cold War, that he had gone there for other, "serious operational purposes"? (pp. 5, 237, 253)

21. How does one explain Nosenko's inability to describe even the most routine KGB procedures? (pp. 83-86, 191-92, 251-55)

22. How come this eleven-year veteran of KGB CI operations was unable to disclose to the U.S. a single KGB spy who at the time of uncovering, i) was still active and ii) had current access to US or NATO-country official secrets and iii) had previously been unsuspected by Western counterintelligence?

23. Is it true, as Nosenko authoritatively reported, having heard it from three different KGB authorities directly involved, that it was by chance Moscow surveillance of British diplomats that the KGB first learned of the treason of CIA's great spy Oleg Penkovsky? [KGB authorities have since denied it and suggested that the source was a mole.] (pp. 2I-22, 86-87, 235, 243)

Nosenko highlighted to CIA in 1962 that the KGB first uncovered Pyotr Popov, CIA's spy in the GRU (Military Intelligence) by chance surveillance of an American diplomat mailing a letter in Moscow in late January 1959. (pp. 11-12, 16-17, 24, 68¬75, 189, 241-43)

24. How does one equate this with the KGB's later admission that the GRU chief was fired from his post as a result of Popov's treason, almost two months before the letter mailing?

25. Or with the fact that KGB surveillants spotted Popov meeting CIA twice, at least two weeks before the letter mailing?

26. Or with the KGB's admission, in a book published in Moscow in 2000, that it had earlier recruited Edward Ellis Smith, the CIA officer who had supported the Popov case in Moscow?

Nosenko claimed inside knowledge about Lee Harvey Oswald in the Soviet Union, having participated in early decisions when Oswald defected to the USSR and later having read the KGB file on Oswald. Later, the KGB chairman at the time and other KGB veterans denied it and stated that Nosenko was lying about this. (So too did the House Select Committee on Assassinations after interviewing Nosenko many times in 1977-78.) (pp. 83-86, 95-96, 191, 210, 249)

27. If Nosenko did not have his claimed access to the Oswald case and did not really study the KGB's file, where did he get his information? And why does he continue to make that claim to this day?

After the Cold War much was learned about a previously unknown SCD department for operational deception, which was actively handing false sources to Western intelligence services to mislead them. It was learned that this department was closely supervised by Nosenko's sponsor General Oleg Gribanov. And that among its officers were Nosenko's friend Yuri Guk, who was meeting Nosenko before and after each CIA meeting in Geneva in 1962 (pp. 6, 9, 66, 236); Aleksandr Kislov, who was rooming with Nosenko in Geneva in 1962 (p. 7, 66, 70-71, 235, 236); and Vladimir Chelnokov, who took him along on an operational mission to Odessa in 1960 (p. 235).

28. Why did Nosenko not report on the existence of this department?

29. Why did Nosenko not tell that his close KGB associates at various times were members of it?

30. Is it mere coincidence that Nosenko replayed to CIA in 1962 each of these specific cases that six months earlier had been compromised to the Americans by KGB defector Anatoly Golitsyn?

i) Vassall (pp. 14, 24, 97, 179, 187, 189, 206, 261)

ii) Preisfreund (pp. 25, 28, 158-59)

iii) Belitsky (pp. 17, 25, 179)

iv) Kovshuk's "trip" to Washington (pp. 24, 65-66, 69, 75-78)

v) Nine others including a Canadian and a French ambassador and a French businessman (pp. 4, 14, 25, 165, 206).

While an objective observer tries to answer each of these thirty questions in a manner consistent with his answers to the other questions, a thirty-first question will have occurred to him. How could so many questions - even a fraction of this number - have arisen about any genuine defector?

Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Lance Payette on January 23, 2026, 02:29:42 PM
I suppose I could be accused of a fallacious appeal to authority here, but wouldn't most folks agree that Larry Hancock is solidly in the sane wing of CTers? Wouldn't most folks agree that he is among the most thorough, thoughtful and respected of CTers and of JFKA researchers in general?

Almost a year ago, I started a thread about Larry and David Boylan's latest book, THE OSWALD PUZZLE: https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,4162.8.html.

Larry described at the Ed Forum the intense work that went into this book. The book is, absolutely, the LN narrative right up to the events in Dealey Plaza. Oswald was simply who the LN narrative says he was. Then it goes off the deep end, IMO: Oswald knew nothing about the assassination and was a complete patsy of anti-Castro types. Alas, the book really just doesn't deal with how this would have worked and all the (to me) unanswerable questions it raises. But that's OK - Larry and David will surely flesh it all out at some point.

My point here is that they COMPLETELY REJECT all the CIA/KGB intrigue stuff. Oswald was simply who and what I believe he obviously was: Just a garden-variety defector who quickly became as disillusioned with the USSR as he had been with America. Neither CIA material, witting or unwitting, nor KGB material by a long shot.

Look, the CIA/KGB stuff is fun, way more fun than the LN narrative. Spy stuff in general is fun - "Mission Impossible" and all that. Opportuniies for speculation are endless: Oswald was on the CIA payroll; no, wait, he was an unwitting dangle; no, wait, he was a witting dangle; no, wait, he was a patriotic ultra-right-winger; no, wait, yada yada. It's fun, but NONE OF IT really fits the facts.

I am struck by how much conspiracy theorizing requires Oswald to be the EXACT OPPOSITE of who he was, 180 degrees removed from the real man. Ditto for other people and events connected with the JFKA - conspiracy theorizing requires them to be the EXACT OPPOSITE of what the evidence tells us. This is perhaps the most bizarre aspect of conspiracy thinking - i.e., its fondness for up being down, white being black, and absolutely nothing being the way common sense and the evidence tells us it is.

Anyway, TG's KGB stuff is just fun (up to a point) and entertaining (up to a point) goofiness. That's all. And that's all I'm going to say about that.

I leave TG and you (as far as this thread is concerned, anyway) with a quotation from Senator William J. Fulbright, ironically enough from a book published in 1963:

The Soviet Union has indeed been our greatest menace - not so much because of what it has done,
but because of the excuses it has provided us for our own failures.
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Tom Graves on January 23, 2026, 02:37:01 PM
[...]

FPR posted while I was editing and expanding my previous post, so here it is again:

Here's an excerpt from what FPR had posted:

"Skeptical about Nosenko" is one thing. "Skeptical about Nosenko" scarcely describes the Angleton/Bagley paranoia that came to be called the Monster Plot. "Skeptical about Nosenko" scarcely describes the breadth and depth of TG's KGB stuff insofar as the CIA is concerned. "Skeptical about Nosenko" greatly understates the reality. Do we actually know there were and are "plenty" of people in the CIA (as opposed to the CT community) skeptical about Noskenko [sic]? Were there protests against the Hart Report or Royden's peer-reviewed article in Studies in Intelligence? One can certainly be skeptical that Nosenko was all he said he was and knew all he said he did without thinking he was a KGB-sponsored false defector. There was essentially no suspicion the Soviets were responsible for the JFKA, so why would the KGB and Nosenko himself undertake this fantastically risky mission - and why would Nosenko endure the ghastly treatment he received? (emphasis added by T.G.)


Here's my edited-and-expanded reply:

Sez Trump-loving Fancy Pants Rants, who evidently doesn't have the gonads or the horse sense to read Tennent H. Bagley's 2007 Yale University Press book, Spy Wars: Moles, Mysteries, and Deadly Games, or even his 2014 follow-up article, "Ghosts of the Spy Wars," but would rather take KGB-and-Trump-approved cheap shots at Bagley, Angleton, and Golitsyn from the Fancy Pants Rants Peanut Gallery.


https://archive.org/details/SpyWarsMolesMysteriesAndDeadlyGames

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08850607.2014.962362


It's funny that Fancy Pants keeps referencing HSCA perjurer John L. Hart, even after I showed him Bagley's 170-page HSCA testimony in which he ripped Hart the proverbial new one.

Here it is again.

Note: "Mr. X" is KGB true defector Anatoliy Golitsyn.

https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/docid-32273600.pdf


As I said in a previous post,

FPR thinks Bagley, a PhD'd former Marine Lieutenant during WW II whose father and two older brothers were Admirals, whose Great Uncle on his mother's side was Fleet Admiral William D. Leahy, who received a medal when he retired from the Agency, and whom Richard Helms said, in so many words, was on the fast track to become Director of CIA until putative KGB staff officer Yuri Nosenko physically defected to the U.S. -- was a scam artist.

Perhaps FPL is a scam artist, himself, and projects his defective character onto anyone, dead or alive, who appears to him to challenge the legitimacy of The Traitorous Orange Bird (rhymes with "Xxxx")?

FPR doesn't want to learn about said mole-protecting putative KGB staff officer / false defector-in-place in Geneva in June 1962 / false (or perhaps rogue) physical defector to the U.S. in February 1964 Yuri Nosenko because Nosenko isn't a "hoot," and because he intuits that if he did learn about him, he'd have to consider the possibility that the KGB* really DID install The Traitorous Orange Bird (rhymes with "Xxxx") as our "president."

*Today's SVR and FSB


Bagley wrote the following in Spy Wars:


There is no indication that CIA ever answered the extraordinary and unprecedented number of questions that arose about the defector Yuri Nosenko. Here is a sample of thirty of them, with references to the pages where they are discussed in Spy Wars.

Nosenko claimed that through the entire years 1960-61 he was deputy chief of the American-Embassy section of the American department of the Second Chief Directorate (SCD) of the KGB. It was this post (especially his claim to have there personally supervised all KGB work against the embassy's code clerks and security officer) that gave him access to all the most important information he gave CIA.

1. Why then, while supervising this top-priority work, was Nosenko performing low-level tasks for a different department? (Spy Wars pp. 94-95, 160-62, 235, 250, 280)

[He himself described his activity during this period, handling street-level homosexual provocateurs of the Tourist Department, recruiting homosexual tourists (one as far away as Sofia), helping the Tourist Department chief in meeting a visiting American travel agent, and traveling abroad repeatedly as watchdog for Soviet industrial delegations.]

2. Why did at least three KGB insiders later state that Nosenko never held that position? [They included i) a visitor to that section at the time, ii) a former member of the section itself, and iii) a former head of foreign counterintelligence, Oleg Kalugin.

3. How does one explain Nosenko's many changes of stories about his KGB career, even about when and how he entered service, and the evidence that the stories were false? (pp. 93, 160-62, 235, 248-50) .[Not a single KGB source during or after the Cold War, even among those who insisted that Nosenko genuinely defected, has confirmed the dates and assignments of his claimed KGB career.]

4. How does one explain Nosenko's authoritative claim that, up to the time he defected, the KGB did not recruit any American Embassy code clerk? (pp. 156-59, 241-42)

[in fact that section of the KGB recruited at least one code clerk and there were compelling signs that Nosenko was hiding the truth about two others.]

5. Why was Nosenko unaware of the operational mission to Helsinki during that period of his direct subordinate Kosolapov as part of a promising attempt to recruit an American Embassy cipher clerk? (pp. 157-60, 242)

6. How could Nosenko err by an entire year - and thus destroy his story about holding this job - by reporting i) that under his supervision KGB surveillants had spotted the American Embassy security officer visiting a certain dead drop site in late 1960 and ii) that for many weeks thereafter, as supervisor, he had received regular reports on the KGB's stakeout of that site. (pp. 88-89, 147-50, 186, 203-4)

[The visit actually happened in late 1961, so any stakeout would have been conducted after Nosenko left the job.]

7. Why did Nosenko fail to mention that dead drop visit when he was telling CIA in 1962 about his coverage of the security officer? (pp. 16, 147, 203)

8. If Nosenko was personally watching over the American Embassy's security officer, why did he not know that the officer traveled from Moscow to his ancestral homeland, Armenia? (Nosenko himself recognized that his failure to answer this question undermined his whole life story.) (pp. 186-87)

Nosenko preserved and brought to Geneva in 1964 the KGB's authorization for his travel in December 1963 to search for a fleeing KGB officer, Vladimir Cherepanov. (pp. 87, 167-68, 250-51)

9. How did he keep this document and why did he bring it to Geneva, whereas KGB regulations - as Nosenko agreed -- required that it be turned in before the next payday and before any further official travel could be authorized?

10. Why was that travel authorization (signed by the SCD chief Gribanov) made out to "Lt. Col. Nosenko", the rank he claimed, whereas under detailed questioning he admitted having been only a captain (as even the KGB now confirms)?

11. Is it mere coincidence that in 1962, long before this erroneous travel authorization, he was already lying about his rank, then calling himself a major,?

12. Why was it "Colonel" Nosenko's story that a Soviet official journalist tried to peddle to the Western press shortly after Nosenko's defection in 1964? (page 163)

13. And why would Nosenko be sent out to search for Cherepanov if, as suggested in questions 1-7 above, Nosenko was not deputy chief of the SCD's American-Embassy section?

Nosenko in 1962 volunteered information that his boss Kovshuk had traveled to the United States five years earlier to restore contact with a KGB-recruited American cipher-machine mechanic codenamed "Andrey." [it became evident that the real reason for Kovshuk's travel was to exploit the KGB recruitment of a CIA officer.] (pp. 67-71, 185)

14. Is it mere coincidence that just when Nosenko was telling CIA about Kovshuk's trip, the two KGB officers closest to him in Geneva, his sole KGB companion there, Yuri Guk, and his hotel roommate Kislov, were precisely the two KGB operatives who had worked with Kovshuk on that trip?

15. Why did Nosenko, having read Kislov's KGB file, certify to CIA that Kislov had no connection with the KGB? (pp. 65-67)

16. Why did Nosenko in 1962 say (and repeat) that "Andrey" was recruited in "1949¬1950" but later, in 1964, report that he himself had been in the KGB (entered 1953) while "Andrey" was still in Moscow?

