JFK Assassination Forum

JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate => JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate => Topic started by: Jarrett Smith on November 16, 2023, 02:10:34 AM

Title: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Jarrett Smith on November 16, 2023, 02:10:34 AM
If you subscribe to Paramount+ this is a great documentary on the Assassination. The Parkland Doctors discuss JFK's wounds that day, and pretty much agree the autopsy photos of the head are forged. Back portion of JFK's head completely blown off no scalp to cover it.
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: David Von Pein on November 16, 2023, 02:49:16 AM
The Parkland Doctors...pretty much agree the autopsy photos of the head are forged.

Dr. McClelland certainly did not believe the autopsy photos had been "forged" (at least as of 1988 at any rate). Instead, McClelland invented a ridiculous theory that has JFK's scalp perfectly intact, but yet the skull right underneath that scalp was blown out:

http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2010/06/head-wounds.html#McClelland
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Jarrett Smith on November 16, 2023, 04:27:47 AM
Dr. McClelland certainly did not believe the autopsy photos had been "forged" (at least as of 1988 at any rate). Instead, McClelland invented a ridiculous theory that has JFK's scalp perfectly intact, but yet the skull right underneath that scalp was blown out:

http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2010/06/head-wounds.html#McClelland

What he said on this documentary was he thought they pulled the scalp over the hole in the back of the head, but he was told no this is the way it was which he says wasn't true. The other Doctors also say the autopsy photos have been altered.
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: John Mytton on November 16, 2023, 06:27:46 AM
Dr. McClelland certainly did not believe the autopsy photos had been "forged" (at least as of 1988 at any rate). Instead, McClelland invented a ridiculous theory that has JFK's scalp perfectly intact, but yet the skull right underneath that scalp was blown out:

http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2010/06/head-wounds.html#McClelland

 Thumb1:

(https://i.postimg.cc/WpSQC06P/Mc-Clelland-Bullspombleprofglidnoctobunsa-zpseecf9014.jpg)

JohnM
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: John Mytton on November 16, 2023, 06:32:48 AM
The other Doctors also say the autopsy photos have been altered.

The impossible to fake stereoscopic photos prove beyond all doubt that there was NO exit wound on the rear of Kennedy's head.

(https://i.postimg.cc/wBTPLK7W/JFKBOHlatest-700.gif)

The actual exit wound is exactly as shown in the equally impossible to fake unaltered Zapruder film.

(https://i.postimg.cc/tCfWFw2X/JFK-Autopsy-Morph-smaller-more-frames.gif)

(https://i.postimg.cc/RFV4RpQQ/Head-Shot-close.gif)

JohnM
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Jerry Organ on November 16, 2023, 07:18:00 AM
(http://drive.google.com/uc?export=view&id=1TjpcglbibHHGmr9DZVRLZIFfTnj3RHjF)

(https://images2.imgbox.com/2a/28/kqoiY4t8_o.gif)
  (http://drive.google.com/uc?export=view&id=1C81_tG_1l6sr5fsmQGGhYqzsnvA9RXmY)
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Dan O'meara on November 16, 2023, 08:09:52 AM
If you subscribe to Paramount+ this is a great documentary on the Assassination. The Parkland Doctors discuss JFK's wounds that day, and pretty much agree the autopsy photos of the head are forged. Back portion of JFK's head completely blown off no scalp to cover it.

Which of the Parkland doctors examined the head wound. By this I mean "examine" in the medical sense.
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Ted Shields on November 16, 2023, 10:27:44 AM
A rehash of what we already know. About 5 minutes of worthy info padded out with 85 minutes of filler. "It was a sunny day" etc.
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Michael Welch on November 16, 2023, 10:48:38 AM
Remember this is also fake like the other fake photos John has posted!
(https://www.jfkassassinationgallery.com/albums/userpics/10001/X_AUT_1.JPG)
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Royell Storing on November 16, 2023, 01:18:59 PM
      We all should want to objectively listen to these 7 Dr's regarding the body of JFK 10-15 minutes after the Kill Shot. Anything short of this begs the question as to what you are doing here to begin with.     
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Fergus O'brien on November 16, 2023, 01:25:52 PM
The impossible to fake stereoscopic photos prove beyond all doubt that there was NO exit wound on the rear of Kennedy's head.

(https://i.postimg.cc/wBTPLK7W/JFKBOHlatest-700.gif)

The actual exit wound is exactly as shown in the equally impossible to fake unaltered Zapruder film.

(https://i.postimg.cc/tCfWFw2X/JFK-Autopsy-Morph-smaller-more-frames.gif)

(https://i.postimg.cc/RFV4RpQQ/Head-Shot-close.gif)

Thomas Evan Robinson
Personal contact info deleted to protect Mr. Robinson's privacy
May 26, 1992 (Phone)
Wounds:
Large gaping hole in back of head.
patched by placing piece of rubber.....over it.
Thinks skull full of Plaster of Paris.
Smaller wound in right temple.
Crescent shped, flapped down (3")
(approx 2) Small sharpnel wounds in face.
Packed with wax.
Wound in back (5 to six inches) below shoulder.
To the right of the back bone.
Adrenlin gland and brain removed.
Other organs removed and then put back.
No swelling or discoloration to face.
(Died instantly)
Dr. Berkley (family physician) came in an ask.....
"How much longer???"
He (Robinson) was told (funeral director)
"Take your time."
Is in favor of exhuming body.....to settle once and....for all.
(Robinson quote) "Good pathologists would know exactly"


(https://i.imgur.com/8FCkeMS.jpg)

JohnM
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Dan O'meara on November 16, 2023, 04:31:43 PM
Remember this is also fake like the other fake photos John has posted!
(https://www.jfkassassinationgallery.com/albums/userpics/10001/X_AUT_1.JPG)


Are all films of the assassination faked?
Are all X-rays faked?
Are all autopsy pictures faked?
Are the likes of Jenkins, Stringer and O'Connor all lying about what they saw?
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Jarrett Smith on November 16, 2023, 11:08:53 PM
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53335511759_9493aaab56_c.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/2pg5rsX)

(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53335410308_4e4ff6a7e3_z.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/2pg4ViN)

(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53336821348_2a7bee6693_c.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/2pgc9L5)


This drawing from Dr. Mccelland looks reasonable from what the Zapruder and Moorman pics show.
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: John Mytton on November 17, 2023, 02:08:44 AM
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53335511759_9493aaab56_c.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/2pg5rsX)

(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53335410308_4e4ff6a7e3_z.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/2pg4ViN)

(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53336821348_2a7bee6693_c.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/2pgc9L5)


This drawing from Dr. Mccelland looks reasonable from what the Zapruder and Moorman pics show.

Your analysis of Moorman and Zapruder is way off. There is no dispute that Kennedy's head only had 1 exit wound and in Zapruder, the wound location is obvious.

The actual evidence from a variety of unconnected sources is all corroborated, for instance here's a high res Moorman crop showing the same scalp tear matching this autopsy photo.

