Reclaiming Misery aka Reclaiming History

[Bill Brown]

No doubt.  Faith can be a very powerful influence.

Spoken like a true atheist.

[John Iacoletti]

Spoken like a true atheist.

Poor Bill -- he keeps trying so hard to bait me into an off-topic religious argument.  I will say though that I'm not at all surprised that he equates his position on the JFK murder to a religion, because that's exactly what it is.

[Richard Rubio]

I forget which thread it was, it was about when G. Edgar Hoover decided he needed to convince the public it was Oswald and that was the 24th of Nov. 1963 I believe.

I saw earlier where Truman seemed to say Oswald did it, already on November 23rd, 1963.

[Bill Brown]

Poor Bill -- he keeps trying so hard to bait me into an off-topic religious argument.  I will say though that I'm not at all surprised that he equates his position on the JFK murder to a religion, because that's exactly what it is.

Trying so hard?  LOL

No.

I'm not trying to "bait" you into anything at all.

Also, how exactly does my comment equate my position on the assassination to a religion?  You're going to have to explain that one.

[Bill Chapman]

That's the problem with you, "Mytton" -- you always think your own guesses are "obvious".  But Chapman has called him "Bueller" more than once.

Says the guy with the urge to reply to anything and everything I say.

'Chapman has called him "Bueller" more than once'
>>>On purpose... and only on his day off

'Says the guy with the urge to reply to anything and everything I say'
>>>Says the guy with 2184 posts who replies to everything every LNer says

[Bill Chapman]

No doubt.  Faith can be a very powerful influence.

You should know, since all you have is speculation that runs contrary to the facts. It's called 'cognitive dissonance'. Look that up to spare yourself having to wet your pants once again as is, seemingly, the case every time I post opinion and science from anywhere other than the conspiracy-monger fiction section of life.

[Richard Smith]

You should know, since all you have is speculation that runs contrary to the facts. It's called 'cognitive dissonance'. Look that up to spare yourself having to wet your pants every time I post opinion and science from anywhere other than the conspiracy-monger fiction section of life.

Remember that John will not even acknowledge that he is a CTer.  He is simply taking issue with any evidence against Oswald by suggesting it is all faked or the product of lies.  LOL. He doesn't have to provide any evidence of this fakery, however, since he is not a CTer.   The circle of lunacy.  A classic example is suggesting there is somehow doubt about Oswald's ownership of the MC rifle.  Imagine all the forge documents, photos, lies, and fakery that would have to have gone on to explain away the evidence that links Oswald to that rifle. But John is not alleging a conspiracy - right?  Just taking issue with the evidence.  We are left to wonder where all this fake evidence derived from if he is not alleging a conspiracy.  Maybe Santa's elves?