JFK Assassination Forum
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate => JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate => Topic started by: Paul May on July 13, 2021, 07:39:11 PM
-
Almost 58 years now. Name your shooter(s). Names, not organizations.
Lee Harvey Oswald.
-
Almost 58 years now. Name your shooter(s). Names, not organizations.
Lee Harvey Oswald.
+1^
-
I ran that 'Name Your Shooter' title twice a few years ago
Shortest threads in history
-
(https://i.postimg.cc/Dy0Bb22G/jfk-murder-row.png)
BILL CHAPMAN
The nobody who shot the somebody had help:
1) Alek Hidell (AKA Lee Harvey Oswald) was in charge of armament procurement
2) O.H. Lee (AKA Lee Harvey Oswald) was in charge of safe-house procurement
3) Dirty Harvey (AKA Lee Harvey Oswald) was in charge of killing poor dumb cops
Dirty Harry
'Smith, Wesson... and me'
-----------------------------
Dirty Harvey
Smith, Wesson... and Lee
(https://i.postimg.cc/6pQk9vQD/card-fun.png)
Alek Hidell (rhymes with Fidel) selective nutjob
(https://i.postimg.cc/4N7n2m6Q/gun-fun.png)
Smith, Wesson... and Lee
(https://i.postimg.cc/L6N6gvvX/small-beckley.png)
O.H. Lee safe-house (no curtain rods needed)
-
I ran that 'Name Your Shooter' title twice a few years ago
Shortest threads in history
24 hours and no responses from conspiracy types. Rational people shake their heads in amazement.
-
24 hours and no responses from conspiracy types. Rational people shake their heads in amazement.
You expected an answer? Maybe a better question would be, who organised the assassination? The CT's so far have a lot of different organisations being involved and I'd just like 1 CT to explain the connection of their accusations, we have the Dallas Police planting, the FBI altering, the CIA manipulating, the KGB harbouring, The Military planning, innocent civilians lying etc etc..
In the end it was either Oswald or it was everyone else in Dallas?
JohnM
-
Art Baker
-
Names of shooters is irrelevant absolutely irrelevant, professional assassins take on jobs through contacts, middle men, the shooters would have no idea who even hired them ( Marcello AND Trafficante imo) the real question should be how come the 18 odd suspicious deaths following the 3 years after 1963 have odds of like 167 trillion to 1 lol, not including the spikes during the HSCA hearings, but they everyone who met their fate were simply unlucky eh ? :D
-
Names of shooters is irrelevant absolutely irrelevant, professional assassins take on jobs through contacts, middle men, the shooters would have no idea who even hired them ( Marcello AND Trafficante imo) the real question should be how come the 18 odd suspicious deaths following the 3 years after 1963 have odds of like 167 trillion to 1 lol, not including the spikes during the HSCA hearings, but they everyone who met their fate were simply unlucky eh ? :D
The name of the person who assassinated President Kennedy is not relevant? Unreal. Talk about an implicit concession of weakness from Oswald defenders.
-
Names of shooters is irrelevant absolutely irrelevant, professional assassins take on jobs through contacts, middle men, the shooters would have no idea who even hired them ( Marcello AND Trafficante imo) the real question should be how come the 18 odd suspicious deaths following the 3 years after 1963 have odds of like 167 trillion to 1 lol, not including the spikes during the HSCA hearings, but they everyone who met their fate were simply unlucky eh ? :D
I read somewhere that those wild death odds were a typo and the publication apologized for it. Cause-of-death studies averaged out between the genpop and the supposed 'disappeared'. I read that too.
Mystery Deaths?
https://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/deaths.htm
-
Same old song and dance for 58 years: prove that somebody else did it or else Oswald wins by default.