(https://i.postimg.cc/L59BncHv/matching-Moorman-with-autopsy-photo.gif)

JohnM
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Royell Storing on November 17, 2023, 03:35:47 AM

  I prefer the Professional Observations of 7 Parkland Dr's that saw the head/body of JFK 10-15 minutes after the Kill Shot vs Layman's Opinions that are made decades after-the-fact.
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Jarrett Smith on November 17, 2023, 04:55:46 AM
  I prefer the Professional Observations of 7 Parkland Dr's that saw the head/body of JFK 10-15 minutes after the Kill Shot vs Layman's Opinions that are made decades after-the-fact.

I agree. Clint Hill said the back of his head was laying in the back seat, Sam Kinney saw the back of the head missing plus found the piece in the car. There was a hole above his hairline the size of a dime. Too many witnesses saying the same thing.
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: John Mytton on November 17, 2023, 05:35:38 AM
Clint Hill said the back of his head....

(https://i.postimg.cc/SNWhK1JD/Clintshowem.gif)

JohnM
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Dan O'meara on November 17, 2023, 09:57:25 AM
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53335511759_9493aaab56_c.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/2pg5rsX)

(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53335410308_4e4ff6a7e3_z.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/2pg4ViN)

(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53336821348_2a7bee6693_c.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/2pgc9L5)


This drawing from Dr. Mccelland looks reasonable from what the Zapruder and Moorman pics show.


This drawing from Dr. Mccelland looks reasonable from what the Zapruder and Moorman pics show.

 :D :D :D

Yeah buddy, its exactly what the Z-film shows!!
Do you see the difference between these two Z-frames?
Pay close attention to the shape of the top of JFK's head:

(https://i.postimg.cc/LXb8kHsN/z292-2.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)
(https://i.postimg.cc/xdjmt102/z330-2.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

Do you see the massive crater where the top of his head used to be?
Would it help if I used an arrow to point out the massive crater in his head?:

(https://i.postimg.cc/wjc86wWX/z328-3.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

And can you guess why the top of his head is missing?

Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Dan O'meara on November 17, 2023, 10:51:33 AM
Just to highlight the Magical Thinking of Alteration Fantasists such as Horne, who believes the head wound we see in the Z-film was painted on [ ::)]
We have to suspend our disbelief in order to enter the Twilight Zone of the Altfan.
In order to achieve this "crater" effect in the top of JFK's head it would be necessary to paint what we see in the background in a consistent 'crater shape' onto JFK's intact head.
Just have a think about this - you can't just paint a crater onto his head. The crater is supposed to be a part of JFK's head that has gone missing. In order to achieve this effect you would have to paint the background to show where the part of JFK's head is missing.
Not only that, the background that is painted in to give the crater effect has to blend seamlessly with the actual footage. 

In the clip below, immediately after the shot, JFK's head rocks backwards, as it begins to come forwards the crater where the top of his head should be is obvious.
This is not a painted on effect.
Pieces of skull and brain were blown into the air and a massive piece of scalp, with bone still attached, is blown over to the right side of his head.

(https://i.postimg.cc/RFV4RpQQ/Head-Shot-close.gif) (https://postimages.org/)
Title: Parkland Hospital Surgeon Malcolm Perry
Post by: Duncan MacRae on November 17, 2023, 03:24:08 PM
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Michael Welch on November 17, 2023, 05:59:21 PM

This drawing from Dr. Mccelland looks reasonable from what the Zapruder and Moorman pics show.

 :D :D :D

Yeah buddy, its exactly what the Z-film shows!!
Do you see the difference between these two Z-frames?
Pay close attention to the shape of the top of JFK's head:

(https://i.postimg.cc/LXb8kHsN/z292-2.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)
(https://i.postimg.cc/xdjmt102/z330-2.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

Do you see the massive crater where the top of his head used to be?
Would it help if I used an arrow to point out the massive crater in his head?:

(https://i.postimg.cc/wjc86wWX/z328-3.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

And can you guess why the top of his head is missing?

Hi Dan, Again, what are you talking about? You mentioned Jenkins yesterday, and I really had to wonder about you! He is featured prominently in the film describing a small entrance wound at the front side of the president's head that was examined by Dr. Finck but not put in the autopsy report. He then talks about a large exit wound in the right rear. He drew this in his ARRB report! He and Dr. McClelland drew the same basic diagram. I was hoping you and John would have learned something....... Thank you for everything! Sincerely yours, Michael        https://aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/pdf/md65.pdf
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Dan O'meara on November 17, 2023, 07:29:07 PM
Hi Dan, Again, what are you talking about? You mentioned Jenkins yesterday, and I really had to wonder about you! He is featured prominently in the film describing a small entrance wound at the front side of the president's head that was examined by Dr. Finck but not put in the autopsy report. He then talks about a large exit wound in the right rear. He drew this in his ARRB report! He and Dr. McClelland drew the same basic diagram. I was hoping you and John would have learned something....... Thank you for everything! Sincerely yours, Michael        https://aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/pdf/md65.pdf

Do you see the large crater where the top of JFK's head should be?
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Jarrett Smith on November 17, 2023, 10:41:48 PM

This drawing from Dr. Mccelland looks reasonable from what the Zapruder and Moorman pics show.

 :D :D :D

Yeah buddy, its exactly what the Z-film shows!!
Do you see the difference between these two Z-frames?
Pay close attention to the shape of the top of JFK's head:

(https://i.postimg.cc/LXb8kHsN/z292-2.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)
(https://i.postimg.cc/xdjmt102/z330-2.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

Do you see the massive crater where the top of his head used to be?
Would it help if I used an arrow to point out the massive crater in his head?:

(https://i.postimg.cc/wjc86wWX/z328-3.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

And can you guess why the top of his head is missing?

Your confused. I never said the top of the head wasn't blown out it was, but as my pics show there is a hole exactly where many of the witnesses place it on the upper rear of the head. The autopsy photos and x-rays were doctored there is too much eyewitness testimony the wounds did not match. My opinion they knew it was a conspiracy but lied to prevent a full scale war, which makes perfect sense under the circumstances. 
Title: Re: Parkland Hospital Surgeon Malcolm Perry
Post by: Jarrett Smith on November 17, 2023, 10:49:47 PM

From the Parkland Doctors Documentary

"At the press conference, Dr. Perry, in describing the wound here [pointing to his throat], said he thought that it looked like an entrance wound," McClelland recalled.

"When he left the room, someone came up to him. Dr. Perry thought 'Maybe he was a secret service man.' And he told Dr. Perry, 'You must never, ever say that that was an entrance wound again if you know what’s good for you.'"

Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Dan O'meara on November 17, 2023, 11:35:34 PM
Your confused. I never said the top of the head wasn't blown out it was, but as my pics show there is a hole exactly where many of the witnesses place it on the upper rear of the head. The autopsy photos and x-rays were doctored there is too much eyewitness testimony the wounds did not match. My opinion they knew it was a conspiracy but lied to prevent a full scale war, which makes perfect sense under the circumstances.

Your confused. I never said the top of the head wasn't blown out it was

You seemed very confused when you posted that McLelland's picture was somehow similar to what was shown in the Z-film. It looks absolutely nothing like what is shown in the Z-film. They are two completely different head wounds. McLelland depicts a blowout in the back of JFK's head, the Z-film shows that the top of JFK's head was blown off and that there was no blowout at the back.
You seem to agree that the top of JFK's head was blown off but you don't seem to have noticed that witnesses like McLelland aren't pointing that out.
You seem confused.

but as my pics show there is a hole exactly where many of the witnesses place it on the upper rear of the head.