17. Nosenko told CIA in 1962 that he had personally participated in the KGB Moscow attempt to recruit CIA officer Edward Ellis Smith. Why then did he in 1964 deny any knowledge of the name or the case? (p. 188)

Other questions:

18. Why did he refer in 1962 to KGB relations with the Finnish president, but then in 1964 deny any knowledge of it? (p. 186)

19. How does one explain Nosenko's mention in 1962 of the name "Zepp" - which at that moment was of intense interest to KGB counterintelligence - and his failure to recognize the name by early 1964? (pp. 15-16, 150-55, 162, 203)

20. If Nosenko was really in Geneva in 1962 and 1964 as the security watchdog of a Soviet conference delegation, as he claimed, why did even his KGB bosses say, after the Cold War, that he had gone there for other, "serious operational purposes"? (pp. 5, 237, 253)

21. How does one explain Nosenko's inability to describe even the most routine KGB procedures? (pp. 83-86, 191-92, 251-55)

22. How come this eleven-year veteran of KGB CI operations was unable to disclose to the U.S. a single KGB spy who at the time of uncovering, i) was still active and ii) had current access to US or NATO-country official secrets and iii) had previously been unsuspected by Western counterintelligence?

23. Is it true, as Nosenko authoritatively reported, having heard it from three different KGB authorities directly involved, that it was by chance Moscow surveillance of British diplomats that the KGB first learned of the treason of CIA's great spy Oleg Penkovsky? [KGB authorities have since denied it and suggested that the source was a mole.] (pp. 2I-22, 86-87, 235, 243)

Nosenko highlighted to CIA in 1962 that the KGB first uncovered Pyotr Popov, CIA's spy in the GRU (Military Intelligence) by chance surveillance of an American diplomat mailing a letter in Moscow in late January 1959. (pp. 11-12, 16-17, 24, 68¬75, 189, 241-43)

24. How does one equate this with the KGB's later admission that the GRU chief was fired from his post as a result of Popov's treason, almost two months before the letter mailing?

25. Or with the fact that KGB surveillants spotted Popov meeting CIA twice, at least two weeks before the letter mailing?

26. Or with the KGB's admission, in a book published in Moscow in 2000, that it had earlier recruited Edward Ellis Smith, the CIA officer who had supported the Popov case in Moscow?

Nosenko claimed inside knowledge about Lee Harvey Oswald in the Soviet Union, having participated in early decisions when Oswald defected to the USSR and later having read the KGB file on Oswald. Later, the KGB chairman at the time and other KGB veterans denied it and stated that Nosenko was lying about this. (So too did the House Select Committee on Assassinations after interviewing Nosenko many times in 1977-78.) (pp. 83-86, 95-96, 191, 210, 249)

27. If Nosenko did not have his claimed access to the Oswald case and did not really study the KGB's file, where did he get his information? And why does he continue to make that claim to this day?

After the Cold War much was learned about a previously unknown SCD department for operational deception, which was actively handing false sources to Western intelligence services to mislead them. It was learned that this department was closely supervised by Nosenko's sponsor General Oleg Gribanov. And that among its officers were Nosenko's friend Yuri Guk, who was meeting Nosenko before and after each CIA meeting in Geneva in 1962 (pp. 6, 9, 66, 236); Aleksandr Kislov, who was rooming with Nosenko in Geneva in 1962 (p. 7, 66, 70-71, 235, 236); and Vladimir Chelnokov, who took him along on an operational mission to Odessa in 1960 (p. 235).

28. Why did Nosenko not report on the existence of this department?

29. Why did Nosenko not tell that his close KGB associates at various times were members of it?

30. Is it mere coincidence that Nosenko replayed to CIA in 1962 each of these specific cases that six months earlier had been compromised to the Americans by KGB defector Anatoly Golitsyn?

i) Vassall (pp. 14, 24, 97, 179, 187, 189, 206, 261)

ii) Preisfreund (pp. 25, 28, 158-59)

iii) Belitsky (pp. 17, 25, 179)

iv) Kovshuk's "trip" to Washington (pp. 24, 65-66, 69, 75-78)

v) Nine others including a Canadian and a French ambassador and a French businessman (pp. 4, 14, 25, 165, 206).

While an objective observer tries to answer each of these thirty questions in a manner consistent with his answers to the other questions, a thirty-first question will have occurred to him. How could so many questions - even a fraction of this number - have arisen about any genuine defector?
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Lance Payette on January 23, 2026, 05:33:17 PM
One more, which is somewhat off-topic, but the epistemological aspects of what we see on forums such as this continue to fascinate me.

It occurred to me on our morning walk (4 miles after Achilles surgery on August 21, thanks for asking) that, apart from all the psychological/sociological jargon, there are really four defining characteristics of far-fetched conspiracy thinking (as opposed to more rational conspiracy thinking, such as I credit Larry Hancock with doing). We see these again and again throughout this forum and the JFKA community in general:

1. An inability – more than a mere stubborn refusal, I think – to step back and view things from the proverbial 30,000-foot level. An inability to ask, “How would my theory have worked, from A to Z, out in the real world? What would it actually have looked like, out in the real world? Would it have made any sense, out in the real world?”

2. An obsession with irrelevant minutiae – attaching huge importance to people and evidence that are actually of little or no importance at all. Together with #1, this results in the proverbial inability to see the forest for the trees (and the shrubs, and the weeds, and the pine cones).

3. A perverse desire for everything to be different – indeed, the very opposite – from what common sense and the evidence tell us it is. Those who simply follow the evidence and apply common sense just don’t “get it,” just don’t grasp how diabolical the conspirators were.

4. An almost cult-like reliance on authorities and sources that mainstream historians, academics and researchers regard as being of dubious expertise and reliability. To the conspiracist, the mainstream thinkers likewise just don't "get it" and are either pawns of or fellow travelers with the conspirators.

These collectively result in the conspiracy theory being almost bullet-proof and the conspiracist’s belief being almost unshakeable.

Why these are the defining characteristics of believers in far-fetched conspiracy theories, even believers who are otherwise intelligent and rational and high-functioning, is where the psychological and sociological studies kick in. But you don’t need them to be able to look at many of the denizens of JFKA World and say, “Yes, that’s exactly who he is and what he's doing.”

Whether this has anything to do with anyone on this thread I leave to others to decide.  ::)
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Tom Graves on January 23, 2026, 06:16:24 PM
One more, which is somewhat off-topic, but the epistemological aspects of what we see on forums such as this continue to fascinate me.

It occurred to me on our morning walk (4 miles after Achilles surgery on August 21, thanks for asking) that, apart from all the psychological/sociological jargon, there are really four defining characteristics of far-fetched conspiracy thinking (as opposed to more rational conspiracy thinking, such as I credit Larry Hancock with doing). We see these again and again throughout this forum and the JFKA community in general:

1. An inability – more than a mere stubborn refusal, I think – to step back and view things from the proverbial 30,000-foot level. An ability to ask, “How would my theory have worked, from A to Z, out in the real world? What would it actually have looked like, out in the real world? Would it have made any sense, out in the real world?”

2. An obsession with irrelevant minutiae – attaching huge importance to people and evidence that are actually of little or no importance at all. Together with #1, this results in the proverbial inability to see the forest for the trees (and the shrubs, and the weeds, and the pine cones).

3. A perverse desire for everything to be different – indeed, the very opposite – from what common sense and the evidence tell us it is. Those who simply follow the evidence and apply common sense just don’t “get it,” just don’t grasp how diabolical the conspirators were.

4. An almost cult-like reliance on authorities and sources that mainstream historians, academics and researchers regard as being of dubious expertise and reliability. To the conspiracist, the mainstream thinkers likewise just don't "get it" and are either pawns of or fellow travelers with the conspirators.

These collectively result in the conspiracy theory being almost bullet-proof and the conspiracist’s belief being almost unshakeable.

Why these are the defining characteristics of believers in far-fetched conspiracy theories, even believers who are otherwise intelligent and rational and high-functioning, is where the psychological and sociological studies kick in. But you don’t need them to be able to look at many of the denizens of JFKA World and say, “Yes, that’s exactly who he is and what he's doing.”

Whether this has anything to do with anyone on this thread I leave to others to decide.  ::)

Dear FPR,

Why didn't you mention your beloved John L. Hart, again?

You know, the guy DCI Stansfield Turner brought back to assassinate Bagley's character to the HSCA and thereby protect false defector-in-place in Geneva in June 1962 / false (or perhaps rogue) physical defector to the U.S. in February 1964, Yuri Nosenko?

You know, the guy for whom Bagley ripped "a new one" during his own testimony to said committee?

Have you had an opportunity to read it yet?

Here it is for you, again, FPR:

https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/docid-32273600.pdf

(Note: "Mr. X" is KGB true defector, Anatoliy Golitsyn)


From Spy Wars:

To steer a less troubling course [after Angleton was fired in December 1974], [William] Colby appointed to head the Counterintelligence Staff George Kalaris, a man without experience in either counterintelligence or Soviet bloc operations, and, as his deputy, [probable mole] Leonard V. McCoy, a handler of reports, not an operations officer, who had already distinguished himself as a fierce advocate for Nosenko. Now began an extraordinary cleanup inside the Counterintelligence Staff — and the disappearance of evidence against Nosenko. [Newton "Scotty"] Miler’s carefully accumulated notes on this and related cases were removed from the files [by McCoy] and disappeared, along with a unique card file of discrepancies in Nosenko’s statements. 18 Shortly afterward Colby appointed an officer to review the files anew. John L. Hart was assisted by four officers. They worked for six months, from June to December 1976. I caught a glimpse of their aims and work methods when Hart came to Europe to interview me. He had not bothered to read what I had written (though he said nothing new had come to light on the question of Nosenko’s bona fides) and seemed interested only in why, eight years earlier, I had warned that bad consequences might flow from Nosenko’s release. I saw that his aim was not to get at the truth but to find a way to clear Nosenko, so I refused to talk further with him. As I later learned, Hart’s team did not even interview the Counterintelligence Staff officers who had analyzed the case and maintained files on it for nine years. Among them were two veteran analysts who, having come “cold” to the case, had concluded on their own that Nosenko was a plant — and had written their reasons. Hart then wrote a report that affirmed total trust in Nosenko. 19

My comment:

To see how full-of-lies Hart's 1976 report was, you're going to have to read Bagley's HSCA testimony (see above).


-- Tom



Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Lance Payette on January 23, 2026, 07:05:46 PM
I would be far out over my skis if I purported to speak knowledgeably about the Bagley stuff with which TG is obsessed, so I don't want to give that impression. I did, however, read a number of reviews of Bagley's Spy Wars, which apparently serves as TG's bible. One noted that Bagley "rather conveniently" relies heavily on information provided to him by supposed - but unnamed - KGB sources. More than one noted Bagley's bitterness at his downfall with the CIA, a motivation that I believe simply must be taken into consideration in regard to all of Bagley's latter-day revelations.

Set forth below is the review from the London Sunday Times. The reviewer, Christoper Andrew, had met with Nosenko and is the co-author, with defector Vasili Mitrokhin, of several books on the famed 300,000 document Mitrokhin Archive. As you can read, he was distinctly unimpressed with Spy Wars.. The review itself appears at: https://www.thetimes.com/world/us-world/article/spy-wars-moles-mysteries-and-deadly-games-n7j9f67n78p.

I'm going to have to get at least one of the Mitrokhin Archives books, which all seem to be available at Amazon:

(https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/81-HC5X+7LL._AC_UY327_FMwebp_QL65_.jpg)

Anyway, here's the review of Spy Wars:

Spy Wars is the story of one of the biggest bungles in the history of the CIA. The bungle began in January 1964, two months after President Kennedy was assassinated, with the defection of Yuri Nosenko, a KGB officer, to America. Recruited as a CIA agent 18 months earlier, Nosenko brought with him a number of leads from KGB files, including information that, while staying in the Soviet Union, Lee Harvey Oswald, Kennedy's assassin, had been assessed by the KGB as too mentally unstable to use as an agent.

Nosenko's CIA interrogators, however, found apparent gaps in his story and quickly became suspicious. The intelligence that seemed to exonerate the KGB of involvement with Oswald was, they concluded, Soviet disinformation. Their suspicions were strengthened by a previous KGB defector, Anatoly Golitsyn, an unreliable conspiracy theorist who warned that bogus defectors would be dispatched by the KGB to discredit him. He claimed that Nosenko was one of them.

In April 1964, Nosenko was imprisoned by the CIA, and deprived of ordinary human contact and reading material, while his interrogators tried to make him admit that he was a plant. Nosenko refused. Four years later, he was exonerated by the CIA leadership, given financial compensation and hired as a consultant. Later agency investigations also concluded Nosenko was genuine. Thirty years after his incarceration, he was invited to give a lecture at the CIA and was given a standing ovation.

Tennent "Pete" Bagley was one of Nosenko's main CIA interrogators. Remarkably, in Spy Wars he sticks to his 40-year-old conclusion that Nosenko was a "provocateur" sent by the KGB to deceive the CIA. His book is deeply unconvincing. As Bagley himself admits, although there had been numerous bogus Soviet refugees, "never in the KGB's 45 years . . . had they sent one directly out of their own halls".

Bagley is still angry with his agency colleagues who cleared Nosenko. He dismisses the first report to do so, by Bruce Solie, as "nonsense" and Solie himself as deeply ignorant of the "real Soviet and KGB world". CIA senior management thought differently and gave Solie an award. For Nosenko, Bagley still feels evident contempt. Nosenko, he claims, was clearly ignorant of "things any KGB officer would know about his own workplace". Why the KGB would choose such an ignorant officer for a mission to deceive the CIA is a question that, surprisingly, does not seem to occur to Bagley.

Twenty years ago, I spent an enjoyable day with Nosenko at the Washington home of Cleve Cram, a CIA historian. Nosenko's explanation for his ordeal at the hands of the CIA was far more convincing than that of Spy Wars. He believed he was one of a series of innocent victims of the culture of conspiracy theory that had developed in the CIA's counter-intelligence staff while it was headed by James Jesus Angleton, an able intelligence officer who, partly under the influence of Golitsyn, had developed paranoid tendencies. Angleton even took seriously Golitsyn's claim that the bitter Sino-Soviet split was a charade devised by Moscow and Beijing to deceive the West.

My final encounter with the Nosenko case came in the late 1990s when I was writing a book with another defector, Vasili Mitrokhin, who had smuggled out of KGB archives an unprecedented volume of top-secret material (highly rated by both the CIA and FBI) on operations in America and elsewhere. This material confirmed that Nosenko was a genuine defector. It also revealed that the KGB (unaware that Nosenko had been imprisoned by the CIA) was making plans in the mid1960s to track him down and assassinate him.
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Steve M. Galbraith on January 23, 2026, 09:07:28 PM
I would be far out over my skis if I purported to speak knowledgeably about the Bagley stuff with which TG is obsessed, so I don't want to give that impression. I did, however, read a number of reviews of Bagley's Spy Wars, which apparently serves as TG's bible. One noted that Bagley "rather conveniently" relies heavily on information provided to him by supposed - but unnamed - KGB sources. More than one noted Bagley's bitterness at his downfall with the CIA, a motivation that I believe simply must be taken into consideration in regard to all of Bagley's latter-day revelations.

