JFK Assassination Forum

JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate => JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate => Topic started by: Fred Litwin on July 31, 2025, 02:40:40 AM

Title: Lee Harvey Oswald was NOT under Surveillance
Post by: Fred Litwin on July 31, 2025, 02:40:40 AM

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/lee-harvey-oswald-was-not-under-surveillance (https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/lee-harvey-oswald-was-not-under-surveillance)

Title: Re: Lee Harvey Oswald was NOT under Surveillance
Post by: Tom Graves on July 31, 2025, 03:00:02 AM

Quote from: Fred Litwin on July 31, 2025, 02:40:40 AM

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/lee-harvey-oswald-was-not-under-surveillance (https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/lee-harvey-oswald-was-not-under-surveillance)

Ironically, Oswald would have been known to the KGB-controlled "CIA" if John M. Newman is correct -- that a KGB mole by the name of Bruce Leonard Solie (look him up) sent (or duped his confidant, protégé, and mole-hunting subordinate, James Angleton, into sending) Oswald to Moscow in 1959 as an ostensible "dangle" in a (unbeknownst to Angleton and Oswald) planned-to-fail hunt for "Popov's U-2 Mole" (Solie) in the wrong part of the CIA.

If true, it might explain why Consul Richard Snyder didn't arrest Oswald on 10/30/59 for threatening to commit espionage against the U.S. -- because he mistakenly believed Oswald had been told to say that to the KGB's hidden microphones as part of a true CIA mole hunt.

Factoid: In addition to "clearing" false defector Yuri Nosenko in 1968, Solie helped probable "mole" Leonard V. McCoy lose Nicholas Shadrin to KGB kidnappers in Vienna in 1975, hid Office of Security files on Oswald from the Church Committee, and was all over Clay Shaw for Jim Garrison.