JFK Assassination Forum
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate => JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate => Topic started by: Bill Chapman on September 09, 2020, 02:07:50 AM
-
NEWS FLASH
Lovelady,Texas
Sept 8, 2020
Faked & planted
by Bill Chapman
UGLY-SHIRTED JACKIE KENNEDY MOTORCADE WITNESS CLAIMING TO BE HIMSELF REVEALS THAT LOVELADY, TEXAS WAS NOT NAMED AFTER HIM
In a time capsule* recently contrived by Bill Chapman's active imagination, Billy Lovelady insisted that he knew precisely who he was, what he looked like, where he was standing (but not, apparently, which shirt he was wearing) the day firecrackers, motorcycle backfires, the smell of gunpowder, and a nobody combined to turn a sitting-duck somebody to a lame-duck somebody and, finally, to a totally dead-duck somebody.
*Billy Lovelady, a fellow who would give you the shirt
off his back, died sometime in the past
-
You're unaware of the Off Topic section of this forum?
Whoa, big fella. Back that chuckwagon up, Tex. Wipe that smirk off your face, Beckley: How is the Jackie Kennedy Motorcade not worthy of front page news around here? Or the fact that Lovelady, Texas was not named after the guy who wore his Sunday best nerdy green 'n white striped referee-style pyjama top to an FBI interview?
And I've already schooled you Oswald-lovers on the assassination:
Click-Click
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2444.msg80740.html#msg80740
The Nobody Who Shot the Somebody Had Help
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2451.0.html#new
Operation SitzGoose
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2674.0.html#new
-
And I've already schooled you Oswald-lovers on the assassination:
What a joke. You've never "schooled" a single person on anything.
-
What a joke. You've never "schooled" a single person on anything.
Anything? Holy crap!
-
Schooled -- LOL
Had too many Onions lately?
CHAPMAN UNHINGED contributions deserve a resting place in the "Topics Unrelated To The JFK Assassination" section.
Topics considered not related to the JFK assassination by the conspiracy crowd: Anything about Oswald. Conspiracy-crowd resting place: Funny farms, laughing factories academies, and looney bins both far and wide.
Response inspired by failure of opposing
entity to show any cleverness whatsoever
-
Topics considered not related to the JFK assassination by the conspiracy crowd: Anything about Oswald. Conspiracy-crowd resting place: Funny farms, laughing factories and looney bins both far and wide.
Response inspired by failure of opposing
entity to show any cleverness whatsoever
Help me out here, Mr. Witty, what's a "laughing factory"?
-
Help me out here, Mr. Witty, what's a "laughing factory"?
A term close enough to 'laughing academy' to draw out untalented conspiracy-crowd nitpickers
For furthur schooling, I can note that 'Laugh Factory' is a chain of comedy clubs in the United States. You may or may not see the obvious implications regarding a temporary crossing-of-wires regarding 'laughing factory' and the said 'Laugh Factory' comedy club.
I predict the latter.
-
A term close enough to 'laughing academy' to draw out untalented conspiracy-crowd nitpickers
For furthur schooling, I can note that 'Laugh Factory' is a chain of comedy clubs in the United States. You may or may not see the obvious implications regarding a temporary crossing-of-wires regarding 'laughing factory' and the said 'Laugh Factory' comedy club.
I predict the latter.
" I predict the laughter-oops, I mean the latter",...
Missed it, by that much.
"Get Smart" ( Acknowledgement. And, perhaps, advice? )
-
Topics considered not related to the JFK assassination by anybody:
Chapman's endless "humorous" asides.
-
" I predict the laughter-oops, I mean the latter",...
Missed it, by that much.
"Get Smart" ( Acknowledgement. And, perhaps, advice? )
Ima li prevoditelja u kući?
-
(https://i.postimg.cc/MZLnXfT0/lockjaw.png)
Credit: Derek Bacon
Onionated* topics using one's
freedom-of-expression card not
welcomed by the conspiracy-
crowd include:
Lovelady's face
Lovelady's shirts
Oswald porch
Cuckoo nest
OH Lee alias
Alex Hidell alias
S&W weapons
Beckley rental
Zapruder's vertigo
Sitzman's location
*'The Onion' is a well-known spoof site
-
Babble factory running 24/7.
Still not clever running 24/7
-
(https://i.postimg.cc/MZLnXfT0/lockjaw.png)
Credit: Derek Bacon
Onionated* topics using one's
freedom-of-expression card not
welcomed by the conspiracy-
crowd include:
Lovelady's face
Lovelady's shirts
Oswald porch
Cuckoo nest
OH Lee alias
Alex Hidell alias
S&W weapons
Beckley rental
Zapruder's vertigo
Sitzman's location
*'The Onion' is a well-known spoof site
Let Onion handle the satire. You suck at it.