The pictures you posted show nothing of the sort. They show absolutely nothing. You have simply put a circle on a picture as if that somehow demonstrates something.

(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53335410308_4e4ff6a7e3_z.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/2pg4ViN)

What, exactly, do you believe the above picture shows? It's too blurred to make out any detail. Here's a better version of the pic I posted elsewhere, can you still see the thing you think you see in the pic you posted?

(https://i.postimg.cc/Y0GLj4J6/Z337headshotredline2.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)


The autopsy photos and x-rays were doctored there is too much eyewitness testimony the wounds did not match.

The key to understanding why some (not all) witnesses are describing a wound just at the back of JFK's head is revealed in an interview with Jim Jenkins. Below is a post from another thread. For anyone actually interested in this issue the interview is worth checking out.

It boils down to this - what the Parkland Doctors report seeing concerning the head wound is different from what we see in the Z-film.
This seems like an insurmountable issue, it's either one or the other.

I believe these two, seemingly contradictory, positions can actually be reconciled. The key is understanding the exact nature of JFK's head wound.


The above is an interview with Jim Jenkins. He was a student at the Medical Technology School, part of Bethesda Naval Hospital and assisted with the autopsy that took place at Bethesda.
At around the 30 min mark Jenkins is describing the wound to the skull. He uses a replica skull to describe an area where occipital bone and tissue were missing. There was no laceration to the scalp in this area just missing bone and tissue:

"The wound was here, approximately where my finger is [he places his finger on the back right of the skull, next to the occipital bone]...and it extended down here. It was about three and a half inches long...about two inches wide. That was where the missing bone was and the missing tissue was."


He then goes on to describe a much larger injury:

"Remember, all of this portion [of the skull] in this area was fractured to the saggital suture[he indicates nearly the whole right side/top of the skull]...but it wasn't gone, it was still being kept intact by the scalp. The scalp had rents and tears in it [he indicates a line running along the saggital suture on the crown of the skull]...it seemed like some of those tears in the scalp had been surgically connected, little connections to follow the fracture line in here [again he indicates the length of the saggital suture on the crown of the skull]...
When Dr. Humes took the wrappings off the head, there was a secondary wrapping on it that I think was a towel...as he was taking it off this area kind of gapped open [he indicates that the whole top right side of the skull from the saggital suture downwards opened up] but as soon as we separated it from the towel it went back together."


Jenkins is describing an injury in which the whole right upper side of JFK's head comes away but can be put back again. He goes on:

"Now, that's significant for the fact is you could actually...lay this skull open, you could actually take your hands and separate it [he makes a motion with his hand to indicate the side of the skull could be opened up like a small, hinged door]. So, that would have given you access to the brain."

This is the key point about JFK's head wound - it was possible to "lay this skull open", to open up the side of his head and then put it back again. Jenkins is describing the truly massive wound we see in the autopsy pics and the Z-film. Not a localised wound at the back of the head but something that takes up the majority of the upper right side of JFK's head.
And this is why the doctors at Parkland didn't appreciate the full extent of JFK's head wound. They may have saw it but none of them actually examined it as they were busy trying to save his life. What they saw was the side of his head put back in place by Jackie on the way to Parkland but there was no real structural integrity to it, as he was lying on his back the contents of his head oozed out of a gap in the wound towards the rear of his head. Almost everyone at Parkland saw the same thing, matter oozing from a big hole towards the back of JFK's head.
What they did not see was that the whole side of JFK's head could come away to reveal the truly massive wound seen in the autopsy pics and the Z-film.

No need for film alteration.
The Z-film shows the injury Jenkins describes.
The way Jenkins describes the injury allows us to understand why the Parkland doctors appeared to report something different from the photo/film record.
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Jarrett Smith on November 18, 2023, 02:25:21 AM
Your confused. I never said the top of the head wasn't blown out it was

You seemed very confused when you posted that McLelland's picture was somehow similar to what was shown in the Z-film. It looks absolutely nothing like what is shown in the Z-film. They are two completely different head wounds. McLelland depicts a blowout in the back of JFK's head, the Z-film shows that the top of JFK's head was blown off and that there was no blowout at the back.
You seem to agree that the top of JFK's head was blown off but you don't seem to have noticed that witnesses like McLelland aren't pointing that out.
You seem confused.

but as my pics show there is a hole exactly where many of the witnesses place it on the upper rear of the head.

The pictures you posted show nothing of the sort. They show absolutely nothing. You have simply put a circle on a picture as if that somehow demonstrates something.

(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53335410308_4e4ff6a7e3_z.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/2pg4ViN)

What, exactly, do you believe the above picture shows? It's too blurred to make out any detail. Here's a better version of the pic I posted elsewhere, can you still see the thing you think you see in the pic you posted?

(https://i.postimg.cc/Y0GLj4J6/Z337headshotredline2.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)


The autopsy photos and x-rays were doctored there is too much eyewitness testimony the wounds did not match.

The key to understanding why some (not all) witnesses are describing a wound just at the back of JFK's head is revealed in an interview with Jim Jenkins. Below is a post from another thread. For anyone actually interested in this issue the interview is worth checking out.

It boils down to this - what the Parkland Doctors report seeing concerning the head wound is different from what we see in the Z-film.
This seems like an insurmountable issue, it's either one or the other.

I believe these two, seemingly contradictory, positions can actually be reconciled. The key is understanding the exact nature of JFK's head wound.


The above is an interview with Jim Jenkins. He was a student at the Medical Technology School, part of Bethesda Naval Hospital and assisted with the autopsy that took place at Bethesda.
At around the 30 min mark Jenkins is describing the wound to the skull. He uses a replica skull to describe an area where occipital bone and tissue were missing. There was no laceration to the scalp in this area just missing bone and tissue:

"The wound was here, approximately where my finger is [he places his finger on the back right of the skull, next to the occipital bone]...and it extended down here. It was about three and a half inches long...about two inches wide. That was where the missing bone was and the missing tissue was."


He then goes on to describe a much larger injury:

"Remember, all of this portion [of the skull] in this area was fractured to the saggital suture[he indicates nearly the whole right side/top of the skull]...but it wasn't gone, it was still being kept intact by the scalp. The scalp had rents and tears in it [he indicates a line running along the saggital suture on the crown of the skull]...it seemed like some of those tears in the scalp had been surgically connected, little connections to follow the fracture line in here [again he indicates the length of the saggital suture on the crown of the skull]...
When Dr. Humes took the wrappings off the head, there was a secondary wrapping on it that I think was a towel...as he was taking it off this area kind of gapped open [he indicates that the whole top right side of the skull from the saggital suture downwards opened up] but as soon as we separated it from the towel it went back together."


Jenkins is describing an injury in which the whole right upper side of JFK's head comes away but can be put back again. He goes on:

"Now, that's significant for the fact is you could actually...lay this skull open, you could actually take your hands and separate it [he makes a motion with his hand to indicate the side of the skull could be opened up like a small, hinged door]. So, that would have given you access to the brain."