Set forth below is the review from the London Sunday Times. The reviewer, Christoper Andrew, had met with Nosenko and is the co-author, with defector Vasili Mitrokhin, of several books on the famed 300,000 document Mitrokhin Archive. As you can read, he was distinctly unimpressed with Spy Wars.. The review itself appears at: https://www.thetimes.com/world/us-world/article/spy-wars-moles-mysteries-and-deadly-games-n7j9f67n78p.

I'm going to have to get at least one of the Mitrokhin Archives books, which all seem to be available at Amazon:

(https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/81-HC5X+7LL._AC_UY327_FMwebp_QL65_.jpg)

Mitrokhin Archive can be read online here: https://archive.org/details/mitrokhinarchive0000andr

The KGB went through great efforts to try and locate Nosenko. The plan was to try and isolate him and kill him. Kalugin book also goes over the plans the KGB had to try and either kidnap or kill Nosenko. Kalugin, who was head of counter intelligence for the KGB (sort of a Soviet equivalent of James Angleton), said Nosenko caused a lot of damage to the KGB including forcing him to return to the USSR. I used to believe that Nosenko was a false defector - the evidence was strong; but a great deal of new evidence that came out, particularly after the fall of the Soviet Union, indicates he was legitimate. Yes, he told lies, made up stories, puffed up his credentials; but so did Golitsyn, e.g., the Sino-Soviet split was a ruse.

Nut graf from Mitrokhin:

 (https://www.drivehq.com/file/DFPublishFile.aspx/FileID13176393536/Keym8kcir6v924s/mitrokhin.png)

Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Lance Payette on January 23, 2026, 10:41:59 PM
Thanks much, Steve!

Given what I now know, it's hard for me to understand the enthusiasm for Bagley - except that what he said fits nicely with the narrative some people would prefer to believe. Him sitting down with Malcolm Blunt strikes me as bizarre at best.

I guess I've always been predisposed to believe Nosenko because it's literally impossible for me to believe the KGB (or the CIA, for that matter) would have had any interest in Lee Harvey Oswald.
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Benjamin Cole on January 24, 2026, 12:46:26 AM
LP--

John Newman is a pretty serious researcher, and he seems to give credence to Bagley, and does Malcolm Blunt.

Newman goes even further, positing that Bruce Solie was a KGB mole.

Nosenko's narrative about the KGB having no stake in LHO is a bit glib. And the timing was perfect.

Gus Russo seems to have his head screwed on tight.

I keep an open mind on this one.

As for threatening to murder JFK, down in MC LHO seemed prone to outbursts, and was ardently seeking passage to Cuba. In a moment of anger, perhaps LHO uttered threats.

Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Steve M. Galbraith on January 24, 2026, 01:10:52 AM
Nosenko's father was a relatively important and honored official in the Soviet Government, Ivan Nosenko. He was awarded three Orders of Lenin, the highest civilian award the Soviets gave out and after his death his funeral was attended by top Soviet officials including Khrushchev. In fact, Khrushchev was one of the honor guards at the funeral.

Question: Why would the KGB send the son of this relatively famous (for the Soviets) person to the US? That's incredibly embarrassing for them. Kalugin said the KGB didn't use fake defectors because it made the Soviet Union look bad and because they would lose control of the person after he left. Send a nobody not the son of a war hero.

Doesn't mean it didn't happen but it's something to add to the evidence that Nosenko was legitimate.

(https://www.drivehq.com/file/DFPublishFile.aspx/FileID13176911369/Keyrnqxbxnwm90x/ivan nosenko.png)
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Tom Graves on January 24, 2026, 04:08:44 AM
Mitrokhin Archive can be read online here: https://archive.org/details/mitrokhinarchive0000andr

The KGB went through great efforts to try and locate Nosenko. The plan was to try and isolate him and kill him. Kalugin book also goes over the plans the KGB had to try and either kidnap or kill Nosenko. Kalugin, who was head of counter intelligence for the KGB (sort of a Soviet equivalent of James Angleton), said Nosenko caused a lot of damage to the KGB including forcing him to return to the USSR. I used to believe that Nosenko was a false defector - the evidence was strong; but a great deal of new evidence that came out, particularly after the fall of the Soviet Union, indicates he was legitimate. Yes, he told lies, made up stories, puffed up his credentials; but so did Golitsyn, e.g., the Sino-Soviet split was a ruse.

Nut graf from Mitrokhin:

 (https://www.drivehq.com/file/DFPublishFile.aspx/FileID13176393536/Keym8kcir6v924s/mitrokhin.png)

. . . . . . .

Dear Steve M.,

Here's a post I made back on 12 June 2025 on my thread titled "KGB disinfo re: Clay Shaw & the CIA, and the effect on The Jolly Green Giant," which was read 1183 times, but you didn't reply to.

Perhaps you missed it?

Major Vasily Mitrokhin, the KGB’s official archivist who was given the task of organizing its operations files and moving them to a new building, was supposedly so distraught by Khruschev’s 1956 anti-Stalin speech and the 1968 USSR / Warsaw Pact invasion of Czechoslovakia that he hand-copied 25,000 KGB documents between 1972 and 1985, retyped them, hid them under the floorboards of his dacha, and smuggled them to the West after the fall of The Iron Curtain — and no one noticed him doing it.

Really?

The putative KGB documents that MI5’s official historian, Christopher Andrew, wrote about in his books The Sword and the Shield: The Mitrokhin Archive and the Secret History of the KGB and The Mitrokhin Archive: The KGB in Europe and the West, either repeat what CIA already knew or strongly suspected (e.g., Lee Harvey Oswald’s “Dear Mr. Hunt” letter was a KGB forgery, and Mark Lane was financially supported by the CPUSA) or, if new, add little to our overall understanding of The Cold War. What’s more interesting to me is what they do not mention, e.g., that Yuri Nosenko was a false-defector-in-place in Geneva in June 1962 and that MI5’s Roger Hollis was a Soviet spy. In fact, they lend “documentary support” to what KGB-influenced espionage writers like Tom Mangold and David Wise have written about those cases.

One can only wonder why.

(sarcasm)

It’s interesting to note, however, that one of Mitrokhin’s documents says a 1967 KGB “active measures” operation involved "placing an article in a NYC newspaper.”

Hmm.

Okay, but it would have been nice if Andrew and Mitrokhin had admitted that the article (see below) was placed in the "National Guardian," a left-wing NYC independent weekly newspaper on 18 March 1967, and that the article referenced another article — one which the KGB had published in a Communist-owned Italian newspaper, "Paese Sera," on 4 March 1967.

Bertrand Russell’s London secretary, Ralph Schoenman, gave Garrison the translated-into-English "Paese Sera" article, and Garrison's assistant from LIFE magazine, Richard Billings, wrote in his journal on 16 March 1967, "Garrison now interested in possible connections between Shaw and the CIA [...] Two leads re: CIA tie: article in March issue of Humanite [sic; L'Humanité]."

These articles motivated the overly ambitious, scandal-plagued and revengeful Garrison to change his reason for having arrested Clay Shaw, a highly successful and closeted gay New Orleans businessman, from suspecting he had masterminded a homosexual "thrill-kill" assassination to fervidly believing he had organized it for the evil, evil CIA.

How did that work out, you ask?

Well, the jury returned a “not guilty” verdict in less than an hour, Garrison wrote a specious book, On the Trail of the Assassins, about the case in 1988, the book’s far-left publisher, Ellen Ray, gave a copy of it to Vietnam War-traumatized Oliver Stone at a Havana film festival, and in 1991 Stone partly based his self-described mythological (“to counter the myth of the Warren Report”) pseudo-documentary, “JFK,” on it.

Which film helped to make our body politic cynical, paranoiac, and apathetic to the point that “former” KGB officer Vladimir Putin, with help from his professional St. Petersburg trolls, et al., was able to install “useful idiot” (or worse) Donald J. Trump as our president in 2017 and 2025.

Here, for your reading pleasure, is the first part of the longish National Guardian article. The bit about "Paese Sera" is in bold text.

By Robert L. Allen on 18 March 1967:

The complicated skein of events involved in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy became even more tangled with the arrest March 1 of Clay L. Shaw, described in the press as "a prominent New Orleans businessman." New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison, who made the arrest, contended in a search warrant that at secret meetings in September 1963, "there was an agreement and combination among Clay Shaw (alias Clay Bertrand), Lee Harvey Oswald, and David W. Ferrie and others to kill John F. Kennedy." . . . The Guardian has received reports from Rome linking Shaw with various right-wing organizations and individuals, and possibly with the CIA. The Guardian's Rome correspondent, Phyllis Rosner, quoting the Rome daily PAESE SERA, reported that from 1961 till 1965 Shaw was on the board of directors of the Centro Mondiale Commerciale, which the paper said was engaged in obscure dealings in Rome . . .

. . . . . . .

My comments:

1) To counter the misconceptions and misstatements in the above "National Guardian" article, I highly suggest that you read Patricia Lambert’s 1998 book, False Witness, about Dean Andrews, Jack "Suggs" Martin, Perry Russo, and overly ambitious, scandal-plagued, and revengeful Jim Garrison, et al. ad nauseam. To read it for free, google “false witness” and “archive” simultaneously.

2) In his 1988 memoir, Garrison said he wasn’t aware of the Paese Serra, L'Humanité, and National Guardian articles until after the 1969 trial, but Ralph Schoenman’s ex-wife, JFKA conspiracy theorist Joan Mellen, told researcher Max Holland, after conferring with Schoenman, that he had given the Paese Serra article to Garrison in 1967.

3) It’s interesting to note that on 25 April 1967, the New Orleans-States Item newspaper referenced or summarized claims from the Paese Sera articles, particularly the CIA-PERMINDEX angle involving Shaw's Italian connections, and that one of the newspaper’s former editors told investigator Max Holland that the newspaper got said information from Jim Garrison.

4) The fact that Andrew and Mitrokhin included this partial nugget in The Sword and the Shield but said nothing about the likes of Igor Kochnov, Yuri Guk, "Alexander Kislov," Oleg Gribanov, Aleksey Kulak, Dmitry Polyakov, Boris Orekhov, and Roger Hollis, et al. ad nauseam, lends support to James Angleton's statement, "A good double agent will tell you 98% truth and 2% lies and really mess you up, boy."

Or words to that effect.


-- Tom
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Lance Payette on January 24, 2026, 01:28:36 PM
LP--

John Newman is a pretty serious researcher, and he seems to give credence to Bagley, and does Malcolm Blunt.

Newman goes even further, positing that Bruce Solie was a KGB mole.

I am catty about Newman to the point of sounding like I have an axe to grind, but the term "serious researcher" as applied to someone in the JFKA community is scarcely the same as "serious researcher" as applied in academia or the professions. (In my Amazon review of a recent gossip-level book on JFK, I noted that Jim Di was referred to as an "acclaimed historian." BWAHAHA.  :D :D :D)

I once went through this little exercise:

1. Newman's first book, on JFK and Vietnam, was published in 1992 by Grand Central Publishing, then an arm of Warner Books. Warner pulled the book, which created a legal brouhaha that ended with the copyright being returned to Newman. It is now self-published on Amazon's self-publishing platform.

2. His book on Oswald and the CIA was published in 1995 by Carroll & Graf, a reputable publisher that ceased operation in 2007. It was reissued by Skyhorse Publishing, a reputable publisher, in 2008.

3. His Jesus book and all four of his JFKA books were self-published on Amazon's self-publishing platform.

This is not the publishing record of anyone whose books are selling or whom reputable publishers believe have a chance of selling.

Worse yet:

1. The first book on JFK and Vietnam received some attention in the press, but none that I could find in academia.

2. Despite being pretty plugged into the theology scene myself, I could not find one mention of the book on Jesus.

3. I could find literally no attention paid to the four JFKA books outside of the JFKA community.

This is not the record of a researcher who is being taken seriously by academia or professional historians. This seems especially odd since Newman actually does have academic connections via his association with the University of Maryland and James Madison University.

Okay, I'm going full-catty here. This is the one-star Amazon review - NOT BY ME - of Newman's book on Jesus. It does capture pretty much exactly his thought processes in relation to the JFKA as well:

1.0 out of 5 stars Christian Conspiracy Theories
Reviewed in the United States on January 27, 2017
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase

Books like this seem to come out of groups of academics who view themselves as biblical scholars. These people share a contempt for and disillusionment with mainstream Christianity. They also have a mistrust for the historical processes and individuals who gave us the New Testament.

The steps that occur to produce a book like this are something like:

1. Somebody digs up some old manuscript written by God knows who which seems to be some sort of gospel but it doesn't exactly match the four gospels which were included in the biblical canon of the New Testament.

2. They start comparing these rejected, non canonical gospels with what's in the New Testament. When they see differences they conclude that this obscure gospel they found is correct and the gospels in the bible are all wrong. They conclude that the evil Church fathers conspired to keep the other gospel out of the bible for some nefarious reason.

3. They need to identify some sort of controversial finding which they say has been concealed from the entire world for 2,000 years. This finding may be something which shows the New Testament is wrong or it may be something which is just not in the New Testament. The implication is these so called scholars can see the hidden meanings in their newly found gospel.

4. They start writing books to reveal what they think are profound revelations that will shake the entire Christian world to its very foundations.

This book by John Newman follows the above steps pretty well. His new gospel is called the gospel of Thomas. And in fact he agrees that deliberate alterations were made to the gospels which were eventually included in the bible. He says the objective of these diabolical alterations was to misrepresent what Christ said to make the bible conform to the Church's evil agenda for future expansion.

But Mr. Newman adds another layer of confusion. He says the earth shattering discovery he has made is that Christ was some sort of yoga master and He somehow encoded secret teachings about mystical yoga techniques into His teachings. So the kingdom of God is really within all of us which is probably true. But then Mr. Newman adds that his discovery completely invalidates the idea that Christ was the Messiah that will return someday and judge the world. So basically Mr. Newman's theories invalidate the entire New Testament as it is understood by mainstream Christianity today.

