JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Gary Mack and the about face !
Mitch Todd:
--- Quote from: Michael Walton on July 12, 2018, 03:16:24 AM ---Gary Mack went from a conspiracy theorist (and making no money) to a lone nut advocate (and getting a full-time job to boot). How anyone can call that fair-minded is beyond me.
There are many good articles about Mack on DiEugenio's site. There's one that critiqued one of those fake assassination shows on Discovery starring Mack. With a straight face, shooting and editing of the program told obvious lies. Look it up if you don't believe me.
But here's one of my favorite articles on this subject:
https://kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-articles/gary-mack-strikes-again
--- End quote ---
It says a lot about Jim DiEugenio that, in all of that article, there is only one footnote, and that's to a book he wrote himself.
John Mytton:
--- Quote from: Michael Walton on July 12, 2018, 03:16:24 AM ---Gary Mack went from a conspiracy theorist (and making no money) to a lone nut advocate (and getting a full-time job to boot). How anyone can call that fair-minded is beyond me.
There are many good articles about Mack on DiEugenio's site. There's one that critiqued one of those fake assassination shows on Discovery starring Mack. With a straight face, shooting and editing of the program told obvious lies. Look it up if you don't believe me.
But here's one of my favorite articles on this subject:
https://kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-articles/gary-mack-strikes-again
--- End quote ---
--- Quote ---How anyone can call that fair-minded is beyond me.
--- End quote ---
When I started I was a conspiracy theorist but as time went on and I learnt the evidence I realized that my initial conclusion which was based on incomplete information(conspiracy books) needed a re-evaluation.
For instance one example of my conspiracy belief was the "back and to the left" but after some research I found a bullet lacks the mass to drive anyone more than an inch or two and upon close examination of the Zapruder film @312-313 Kennedy and all the resulting matter is pushed forward. The first eyewitnesses interviewed on TV, the Newmans and Zapruder all describe what we see in the Zapruder film and finally after studying the genuine stereoscopic Autopsy photos the injuries to Kennedy's head reinforce a shot from behind.
JohnM
Royell Storing:
--- Quote from: Richard Smith on June 21, 2018, 07:32:50 PM ---Mack was fair minded, knowledegable, and relied upon the evidence. My interpretation of his view is that he left open the possibility of a conspiracy (primarily because you can't disprove the negative with 100% certainty) but that there was no credible evidence to support it.
--- End quote ---
Is your, "fair minded, Knowledgeable, and Relied upon the Evidence" appraisal Before or After his pushing of the Badgeman & his mis ID of Mumford/McKinnon?
Royell Storing:
--- Quote from: John Mytton on July 12, 2018, 05:37:20 AM ---
When I started I was a conspiracy theorist but as time went on and I learnt the evidence I realized that my initial conclusion which was based on incomplete information(conspiracy books) needed a re-evaluation.
For instance one example of my conspiracy belief was the "back and to the left" but after some research I found a bullet lacks the mass to drive anyone more than an inch or two and upon close examination of the Zapruder film @312-313 Kennedy and all the resulting matter is pushed forward. The first eyewitnesses interviewed on TV, the Newmans and Zapruder all describe what we see in the Zapruder film and finally after studying the genuine stereoscopic Autopsy photos the injuries to Kennedy's head reinforce a shot from behind.
JohnM
--- End quote ---
The validity of the stolen autopsy photos currently displayed in the public arena can hardly be described as "Genuine". "Kinkos" Groden continues cranking them out on a daily basis.
Steve M. Galbraith:
--- Quote from: Michael Walton on July 12, 2018, 03:16:24 AM ---Gary Mack went from a conspiracy theorist (and making no money) to a lone nut advocate (and getting a full-time job to boot). How anyone can call that fair-minded is beyond me.
There are many good articles about Mack on DiEugenio's site. There's one that critiqued one of those fake assassination shows on Discovery starring Mack. With a straight face, shooting and editing of the program told obvious lies. Look it up if you don't believe me.
But here's one of my favorite articles on this subject:
https://kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-articles/gary-mack-strikes-again
--- End quote ---
Mack wasn't a lone nut advocate; he believed up to his death that Oswald did shoot JFK but that he had help. In other words, Mack believed in a conspiracy albeit with a small or lower case "c".
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version