This is the key point about JFK's head wound - it was possible to "lay this skull open", to open up the side of his head and then put it back again. Jenkins is describing the truly massive wound we see in the autopsy pics and the Z-film. Not a localised wound at the back of the head but something that takes up the majority of the upper right side of JFK's head.
And this is why the doctors at Parkland didn't appreciate the full extent of JFK's head wound. They may have saw it but none of them actually examined it as they were busy trying to save his life. What they saw was the side of his head put back in place by Jackie on the way to Parkland but there was no real structural integrity to it, as he was lying on his back the contents of his head oozed out of a gap in the wound towards the rear of his head. Almost everyone at Parkland saw the same thing, matter oozing from a big hole towards the back of JFK's head.
What they did not see was that the whole side of JFK's head could come away to reveal the truly massive wound seen in the autopsy pics and the Z-film.

No need for film alteration.
The Z-film shows the injury Jenkins describes.
The way Jenkins describes the injury allows us to understand why the Parkland doctors appeared to report something different from the photo/film record.


Thanks for that video it pretty much confirms what the parkland doctors saw. So the fatal shot was from the front and the autopsy doctors found the wound. Not really shocking I do think they were afraid of War thus the Cover Up.
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Dan O'meara on November 18, 2023, 07:49:05 AM
Thanks for that video it pretty much confirms what the parkland doctors saw. So the fatal shot was from the front and the autopsy doctors found the wound. Not really shocking I do think they were afraid of War thus the Cover Up.

Thanks for that video it pretty much confirms what the parkland doctors saw

Which of the Parkland doctors saw a head wound that took up virtually the whole upper right side of JFK's skull, from just behind the front hairline to the back of his head?
A wound that could be opened and closed like a hinged door?

So the fatal shot was from the front

Then why, at the moment of impact, is JFK's first movement forward?

(https://i.postimg.cc/RFV4RpQQ/Head-Shot-close.gif) (https://postimages.org/)

Not really shocking I do think they were afraid of War thus the Cover Up.

You don't think the cover up was because it wasn't the Russians?
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Jarrett Smith on November 18, 2023, 07:16:15 PM
Dan O'meara link=topic=3851.msg152537#msg152537 date=1700293745]
Thanks for that video it pretty much confirms what the parkland doctors saw

Which of the Parkland doctors saw a head wound that took up virtually the whole upper right side of JFK's skull, from just behind the front hairline to the back of his head?
A wound that could be opened and closed like a hinged door?

Dr. Salyer

So the fatal shot was from the front

Then why, at the moment of impact, is JFK's first movement forward?

He was shot from behind, then front. Bang-Bang

(https://i.postimg.cc/RFV4RpQQ/Head-Shot-close.gif) (https://postimages.org/)

Not really shocking I do think they were afraid of War thus the Cover Up.

You don't think the cover up was because it wasn't the Russians?


Not at first no
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Royell Storing on November 18, 2023, 07:36:29 PM
  With regard to the "forward" head movement, you need to merely permit your eyes to absorb/examine the ENTIRE IMAGE. The gore is attracting/distracting your eyes. JFK's head has that "forward bob' due to Jackie Pulling DOWNWARD On His Arm/Wrist. It's easy to see if you'll get away from your macabre fixation. And don't feel bad, you're Not the only one on this Forum displaying this affliction.
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Dan O'meara on November 18, 2023, 08:38:14 PM
  With regard to the "forward" head movement, you need to merely permit your eyes to absorb/examine the ENTIRE IMAGE. The gore is attracting/distracting your eyes. JFK's head has that "forward bob' due to Jackie Pulling DOWNWARD On His Arm/Wrist. It's easy to see if you'll get away from your macabre fixation. And don't feel bad, you're Not the only one on this Forum displaying this affliction.

 :D :D :D
You funny
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Steve M. Galbraith on November 18, 2023, 10:47:16 PM
Here is what Dr. McClelland wrote the day of the assassination, about three hours after JFK was pronounced dead:

From the handwritten statement of Robt McClelland written Nov 22, 1963 at 4:45pm on the cause of death of JFK:

"At approximately 12:45pm on the above date I was called from the second floor of Parkland Hospital and went immediately to the Emergency Operating Room. When I arrived President Kennedy was being attended by Drs Malcolm Perry, Charles Baxter, James Carrico and Ronald Jones. The President was at that time commatose from a massive gunshot wound of the head with afragment wound of the trachea. An endotracheal tube and assisted respiration was started immediately by Dr Carrico on duty in the EOR when the President arrived. Drs Perry, Baxter and I then performed a tacheotomy for respiratory distress and tracheal injury and Drs Jones and Paul Peters inserted bilateral anterior chest tubes for pneumothoracis secondary to the tracheomediastinal injury. In spite of this, at 12:55 he was pronounced dead by Dr Kemp Clark the neurosurgeon and professor of neurosurgery who arrived immediately after I did. The cause of death was due to massive head and brain injury from a gunshot wound of the left (sic) temple. He was pronounced dead after external cardiac massage failed and ECG activity was gone.

Yes, the cause of death was: "[D]ue to massive head and brain injury from a gunshot wound of the left temple." Yes, left temple(?). Not the back of the head.

Later (January '64), in the Texas State Journal of Medicine, McClelland told the publication this: "[T]he cause of death was the massive head and brain injuries from a gunshot wound of the right side of the head."

Here he says right side. Nowhere in either account did he mention the back/rear of the head.

Several of the other doctors were interviewed by the publication and gave accounts of what they saw. This was *before* they testified. To be blunt, they were very confused.

You can read them here: https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth599863/m1/102

Shorter: the accounts of the ER doctors on the location of the head wound are, for me, very questionable.

Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Steve Barber on November 18, 2023, 11:52:42 PM
  I prefer the Professional Observations of 7 Parkland Dr's that saw the head/body of JFK 10-15 minutes after the Kill Shot vs Layman's Opinions that are made decades after-the-fact.

Of course you do!  Meanwhile, you ignore what Mrs., Kennedy told Theodore White one week after the assassination-in gory detail-how she "Kept trying to hold the top of his head down. Maybe I could keep it ("his brains") in". By the time the doctors saw the head wound, it had been inadvertantly altered by Mrs. Kennedy who obvilously put the large skull flap hanging from the top of his head inside-out in front of her husband's ear. extending over the temple.  Once she did this, the entire head wound wasn't seen by anyone else until the body reached Washington D.C. 
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Steve Barber on November 19, 2023, 12:22:06 AM
(http://drive.google.com/uc?export=view&id=1TjpcglbibHHGmr9DZVRLZIFfTnj3RHjF)

(https://images2.imgbox.com/2a/28/kqoiY4t8_o.gif)
  (http://drive.google.com/uc?export=view&id=1C81_tG_1l6sr5fsmQGGhYqzsnvA9RXmY)

 Hi Jerry, 

  EXCELLENT GIF showing the forward head movement! 

   No matter what-the Orville Nix film very vividly also shows the forward head movement. 
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: John Mytton on November 19, 2023, 12:41:44 AM
I see the infamous Cyril Wecht is also in this documentary, the following example which I don't think is in this doco but it is a good example of the extraordinary lengths Wecht will go to, to perpetuate his "ideas", e.g. equal height of seating, randomly sized occupants, wrong body orientation etc etc.