Whether Jesus Christ practiced yoga in some form I don't know. But we can discern from the canonical gospels that revealing mystical knowledge in hidden ways was not something Christ was trying to do. Christ is viewed by many people today as the greatest philosopher of all time specifically for His ability to explain spiritual truths in a way that everyone can easily understand.

Mr. Newman feels he is part of a revolution which is going to allow the entire world to finally understand Christ's teachings for the first time. But to me this book is just part of a fad in popular culture similar to the Da Vinci Code. Like all fads which are built on a foundation of quicksand these trends will eventually die out. At that point these academics will move on and start writing books about whatever new anti Catholic, anti Christianity trend has emerged in society.

...

This book by John Newman is one of the worst, most convoluted and misleading books about Christianity I have ever read in my life. The criticisms against fundamental Christian doctrines contained in this book are egregious and severe.

That being said, it may be worth reading to understand the logic and thought processes used to perform the steps I listed above for writing a book like this.


Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Tom Graves on January 24, 2026, 01:43:43 PM
[...]

Dear FPR,

It's too bad you can't point out for us the shortcomings in Newman's Oswald and the CIA, other, perhaps, than his since-admitted error of accusing in the 2008 edition that James Angleton was the JFKA mastermind.

Hopefully you'll be able to do that after you've thoroughly read The Sword and the Shield by a guy who's either a monumental fool or a KGB* agent -- Christopher Andrew -- and a definite KGB* agent, Vasili Mitrokhin (RIP).

*Today's SVR and FSB

-- Tom
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Lance Payette on January 24, 2026, 02:20:23 PM
More to the point: Insofar as I am able to determine, John Newman has NEVER published ONE WORD in ANY peer-reviewed scholarly or professional journal. This is almost unbelievable. Despite his supposed bombshell discoveries, he has not submitted ONE for peer review. This in itself is sufficient to tell you that Newman is not a "serious researcher" in any context other than JFKA-mania.

(Don't be misled: There is another John M. Newman who is a professor and publishes extensively in professional journals on antitrust topics.)

Little Old Me has published in law reviews. You can find my first, "Risks Under the Antitrust Laws Against Tying and Monopolization," published in the Idaho Law Review in 1986, if you care to subscribe to the service HeinOnline. I absolutely busted my butt on that obscure piece, but the first submission for peer review just about had me in tears (it was rejected by a much more influential journal than the ILR, but I did eventually have a piece included in the upper-echelon Antitrust Law Journal a decade later).

Instead of bandying about terms like "serious researcher," folks should challenge kooky Newman as to why he self-publishes and, despite his academic connections, has NEVER submitted ANYTHING for peer review. Just ONE "Oswald CIA" nugget, pal, just ONE.
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Tom Graves on January 24, 2026, 02:51:36 PM
Instead of bandying about terms like "serious researcher," folks should challenge kooky Newman as to why he self-publishes and, despite his academic connections, has NEVER submitted ANYTHING for peer review. Just ONE "Oswald CIA" nugget, pal, just ONE.

Dear Sonderführer Storing I mean Fancy Pants Rants,

It's "Oswald and the CIA," not "Oswald CIA."

Regardless, Tennent H. Bagley earned a PhD in political science from the University of Geneva, and his 35-page article, "Ghosts of the Spy Wars," was published in the International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence in 2014.

Why are you afraid to read it?

Is it because your wife doesn't want you to?

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08850607.2014.962362#d1e141


The International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence is a quarterly academic journal about intelligence studies and responses to intelligence activities. All articles submitted to this journal undergo editorial screening and review.[1] The journal was established in 1986[2] and is published by Routledge. The editor-in-chief is Dr. Jan Goldman (The Citadel).[3] -- Wikipedia

Another International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence article that's pro-Bagley and anti-Nosenko is Alan W. Messer's 2013 "In Pursuit of the Squared Circle: The Nosenko Theories Revisited," in which he posits the idea that Nosenko was -- as Bagley says in "Spy Wars" -- a false defector-in-place in Geneva in June 1962, sent to the CIA there to discredit what a recent true defector, Anatoliy Golitsyn, was telling James Angleton about possible KGB penetrations of the CIA, the FBI, and the intelligence services of our NATO allies -- but instead of a false physical defector to the U.S. in February 1964, he was a rogue one whose bona fides the KGB had no choice but to support through its moles in the CIA and its Kremlin-loyal triple agents like Aleksei Kulak (J. Edgar Hoover's shielded-from-CIA FEDORA at the Bureau's NYC field office).

Here's the blurb on Messer:

W. Alan Messer joined the Central Intelligence Agency in 1972 after serving in the U.S. Army and earning an M.A. in International Affairs from the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. For nearly sixteen years he was an analyst on Soviet defense economics, including strategic missile production assessments, in the Agency's Directorate of Intelligence. After a two-year stint in the Directorate of Science and Technology, serving as a program manager in its Mobile Missile Assessment Center, Mr. Messer joined the Directorate of Operations as an operations officer on operational counterintelligence, specializing in the Soviet/Russian intelligence services. He retired from the CIA in 2003.

It's a great read, but unfortunately it costs $56 at Taylor & Francis Online.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08850607.2013.757994?needAccess=true


-- Tom




 
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Lance Payette on January 24, 2026, 03:49:18 PM
I'm starting to feel somewhat guilty about kicking TG's butt, but I saw his post when I logged out and, hey, I actually read Bagley's article.

Uh, no, TG, back to the drawing board for you.

Bagley's article is not a peer-reviewed research piece. The title - duh - kind of tells you that. TG conveniently doesn't give you the full title:

"Ghosts of the Spy Wars: A Personal Reminder to Interested Parties."

In case you didn't catch that:

A PERSONAL REMINDER

By far the greatest number of citations are to Bagley's own book. IT'S AN OPINION PIECE, TG. Jesus.

Know how many times it's been cited since it was publshed in 2014. Correct: ZERO.

I don't know if the Wikipedia article on the International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence was written by TG, but it is not accurate. From the journal itself:

"The International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence serves as a medium for professionals and scholars to exchange opinions on issues and challenges encountered by both government and business institutions in making contemporary intelligence-related decisions and policy."

In case you didn't catch that:

EXCHANGE OPINIONS

Peer review is limited to research articles. Bagley's "personal reminder" was not a research article.

"Peer Review Policy: All papers submitted to the International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence undergo initial editorial screening. Once deemed suitable, research articles are sent out for double-anonymous peer review by at least two independent referees."

Give it up, TG. Thank God I don't see most of your posts, but you are embarrassing yourself in the ones I do see.
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Tom Graves on January 24, 2026, 03:58:51 PM
I'm starting to feel somewhat guilty about kicking TG's butt, but I saw his post when I logged out and, hey, I actually read Bagley's article.

Uh, no, TG, back to the drawing board for you.

Bagley's article is not a peer-reviewed research piece. The title - duh - kind of tells you that. TG conveniently doesn't give you the full title:

"Ghosts of the Spy Wars: A Personal Reminder to Interested Parties."

In case you didn't catch that:

A PERSONAL REMINDER

By far the greatest number of citations are to Bagley's own book. IT'S AN OPINION PIECE, TG. Jesus.

Know how many times it's been cited since it was publshed in 2014. Correct: ZERO.

I don't know if the Wikipedia article on the International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence was written by TG, but it is not accurate. From the journal itself:

"The International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence serves as a medium for professionals and scholars to exchange opinions on issues and challenges encountered by both government and business institutions in making contemporary intelligence-related decisions and policy."

In case you didn't catch that:

EXCHANGE OPINIONS

Peer review is limited to research articles. Bagley's "personal reminder" was not a research article.

"Peer Review Policy: All papers submitted to the International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence undergo initial editorial screening. Once deemed suitable, research articles are sent out for double-anonymous peer review by at least two independent referees."

Give it up, TG. Thank God I don't see most of your posts, but you are embarrassing yourself in the ones I do see.

Lance, you're a fool.

As are all Trump-lovers.

And why are you shouting all of a sudden?

ME: Has Tennent H. Bagley's 2014 article, "Ghosts of the Spy Wars," been cited in any books or articles by "serious" authors?

GROK: Yes, Tennent H. Bagley's 2014 article "Ghosts of the Spy Wars: A Personal Reminder to Interested Parties" (published in the International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, Vol. 28, No. 1) has been cited or referenced in several works by authors in the intelligence studies field, including academics, historians, and former intelligence professionals — whom one could reasonably consider "serious" in this specialized domain.

Key examples include:

It appears in the bibliography of the book KGB Literati (University of Toronto Press, 2025 or late publication context), listed as: Bagley, Tennent H. “Ghosts of the Spy Wars: A Personal Reminder to Interested Parties.” International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence.

It is cited in academic theses/dissertations, such as Kyle S. Cunliffe's thesis "An existential crisis and a golden opportunity? Assessing hard-target espionage in the cyber era" (Aberystwyth University), where it is referenced in the context of Cold War spy operations and sources.

It is referenced in intelligence/counterintelligence library guides, such as the Naval War College's LibGuide on "Counterintelligence: Cold War," which lists it among key resources.

It has been discussed or quoted in online analyses and commentary by writers focused on espionage history, including Substack posts and SpyTalk (a platform with contributions from journalists and former intelligence figures) that engage seriously with Bagley's arguments on topics like KGB penetrations, Yuri Nosenko, and cases such as TOPHAT.

The article itself is hosted on academic platforms like Taylor & Francis (the journal publisher), ResearchGate, Semantic Scholar, and Ingenta Connect, often with metrics or download options indicating scholarly interest.

While it does not appear to have extremely high citation counts on open sources (e.g., no prominent Google Scholar hits surfaced in broad searches, possibly due to the niche field and paywalls), its inclusion in bibliographies, theses, and specialized intelligence literature shows it has been taken seriously and engaged with by experts in Cold War espionage studies.

Bagley's work overall (including his earlier book Spy Wars) is frequently praised in these contexts as insightful from a former CIA counterintelligence officer's perspective. The 2014 piece serves as a follow-up/extension to those ideas and has been noted accordingly by authors in the field. If you're looking for specific citation counts or full-text access, academic databases like JSTOR or the journal's site would provide more precise metrics.

. . . . . . .

ME: How about his 2007 book, "Spy Wars: Moles, Mysteries, and Deadly Games"?

GROK: Yes, Tennent H. Bagley's 2007 book Spy Wars: Moles, Mysteries, and Deadly Games (published by Yale University Press) has been widely cited, referenced, and engaged with by "serious" authors in the fields of intelligence studies, Cold War history, espionage scholarship, and related academic/professional work. As a memoir/analysis from a former senior CIA counterintelligence officer focused on the controversial Yuri Nosenko defection case (and broader KGB-CIA interactions, including mole-hunting and figures like Oleg Penkovsky and Dmitri Polyakov), it has sparked debate and been taken seriously—though opinions on its conclusions vary.

Key indicators of its reception among credible sources include:

Academic and scholarly citations/reviews — It received a formal review in the peer-reviewed journal Intelligence and National Security (Vol. 24, No. 3, 2009), where it's discussed in the context of Cold War espionage history. The book appears in bibliographies and library catalogs for intelligence studies programs (e.g., via WorldCat, university libraries like Missouri University of Science & Technology, and academic databases). It's referenced in discussions of KGB penetrations, defector reliability, and CIA internal debates.

Reviews by prominent journalists, historians, and intelligence experts — Positive or notable endorsements came from figures like:

Evan Thomas (historian and author of books on U.S. intelligence, such as The Very Best Men).

David Ignatius (longtime Washington Post columnist on intelligence and foreign affairs).

Ron Rosenbaum (journalist and author known for Cold War/esoterica writing).

Edward Jay Epstein (author of books on intelligence and the Warren Commission).

Frederick Kempe (former Wall Street Journal editor and author of Berlin 1961).

A detailed New York Times review by Evan Thomas (2007) treated it as a serious contribution, noting Bagley's insider perspective on Nosenko and potential moles.

William Safire (Pulitzer-winning New York Times columnist) selected it as a "publishing sleeper-seller of the year" for 2007.

Influence in broader intelligence literature — It's frequently mentioned in discussions of Cold War spy cases (e.g., Nosenko's role in Oswald-related claims, Angleton's mole-hunt paranoia). Later works by Bagley himself (like Spymaster in 2015, co-authored with insights from KGB General Sergey Kondrashev) build on it and reference similar themes. It's also cited or alluded to in online analyses by former intelligence professionals and historians on platforms like SpyTalk or archived commentaries. The book is available free on the Internet Archive and has been discussed in contexts challenging official narratives (e.g., by authors skeptical of Nosenko's bona fides).

While exact citation counts aren't always easy to pinpoint in open sources (Google Scholar results were limited in searches, likely due to the niche field and paywalls), its inclusion in specialized journals, major reviews, and intelligence bibliographies shows substantial engagement by academics, historians, journalists specializing in espionage, and ex-intelligence figures. Critics (including some historians like Christopher Andrew) have questioned its interpretations as overly suspicious or unconvincing, but that's common in this contentious area—it's still treated as a key primary source and provocative contribution rather than dismissed.

Overall, Spy Wars is far more prominent and cited than the 2014 article, reflecting its status as a full-length, Yale-published work that stirred debate in serious circles upon release and continues to inform discussions on CIA-KGB "spy wars."

If you're interested in specific excerpts, reviews, or related books, I can point you to sources like the Intelligence and National Security review or the NYT piece.


Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Lance Payette on January 24, 2026, 05:38:02 PM
The journal in which Bagley's opinion piece was published (after his death at age 88) shows "Citations: 0."

I hate to break the news to TG, who has a case of Bagley worship unprecedented in my considerable experience with religious fanatics of all stripes, but references in books and articles are not "citations." Citations in this context means peer-reviewed journals. That's why the journal itself shows 0.

Holy God, you folks have no idea - or maybe you do, but I didn't - of the level of OBSESSION you are dealing with in TG. In my little effort at researching Bagley's opinion piece, I discovered that TG is literally EVERYWHERE that Bagley is mentioned. You literally can't write something about Bagley or the KGB stuff on the most obscure site without TG spewing spittle all over his keyboard. Truly, and I mean this sincerely, I do not believe I have EVER, ANYWHERE, encountered a level of obsession like this. What you see at this forum, jaw-dropping as it is, is not even the tip of the iceberg.

