Gary Mack and the about face !

[Bill Chapman]

The old CT-Catch 22 mantra.  Don't like the evidence? Then suggest it is fake.  Therefore ensuring nothing can ever convince them of a fact they don't like.

It's the cognitive-dissonance thing: The facts don't match conspiracy-monger beliefs. Therefore to CTers, everyone just has to be lying, everything just has to be faked.

And I wonder how the Parkland doctors managed to see the back of the head without also seeing the back/neck wound.

[Bill Chapman]

You don't know what you're talking about.  I'd advise you to go to Kennedys and King and do a search.  Mack used to be only a CT and then got hired and "switched sides."  If you don't consider that "switching sides" then I feel sorry for you.

And if you don't think many of the dishonest shows that he hosted on Discovery were dishonest, then I also feel sorry for you. Take the wool away from your eyes, please.

'Take the wool away from your eyes, please'
 

Mack came to the conclusion that Oswald had help. That's been known for some time.
Maybe put away those shears and dip yourself into some honest research.

New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/17/us/gary-mack-kennedy-assassination-expert-dies-at-68.html

[EXCERPT]

Over time, he [Mack] adopted a much more measured view of the assassination.

?I had learned the basics ? step back and look at all sides,? he told The Dallas Morning News, referring to his journalistic training. ?But I?d read all the pro-conspiracy books and was convinced they were probably right. When I decided to step back, I realized they weren?t telling me the whole story, just one side of it.?

He eventually settled on what might be called conspiracy lite. That is, he doubted that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone, and believed, at least, that there was more to the Oswald story than we know, but shed the more lurid hypotheses in favor of scientific detachment.

[John Iacoletti]

Jackie

Would that be Jacqueline "reference to wounds deleted" Kennedy?

[John Iacoletti]

The old CT-Catch 22 mantra.  Don't like the evidence? Then suggest it is fake.  Therefore ensuring nothing can ever convince them of a fact they don't like.

As opposed to the LN mantra that evidence they don't like is wrong because the person providing it is lying or mistaken.

[John Iacoletti]

It's the cognitive-dissonance thing: The facts don't match conspiracy-monger beliefs. Therefore to CTers, everyone just has to be lying, everything just has to be faked.

Do I need to repost the LN cavalcade of lying/mistaken witnesses?

And I wonder how the Parkland doctors managed to see the back of the head without also seeing the back/neck wound.

It's not rocket science, Bill.

[John Iacoletti]

?But I?d read all the pro-conspiracy books and was convinced they were probably right. When I decided to step back, I realized they weren?t telling me the whole story, just one side of it.?

That's a good description of the Warren Commission Report.

[Royell Storing]

Jackie

          Jackie also said that SA Hill was laying down inside the JFK Limo with her and JFK. Are you also going to buy into that or are you going to join the Cherry Picking Society?