(https://i.postimg.cc/tCV8qwVM/cyril-wecht-sbt-mess.jpg)

Anyway, in the documentary "What the doctors saw" he shows this silly little cartoon which is wrong in so many ways.

(https://i.postimg.cc/1RDYbwxk/wecht-sbt.jpg)

1) Kennedy's back wound is vertically inset from the right side of his neck but in the above diagram the back wound is almost in his armpit.

(https://i.postimg.cc/W1dmccFd/Kennedy-back-wound.jpg)

2) The exit wound on Connally was below his right nipple, not out of his shoulder.

3) CE399 struck Connally's wrist not half way down his forearm.

Seriously Cyril, is this what it takes??

JohnM

Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: John Mytton on November 19, 2023, 01:09:55 AM
I was just looking through my JFKA imagery and came across this little gem.

The author of this composite image which obviously took some time to create, claimed that either 1 or both images were falsified due to the fact that the concrete wall behind the Limo was a different size as compared to the length of the Limo? And no, he/she/it wasn't joking!

(https://i.postimg.cc/X7q3WsVZ/MOORMAN-NIX-compared.jpg)

Do any CT's concur with the original author's reasoning?

Btw along with the above Wecht nonsense, do these comically insane images and any others that exist deserve their own thread?

EDIT, I was just over at the Ed Forum and some guy devoted a thread about the mystery of the hidden Zapruder frame 312.5 and seems to be seriously concerned that Z312.5 which "captures a haunting, reddish mist enveloping President Kennedy and First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy" is absent from the NARA collection!? You can't make this stuff up, Brilliant!

(https://chatbotcpa.com/jfk/ZFrame312.5.png)

JohnM
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Royell Storing on November 19, 2023, 04:05:25 AM
Of course you do!  Meanwhile, you ignore what Mrs., Kennedy told Theodore White one week after the assassination-in gory detail-how she "Kept trying to hold the top of his head down. Maybe I could keep it ("his brains") in". By the time the doctors saw the head wound, it had been inadvertantly altered by Mrs. Kennedy who obvilously put the large skull flap hanging from the top of his head inside-out in front of her husband's ear. extending over the temple.  Once she did this, the entire head wound wasn't seen by anyone else until the body reached Washington D.C.

    Several of you guys are confusing that Trap Door wound in the temple area with a Large Hole in the Back/Rear of JFK's skull. This HOLE in the back of his head is Now being connected to an Entry Wound in the neck/throat. This entry wound in the neck resulting in a blow-out exit wound in the back of JFK's head is rapidly gaining steam as we approach the 60 year anniversary of 11/22/63. 
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Dan O'meara on November 19, 2023, 11:57:41 AM
    Several of you guys are confusing that Trap Door wound in the temple area with a Large Hole in the Back/Rear of JFK's skull. This HOLE in the back of his head is Now being connected to an Entry Wound in the neck/throat. This entry wound in the neck resulting in a blow-out exit wound in the back of JFK's head is rapidly gaining steam as we approach the 60 year anniversary of 11/22/63.

 Several of you guys are confusing that Trap Door wound in the temple area with a Large Hole in the Back/Rear of JFK's skull.

I'm glad to see you finally acknowledging that JFK's head wound is far more complex than your imaginary "blow-out". You've come a long way.
It's good to see that Jarrett also acknowledges that the top of JFK's head was blown off.
This "Trap Door wound", as you put it, is the key to understanding why there has been so much confusion over this issue. Jenkins describes taking the wrapping off JFK's head and the whole side of his head coming away and that it could be put back in place. Once in place it was very difficult to grasp the full extent of the injury.
This injury can be seen in the Z-film, it is a large flap of scalp with bone still attached to the inside of it. A truly grotesque injury.
This flap was described by others:

Floyd Riebe - Yes, there was a flap of bone over on the side above the temporal area.
Jerrol Custer - the only thing that held it together was the skin. And even that was loose...This is where all the trauma was (on the right side), right here… Right anatomical side again".
John Stringer - Well...the side of the head, the bone was gone. But there was a flap, where you could lay it back. But the back...It was a complete head of hair

It must be remembered, once this large flap of scalp and bone was put back in place (which Jackie apparently did on the way to Parkland), the full extent of the injury was impossible to gauge. What a lot of people saw was JFK in a prone position with brain matter oozing from an apparent hole in the back of his head. A handful of people described an injury that was just in the back of the head but none of these people saw the full extent of the injury. None of then examined the injury, they were just reporting their impressions of what they saw.
It must also be remembered that not everyone at Parkland saw a wound exclusively at the back of the head. The following is from Pat Speer's website:

"Dr. Burkley was aware of but one wound on Kennedy's head, a large wound by his temple. As far as the Parkland staff, well, Dr. Baxter testified before the Warren Commission that the wound was temporal and parietal, and thus near the ear, and not on the back of the head. Dr. Salyer, as well, testified that the wound was in the "right temporal area," and thus near the ear, and not on the back of the head. While Dr. Giesecke testified before the Commission that...it was a large wound stretching from the vertex to the ear, and the brow-line to the occiput, and thus not the hole on the back of the head recalled by others. In fact, he later admitted to Vincent Palamara that although he "did not examine the President's head and should never have said anything about the wounds,"
"...Dr. Don Curtis...specified to researcher Vincent Palamara that the wound was on the "posterior lateral surface of the skull," the side of the head. Dr. William Midgett's story is similar. While his presence in the emergency room was confirmed by the Warren Commission testimony of several nurses, his impressions were not recorded until decades later when he was interviewed first by Gerald Posner and then Wallace Milam. He is reported to have told Posner the wound was "more parietal than occipital" and to have told Milam it was an approximately 6 cm wound in the parietal area behind the ear."
"When contacted by researcher Vincent Palamara in 1998, [Dr. Donald] Seldin is reported to have claimed that the bullet exploded the skull, and that the "frontal, parietal, and temporal bones were shattered." No mention of the occipital bone."
"Sharon Calloway...an x-ray intern at Parkland on the day of the shooting, performed an oral history interview for the Sixth Floor Museum on 1-27-02, and claimed she saw the back of Kennedy's head in the hallway before he was moved into Trauma Room One. She claimed: "The top of his head was gone... One of the doctors came down the hall shaking his head and he said it looked like someone had dropped a ripe watermelon on the floor. This is what the top of his head looked like. And we could see that. We could see his head. It wasn't draped yet."


A handful of doctors who were busily trying to save the President's life and who did not examine the head wound were mistaken when they felt they were describing the full extent of the head wound.
Rather than accept this very straight-forward reality, the Tinfoil Nutjob Brigade insist these few men were right, that everyone else who saw something different is a liar, that the Z-film was altered and that all other films of the assassination had to be similarly altered, that the autopsy X-rays were altered and that the autopsy pictures were also altered.
On one hand is the understandable mistake of a handful, on the other, a mountain of testimonial/film/photographic evidence demonstrating these few were mistaken.


Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Dan O'meara on November 19, 2023, 12:05:50 PM
Dan O'meara link=topic=3851.msg152537#msg152537 date=1700293745]
Thanks for that video it pretty much confirms what the parkland doctors saw

Which of the Parkland doctors saw a head wound that took up virtually the whole upper right side of JFK's skull, from just behind the front hairline to the back of his head?
A wound that could be opened and closed like a hinged door?

Dr. Salyer

So the fatal shot was from the front

Then why, at the moment of impact, is JFK's first movement forward?

He was shot from behind, then front. Bang-Bang

(https://i.postimg.cc/RFV4RpQQ/Head-Shot-close.gif) (https://postimages.org/)

Not really shocking I do think they were afraid of War thus the Cover Up.

You don't think the cover up was because it wasn't the Russians?


Not at first no

Quote
Which of the Parkland doctors saw a head wound that took up virtually the whole upper right side of JFK's skull, from just behind the front hairline to the back of his head?
A wound that could be opened and closed like a hinged door?

Dr. Salyer

Now I am confused.
Why would Sayler be saying the autopsy photos were altered?
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Royell Storing on November 19, 2023, 04:08:01 PM
I see the infamous Cyril Wecht is also in this documentary, the following example which I don't think is in this doco but it is a good example of the extraordinary lengths Wecht will go to, to perpetuate his "ideas", e.g. equal height of seating, randomly sized occupants, wrong body orientation etc etc.

(https://i.postimg.cc/tCV8qwVM/cyril-wecht-sbt-mess.jpg)

Anyway, in the documentary "What the doctors saw" he shows this silly little cartoon which is wrong in so many ways.

(https://i.postimg.cc/1RDYbwxk/wecht-sbt.jpg)

1) Kennedy's back wound is vertically inset from the right side of his neck but in the above diagram the back wound is almost in his armpit.

(https://i.postimg.cc/W1dmccFd/Kennedy-back-wound.jpg)

2) The exit wound on Connally was below his right nipple, not out of his shoulder.

3) CE399 struck Connally's wrist not half way down his forearm.

Seriously Cyril, is this what it takes??

JohnM

   John -  Keep checking "You Tube". With the anniversary date quickly approaching, all kinds of new stuff is being posted from credible sources. Some guy with a lab operation in Colorado did an extensive 360 Mapping of Dealey Plaza. Via computer, he has also input 30+ images from 11/22/63 to keep his 360 Dealey Plaza, "dead on balls accurate". He then lines up the 6th Floor Snipers Nest with the JFK Limo. The SBT turns out to be impossible via his lab's work product. Once again, we are getting back to the placement of Connally's Jump Seat vs where Connally was actually physically positioned when the SBT was allegedly fired. Very Professionally done work. You need to check it out.
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Royell Storing on November 19, 2023, 05:35:05 PM
A rehash of what we already know. About 5 minutes of worthy info padded out with 85 minutes of filler. "It was a sunny day" etc.

    What about the throat wound being observed at Parkland Hospital as an Entry Wound?  Is this the "padded" you're referencing? An entrance wound in the throat = Conspiracy. Rather than "padded", this is a Game Changer. And this Entrance Wound is not just observed, it is notated. Good thing Humes was not working at Parkland Hospital or this clerical documentation might have been thrown into a blazing fireplace.
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Steve Barber on November 19, 2023, 08:19:30 PM
Not a valid %s URL
    Several of you guys are confusing that Trap Door wound in the temple area with a Large Hole in the Back/Rear of JFK's skull. This HOLE in the back of his head is Now being connected to an Entry Wound in the neck/throat. This entry wound in the neck resulting in a blow-out exit wound in the back of JFK's head is rapidly gaining steam as we approach the 60 year anniversary of 11/22/63.

 I'm not confusing the "trap  door" as you call it w, with anything.   That skull flap is connected the top of the head, and this is what Mrs. Kennedy was talking about when she said that she "Kept trying to hold the top of his head down.  Maybe I could keep it ('his brains") in". The rest of the top of JFK's head was in fragments that were scattered in Dealey Plaza, as well as inside the limousine.  The Harper, Burros, and Seymour Wetzman fragments--all were found some 25 feet ahead of where the limousine was when the fatal shot was fired. The Weitzman fragment was so small that Weitzman thought it was from a "Firecracker".  The Burros almost 2 inches in size, and was transported to Washington D.C. in a small Neiman-Marcus box.  The Harper fragment most everyone knows the histrory of was about 3 inches in size, and was given to Harper's uncle, who then turned it over to authorities, then kept at the NA in Washington D.C. before it was stolen.  The third fragment can be seen in the Zapruder film beginning in frame 314, and following frames ( minus the 7 frames where Zapruder panned too high as it was in flight ) before it came to rest under Nellie Connally's seat. I made this discovery in 2004, and a researcher by the name of Paul Seaton made a (poor) gif of it, which I think is still online.  I have since made my own gif which I will include in this post.  This fragment is large in size, and either struck Nellie Connally on the back, bounced off her back and and landed on the top portion of the backrest of her jump seat which it landed on, then toppled to the floor of the car, which we can see in the film.  It was then found under Nellie Connally's seat by Secret Servive agent Samuel Kinney, whom is on record as having found the skull fragment. and is mentioned in his account to the HSCA .  I don't know why you insist that the back of JFK's head was bown off. It isn't true at all.  The Zapruder film certainly shows no such thing, Mrs Kennedy's own words of desribing the head wound reveal no such thing, and neither does the Nix or Marie Muchmore films, or the Mary Ann Moorman Krahmer photograph confirm it. In fact, they--as well as the Zapruder film--prove that the back of the head is intact, and that the TOP of the head was blown off, as all skull fragments blown 25 feet AHEAD of the car, plus the fragment we see land on Nellie Connally's that falls to the floor.  If the  back of the head was blown off, none of these skull fragments would have been located 25 feet away in FRONT of where the car was located at the time of the fatal shot.  And they can be celarly seen in the Zapruder film, Nix film and Muchmore film, flying upward and westward, at a speed calculated by John K. Lattimer at around 80 MPH. 

   
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Dan O'meara on November 19, 2023, 08:44:06 PM
Not a valid %s URL I'm not confusing the "trap  door" as you call it w, with anything.   That skull flap is connected the top of the head, and this is what Mrs. Kennedy was talking about when she said that she "Kept trying to hold the top of his head down.  Maybe I could keep it ('his brains") in". The rest of the top of JFK's head was in fragments that were scattered in Dealey Plaza, as well as inside the limousine.  The Harper, Burros, and Seymour Wetzman fragments--all were found some 25 feet ahead of where the limousine was when the fatal shot was fired. The Weitzman fragment was so small that Weitzman thought it was from a "Firecracker".  The Burros almost 2 inches in size, and was transported to Washington D.C. in a small Neiman-Marcus box.  The Harper fragment most everyone knows the histrory of was about 3 inches in size, and was given to Harper's uncle, who then turned it over to authorities, then kept at the NA in Washington D.C. before it was stolen.  The third fragment can be seen in the Zapruder film beginning in frame 314, and following frames ( minus the 7 frames where Zapruder panned too high as it was in flight ) before it came to rest under Nellie Connally's seat. I made this discovery in 2004, and a researcher by the name of Paul Seaton made a (poor) gif of it, which I think is still online.  I have since made my own gif which I will include in this post.  This fragment is large in size, and either struck Nellie Connally on the back, bounced off her back and and landed on the top portion of the backrest of her jump seat which it landed on, then toppled to the floor of the car, which we can see in the film.  It was then found under Nellie Connally's seat by Secret Servive agent Samuel Kinney, whom is on record as having found the skull fragment. and is mentioned in his account to the HSCA .  I don't know why you insist that the back of JFK's head was bown off. It isn't true at all.  The Zapruder film certainly shows no such thing, Mrs Kennedy's own words of desribing the head wound reveal no such thing, and neither does the Nix or Marie Muchmore films, or the Mary Ann Moorman Krahmer photograph confirm it. In fact, they--as well as the Zapruder film--prove that the back of the head is intact, and that the TOP of the head was blown off, as all skull fragments blown 25 feet AHEAD of the car, plus the fragment we see land on Nellie Connally's that falls to the floor.  If the  back of the head was blown off, none of these skull fragments would have been located 25 feet away in FRONT of where the car was located at the time of the fatal shot.  And they can be celarly seen in the Zapruder film, Nix film and Muchmore film, flying upward and westward, at a speed calculated by John K. Lattimer at around 80 MPH. 