Reasoned discussion is always welcomed. You should try it sometime. Hint: merely claiming that “Alex [sic] Hidell” was an alias that Oswald used is not reasoned discussion.
-
Let Onion handle the satire. You suck at it.
Reasoned discussion is always welcomed. You should try it sometime. Hint: merely claiming that “Alex [sic] Hidell” was an alias that Oswald used is not reasoned discussion.
Rhymes with Fidel.
And I'm only reportin' the news. Pretty sure that discussion can be termed 'reasoned' given Oswald's mug on his Hidell Selective Service NutJob card.
And you missed the freedom-of-expression part. Now, point out where The Onion is about anything other than satire.
-
Rhymes with Fidel.
And I'm only reportin' the news. Pretty sure that discussion can be termed 'reasoned' given Oswald's mug on his Hidell Selective Service NutJob card.
That’s not reasoned discussion. It’s obscure unsourced references to things that you just accept as true. Reasoned discussion would involve providing a single example of Oswald ever using “Hidell” as an alias for himself prior to 11/22, or any mention of this selective service card in any interview or police document prior to the discovery of the Klein’s order.
And you missed the freedom-of-expression part.
There’s no freedom of expression here. It’s a private forum.
Now, point out where The Onion is about anything other than satire.
Why? I never claimed otherwise.
-
That’s not reasoned discussion. It’s obscure unsourced references to things that you just accept as true. Reasoned discussion would involve providing a single example of Oswald ever using “Hidell” as an alias for himself prior to 11/22, or any mention of this selective service card in any interview or police document prior to the discovery of the Klein’s order.
There’s no freedom of expression here. It’s a private forum.
Why? I never claimed otherwise.
Bah, humbug. This is an open forum of Oswald-lovers v Oswald-accusers, not an ivory-tower formal debate.
I've already stated that those aliases are part of the assassination-lore whether you like or not, ripe for a bit of fun from those who express themselves here in a light-hearted manner at times.
-
Bah, humbug. This is an open forum of Oswald-lovers v Oswald-accusers, not an ivory-tower formal debate.
I've already stated that those aliases are part of the assassination-lore whether you like or not, ripe for a bit of fun from those who express themselves here in a light-hearted manner at times.
Questioning the basis of your stating your "lore" as facts doesn't make one an "Oswald lover". That's just your smug and condescending way of trying to weasel out of responsibility for substantiating your claims.
-
Questioning the basis of your stating your "lore" as facts doesn't make one an "Oswald lover". That's just your smug and condescending way of trying to weasel out of responsibility for substantiating your claims.
'weasel'
That's soooo clever. And tell us why you think I need to prove something here.
'stating your "lore" as facts'
No, using JFK assassination lore in a manner which, apparently, makes grumpy old men evermore grumpier.
-
'weasel'
That's soooo clever. And tell us why you think I need to prove something here.
Because this is a discussion forum, and you keep making unsubstantiated fact claims.
'stating your "lore" as facts'
No, using JFK assassination lore in a manner which, apparently, makes grumpy old men evermore grumpier.
Calling me "grumpy" doesn't substantiate your "lore".
-
Because this is a discussion forum, and you keep making unsubstantiated fact claims.
Calling me "grumpy" doesn't substantiate your "lore"
JFK assassination lore has it that Oswald signed in at Beckley as OH Lee
JFK assassination lore has it that Oswald pretended to be Alek Hidell
JFK assassination lore has it that Oswald (aka Dirty Harvey) used a S&W
Fair game in any man's discussion
Fair game for a proof-of-concept undertaking
Fair game for some good-natured spoofing
(https://i.postimg.cc/gjtpLGfz/alek-hidell.png)
Oswald as Hidell is in the annals of JFK Assassination Lore whether this is faked or not
-
JFK assassination lore has it that Oswald signed in to Beckley as OH Lee
JFK assassination lore has it that Oswald pretended to be Alek Hidell*
JFK assassination lore has it that Oswald (aka Dirty Harvey) used a S&W
Fair game in any man's discussion
Fair game for a proof-of-concept undertaking
Fair game for some good-natured spoofing
*
(https://i.postimg.cc/gjtpLGfz/alek-hidell.png)
The first thing any competent researcher would do would determine if either of the cards were authentic Selective Service "Draft Cards"
Neither of the cards shown are an actual Selective Service document
-
Oswald as Hidell is in the annals of JFK Assassination Lore whether the cards are faked or not
-
(https://i.postimg.cc/MZLnXfT0/lockjaw.png)
What should happen to this thread.
-
(https://i.postimg.cc/MZLnXfT0/lockjaw.png)
What should happen to this thread.
Feel free to go elsewhere
-
Feel free to go elsewhere
You can go to elsewhere :-\
-
You can go to elsewhere :-\
Buh-bye. And don't have a nice day.
