JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Up close shot to Tippit's head and no spatter detected on shoes or pants?
Walt Cakebread:
--- Quote from: Bill Brown on January 22, 2018, 07:06:21 AM ---I go with the evidence. In the Tippit case, all of the available evidence points to Oswald. Feel free to post any evidence which points anywhere other than Oswald.
--- End quote ---
I go with the evidence. In the Tippit case, all of the available evidence points to Oswald.
What evidence do you have that the Killer walked to Tippit's body ( That was face down on the street) and shot him in the forehead?
Domingo Benavides reported no such action by Tippit's killer....Nor did Helen Markham.....
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: Bill Brown on January 22, 2018, 07:06:21 AM ---I go with the evidence. In the Tippit case, all of the available evidence points to Oswald. Feel free to post any evidence which points anywhere other than Oswald.
--- End quote ---
And by "all the available evidence" you mean an identification by an utter screwball in an unfair lineup.
Bill Brown:
--- Quote from: Walt Cakebread on January 22, 2018, 11:42:36 PM ---I go with the evidence. In the Tippit case, all of the available evidence points to Oswald.
What evidence do you have that the Killer walked to Tippit's body ( That was face down on the street) and shot him in the forehead?
Domingo Benavides reported no such action by Tippit's killer....Nor did Helen Markham.....
--- End quote ---
Tippit wasn't shot in the forehead.
Bill Brown:
--- Quote from: Bill Brown on January 22, 2018, 07:06:21 AM ---I go with the evidence. In the Tippit case, all of the available evidence points to Oswald. Feel free to post any evidence which points anywhere other than Oswald.
--- End quote ---
--- Quote from: John Iacoletti on January 23, 2018, 04:58:45 PM ---And by "all the available evidence" you mean an identification by an utter screwball in an unfair lineup.
--- End quote ---
Again, feel free to post any evidence which points anywhere other than Oswald. Fair enough?
Bill Brown:
--- Quote from: Rob Caprio on January 23, 2018, 08:23:05 PM ---You are playing games again. The issue is whether Reynolds ever identified LHO as the man he saw running after the JDT murder, and until he was shot in the head the answer was no.
This is from my "Statements That Sink The WC's Conclusions" series.
Quote on
REYNOLDS was shown a photograph of LEE HARVEY OSWALD, at which time he advised he is of the opinion OSWALD is the person he had followed on the afternoon of November 22, 1963; however, he would hesitate to definitely identify OSWALD as the individual. (FBI Interview with Warren Reynolds on January 21, 1964, Commission Exhibit (CE) 2523, p. 731)
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh25/html/WC_Vol25_0381a.htm
Quote off
--- End quote ---
But, you said that Warren Reynolds said that the man was NOT Lee Oswald.
You lied and misrepresented. Typical.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version