Well, I hope this thread has elucidated TG's "KGB stuff" for some of you. It hasn't for me, "exposed" being the term that I might use.

I will now let TG have the last 47 posts and 28,312 words that no one reads because he literally can't stop himself.
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Tom Graves on January 24, 2026, 10:42:54 PM
The journal in which Bagley's opinion piece was published (after his death at age 88) shows "Citations: 0."


Dear Fancy Pants Rants,


According to Google Scholar, these are the works that have cited at least one of Bagley's three different publications (in chronological order): Spy Wars, Spymaster, and "Ghosts of the Spy Wars."


Spy Wars:

The spies who came to the East: Soviet illegals in the post-World War II Japan
G Serscikov - Journal of Intelligence History, 2023 - Taylor & Francis
This article describes the Soviet illegals intelligence program that was established one
hundred years ago. It offers a brief overview of the Soviet intelligence organizations involved in …


Rethinking US Counterintelligence: A Game Theoretical Approach
R Breeden - 2024 - search.proquest.com
For a field as complex as counterintelligence, a carefully thought-out rationalization for
observations of the world in which practitioners, decision-makers, and academia reside continues …


“We're Supposed To Have A Special Relationship.” Cold War Men and Espionage Narratives of Operation Stopwatch/Gold in Ian McEwan's The Innocent1
Roxana Oltean - War, Espionage, and Masculinity in British Fiction, 2023 - books.google.com
This paper takes a comparative approach to early Cold War British and American masculinities in Ian McEwan's The Innocent, contextualizing the analysis with non-fictional American …


“An Ominous Talent”: Oleg Gribanov and KGB Counterintelligence
F Kovacevic - International Journal of Intelligence and …, 2023 - Taylor & Francis
Lieutenant General Oleg Gribanov was one of the most enigmatic and controversial leadership figures in the history of Soviet counterintelligence. Having joined the ranks of Soviet state …


[PDF] abin.gov.br
Como pegar um espião
AR Pereira - Revista Brasileira de Inteligência, 2023 - rbi.abin.gov.br
A espionagem é utilizada na obtenção de informações para apoiar o processo decisório
estatal. Os Estados praticam a contraespionagem para proteger seus segredos. Três casos


[PDF] esg.br
DEZ LIÇÕES QUE PODEMOS APRENDER COM OS “ILEGAIS”
AR Pereira, RA de Arruda - Revista da Escola Superior de Guerra, 2025 - revista.esg.br
O mundo da inteligência é hermético e o usuário final da inteligência, via de regra, é um
político com pouco ou nenhum conhecimento sobre o assunto. Este ensaio visa, a partir de um …

A study on how cyber economic espionage affects US national security and competitiveness
AM Mayers - 2018 - search.proquest.com
Cyber economic espionage is the use or facilitation of covert, forcible, or misleading means
by a nation-state or its proxies to acquire economic intelligence by using computer networks. …


The Final Act: The Helsinki Accords and the Transformation of the Cold War
MC Morgan - 2018 - torrossa.com
Names: Morgan, Michael Cotey, author. Title: The final act: the Helsinki Accords and the
transformation of the Cold War/Michael Cotey Morgan. Description: Princeton: Princeton …


[HTML] dukeupress.edu
[BOOK] From Washington to Moscow: US-Soviet relations and the collapse of the USSR
L Sell - 2016 - books.google.com
When the United States and the Soviet Union signed the first Strategic Arms Limitation Talks
accords in 1972 it was generally seen as the point at which the USSR achieved parity with


[BOOK] Agents of Influence: How the KGB Subverted Western Democracies
M Hollingsworth - 2023 - books.google.com
There's no such thing as a former KGB man...'A gripping story filled with remarkable
revelations.'Tom Bower, author of Revenge Agents of Influence reveals the secret history of …


[PDF] tandfonline.com
John Cairncross, RASCLS and a reassessment of his motives
C Smith - Intelligence and National Security, 2022 - Taylor & Francis
ABSTRACT In 1990, John Cairncross was identified as the 'fifth man'of the Cambridge Ring
of Five. Historians have provided various motivations for Cairncross' decision to spy for the …


[PDF] tandfonline.com
State Department cipher machines and communications security in the early Cold War, 1944–1965
D Easter - Intelligence and National Security, 2024 - Taylor & Francis
ABSTRACT From 1944 the State Department attempted to improve its communications
security by creating a Division of Cryptography and mechanising the encryption process …


The need to up our game in countering disinformation
T Leventhal - Comparative Strategy, 2023 - Taylor & Francis
The US government should establish a nongovernmental institute of expert spokespersons
to counter foreign disinformation and propaganda more effectively. Such an institute would …


Save Cite Cited by 3 Related articles All 2 versions
[PDF] kyleorton.co.uk
Doubles Troubles: The CIA and Double Agents during the Cold War
BB Fischer - International Journal of Intelligence and …, 2016 - Taylor & Francis
Double agents are a special breed of people. They pretend to spy for one foreign
intelligence service while actually spying for another. All intelligence services fall victim to …


[BOOK] The Illegals: Russia's Most Audacious Spies and Their Century-Long Mission to Infiltrate the West
S Walker - 2025 - books.google.com
The definitive history of Russia's most secret spy program, from the earliest days of the
Soviet Union to Putin's invasion of Ukraine, and a revelatory examination of how that hidden …


[PDF] mit.edu
Glorified Images of Soviet State Security and Intelligence Services: A Survey of Books Published in Putin's Russia
F Kovacevic - Journal of Cold War Studies, 2024 - direct.mit.edu
This survey article critically evaluates books about the Soviet-era state security and
intelligence services published in Russia over the past quarter century by eight major pro …


[PDF] jhu.edu
Covert Networks: A Comparative Study of Intelligence Techniques Used By Foreign Intelligence Agencies to Weaponize Social Media
S Ogar - 2019 - jscholarship.library.jhu.edu
Abstract From the Bolshevik Revolution to the Brexit Vote, the covert world of intelligence
has attempted to influence global events with varying degrees of success. In 2016, one of …


Penkovsky, the Spy Who Tried to Destroy the World
BB Fischer - International Journal of Intelligence and …, 2023 - Taylor & Francis
Abstract Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) lore and popular culture tout Col. Oleg Penkovsky
as “the spy who saved the world” during the Berlin and Cuban missile crises. In fact, his …


[PDF] state.gov
[PDF] More Than a Century of Antisemitism: How Successive Occupants of the
GE Center - 2024 - 2021-2025.state.gov
For over a century, Tsarist, Soviet and now Russian Federation authorities have used
antisemitism to discredit, divide, and weaken their perceived adversaries at home and …


[BOOK] Gli infiltrati: La vera storia del più riservato programma di spionaggio russo in Occidente
S Walker - 2025 - books.google.com
Nel 2010 negli Stati Uniti furono arrestate dieci spie russe che, sotto false identità, si erano
infiltrate nella società americana per trasmettere informazioni riservate a Mosca. Nessuno …


[PDF] proquest.com
[BOOK] Propaganda on Steroids: A Case Study on How Communication Technology" Pumped-Up" Russian Black Propaganda
RE Rosin - 2023 - search.proquest.com
Propaganda is a tool used to exercise power through an act of communication. It is a type of
communication that this study refers to as manipulative communication, where an actor …


[PDF] joanmellen.com
[BOOK] Blood in the water: How the US and Israel conspired to ambush the USS liberty
J Mellen - 2018 - joanmellen.com
FIVE: MEIR AMIT ON THE MOVE SIX: HEROES IN THE SEAWEED SEVEN:
CONSPICUOUS GALLANTRY EIGHT: WITH THE SIXTH FLEET NINE: COVER UP TEN …


[BOOK] The Spy who Would be Tsar: The Mystery of Michal Goleniewski and the Far-right Underground
K Coogan - 2021 - taylorfrancis.com
Michal Goleniewski was one of the Cold War's most important spies but has been
overlooked in the vast literature on the intelligence battles between the Western Powers and …


SPIES IN THE WORLD OF FICTION
IF Carré, T Clancy, A Judd… - The Psychology of Spies …, 2022 - books.google.com
An evaluation of the role of plot and characterisation in fiction, followed by a focus on how
writers in the spy fiction genre develop the personalities when they face critical decisions …


The Soviet International Agenda on Human Rights and the" Second Helsinki Process"
RM Cucciolla - Gorbachev, Italian communism and human rights …, 2022 - torrossa.com
In the second half of the 1980s, the USSR attempted to play an active role in the promotion
of human rights at an international level. In addition to the personal vision of Mikhail …


Spies
SN Kalic - 2019 - torrossa.com
Description: Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger Security International,[2019]| Includes
bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2018049628 (print)| LCCN …


[PDF] jyu.fi
Aktiivisten toimenpiteiden heijastumia
J Kotakallio - 2023 - jyx.jyu.fi
The study observed the Cold War-era term Active Measures. The term is associated with
Soviet and Russian intelligence. Efforts have been made to find different attributes for this



[PDF] Kleine Brüder des KGB
C Nehring - Die Kooperation von Ddr-Auslandsaufklärung und … - bundesarchiv.de
Kleine Brüder des KGB - Page 1 Christopher Nehring Kleine Brüder des KGB Die Kooperation
von DDR-Auslandsaufklärung und bulgarischer Staatssicherheit BF informiert 42 (2019) Page 2 …


The NKVD General: Boris Volodarsky: Stalin's Agent: The Life and Death of Alexander Orlov Oxford University Press, London and New York, 2015, 789 p., $34.95.
N West - 2015 - Taylor & Francis
Alexander Orlov is a legendary figure in the counterintelligence world for several reasons.
Although he abandoned the Soviet cause in 1938 and fled to the United States with his wife …


[PDF] jeremydfoote.com
Transparency, control, and content generation on Wikipedia: editorial strategies and technical affordances
SA Matei, J Foote - Transparency in Social Media: Tools, Methods and …, 2015 - Springer
Wikipedia is perhaps the most culturally influential example of “peer production” principles in
action, and is certainly the most visible. As the sixth most popular web site on the Internet …


La “seconda Helsinki” sovietica
RM Cucciolla - Diritti umani e la trasformazione delle culture politiche …, 2021 - torrossa.com
Nella seconda metà degli anni Ottanta, l'Urss sperimentò un ruolo attivo nella promozione
dei diritti umani a livello internazionale. Oltre alle visioni personali di Michail Gorbačëv e …


[CITATION] The Illegals: Russia's Most Audacious Spies and the Plot to Infiltrate the West
S Walker - 2025 - Profile Books


[CITATION] Oleg Penkovsky
O Penkovsky   


[BOOK] Spy Wars: Moles, Mysteries, and Deadly Games
TH Bagley - 2007 - books.google.com
Chosen by William Safire in the New York Times to be the publishing sleeper-seller of the
year for 2007. In this rapid-paced book, a former CIA chief of Soviet bloc counterintelligence …


Spy Wars: Moles, Mysteries, and Deadly Games
JR Clark - 2009 - JSTOR
tion, the Hungarian-Soviet Cultural Society, which was entrusted with the dissemination of
Soviet culture. This proved to be a Page 1 tion, the Hungarian-Soviet Cultural Society, which …


A Review of: “The Nosenko Affair Revisited” Tennent H. Bagley: Spy Wars: Moles, Mysteries and Deadly Games Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 2007, 313 p …
RD Chapman - 2008 - Taylor & Francis
It’s a powerful book. Tennent ‘‘Pete’’ Bagley’s Spy Wars: Moles, Mysteries and Deadly Games
is like none we’ve read before. It rocks the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) with the Yuri …



Bagley, Tennent H. Spy Wars: Moles, Mysteries, and Deadly Games
D Pitt - Booklist, 2007 - go.gale.com
Bagley, who oversaw the CIA's operations against the KGB in the 1960s, takes us deep
inside the cold war spy game. He focuses on a notorious case, one he was intimately familiar …


My Two Moles: A Memoir
BB Fischer - International Journal of Intelligence and …, 2022 - Taylor & Francis
During my career, I had the dubious experience of crossing paths with the two most notorious
foreign intelligence penetrations (“moles”) of the US Intelligence Community (IC) during …


Morley, Jefferson. Our Man in Mexico: Winston Scott and the Hidden History of the CIA
E Goedeken - Library Journal, 2008 - go.gale.com
As the Cold War recedes into history, we are starting to see a number of books dealing with
many of the remarkable characters who worked quietly (and sometimes not so quietly) …


Spymaster: startling Cold War revelations of a Soviet KGB chief
KF Jensen - 2018 - Taylor & Francis
Two old spies got together regularly in Brussels over a period of many years. Both were
retired. One was senior KGB officer Sergey Kondrashev. The other was his sometime opposite …

A Controversial Memoir
BB Fischer - 2014 - Taylor & Francis
For 50 years the late Tennent (Pete) Bagley pursued Yuri Nosenko, a KGB (Soviet Committee
for State Security) officer who defected in 1964. He believed that the Russian was a liar …


[CITATION] Spy wars: Moles, mysteries, and deadly games.
E Goedeken - 2007 - REED BUSINESS INFORMATION …



Spymaster


Spymaster: startling Cold War revelations of a Soviet KGB chief
KF Jensen - 2018 - Taylor & Francis
Two old spies got together regularly in Brussels over a period of many years. Both were
retired. One was senior KGB officer Sergey Kondrashev. The other was his sometime opposite …


A Controversial Memoir
BB Fischer - 2014 - Taylor & Francis
For 50 years the late Tennent (Pete) Bagley pursued Yuri Nosenko, a KGB (Soviet Committee
for State Security) officer who defected in 1964. He believed that the Russian was a liar …
[CITATION] Spy wars: Moles, mysteries, and deadly games.
E Goedeken - 2007 - REED BUSINESS INFORMATION …


[PDF] wiley.com
Through a glass, darkly: the CIA and oral history
A Hammond - History, 2015 - Wiley Online Library
This article broaches the thorny issue of how we may study the history of the CIA by utilizing
oral history interviews. This article argues that while oral history interviews impose particular …