-
JFK assassination lore has it that Oswald signed in at Beckley as OH Lee
JFK assassination lore has it that Oswald pretended to be Alek Hidell
JFK assassination lore has it that Oswald (aka Dirty Harvey) used a S&W
Fair game in any man's discussion
Fair game for a proof-of-concept undertaking
Fair game for some good-natured spoofing
(https://i.postimg.cc/gjtpLGfz/alek-hidell.png)
Oswald as Hidell is in the annals of JFK Assassination Lore whether this is faked or not
Oswald as Hidell is in the annals of JFK Assassination Lore whether this is faked or not
And you could care less if it is faked or not, right?
-
JFK assassination lore has it that Oswald signed in at Beckley as OH Lee
And there's no evidence of that beyond Mrs. Johnson's say-so, and some unidentifiable writing on a "register" that looks nothing like a register.
JFK assassination lore has it that Oswald pretended to be Alek Hidell
There's no evidence of that whatsoever.
JFK assassination lore has it that Oswald (aka Dirty Harvey) used a S&W
Or that.
Fair game in any man's discussion
Fair game for a proof-of-concept undertaking
Fair game for some good-natured spoofing
Making a series of unsubstantiated claims is not a "discussion". Especially when you steadfastly refuse to ever substantiate anything you say (often incorrectly) about the case.
-
Oswald as Hidell is in the annals of JFK Assassination Lore whether the cards are faked or not
No, you specifically asserted that he "pretended to be Hidell".
-
No, you specifically asserted that he "pretended to be Hidell"
You lot only call a discussion a 'discussion' when people agree with you
And are you claiming the cards are faked by someone other than Oswald?
-
And there's no evidence of that beyond Mrs. Johnson's say-so, and some unidentifiable writing on a "register" that looks nothing like a register.
There's no evidence of that whatsoever.
Or that.
Making a series of unsubstantiated claims is not a "discussion". Especially when you steadfastly refuse to ever substantiate anything you say (often incorrectly) about the case.
Nobody named Oswald was signed into Beckley.
-
Are you claiming the cards are faked by someone other than Oswald?
Could you possibly meander any further from your own topic? When and by what evidence did Oswald ever present himself [and consequently showing the ID] as A. Hidell?
-
Could you possibly meander any further from your own topic? When and by what evidence did Oswald ever present himself [and consequently showing the ID] as A. Hidell?
You lot meandered immediately by ignoring the fact that my OP is a spoof.
Not my bad if the concept escapes you.
My Onion*-ized spoofs are the Onion-ized truth, the whole Onion-ized truth, and nothing but the Onion-ized truth.
*The Onion is a well-known spoof site
-
Bill Chapman is his own biggest fan ;D
-
Bill Chapman is his only fan ;D
There, fixed it for you, Jerry.
No charge.
-
There, fixed it for you, Jerry.
No charge.
You two should hook up
-
You two should hook up
You, too, should shut up.
-
You, too, should shut up.
I didn't tell anybody to shut up: So what's with the 'You, too', professor?
-
I didn't tell anybody to shut up: So what's with the 'You, too', professor?
You are obviously too dense to see the pun.
-
You are obviously too dense to see the pun.
You shouldn't try writing puns, you're just not good at it.
Now, tell us why you're on this thread. And why I should shut up.
-
You shouldn't try writing puns, you're just not good at it.
Says the guy who thinks he's good at spoofs.
-
Says the guy who thinks he's good at spoofs.
Says the grumpy Oswald-worshipper who keeps responding to my spoofs with nothing but hissing, complaining, and the gnashing of teeth.
-
Says the Oswald-worshipper who keeps responding to my spoofs with nothing but hissing, complaining, and the gnashing of teeth.
I don't worship anybody -- sorry to burst your little strawman bubble. And what you call "spoofs" everybody else calls incomprehensible babbling.
-
I don't worship anybody -- sorry to burst your little strawman bubble. And what you call "spoofs" everybody else calls incomprehensible babbling.
'I don't worship anybody -- sorry to burst your little strawman bubble'.
> Taking a knee at Lee Harvey Nobody's grave certainly suggests some sort of fealty on your part.
'And what you call "spoofs" everybody else calls incomprehensible babbling.'
> I've yet to see anyone but you hurl 'incomprehensible babbling' my way.
-
'I don't worship anybody -- sorry to burst your little strawman bubble'.
> Taking a knee at Lee Harvey Nobody's grave certainly suggests some sort of fealty on your part.
You make up a lot of "suggestions" in your head. What's new?
> I've yet to see anyone but you hurl 'incomprehensible babbling' my way.
I have.
-
You make up a lot of "suggestions" in your head. What's new?
I have.
'You make up a lot of "suggestions" in your head'
> What I saw wrote itself
'What's new?'
> Stay tuned
'I have'
> Detractors are always useful