Handy guide to Walt's fabrications

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Handy guide to Walt's fabrications  (Read 130948 times)

Offline Steve Logan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 286
Re: Handy guide to Walt's fabrications
« Reply #84 on: January 31, 2019, 06:02:31 PM »
Hey Lo Gun..... Did ya ever figger out why someone had stuck seven RED RINGS in the windows of the TSBD before the murder of JFK?
The ones that signaled LBJ that the hit was a go? The ones that they took down right after the shooting? The ones they put back up the next morning? The ones that the FBI put back when they were doing their reenactment? These are all YOUR contributions. Wow, does your ass ever get sore?

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5031
Re: Handy guide to Walt's fabrications
« Reply #85 on: January 31, 2019, 07:30:37 PM »
Hey Lo Gun..... Did ya ever figger out why someone had stuck seven RED RINGS in the windows of the TSBD before the murder of JFK?

     There are better ways to green light shooter(s) than taking out a Billboard. Which brings to mind why RED would be used as a Green Light/Go signal?
« Last Edit: January 31, 2019, 07:31:16 PM by Royell Storing »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Handy guide to Walt's fabrications
« Reply #86 on: January 31, 2019, 08:21:45 PM »
     There are better ways to green light shooter(s) than taking out a Billboard. Which brings to mind why RED would be used as a Green Light/Go signal?

JFK knew that the RED RINGS on the beach at BOP were there to identify the location of the Cuban in Brigade 2508, and a signal to the air cover that the CIA had promised the Cubans.   The RED RINGS served a dual purpose....  A) An instant visual reminder to JFK that he had caused the brigade's capture and the deaths of dozens of the "Freedom Fighters"...... That's what the CIA wanted.... And they also notified LBJ, that the trap was set.... It required only his signal to spring it.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Handy guide to Walt's fabrications
« Reply #87 on: January 31, 2019, 09:33:34 PM »
OH really.....There are many many critics of LBJ's Cover up committee's report, who have no theory at all.   Personally I can't imagine why an intelligent person can't draw a solid conclusion after decades of reviewing information but there are some who reject the WR but still refuse to draw a conclusion....

Your 'many, many critics' reside on the far shores of the lunatic fringe
« Last Edit: January 31, 2019, 10:02:21 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Handy guide to Walt's fabrications
« Reply #88 on: January 31, 2019, 09:42:15 PM »

     The SBT is certainly Not a "finding". It is David Copperfield worthy. An Illusion.

That's just your opinion

How about some facts: For instance, why do you lot never post this:



@Newbies: These brainiacs  are still claiming (after 55 years, mind you) CE399 a pristine bullet
Lets see their heads squished to that degree and still brush it off as 'minor'
 
« Last Edit: January 31, 2019, 09:52:23 PM by Bill Chapman »

Online Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: Handy guide to Walt's fabrications
« Reply #89 on: January 31, 2019, 11:12:08 PM »
That's just your opinion

How about some facts: For instance, why do you lot never post this:



@Newbies: These brainiacs  are still claiming (after 55 years, mind you) CE399 a pristine bullet
Lets see their heads squished to that degree and still brush it off as 'minor'

@Newbies: LNer brainiacs  are still claiming (after 55 years, mind you) CE399 was NOT a pristine bullet
But pristine means intact. CE399 was 95% intact. How does 1 bullet smash thru 3 bones and show up slightly deformed, intact with no DNA on it, while the 2nd FMJ bullet strikes 1 bone and explodes (0% intact)?

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Handy guide to Walt's fabrications
« Reply #90 on: January 31, 2019, 11:57:59 PM »
That's just your opinion

How about some facts: For instance, why do you lot never post this:



@Newbies: These brainiacs  are still claiming (after 55 years, mind you) CE399 a pristine bullet
Lets see their heads squished to that degree and still brush it off as 'minor'

Nice try Chappy.....  Though the bullet (CE 399) may not be "pristine" in the strictest sense of the word it definite did NOT strike Connally's rib or his wrist.....
Any FMJ 6.5 bullet would have been badly damaged if it had stuck either of the bones that CE 399 is imagined to have struck.