JFK Assassination Forum
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate => JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate => Topic started by: Jim Brunsman on June 10, 2020, 03:01:13 PM
-
Tom Robinson's autopsy testimony provided a series of nails for the Warren Commission coffin. Love to see how the nutters discredit his testimony.
-
Tom Robinson's autopsy testimony provided a series of nails for the Warren Commission coffin. Love to see how the nutters discredit his testimony.
Pat Speer does exactly that and Pat is a conspiracy advocate. This is from 2014. This is how out of touch you are. Keep reading those conspiracy books! And Speer shows how nuts Horne’s BS is.
This reconstruction was done in the Bethesda morgue, and not at the mortuary. So, yeah, plenty of people were watching it being done.
As I recall, moreover, Robinson noted but one small wound on the face, and felt certain that this was not an entrance wound, but perhaps a shrapnel wound or an exit of a fragment.
A lot of nonsense has been spewed about Robinson. Those desperate to believe Kennedy's wounds were altered, cite Robinson as Exhibit 1A. in Horne's book, he unintentionally reveals the silliness of all this. He has Robinson see an orange-sized hole on the back of Kennedy's head, Humes expand this into a big hole, then the morticians reconstruct the head so that it once again has an orange-sized hole on the back of Kennedy's head, which is then observed by Robinson's co-worker, and photographed. These photographs are then developed by Saunda Spencer.
This is as illogical as can be.
-
Another very selective and rather dishonest appraisal of Robinson's testimony. Don't take my word for it. Check out the totality yourself. Pat Speer is not someone I would cite as support. I agree with little he has posted publicly, but I think he's open minded on the subject. Even a cursory search shows he buys the ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE SBT. That alone destroys his credibility. He also doesn't believe there was a shooter behind the stockade fence despite a mountain of evidence to the contrary.
-
Another very selective and rather dishonest appraisal of Robinson's testimony. Don't take my word for it. Check out the totality yourself. Pat Speer is not someone I would cite as support. I agree with little he has posted publicly, but I think he's open minded on the subject. Even a cursory search shows he buys the ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE SBT. That alone destroys his credibility. He also doesn't believe there was a shooter behind the stockade fence despite a mountain of evidence to the contrary.
A mountain of evidence? Missed by thousands for 56+ years. Remarkable. Waiting for you to break the case wide opened. Show us what you’ve got.
-
Pat Speer is not someone I would cite as support. Even a cursory search shows he buys the ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE SBT.
This Pat Speer?
Pat Speer - The Single Bullet Theory Voodoo Science and Zombie Lies HD
-
This Pat Speer?
Pat Speer - The Single Bullet Theory Voodoo Science and Zombie Lies HD
Sure doesn’t sound as if Pat is buying the SBT. Brusman blows another one!
-
Hey May, you're right for once. I saw Number 5 of Speer's top ten and didn't look at Number 6. I WAS WRONG.
1. It’s doubtful there was a shooter behind the stockade fence.
2. There is clear and compelling evidence that not all the shots came from the Texas School Book Depository, however.
3. It’s illogical to believe Kennedy’s wounds were changed.
4. It’s incredibly clear, however, that the interpretations of government experts regarding the president’s wounds were manipulated, and that both the Warren Commission and the HSCA deliberately misrepresented evidence.
5. There is a good chance that Kennedy and Connally were hit by the same bullet, after all.
6. It’s highly, unlikely, however, that this bullet was CE399, often referred to as the “magic bullet.”
7. The doctors who presided over the President’s autopsy were correct when they described an entrance into the President’s skull at the back of his head near his hairline.
8. They were wrong, however, in assuming that this bullet exited from the top of Kennedy’s skull, as this bullet most logically exited from the President’s throat.
9. Oswald was impersonated in Mexico.
10. There’s a good chance, however, this had little to do with the assassination.
-
Still waiting for your “mountain of evidence” for multiple shooters.
-
Still waiting for your “mountain of evidence” for multiple shooters.
The man claims a mountain of evidence. Why does he run?
-
This Pat Speer?
Pat Speer - The Single Bullet Theory Voodoo Science and Zombie Lies HD
Sure a lot of attendees disguised as empty seats laughing along with Speer
Kind of like a lot of shooters on the knoll disguised as trees, branches, and foliage
-
Hey May, you're right for once. I saw Number 5 of Speer's top ten and didn't look at Number 6. I WAS WRONG.
1. It’s doubtful there was a shooter behind the stockade fence.
2. There is clear and compelling evidence that not all the shots came from the Texas School Book Depository, however.
3. It’s illogical to believe Kennedy’s wounds were changed.
4. It’s incredibly clear, however, that the interpretations of government experts regarding the president’s wounds were manipulated, and that both the Warren Commission and the HSCA deliberately misrepresented evidence.
5. There is a good chance that Kennedy and Connally were hit by the same bullet, after all.
6. It’s highly, unlikely, however, that this bullet was CE399, often referred to as the “magic bullet.”
7. The doctors who presided over the President’s autopsy were correct when they described an entrance into the President’s skull at the back of his head near his hairline.
8. They were wrong, however, in assuming that this bullet exited from the top of Kennedy’s skull, as this bullet most logically exited from the President’s throat.
9. Oswald was impersonated in Mexico.
10. There’s a good chance, however, this had little to do with the assassination.
Jackie said 'top, behind the forehead' (exit)
-
Take it easy and maybe take a sedative or something. Also, your strident demands would be better accepted if you answered any of the questions I've asked you. Be fair. I'm trying to be.
-
Take it easy and maybe take a sedative or something. Also, your strident demands would be better accepted if you answered any of the questions I've asked you. Be fair. I'm trying to be.
Are you talking to me.. I'm not May.
-
Nope, the evidence was only missed by you and the others who live by the motto, "Convinced against his will, he's of the same mind still." Honest researchers saw it from the start...
-
Sorry Chapman, you are mostly a troll without a clue...
-
Are you talking to me.. I'm not May.
So, what month are you? February? That also comes up short every year.....
Sorry Chapman, you are mostly a troll without a clue...
Mostly?