   

 Thumb1:
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Royell Storing on November 19, 2023, 10:14:09 PM
Of course you do!  Meanwhile, you ignore what Mrs., Kennedy told Theodore White one week after the assassination-in gory detail-how she "Kept trying to hold the top of his head down. Maybe I could keep it ("his brains") in". By the time the doctors saw the head wound, it had been inadvertantly altered by Mrs. Kennedy who obvilously put the large skull flap hanging from the top of his head inside-out in front of her husband's ear. extending over the temple.  Once she did this, the entire head wound wasn't seen by anyone else until the body reached Washington D.C.

     So 1st you repeatedly throw that Z Film Gore out there, and now you move on to speculating that Jackie re-assembled JFK's head "inside-out"? This is without question Cuckoo Bird material. And ALL of this is after you tell me that you are unable to share YOUR Copy of the Darnell Film because you engaged in some kinda sacred promise with an unidentified individual. OK...........................   
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Steve Barber on November 19, 2023, 10:16:36 PM
 

 BTW...I wonder if anyone ever noticed the sizeable chunk of brain tissue on the passnger side window that wasn't there before the fatal shot?   More  proof that the only shot to the head came from the rear of the limousine.

(https://i.imgur.com/fGKjzCr.png)
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Steve Barber on November 19, 2023, 10:20:07 PM
     So 1st you repeatedly throw that Z Film Gore out there, and now you move on to speculating that Jackie re-assembled JFK's head "inside-out"? This is without question Cuckoo Bird material. And ALL of this is after you tell me that you are unable to share YOUR Copy of the Darnell Film because you engaged in some kinda sacred promise with an unidentified individual. OK...........................

 Storing, you defintely have a reading comprehension problem!   I NEVER said that Mrs. Kennedy did anything with that skull flap haning upside down exposing the inside of the skull ( FACING INSIDE-OUT- GET IT???!!!)  That's how it ended up during the explosion of the head!! The only thing Mrs. Kennedy did to this fragment was push it up back where it belonged!   For the love of sanity, MAN!  You really EXASPERATE ME!  As for the Darnell--or anything else that I have in my files--I wouldn't share anything with a person such as you because you adulterate everything you touch JFK--no matter what it is!  So drop it and live with it! I am a man of my word and when someone says "Please do not share this with anyone" my response is "I won't.".   GOT IT?!!!!  GET IT!
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Royell Storing on November 19, 2023, 10:37:50 PM


 BTW...I wonder if anyone ever noticed the sizeable chunk of brain tissue on the passnger side window that wasn't there before the fatal shot?   More  proof that the only shot to the head came from the rear of the limousine.

(https://i.imgur.com/fGKjzCr.png)

   Are you sure that is not the result of a bullet fragment? ASAIC Kellerman described the scene as a "flurry" coming into the JFK Limo.
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Royell Storing on November 19, 2023, 10:40:52 PM
Of course you do!  Meanwhile, you ignore what Mrs., Kennedy told Theodore White one week after the assassination-in gory detail-how she "Kept trying to hold the top of his head down. Maybe I could keep it ("his brains") in". By the time the doctors saw the head wound, it had been inadvertantly altered by Mrs. Kennedy who obvilously put the large skull flap hanging from the top of his head inside-out in front of her husband's ear. extending over the temple.  Once she did this, the entire head wound wasn't seen by anyone else until the body reached Washington D.C.

 For the record. ".......top of his head INSIDE-OUT"
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Dan O'meara on November 19, 2023, 10:53:12 PM
For the record. ".......top of his head INSIDE-OUT"

(https://i.postimg.cc/wjc86wWX/z328-3.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

Seeing the crater yet, Royell?
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Royell Storing on November 20, 2023, 12:03:58 AM
Of course you do!  Meanwhile, you ignore what Mrs., Kennedy told Theodore White one week after the assassination-in gory detail-how she "Kept trying to hold the top of his head down. Maybe I could keep it ("his brains") in". By the time the doctors saw the head wound, it had been inadvertantly altered by Mrs. Kennedy who obvilously put the large skull flap hanging from the top of his head inside-out in front of her husband's ear. extending over the temple.  Once she did this, the entire head wound wasn't seen by anyone else until the body reached Washington D.C.

    Read it and weep.   "...it had been inadvertantly ALTERED by Mrs Kennedy .....................
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Steve Barber on November 20, 2023, 12:28:46 AM
    Read it and weep.   "...it had been inadvertantly ALTERED by Mrs Kennedy .....................

 I don't have to "Read it and weep", Storing!  I wrote it!  Same inside out falp of skull hanging in front of the ear.  BEFORE Mrs. Kennedy put it back into place on the way to the hospital is frame 335 from the Z film.  When the autopsists pulled that inside out upside down skull flap it was photographed opened back up.  Identical to what the Zaprder film show.

  (https://i.imgur.com/E1LESnL.png) 

 
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Steve Barber on November 20, 2023, 12:39:06 AM
(https://i.postimg.cc/wjc86wWX/z328-3.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

Seeing the crater yet, Royell?

  Hear! Hear!!   Thumb1:
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Royell Storing on November 20, 2023, 01:20:59 AM
Of course you do!  Meanwhile, you ignore what Mrs., Kennedy told Theodore White one week after the assassination-in gory detail-how she "Kept trying to hold the top of his head down. Maybe I could keep it ("his brains") in". By the time the doctors saw the head wound, it had been inadvertantly altered by Mrs. Kennedy who obvilously put the large skull flap hanging from the top of his head inside-out in front of her husband's ear. extending over the temple.  Once she did this, the entire head wound wasn't seen by anyone else until the body reached Washington D.C.