Kim and Jim Redux: Michael Holzman: Spies and Traitors: Kim Philby, James Angleton and Betrayal that Would Shape MI6, the CIA, and the Cold War Pegasus …
BB Fischer - 2023 - Taylor & Francis
Harold Adrian Russel (Kim) Philby and James (Jim) Angleton were two of the most notorious
figures of the Cold War. Philby was the first and most important of the famous Cambridge …


Spy dust and ghost surveillance: How the KGB spooked the CIA and hid aldrich ames in plain sight
BB Fischer - International Journal of Intelligence and …, 2011 - Taylor & Francis
Presidents Day fell on the 21st of February in 1994. While other government employees
were relaxing on the federal holiday, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) officer Aldrich Hazen …


Counterintelligence
HB Peake - Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies, 2010 - oxfordre.com
“Counterintelligence”(CI) is a term with multiple meanings—its definitions vary, even when
applied to a single nation. Yet it can be understood by identifying the common CI functions in …


Death to traitors? The pursuit of intelligence defectors from the Soviet Union to the Putin era
A Hänni, M Grossmann - Intelligence and National Security, 2020 - Taylor & Francis
This article argues that Russia’s use of lethal violence against intelligence defectors has to
be understood as a public spectacle in which Russian leaders and intelligence officials never …


[PDF] scholarlypublishingcollective.org
The Spy Story Behind The Third Man
T Riegler - Journal of Austrian-American History, 2020 - scholarlypublishingcollective.org
The Third Man symbolically stands for espionage. Indeed, though its storyline concerns
friendship and the hunt for an unscrupulous black-market dealer, the film has been connected to …


WIE ERFOLGREICH SIND GEHEIMDIENSTLICHE TÖTUNGSOPERATIONEN? EIN VIER-EBENEN-MODELL.
C Nehring, A Hänni - Journal for Intelligence, Propaganda & …, 2020 - search.ebscohost.com
This article develops a model to holistically analyze the aims, effects, and the success of
assassination operations carried out by intelligence services. Our four-level model consists of a …


Indice degli autori e dei volumi recensiti
M a de Gaulle - rivisteweb.it
216 Pelletier, D.(a cura di), Les catholiques dans la République, 1905-2005. 217 Pelletier, D.,
La crise catholique. Religions, société, politique en France (1965-1978). 253 Porcaro, M., …


Since 1900
D Petruzzi, MFN New - search.ebscohost.com
The article lists books of military history since 1900s which includes" The Army Command
Post and Defense Reshaping 1987-1997," by Mark D. Sherry," Facing the Heat Barrier: A …


The UK–US Intelligence Partnership
SD Omand - The Oxford Handbook of National Security …, 2025 - books.google.com
The US–UK intelligence partnership is an important strand, many would say the thickest and
most resilient strand, of the wider defense, security, and intelligence relationship that has …

[PDF] lobster-magazine.co.uk
[PDF] Tokyo legend? Lee Harvey Oswald and Japan
K Coogan - Lobster, 2015 - lobster-magazine.co.uk
What do we know about Lee Harvey Oswald’s stay in Japan? Surprisingly, the answer is ‘very
little’. From autumn 1957 to late 1958, Lee Harvey Oswald worked at an American military …

Federal Bureau of Investigation
RJ BATVINIS - The Oxford Handbook of National Security …, 2025 - books.google.com
27.1. Background It was June 1939, two months before the start of World War II, when
President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued a sweeping order to J. Edgar Hoover, the Director of the …

“An Ominous Talent”: Oleg Gribanov and KGB Counterintelligence
F Kovacevic - International Journal of Intelligence and …, 2023 - Taylor & Francis
Lieutenant General Oleg Gribanov was one of the most enigmatic and controversial leadership
figures in the history of Soviet counterintelligence. Having joined the ranks of Soviet state …


In Pursuit of the Squared Circle: The Nosenko Theories Revisited
WA Messer - International Journal of Intelligence and …, 2013 - Taylor & Francis
The controversial case of KGB defector Yuriy Nosenko has centered on the contention that
he was a double agent for the KGB. Heretofore, compelling evidence suggesting that he was …


DIE SPIONAGEGESCHICHTE HINTER DER DRITTE MANN.
T Riegler - Journal for Intelligence, Propaganda & Security …, 2018 - search.ebscohost.com
More than 70 years ago, The Third Man was shot in Vienna-a film that symbolically stands
for espionage. But strictly speaking, this is not the movie's subject, instead the plot tells the …


[BOOK] Secrecy and tradecraft in educational administration: The covert side of educational life
EA Samier - 2014 - taylorfrancis.com
During the last couple of decades, there has been an expansion in a number of related and
overlapping fields producing evidence of covert activities: toxic cultures, destructive …


Revisiting the CIA's Time of Troubles: Frank J. Rafalko: MH/CHAOS The CIA's Campaign Against the Radical New Left and the Black Panthers.Naval Institute …
BB Fischer - 2013 - Taylor & Francis
In 1996 my boss drafted me to represent our office on a committee planning for the Central
Intelligence Agency’s (CIA’s) 50th anniversary. The chairwoman opened the first meeting by …


[PDF] cia.gov
[PDF] " Beautiful in Another Context": A Counterintelligence Assessment of GTPROLOGUE
A Orleans - Studies in Intelligence, 2025 - cia.gov
In the 1980s, the Soviet Union’s Committee for State Security (KGB) launched a concentrated
disinformation campaign as part of an effort to safeguard the identity of their CIA …


When Life Imitates Art: Éric Rohmer's Triple Agent (2004) As a Primer for Real-Life Politics
JJ Ward - Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 2023 - Taylor & Francis
This article examines the striking parallel between plans that were discussed in the CIA in
2017 to kidnap and possibly murder Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, who was living …


[PDF] researchgate.net
Integrating cyber-D&D into adversary modeling for active cyber defense
FJ Stech, KE Heckman, BE Strom - Cyber Deception: Building the Scientific …, 2016 - Springer
This chapter outlines a concept for integrating cyber denial and deception (cyber-D&D) tools,
tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTTPs) into an adversary modeling system to support …


[BOOK] Spy Lost: Caught between the KGB and the FBI
KR Tuomi - 2013 - books.google.com
Page 1 KAARLO R. TUOMI Introduction by JOHN EARL HAYNES SPOST Caught between
the KGB and the FBI Page 2 Enigma Books Page 3 Also published by Enigma Books Hitler's …


Failing the Grade on Judging Angleton: Michael Holzman: James Jesus Angleton: The CIA and the Craft of Intelligence University of Massachusetts Press …
N West - 2010 - Taylor & Francis
Strategic Services (OSS) X-2 before running operations in Italy as the organization’s youngest
branch chief. He would later supervise the CIA’s relationship with the Israelis as well, from …



Sennacherib's invasion of the Levant through the eyes of Assyrian intelligence services
P Dubovský - Sennacherib at the Gates of Jerusalem: Story, History …, 2014 - brill.com
Peter Dubovský i. introduction a study of assyrian intelligence techniques, networks and
their development over the eighth and seventh centuries bce provides a new perspective on …


[HTML] geneastar.org
[HTML] Family tree of Aldrich Ames
G George, D Nancy, N Philo, I Alzalon, J Edward… - en.geneastar.org
Family tree of Aldrich Ames - Geneastar Geneanet Geneastar Photo of Aldrich Ames Family
tree of Aldrich Ames Other American Born Aldrich Hazen Ames American former Central …


[PDF] foiaresearch.net
[BOOK] In search of a lesser evil: anti-soviet nationalism and the Cold War
DCS Albanese - 2015 - search.proquest.com
This dissertation explores Western intelligence services’ early Cold War employment of former
Nazi officers and collaborators who planned and participated in the wartime occupation of …


Of revelatory histories and hatchet jobs: propaganda and method in intelligence history
RG Hughes - Intelligence and National Security, 2008 - Taylor & Francis
This article explores a number of issues in the contemporary study of intelligence. These
issues are methodological (relating to engagement with ‘primary’ sources), epistemological (…


Soviet Bloc and Western bugging of opponents' diplomatic premises during the early cold war
D Easter - Intelligence and National Security, 2016 - Taylor & Francis
This article examines Soviet Bloc and Western bugging of their opponents’ diplomatic
premises in the early Cold War, from 1945 to the late 1960s. It explains the process of audio …


[PDF] escholarship.org
Marianne is Watching: Knowledge, Secrecy, Intelligence and the Origins of the French Surveillance State (1870-1914)
DS Bauer - 2013 - escholarship.org
"Marianne is Watching" presents a history of the institutionalization of professional intelligence
and counterintelligence services in France from 1870 to 1914. As the practice of secret


[BOOK] DISINFORMATION IN THE REAGAN YEARS AND LESSONS FOR TODAY.
M Reiss - 2022 - JSTOR
Russian military attacks against Estonia, Georgia, the Ukraine and others in the ensuing
years, the United States was large and powerful, and any real, residual threat was neutralized …


[BOOK] JFK Was Killed by Consensus: Dealey Plaza Was Just The Final Stop
DW Mantik - 2025 - books.google.com
Page 1 Mantik's magnum opus fuses two main lines of evidence: the blatant medical fraud
and a stark account of how America's national security establishment reached a consensus …


[PDF] bibliotekanauki.pl
[PDF] Koncepcje dezinformacji obcych wywiadów. Nowe ślady w strukturalnej historii Departamentu II Ministerstwa Spraw Wewnętrznych po 1956 r.
P Pleskot - Aparat Represji w Polsce Ludowej 1944–1989, 2020 - bibliotekanauki.pl
Ujawnione po likwidacji tzw. zbioru zastrzeżonego IPN dokumenty pozwalają rzucić nowe
światło na ewolucję strukturalną i zakres kompetencji Wydziału VIII Departamentu II MSW, …


What are Models for?
P McBurney - European Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems, 2011 - Springer
In this paper I discuss some of the purposes and functions of building models, particularly
agent-based models, and present a comprehensive list of these purposes and functions. …


ÖSTERREICHS NACHRICHTENDIENSTE UND DER „SPIONAGEPLATZ" WIEN: ERKENNTNISSE AUS DEM ARCHIV DER DDR-STAATSSICHERHEIT.
T Riegler - Journal for Intelligence, Propaganda & Security …, 2018 - search.ebscohost.com
Austria's intelligence services are a virtual" black box". There is no access to historical files
nor is there a transparent information policy. In contrast to recent efforts in the United States …


Hungary from the Nazis to the Soviets: The Establishment of the Communist Regime in Hungary, 1944–1948
L Borhi - 2009 - JSTOR
Peter Kenez writes that “nationalist and conservative politicians... partial to a certain exclusivist,
almost racialist nationalism... date the beginning of Soviet oppression at the end of the …


[PDF] thomas-riegler.net
[PDF] Austria's homegrown lone actor terrorist: Franz Fuchs and the letter bomb campaign of the 1990s
P Schliefsteiner - Journal for Intelligence, Propaganda and …, 2018 - thomas-riegler.net
AUSTRIA’S HOMEGROWN LONE ACTOR TERRORIST: FRANZ FUCHS AND THE LETTER
BOMB CAMPAIGN OF THE 1990S Page 1 AUSTRIA’S HOMEGROWN LONE ACTOR …


[PDF] oapen.org
[BOOK] Milieux de mémoire in late Modernity: Local communities, religion and historical politics
Z Bogumił, M Głowacka-Grajper - 2019 - library.oapen.org
This book shows how vernacular communities commemorate their traumatic experiences of
the Second World War. Despite having access to many diverse memory frameworks typical …


Russian Federation
LLOS Intelligence, L Register - cambridge.org
Bibliography Page 1 Bibliography Primary Sources France Army Historical Service, Vincennes
Fonds Moscou Deuxième (2e) Bureau Records, Army General Staff Russian Federation …


[CITATION] Ensiklopedia Dunia
Y Nosenko - p2k.stekom.ac.id
Yuri Ivanovich Nosenko (bahasa Rusia: Юрий Иванович Носенко; 30 Oktober 1927–23
Agustus 2008) adalah seorang perwira KGB yang secara nominal membelot ke Amerika …



Ghosts of the Spy Wars


Ghosts of the spy wars: A personal reminder to interested parties
TH Bagley - International Journal of Intelligence and …, 2015 - Taylor & Francis
… Ghosts of the Spy Wars: A Personal Reminder to Interested Parties … KGB traveler to
Washington was never identified, as far as I know, and joins the company of ghosts of the spy wars.) …


The spies who came to the East: Soviet illegals in the post-World War II Japan
G Serscikov - Journal of Intelligence History, 2023 - Taylor & Francis
This article describes the Soviet illegals intelligence program that was established one
hundred years ago. It offers a brief overview of the Soviet intelligence organizations involved in …


Rethinking US Counterintelligence: A Game Theoretical Approach
R Breeden - 2024 - search.proquest.com
For a field as complex as counterintelligence, a carefully thought-out rationalization for
observations of the world in which practitioners, decision-makers, and academia reside continues …


“We're Supposed To Have A Special Relationship.” Cold War Men and Espionage Narratives of Operation Stopwatch/Gold in Ian McEwan's The Innocent One
R Oltean - War, Espionage, and Masculinity in British Fiction, 2023 - books.google.com
This paper takes a comparative approach to early Cold War British and American masculinities
in Ian McEwan's The Innocent, contextualizing the analysis with non-fictional American …


“An Ominous Talent”: Oleg Gribanov and KGB Counterintelligence
F Kovacevic - International Journal of Intelligence and …, 2023 - Taylor & Francis
Lieutenant General Oleg Gribanov was one of the most enigmatic and controversial leadership
figures in the history of Soviet counterintelligence. Having joined the ranks of Soviet state …


[PDF] abin.gov.br
Como pegar um espião
AR Pereira - Revista Brasileira de Inteligência, 2023 - rbi.abin.gov.br
A espionagem é utilizada na obtenção de informações para apoiar o processo decisório
estatal. Os Estados praticam a contraespionagem para proteger seus segredos. Três casos …


[PDF] esg.br
DEZ LIÇÕES QUE PODEMOS APRENDER COM OS “ILEGAIS”
AR Pereira, RA de Arruda - Revista da Escola Superior de Guerra, 2025 - revista.esg.br
O mundo da inteligência é hermético e o usuário final da inteligência, via de regra, é um
político com pouco ou nenhum conhecimento sobre o assunto. Este ensaio visa, a partir de um …


A study on how cyber economic espionage affects US national security and competitiveness
AM Mayers - 2018 - search.proquest.com
Cyber economic espionage is the use or facilitation of covert, forcible, or misleading means
by a nation-state or its proxies to acquire economic intelligence by using computer networks. …
Title: Re: Anyone but Tom understand what the "KGB stuff" is all about?
Post by: Tom Graves on January 25, 2026, 01:31:26 PM

Dear Fancy Pants Rants,


According to Google Scholar, these are the works that have cited Bagley's three different publications (in chronological order): Spy Wars, Spymaster, and "Ghosts of the Spy Wars."


