JFK Assassination Forum
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate => JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate => Topic started by: Fred Litwin on January 17, 2025, 01:11:33 PM
-
https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/did-eugene-dinkin-try-to-stop-the-jfk-assassination (https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/did-eugene-dinkin-try-to-stop-the-jfk-assassination)
Did Eugene Dinkin Try to Stop the JFK Assassination?
I have all the primary documents in this case, and in my multi-part blog post, I will show how Eugene Dinkin was a very disturbed young man.
fred
-
So many people disturbed. By the same thing.
-
Yes, conspiracy fever.
fred
-
Yes, conspiracy fever.
fred
As you know (and anyone can find out at NARA), the FBI files - the raw reports - on the assassination are filled with hundreds (probably thousands) of people making bizarre claims about their involvement or having seen or heard something about it. To put it differently: police say that whenever a suspected serial killer is found that they are inundated with calls from people either confessing to the crimes (!) or accusing someone of being the killer.
It seems that before the internet unstable conspiracy-oriented people made phone calls to the FBI about the assassination; now they have their own websites.
-
https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-dinkin-and-jim-garrison (https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-dinkin-and-jim-garrison)
Part Two of my multi-part series on Eugene Dinkin
Bill Boxley, one of Garrison's investigators, interviewed Dinkin in 1968 and found him to be a nut.
-
https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-b-dinkin-v-the-u-s-defense-department-and-the-cia][url]https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-b-dinkin-v-the-u-s-defense-department-and-the-cia (http://[url)[/url]
Eugene B. Dinkin v. the U.S. Defense Department and the CIA
Dinkin sued the U.S. Defense Department and the CIA in 1975. Here is his complaint, and you can see some of his "proofs' that JFK was going to be assassinated in November of 1963.
-
[url=https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-b-dinkin-v-the-u-s-defense-department-and-the-cia]https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-b-dinkin-v-the-u-s-defense-department-and-the-cia][url=https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-b-dinkin-v-the-u-s-defense-department-and-the-cia]https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-b-dinkin-v-the-u-s-defense-department-and-the-cia]https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-b-dinkin-v-the-u-s-defense-department-and-the-cia][url=https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-b-dinkin-v-the-u-s-defense-department-and-the-cia]https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-b-dinkin-v-the-u-s-defense-department-and-the-cia]https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-b-dinkin-v-the-u-s-defense-department-and-the-cia]https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-b-dinkin-v-the-u-s-defense-department-and-the-cia][url=https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-b-dinkin-v-the-u-s-defense-department-and-the-cia]https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-b-dinkin-v-the-u-s-defense-department-and-the-cia]https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-b-dinkin-v-the-u-s-defense-department-and-the-cia]https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-b-dinkin-v-the-u-s-defense-department-and-the-cia]https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-b-dinkin-v-the-u-s-defense-department-and-the-cia][url]https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-b-dinkin-v-the-u-s-defense-department-and-the-cia]https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-b-dinkin-v-the-u-s-defense-department-and-the-cia]https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-b-dinkin-v-the-u-s-defense-department-and-the-cia]https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-b-dinkin-v-the-u-s-defense-department-and-the-cia]https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-b-dinkin-v-the-u-s-defense-department-and-the-cia]https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-b-dinkin-v-the-u-s-defense-department-and-the-cia][url]https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-b-dinkin-v-the-u-s-defense-department-and-the-cia (http://[url=https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-b-dinkin-v-the-u-s-defense-department-and-the-cia)[/url]
Eugene B. Dinkin v. the U.S. Defense Department and the CIA
Dinkin sued the U.S. Defense Department and the CIA in 1975. Here is his complaint, and you can see some of his "proofs' that JFK was going to be assassinated in November of 1963.
You repeatedly cite primary/original sources - which is what any even semi-serious researcher should do - and the conspiracists simply don't like it. Not all (you're a good test case that separates the responsible from the irresponsible ones) but those who respond to your research by calling you a disinformation agent or a CIA apologist or, heaven forbid, a lone nutter and Warren Commission apologist. That crowd.
Let's assume for the argument that you are, that you're a government agent (Trudeau was a lone nutter?): that's not answering your work, refuting your research. It's old fashioned poisoning of the well, attacking you but not what you find. In their defense, at this point it's all they have. Like the earth riding on the backs of an infinite number of turtles, it's conspiracies all of the way down. What else can they say?
-
You repeatedly cite the primary/original sources - which is what any even semi-serious researcher should do - and the conspiracists simply don't like it. Not all (you're a good test case to separate the responsible from the irresponsible ones), but those who respond to your work by calling you a disinformation agent or a CIA apologist or, heaven forbid, a lone nutter and Warren Commission apologist. That crowd.
Let's assume for the argument that you are, that you're a government agent (Trudeau was a lone nutter?): that's not answering your work, refuting your research. It's old fashioned poisoning of the well, attacking you but not what you find. In their defense, at this point it's all they have. Like the earth riding on the backs of turtles, it's conspiracies all of the way down.
Well put.
-
https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-dinkin-s-submissions-to-the-hsca (https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-dinkin-s-submissions-to-the-hsca)
Eugene Dinkin's Submission to the HSCA
Dinkin wrote three times to the HSCA and submitted 23 "demonstrations" of his so-called "psychological sets" that indicated JFK would be assassinated. Please tell me which one you found the funniest!
-
https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-dinkin-meets-with-dick-russell (https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-dinkin-meets-with-dick-russell)
Eugene Dinkin Meets Dick Russell
Russell talked with Dinkin twice in 1975. Dinkin showed Russell more of his "proofs." None of the nuttiness of this interview showed up in Russell's book, The Man Who Knew Too Much.
-
https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-dinking-and-james-dieugenio (https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-dinking-and-james-dieugenio)
Eugene Dinkin and James DiEugenio
DiEugenio has published three articles about Eugene Dinkin on his website and seems to believe Dinkin's ridiculous "demonstrations."
-
https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-dinkin-and-vince-palamara (https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/eugene-dinkin-and-vince-palamara)
Eugene Dinkin and Vince Palamara
Vince Palamara loves the Eugene Dinkin story. He has used it in three of his books. But he adds some new details that he taken from a surprising source.