    For the record. If you mis-spoke when you said, "By the time the doctors saw the head wound, IT HAD BEEN INADVERTANTLY ALTERED BY MRS KENNEDY..........................", just admit it. You're claiming she put JFK's head back together "inside out" is wild. This woman was in shock and still in shock while at Parkland and then when LBJ trotted her out during his swearing in ceremony aboard AF1. She is not up to reconstructing the head of her husband while knocking around the back seat/floor board of the JFK Limo.
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Jarrett Smith on November 20, 2023, 02:17:19 AM
    For the record. If you mis-spoke when you said, "By the time the doctors saw the head wound, IT HAD BEEN INADVERTANTLY ALTERED BY MRS KENNEDY..........................", just admit it. You're claiming she put JFK's head back together "inside out" is wild. This woman was in shock and still in shock while at Parkland and then when LBJ trotted her out during his swearing in ceremony aboard AF1. She is not up to reconstructing the head of her husband while knocking around the back seat/floor board of the JFK Limo.

Royell, you have two options.....you can believe the Parkland Doctors and Jim Jenkins who was at the autopsy, or these guys on this message board who are armchair neurosurgeons.
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Steve Barber on November 20, 2023, 04:28:41 AM
    For the record. If you mis-spoke when you said, "By the time the doctors saw the head wound, IT HAD BEEN INADVERTANTLY ALTERED BY MRS KENNEDY..........................", just admit it. You're claiming she put JFK's head back together "inside out" is wild. This woman was in shock and still in shock while at Parkland and then when LBJ trotted her out during his swearing in ceremony aboard AF1. She is not up to reconstructing the head of her husband while knocking around the back seat/floor board of the JFK Limo.

   I didn't "mis-speak"!  I meant what I said! You're a real piece of work, Storing!  Oh...And by the way.  I guess maybe I did mis-speak.  I said that you have a reading comprehension problem.  Well, I was wrong.  You have a VERY SERIOUS reading comprehension problem!  You are also a rogue in the extreme.  You've done nothing but try to twist the things I pointed out about the flap of skull hanging in front of JFK's ear.    I never once said or implied that Mrs. Kennedy was trying to "Reconstruct" her husband's head!  I read what she said she did on the way to Parkland hospital with trying to "Keep his brains in his head".  She said she was trying to "keep the top of his head down", twice she said this, to Theodore White  Your twisted mind can't comprehend what she was saying though, and your failed attempt at putting words in my mouth is just that! A failed attempt.    You twisted everything I pointed out that she said and described to Theodore White, writer for LIFE Magazine, which you can read for yourself!  So put that in your beverage and drink it.       
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Steve Barber on November 20, 2023, 04:31:21 AM
 :D
Royell, you have two options.....you can believe the Parkland Doctors and Jim Jenkins who was at the autopsy, or these guys on this message board who are armchair neurosurgeons.

    Nope!  I'm no such thing.  I just stated the facts, and Storing twists everything around because he's a sick little man who needs help.
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Dan O'meara on November 20, 2023, 08:30:27 AM
Royell, you have two options.....you can believe the Parkland Doctors and Jim Jenkins who was at the autopsy, or these guys on this message board who are armchair neurosurgeons.

And you have two options - accept the mountain of evidence demonstrating there was no blow-out at the back of the head or ignore it in favour of your childish fantasies.

And as for Jim Jenkins, he was the one who described the massive wound to the upper right side of JFK's skull in detail. That this injury consisted of a massive piece of scalp with bone still attached to it that could literally be opened and closed. He also describes bone and tissue missing in the occipital/parietal area but that there was no laceration in the scalp at the back of the head - there was no blowout at the back of the head!.
It is because this wound can be opened and closed that has caused all the issues around this aspect of the case. When it is closed it is almost impossible to gauge the full extent of the head injury which is why a handful of doctors misunderstood what they were seeing. They did not examine the head as they were too busy trying to save JFK's life.
At Bethesda Jenkins, O'Connor, Riebe, Stringer, Hulmes and Boswell report seeing this massive wound encompassing the top of JFK's head.
At Parkland Burkley, Baxter, Salyer, Giesecke, Curtis, Midgett, Seldin and Calloway report this massive wound to the parietal area of the skull.

You, yourself, accept that the top of JFK's head was blown off, that pieces of skull were blown into the air from the top of his head and not out of the back.
You must also accept that this wound consisted of a massive flap of scalp, with bone still attached, that was blown over to the right side of JFK's skull and which could be closed back over his head disguising the full extent of the wound.

But no. You have your childish fantasies.
You have to pretend that all these people named were wrong or lying.
That the Z-film was impossibly altered.
That the Nix, Muchmore and Bronson films were also altered.
That the autopsy X-rays were altered.
That the autopsy pictures were altered.

A piece of advice to yourself and other Alteration Fantasists such as Royell - Grow Up!


Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Dan O'meara on November 20, 2023, 10:12:51 AM
    Several of you guys are confusing that Trap Door wound in the temple area with a Large Hole in the Back/Rear of JFK's skull. This HOLE in the back of his head is Now being connected to an Entry Wound in the neck/throat. This entry wound in the neck resulting in a blow-out exit wound in the back of JFK's head is rapidly gaining steam as we approach the 60 year anniversary of 11/22/63.

This entry wound in the neck resulting in a blow-out exit wound in the back of JFK's head is rapidly gaining steam


Below is an approximation of the bullet trajectory for an entrance wound in the neck and a blow-out at the back of the head:

(https://i.postimg.cc/MKm4smMs/z312trajectory.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

It is clear from this that whoever shot the President was lying on the floor of the limo at the time of the head shot.
There were some reports, I can't remember where from, that there was a small dog in the back of the limo.
Could it possibly be a poodle with a hand gun killed JFK?
Is this Royell's new revelation?
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Steve Barber on November 20, 2023, 01:27:30 PM
This entry wound in the neck resulting in a blow-out exit wound in the back of JFK's head is rapidly gaining steam


Below is an approximation of the bullet trajectory for an entrance wound in the neck and a blow-out at the back of the head:

(https://i.postimg.cc/MKm4smMs/z312trajectory.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

It is clear from this that whoever shot the President was lying on the floor of the limo at the time of the head shot.
There were some reports, I can't remember where from, that there was a small dog in the back of the limo.
Could it possibly be a poodle with a hand gun killed JFK?
Is this Royell's new revelation?

   Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1:
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Michael Welch on November 20, 2023, 05:16:56 PM
In this video starting at around the 57 minute mark, Jim Jenkins says if Oswald fired at President Kennedy, he would have only fired a non-fatal back wound. He then points out the neck wound and head wound both came from the front. He shows where he thinks they came from in Dealey Plaza because he is standing in Dealey Plaza!

Remember, any time you see an autopsy picture of the back of the president's head, it is fake!

(https://i.postimg.cc/W1dmccFd/Kennedy-back-wound.jpg)
Title: Re: JFK: What the Doctors Saw
Post by: Dan O'meara on November 20, 2023, 05:42:05 PM
In this video starting at around the 57 minute mark, Jim Jenkins says if Oswald fired at President Kennedy, he would have only fired a non-fatal back wound. He then points out the neck wound and head wound both came from the front. He shows where he thinks they came from in Dealey Plaza because he is standing in Dealey Plaza!

Remember, any time you see an autopsy picture of the back of the president's head, it is fake!

(https://i.postimg.cc/W1dmccFd/Kennedy-back-wound.jpg)

(https://i.postimg.cc/wjc86wWX/z328-3.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

Are you seeing the crater where the top of JFK's head should be, Michael?