Spy Wars:

The spies who came to the East: Soviet illegals in the post-World War II Japan
G Serscikov - Journal of Intelligence History, 2023 - Taylor & Francis
This article describes the Soviet illegals intelligence program that was established one
hundred years ago. It offers a brief overview of the Soviet intelligence organizations involved in …


Rethinking US Counterintelligence: A Game Theoretical Approach
R Breeden - 2024 - search.proquest.com
For a field as complex as counterintelligence, a carefully thought-out rationalization for
observations of the world in which practitioners, decision-makers, and academia reside continues …


“We're Supposed To Have A Special Relationship.” Cold War Men and Espionage Narratives of Operation Stopwatch/Gold in Ian McEwan's The Innocent
R Oltean - War, Espionage, and Masculinity in British Fiction, 2023 - books.google.com
This paper takes a comparative approach to early Cold War British and American masculinities in Ian McEwan's The Innocent, contextualizing the analysis with non-fictional American …


“An Ominous Talent”: Oleg Gribanov and KGB Counterintelligence
F Kovacevic - International Journal of Intelligence and …, 2023 - Taylor & Francis
Lieutenant General Oleg Gribanov was one of the most enigmatic and controversial leadership figures in the history of Soviet counterintelligence. Having joined the ranks of Soviet state …


[PDF] abin.gov.br
Como pegar um espião
AR Pereira - Revista Brasileira de Inteligência, 2023 - rbi.abin.gov.br
A espionagem é utilizada na obtenção de informações para apoiar o processo decisório
estatal. Os Estados praticam a contraespionagem para proteger seus segredos. Três casos


[PDF] esg.br
DEZ LIÇÕES QUE PODEMOS APRENDER COM OS “ILEGAIS”
AR Pereira, RA de Arruda - Revista da Escola Superior de Guerra, 2025 - revista.esg.br
O mundo da inteligência é hermético e o usuário final da inteligência, via de regra, é um
político com pouco ou nenhum conhecimento sobre o assunto. Este ensaio visa, a partir de um …

A study on how cyber economic espionage affects US national security and competitiveness
AM Mayers - 2018 - search.proquest.com
Cyber economic espionage is the use or facilitation of covert, forcible, or misleading means
by a nation-state or its proxies to acquire economic intelligence by using computer networks. …


The Final Act: The Helsinki Accords and the Transformation of the Cold War
MC Morgan - 2018 - torrossa.com
Names: Morgan, Michael Cotey, author. Title: The final act: the Helsinki Accords and the
transformation of the Cold War/Michael Cotey Morgan. Description: Princeton: Princeton …


[HTML] dukeupress.edu
[BOOK] From Washington to Moscow: US-Soviet relations and the collapse of the USSR
L Sell - 2016 - books.google.com
When the United States and the Soviet Union signed the first Strategic Arms Limitation Talks
accords in 1972 it was generally seen as the point at which the USSR achieved parity with


[BOOK] Agents of Influence: How the KGB Subverted Western Democracies
M Hollingsworth - 2023 - books.google.com
There's no such thing as a former KGB man...'A gripping story filled with remarkable
revelations.'Tom Bower, author of Revenge Agents of Influence reveals the secret history of …


[PDF] tandfonline.com
John Cairncross, RASCLS and a reassessment of his motives
C Smith - Intelligence and National Security, 2022 - Taylor & Francis
ABSTRACT In 1990, John Cairncross was identified as the 'fifth man'of the Cambridge Ring
of Five. Historians have provided various motivations for Cairncross' decision to spy for the …


[PDF] tandfonline.com
State Department cipher machines and communications security in the early Cold War, 1944–1965
D Easter - Intelligence and National Security, 2024 - Taylor & Francis
ABSTRACT From 1944 the State Department attempted to improve its communications
security by creating a Division of Cryptography and mechanising the encryption process …


The need to up our game in countering disinformation
T Leventhal - Comparative Strategy, 2023 - Taylor & Francis
The US government should establish a nongovernmental institute of expert spokespersons
to counter foreign disinformation and propaganda more effectively. Such an institute would …


Save Cite Cited by 3 Related articles All 2 versions
[PDF] kyleorton.co.uk
Doubles Troubles: The CIA and Double Agents during the Cold War
BB Fischer - International Journal of Intelligence and …, 2016 - Taylor & Francis
Double agents are a special breed of people. They pretend to spy for one foreign
intelligence service while actually spying for another. All intelligence services fall victim to …


[BOOK] The Illegals: Russia's Most Audacious Spies and Their Century-Long Mission to Infiltrate the West
S Walker - 2025 - books.google.com
The definitive history of Russia's most secret spy program, from the earliest days of the
Soviet Union to Putin's invasion of Ukraine, and a revelatory examination of how that hidden …


[PDF] mit.edu
Glorified Images of Soviet State Security and Intelligence Services: A Survey of Books Published in Putin's Russia
F Kovacevic - Journal of Cold War Studies, 2024 - direct.mit.edu
This survey article critically evaluates books about the Soviet-era state security and
intelligence services published in Russia over the past quarter century by eight major pro …


[PDF] jhu.edu
Covert Networks: A Comparative Study of Intelligence Techniques Used By Foreign Intelligence Agencies to Weaponize Social Media
S Ogar - 2019 - jscholarship.library.jhu.edu
Abstract From the Bolshevik Revolution to the Brexit Vote, the covert world of intelligence
has attempted to influence global events with varying degrees of success. In 2016, one of …


Penkovsky, the Spy Who Tried to Destroy the World
BB Fischer - International Journal of Intelligence and …, 2023 - Taylor & Francis
Abstract Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) lore and popular culture tout Col. Oleg Penkovsky
as “the spy who saved the world” during the Berlin and Cuban missile crises. In fact, his …


[PDF] state.gov
[PDF] More Than a Century of Antisemitism: How Successive Occupants of the
GE Center - 2024 - 2021-2025.state.gov
For over a century, Tsarist, Soviet and now Russian Federation authorities have used
antisemitism to discredit, divide, and weaken their perceived adversaries at home and …


[BOOK] Gli infiltrati: La vera storia del più riservato programma di spionaggio russo in Occidente
S Walker - 2025 - books.google.com
Nel 2010 negli Stati Uniti furono arrestate dieci spie russe che, sotto false identità, si erano
infiltrate nella società americana per trasmettere informazioni riservate a Mosca. Nessuno …


[PDF] proquest.com
[BOOK] Propaganda on Steroids: A Case Study on How Communication Technology" Pumped-Up" Russian Black Propaganda
RE Rosin - 2023 - search.proquest.com
Propaganda is a tool used to exercise power through an act of communication. It is a type of
communication that this study refers to as manipulative communication, where an actor …


[PDF] joanmellen.com
[BOOK] Blood in the water: How the US and Israel conspired to ambush the USS liberty
J Mellen - 2018 - joanmellen.com
FIVE: MEIR AMIT ON THE MOVE SIX: HEROES IN THE SEAWEED SEVEN:
CONSPICUOUS GALLANTRY EIGHT: WITH THE SIXTH FLEET NINE: COVER UP TEN …


[BOOK] The Spy who Would be Tsar: The Mystery of Michal Goleniewski and the Far-right Underground
K Coogan - 2021 - taylorfrancis.com
Michal Goleniewski was one of the Cold War's most important spies but has been
overlooked in the vast literature on the intelligence battles between the Western Powers and …


SPIES IN THE WORLD OF FICTION
IF Carré, T Clancy, A Judd… - The Psychology of Spies …, 2022 - books.google.com
An evaluation of the role of plot and characterisation in fiction, followed by a focus on how
writers in the spy fiction genre develop the personalities when they face critical decisions …


The Soviet International Agenda on Human Rights and the" Second Helsinki Process"
RM Cucciolla - Gorbachev, Italian communism and human rights …, 2022 - torrossa.com
In the second half of the 1980s, the USSR attempted to play an active role in the promotion
of human rights at an international level. In addition to the personal vision of Mikhail …


Spies
SN Kalic - 2019 - torrossa.com
Description: Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger Security International,[2019]| Includes
bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2018049628 (print)| LCCN …


[PDF] jyu.fi
Aktiivisten toimenpiteiden heijastumia
J Kotakallio - 2023 - jyx.jyu.fi
The study observed the Cold War-era term Active Measures. The term is associated with
Soviet and Russian intelligence. Efforts have been made to find different attributes for this



[PDF] Kleine Brüder des KGB
C Nehring - Die Kooperation von Ddr-Auslandsaufklärung und … - bundesarchiv.de
Kleine Brüder des KGB - Page 1 Christopher Nehring Kleine Brüder des KGB Die Kooperation
von DDR-Auslandsaufklärung und bulgarischer Staatssicherheit BF informiert 42 (2019) Page 2 …


The NKVD General: Boris Volodarsky: Stalin's Agent: The Life and Death of Alexander Orlov Oxford University Press, London and New York, 2015, 789 p., $34.95.
N West - 2015 - Taylor & Francis
Alexander Orlov is a legendary figure in the counterintelligence world for several reasons.
Although he abandoned the Soviet cause in 1938 and fled to the United States with his wife …


[PDF] jeremydfoote.com
Transparency, control, and content generation on Wikipedia: editorial strategies and technical affordances
SA Matei, J Foote - Transparency in Social Media: Tools, Methods and …, 2015 - Springer
Wikipedia is perhaps the most culturally influential example of “peer production” principles in
action, and is certainly the most visible. As the sixth most popular web site on the Internet …


La “seconda Helsinki” sovietica
RM Cucciolla - Diritti umani e la trasformazione delle culture politiche …, 2021 - torrossa.com
Nella seconda metà degli anni Ottanta, l'Urss sperimentò un ruolo attivo nella promozione
dei diritti umani a livello internazionale. Oltre alle visioni personali di Michail Gorbačëv e …


[CITATION] The Illegals: Russia's Most Audacious Spies and the Plot to Infiltrate the West
S Walker - 2025 - Profile Books


[CITATION] Oleg Penkovsky
O Penkovsky   


[BOOK] Spy Wars: Moles, Mysteries, and Deadly Games
TH Bagley - 2007 - books.google.com
Chosen by William Safire in the New York Times to be the publishing sleeper-seller of the
year for 2007. In this rapid-paced book, a former CIA chief of Soviet bloc counterintelligence …


Spy Wars: Moles, Mysteries, and Deadly Games
JR Clark - 2009 - JSTOR
tion, the Hungarian-Soviet Cultural Society, which was entrusted with the dissemination of
Soviet culture. This proved to be a Page 1 tion, the Hungarian-Soviet Cultural Society, which …


A Review of: “The Nosenko Affair Revisited” Tennent H. Bagley: Spy Wars: Moles, Mysteries and Deadly Games Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 2007, 313 p …
RD Chapman - 2008 - Taylor & Francis
It’s a powerful book. Tennent ‘‘Pete’’ Bagley’s Spy Wars: Moles, Mysteries and Deadly Games
is like none we’ve read before. It rocks the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) with the Yuri …



Bagley, Tennent H. Spy Wars: Moles, Mysteries, and Deadly Games
D Pitt - Booklist, 2007 - go.gale.com
Bagley, who oversaw the CIA's operations against the KGB in the 1960s, takes us deep
inside the cold war spy game. He focuses on a notorious case, one he was intimately familiar …


My Two Moles: A Memoir
BB Fischer - International Journal of Intelligence and …, 2022 - Taylor & Francis
During my career, I had the dubious experience of crossing paths with the two most notorious
foreign intelligence penetrations (“moles”) of the US Intelligence Community (IC) during …


Morley, Jefferson. Our Man in Mexico: Winston Scott and the Hidden History of the CIA
E Goedeken - Library Journal, 2008 - go.gale.com
As the Cold War recedes into history, we are starting to see a number of books dealing with
many of the remarkable characters who worked quietly (and sometimes not so quietly) …


Spymaster: startling Cold War revelations of a Soviet KGB chief
KF Jensen - 2018 - Taylor & Francis
Two old spies got together regularly in Brussels over a period of many years. Both were
retired. One was senior KGB officer Sergey Kondrashev. The other was his sometime opposite …

A Controversial Memoir
BB Fischer - 2014 - Taylor & Francis
For 50 years the late Tennent (Pete) Bagley pursued Yuri Nosenko, a KGB (Soviet Committee
for State Security) officer who defected in 1964. He believed that the Russian was a liar …


[CITATION] Spy wars: Moles, mysteries, and deadly games.
E Goedeken - 2007 - REED BUSINESS INFORMATION …



Spymaster


Spymaster: startling Cold War revelations of a Soviet KGB chief
KF Jensen - 2018 - Taylor & Francis
Two old spies got together regularly in Brussels over a period of many years. Both were
retired. One was senior KGB officer Sergey Kondrashev. The other was his sometime opposite …


A Controversial Memoir
BB Fischer - 2014 - Taylor & Francis
For 50 years the late Tennent (Pete) Bagley pursued Yuri Nosenko, a KGB (Soviet Committee
for State Security) officer who defected in 1964. He believed that the Russian was a liar …
[CITATION] Spy wars: Moles, mysteries, and deadly games.
E Goedeken - 2007 - REED BUSINESS INFORMATION …


[PDF] wiley.com
Through a glass, darkly: the CIA and oral history
A Hammond - History, 2015 - Wiley Online Library
This article broaches the thorny issue of how we may study the history of the CIA by utilizing
oral history interviews. This article argues that while oral history interviews impose particular …


Kim and Jim Redux: Michael Holzman: Spies and Traitors: Kim Philby, James Angleton and Betrayal that Would Shape MI6, the CIA, and the Cold War Pegasus …
BB Fischer - 2023 - Taylor & Francis
Harold Adrian Russel (Kim) Philby and James (Jim) Angleton were two of the most notorious
figures of the Cold War. Philby was the first and most important of the famous Cambridge …


