JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Z Film & Other Evidence Makes Conspiracy VERY CLEAR
Allan Fritzke:
I actually believe the Zapruder film is exonerated by that watermark which is present in the cogs of the entire film. Not only is that consistent, but you can find the matching frame which would match the Altgens frame at the same instant. Each one was taken from 2 different cameras and match each other. If I could not match this with another film, I would have to question its authenticity and credibility. There is also another film which also is consistent in comparison to the Zapruder film when looking at what I call the bi-afro girl when she changes direction at z-322 - there is much synergy between the films.
Now I am not saying that animators did not enhance or modify frames but the basics of the original film are consistent with other photos and films. It does not mean that the frames themselves were not doctored in order to prove that shots came from the TSBD building. It seems that the film was a necessary item of evidence in the frame job of LHO as just certain frames were used and nothing was released to the public until many years later. They relied on frames Z-313/14 to prove a shot that came from behind! If you remove those 2 frames from the Zapruder film, you see an entirely different picture.
It also was very convenient that a neck shot came in from behind the sign which could not be recorded by Zapruder. Very coincidental that his position hid that and that he was given his 33rd degree Masonhood shortly after his filming! The WC was also full of high order Masons - pure coincidence we must assume!
Mitch Todd:
--- Quote from: Royell Storing on July 07, 2018, 01:39:45 AM --- YOU have claimed that "GUNK in the camera" is responsible for that Image. If this is true, All images produced by that camera become questionable. This renders the images on the Current Zapruder Film unreliable.
--- End quote ---
The image I'm talking about is the "rifleman reflection" Blevins claims to see in the intersprocket area. It takes up a very small amount of real estate per frame. An anomaly that small doesn't effect the overall image, or its credibility.
Matt Grantham:
--- Quote from: John Kozlowski on July 06, 2018, 01:09:40 AM ---This guy is a fraud. No offense to you but he's full of crap. Do some research on Mr. Blevins. Look into his research on Bigfoot, the garden of Eden and Noah's Ark. My opinion he's just looking for a quick payday. Nothing he does should be taken seriously. I 100% believe in a conspiracy involving our government but all this guy is doing is muddying the waters.
--- End quote ---
Thanks John A lot of it very interesting The guy on the second floor of county records along with the other corroborating flash from that location from a different film makes the evidence of a shot almost incontrovertible It seems however that this hot would have come much earlier than the first reports of gunfire or do I have that wrong Excellent stuff and it is difficult to understand why it does not get more play Thanks for posting it
Royell Storing:
--- Quote from: Allan Fritzke on July 07, 2018, 06:38:01 AM ---I actually believe the Zapruder film is exonerated by that watermark which is present in the cogs of the entire film. Not only is that consistent, but you can find the matching frame which would match the Altgens frame at the same instant. Each one was taken from 2 different cameras and match each other. If I could not match this with another film, I would have to question its authenticity and credibility. There is also another film which also is consistent in comparison to the Zapruder film when looking at what I call the bi-afro girl when she changes direction at z-322 - there is much synergy between the films.
Now I am not saying that animators did not enhance or modify frames but the basics of the original film are consistent with other photos and films. It does not mean that the frames themselves were not doctored in order to prove that shots came from the TSBD building. It seems that the film was a necessary item of evidence in the frame job of LHO as just certain frames were used and nothing was released to the public until many years later. They relied on frames Z-313/14 to prove a shot that came from behind! If you remove those 2 frames from the Zapruder film, you see an entirely different picture.
It also was very convenient that a neck shot came in from behind the sign which could not be recorded by Zapruder. Very coincidental that his position hid that and that he was given his 33rd degree Masonhood shortly after his filming! The WC was also full of high order Masons - pure coincidence we must assume!
--- End quote ---
They cleverly removed the Black Dog Man Nook from the bottom of the Z Film. That is Not hard to do as Groden did likewise with his copy of the Bell Film. For whatever reason Groden removed The Cuban and The Umbrella Man sitting on the retaining wall from the bottom of his copy of the Bell Film/DVD.
The Blackest Hole in the Z Film, (and there are many), is the Start-Stop-GAP at the beginning of the film. This missing footage would have given us a view of the Records Bld and the Dal Tex Bld as the JFK Limo turned onto Elm St. This is why after initially buying Limited Print rights from Zapruder, Life came back the following day and bought every scrap of film he had. They knew based on what the film revealed, the taking of a meat clever to it would be mandatory. After finishing with their lobotomy on the film, they then Immediately put it under lock-n-key for the next 12 years.
Matt Grantham:
--- Quote from: Royell Storing on July 07, 2018, 08:34:05 PM ---
The Blackest Hole in the Z Film, (and there are many), is the Start-Stop-GAP at the beginning of the film. This missing footage would have given us a view of the Records Bld and the Dal Tex Bld as the JFK Limo turned onto Elm St.
--- End quote ---
As far as you know, no official quotes exist where Zapruder, or his Daughter, said they never stopped filming?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version