Spy dust and ghost surveillance: How the KGB spooked the CIA and hid aldrich ames in plain sight
BB Fischer - International Journal of Intelligence and …, 2011 - Taylor & Francis
Presidents Day fell on the 21st of February in 1994. While other government employees
were relaxing on the federal holiday, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) officer Aldrich Hazen …


Counterintelligence
HB Peake - Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies, 2010 - oxfordre.com
“Counterintelligence”(CI) is a term with multiple meanings—its definitions vary, even when
applied to a single nation. Yet it can be understood by identifying the common CI functions in …


Death to traitors? The pursuit of intelligence defectors from the Soviet Union to the Putin era
A Hänni, M Grossmann - Intelligence and National Security, 2020 - Taylor & Francis
This article argues that Russia’s use of lethal violence against intelligence defectors has to
be understood as a public spectacle in which Russian leaders and intelligence officials never …


[PDF] scholarlypublishingcollective.org
The Spy Story Behind The Third Man
T Riegler - Journal of Austrian-American History, 2020 - scholarlypublishingcollective.org
The Third Man symbolically stands for espionage. Indeed, though its storyline concerns
friendship and the hunt for an unscrupulous black-market dealer, the film has been connected to …


WIE ERFOLGREICH SIND GEHEIMDIENSTLICHE TÖTUNGSOPERATIONEN? EIN VIER-EBENEN-MODELL.
C Nehring, A Hänni - Journal for Intelligence, Propaganda & …, 2020 - search.ebscohost.com
This article develops a model to holistically analyze the aims, effects, and the success of
assassination operations carried out by intelligence services. Our four-level model consists of a …


Indice degli autori e dei volumi recensiti
M a de Gaulle - rivisteweb.it
216 Pelletier, D.(a cura di), Les catholiques dans la République, 1905-2005. 217 Pelletier, D.,
La crise catholique. Religions, société, politique en France (1965-1978). 253 Porcaro, M., …


Since 1900
D Petruzzi, MFN New - search.ebscohost.com
The article lists books of military history since 1900s which includes" The Army Command
Post and Defense Reshaping 1987-1997," by Mark D. Sherry," Facing the Heat Barrier: A …


The UK–US Intelligence Partnership
SD Omand - The Oxford Handbook of National Security …, 2025 - books.google.com
The US–UK intelligence partnership is an important strand, many would say the thickest and
most resilient strand, of the wider defense, security, and intelligence relationship that has …

[PDF] lobster-magazine.co.uk
[PDF] Tokyo legend? Lee Harvey Oswald and Japan
K Coogan - Lobster, 2015 - lobster-magazine.co.uk
What do we know about Lee Harvey Oswald’s stay in Japan? Surprisingly, the answer is ‘very
little’. From autumn 1957 to late 1958, Lee Harvey Oswald worked at an American military …

Federal Bureau of Investigation
RJ BATVINIS - The Oxford Handbook of National Security …, 2025 - books.google.com
27.1. Background It was June 1939, two months before the start of World War II, when
President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued a sweeping order to J. Edgar Hoover, the Director of the …

“An Ominous Talent”: Oleg Gribanov and KGB Counterintelligence
F Kovacevic - International Journal of Intelligence and …, 2023 - Taylor & Francis
Lieutenant General Oleg Gribanov was one of the most enigmatic and controversial leadership
figures in the history of Soviet counterintelligence. Having joined the ranks of Soviet state …


In Pursuit of the Squared Circle: The Nosenko Theories Revisited
WA Messer - International Journal of Intelligence and …, 2013 - Taylor & Francis
The controversial case of KGB defector Yuriy Nosenko has centered on the contention that
he was a double agent for the KGB. Heretofore, compelling evidence suggesting that he was …


DIE SPIONAGEGESCHICHTE HINTER DER DRITTE MANN.
T Riegler - Journal for Intelligence, Propaganda & Security …, 2018 - search.ebscohost.com
More than 70 years ago, The Third Man was shot in Vienna-a film that symbolically stands
for espionage. But strictly speaking, this is not the movie's subject, instead the plot tells the …


[BOOK] Secrecy and tradecraft in educational administration: The covert side of educational life
EA Samier - 2014 - taylorfrancis.com
During the last couple of decades, there has been an expansion in a number of related and
overlapping fields producing evidence of covert activities: toxic cultures, destructive …


Revisiting the CIA's Time of Troubles: Frank J. Rafalko: MH/CHAOS The CIA's Campaign Against the Radical New Left and the Black Panthers.Naval Institute …
BB Fischer - 2013 - Taylor & Francis
In 1996 my boss drafted me to represent our office on a committee planning for the Central
Intelligence Agency’s (CIA’s) 50th anniversary. The chairwoman opened the first meeting by …


[PDF] cia.gov
[PDF] " Beautiful in Another Context": A Counterintelligence Assessment of GTPROLOGUE
A Orleans - Studies in Intelligence, 2025 - cia.gov
In the 1980s, the Soviet Union’s Committee for State Security (KGB) launched a concentrated
disinformation campaign as part of an effort to safeguard the identity of their CIA …


When Life Imitates Art: Éric Rohmer's Triple Agent (2004) As a Primer for Real-Life Politics
JJ Ward - Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 2023 - Taylor & Francis
This article examines the striking parallel between plans that were discussed in the CIA in
2017 to kidnap and possibly murder Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, who was living …


[PDF] researchgate.net
Integrating cyber-D&D into adversary modeling for active cyber defense
FJ Stech, KE Heckman, BE Strom - Cyber Deception: Building the Scientific …, 2016 - Springer
This chapter outlines a concept for integrating cyber denial and deception (cyber-D&D) tools,
tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTTPs) into an adversary modeling system to support …


[BOOK] Spy Lost: Caught between the KGB and the FBI
KR Tuomi - 2013 - books.google.com
Page 1 KAARLO R. TUOMI Introduction by JOHN EARL HAYNES SPOST Caught between
the KGB and the FBI Page 2 Enigma Books Page 3 Also published by Enigma Books Hitler's …


Failing the Grade on Judging Angleton: Michael Holzman: James Jesus Angleton: The CIA and the Craft of Intelligence University of Massachusetts Press …
N West - 2010 - Taylor & Francis
Strategic Services (OSS) X-2 before running operations in Italy as the organization’s youngest
branch chief. He would later supervise the CIA’s relationship with the Israelis as well, from …



Sennacherib's invasion of the Levant through the eyes of Assyrian intelligence services
P Dubovský - Sennacherib at the Gates of Jerusalem: Story, History …, 2014 - brill.com
Peter Dubovský i. introduction a study of assyrian intelligence techniques, networks and
their development over the eighth and seventh centuries bce provides a new perspective on …


[HTML] geneastar.org
[HTML] Family tree of Aldrich Ames
G George, D Nancy, N Philo, I Alzalon, J Edward… - en.geneastar.org
Family tree of Aldrich Ames - Geneastar Geneanet Geneastar Photo of Aldrich Ames Family
tree of Aldrich Ames Other American Born Aldrich Hazen Ames American former Central …


[PDF] foiaresearch.net
[BOOK] In search of a lesser evil: anti-soviet nationalism and the Cold War
DCS Albanese - 2015 - search.proquest.com
This dissertation explores Western intelligence services’ early Cold War employment of former
Nazi officers and collaborators who planned and participated in the wartime occupation of …


Of revelatory histories and hatchet jobs: propaganda and method in intelligence history
RG Hughes - Intelligence and National Security, 2008 - Taylor & Francis
This article explores a number of issues in the contemporary study of intelligence. These
issues are methodological (relating to engagement with ‘primary’ sources), epistemological (…


Soviet Bloc and Western bugging of opponents' diplomatic premises during the early cold war
D Easter - Intelligence and National Security, 2016 - Taylor & Francis
This article examines Soviet Bloc and Western bugging of their opponents’ diplomatic
premises in the early Cold War, from 1945 to the late 1960s. It explains the process of audio …


[PDF] escholarship.org
Marianne is Watching: Knowledge, Secrecy, Intelligence and the Origins of the French Surveillance State (1870-1914)
DS Bauer - 2013 - escholarship.org
"Marianne is Watching" presents a history of the institutionalization of professional intelligence
and counterintelligence services in France from 1870 to 1914. As the practice of secret


[BOOK] DISINFORMATION IN THE REAGAN YEARS AND LESSONS FOR TODAY.
M Reiss - 2022 - JSTOR
Russian military attacks against Estonia, Georgia, the Ukraine and others in the ensuing
years, the United States was large and powerful, and any real, residual threat was neutralized …


[BOOK] JFK Was Killed by Consensus: Dealey Plaza Was Just The Final Stop
DW Mantik - 2025 - books.google.com
Page 1 Mantik's magnum opus fuses two main lines of evidence: the blatant medical fraud
and a stark account of how America's national security establishment reached a consensus …


[PDF] bibliotekanauki.pl
[PDF] Koncepcje dezinformacji obcych wywiadów. Nowe ślady w strukturalnej historii Departamentu II Ministerstwa Spraw Wewnętrznych po 1956 r.
P Pleskot - Aparat Represji w Polsce Ludowej 1944–1989, 2020 - bibliotekanauki.pl
Ujawnione po likwidacji tzw. zbioru zastrzeżonego IPN dokumenty pozwalają rzucić nowe
światło na ewolucję strukturalną i zakres kompetencji Wydziału VIII Departamentu II MSW, …


What are Models for?
P McBurney - European Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems, 2011 - Springer
In this paper I discuss some of the purposes and functions of building models, particularly
agent-based models, and present a comprehensive list of these purposes and functions. …


ÖSTERREICHS NACHRICHTENDIENSTE UND DER „SPIONAGEPLATZ" WIEN: ERKENNTNISSE AUS DEM ARCHIV DER DDR-STAATSSICHERHEIT.
T Riegler - Journal for Intelligence, Propaganda & Security …, 2018 - search.ebscohost.com
Austria's intelligence services are a virtual" black box". There is no access to historical files
nor is there a transparent information policy. In contrast to recent efforts in the United States …


Hungary from the Nazis to the Soviets: The Establishment of the Communist Regime in Hungary, 1944–1948
L Borhi - 2009 - JSTOR
Peter Kenez writes that “nationalist and conservative politicians... partial to a certain exclusivist,
almost racialist nationalism... date the beginning of Soviet oppression at the end of the …


[PDF] thomas-riegler.net
[PDF] Austria's homegrown lone actor terrorist: Franz Fuchs and the letter bomb campaign of the 1990s
P Schliefsteiner - Journal for Intelligence, Propaganda and …, 2018 - thomas-riegler.net
AUSTRIA’S HOMEGROWN LONE ACTOR TERRORIST: FRANZ FUCHS AND THE LETTER
BOMB CAMPAIGN OF THE 1990S Page 1 AUSTRIA’S HOMEGROWN LONE ACTOR …


[PDF] oapen.org
[BOOK] Milieux de mémoire in late Modernity: Local communities, religion and historical politics
Z Bogumił, M Głowacka-Grajper - 2019 - library.oapen.org
This book shows how vernacular communities commemorate their traumatic experiences of
the Second World War. Despite having access to many diverse memory frameworks typical …


Russian Federation
LLOS Intelligence, L Register - cambridge.org
Bibliography Page 1 Bibliography Primary Sources France Army Historical Service, Vincennes
Fonds Moscou Deuxième (2e) Bureau Records, Army General Staff Russian Federation …


[CITATION] Ensiklopedia Dunia
Y Nosenko - p2k.stekom.ac.id
Yuri Ivanovich Nosenko (bahasa Rusia: Юрий Иванович Носенко; 30 Oktober 1927–23
Agustus 2008) adalah seorang perwira KGB yang secara nominal membelot ke Amerika …



Ghosts of the Spy Wars


Ghosts of the spy wars: A personal reminder to interested parties
TH Bagley - International Journal of Intelligence and …, 2015 - Taylor & Francis
… Ghosts of the Spy Wars: A Personal Reminder to Interested Parties … KGB traveler to
Washington was never identified, as far as I know, and joins the company of ghosts of the spy wars.) …


The spies who came to the East: Soviet illegals in the post-World War II Japan
G Serscikov - Journal of Intelligence History, 2023 - Taylor & Francis
This article describes the Soviet illegals intelligence program that was established one
hundred years ago. It offers a brief overview of the Soviet intelligence organizations involved in …


Rethinking US Counterintelligence: A Game Theoretical Approach
R Breeden - 2024 - search.proquest.com
For a field as complex as counterintelligence, a carefully thought-out rationalization for
observations of the world in which practitioners, decision-makers, and academia reside continues …


“We're Supposed To Have A Special Relationship.” Cold War Men and Espionage Narratives of Operation Stopwatch/Gold in Ian McEwan's The Innocent One
R Oltean - War, Espionage, and Masculinity in British Fiction, 2023 - books.google.com
This paper takes a comparative approach to early Cold War British and American masculinities
in Ian McEwan's The Innocent, contextualizing the analysis with non-fictional American …


“An Ominous Talent”: Oleg Gribanov and KGB Counterintelligence
F Kovacevic - International Journal of Intelligence and …, 2023 - Taylor & Francis
Lieutenant General Oleg Gribanov was one of the most enigmatic and controversial leadership
figures in the history of Soviet counterintelligence. Having joined the ranks of Soviet state …


[PDF] abin.gov.br
Como pegar um espião
AR Pereira - Revista Brasileira de Inteligência, 2023 - rbi.abin.gov.br
A espionagem é utilizada na obtenção de informações para apoiar o processo decisório
estatal. Os Estados praticam a contraespionagem para proteger seus segredos. Três casos …


[PDF] esg.br
DEZ LIÇÕES QUE PODEMOS APRENDER COM OS “ILEGAIS”
AR Pereira, RA de Arruda - Revista da Escola Superior de Guerra, 2025 - revista.esg.br
O mundo da inteligência é hermético e o usuário final da inteligência, via de regra, é um
político com pouco ou nenhum conhecimento sobre o assunto. Este ensaio visa, a partir de um …


A study on how cyber economic espionage affects US national security and competitiveness
AM Mayers - 2018 - search.proquest.com
Cyber economic espionage is the use or facilitation of covert, forcible, or misleading means
by a nation-state or its proxies to acquire economic intelligence by using computer networks. …

Bumped for Fancy Pants Rants.