JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
John Mytton:
After over forty years of the most prodigiously intensive investigation and examination of a murder case in world history, certain powerful facts exist which cannot be challenged: Not one weapon other than Oswald?s Mannlicher-Carcano rifle has ever been found and linked in any way to the assassination. Not one bullet other than the three fired from Oswald?s rifle has ever been found and linked to the assassination. No person other than Oswald has ever been connected by evidence, in any way, to the assassination. No evidence has ever surfaced linking Oswald to any of the major groups suggested by conspiracy theorists of being behind the assassination. And no evidence has ever been found showing that any person or group framed Oswald for the murder they committed. One would think that faced with these stubborn and immutable realities, the critics of the Warren Commission, unable to pay the piper, would finally fold their tent and go home. But instead, undaunted and unfazed, they continue to disgorge even more of what we have had from them for over forty years?wild speculation, theorizing, and shameless dissembling about the facts of the case.
The purpose of this book has been twofold. One, to educate everyday Americans that Oswald killed Kennedy and acted alone, paying for his own bullets. And two, to expose, as never before, the conspiracy theorists and the abject worthlessness of all their allegations. I believe this book has achieved both of these goals.
RHVB
JohnM
Bill Charleston:
Gov Connally said a lot of things but one thing he (almost) ALWAYS said was "the force of the blow (to his back) bent me over."
We can CLEARLY see that John Connally was only bent over only ONE TIME in the Z film and it is easy to see exactly when that happened. IF you want to solve the JFK assassination shooting "mystery", it is no more difficult than STARTING with identifying EXACTLY WHEN Gov. Connally is bent over by the bullet hitting him in the back. (time 0:33 in this video)
Not a valid vimeo URL
Eventually, the editors of Connally's Warren Comm testimony show him being bent over but it is well after they say he was shot, in other words, Connally was shot in the back seconds after most everyone thinks he was shot in the back.
One of the reasons we are still reviewing the JFK assassination decades later is that many of the witnesses' recollections DOES NOT MATCH THE WARREN COMM's conclusions.
What this or any other video says or shows does NOT prove Connally was shot in the back at a different time than when Bugliosi concluded he was shot but it does give a starting point. I was shot in a hunting accident about the time of the assassination of JFK and I remember in detail some of my incident just like Connally remembered his incident. Fortunately, there is other evidence that allows us to PROVE BEYOND ANY DOUBT EXACTLY when Connally was shot in the back.
Start with these thoughts and you will soon find out how easy it is for the US gov't to fool the public.
Richard Smith:
--- Quote from: Ross Lidell on July 21, 2018, 02:28:09 AM ---So John, you are:
- a fence sitter?
- a contrarian?
--- End quote ---
I would suggest lazy, closet CTer. The laziest position for a CTer is to suggest they are not a CTer at all but are merely taking issue with the evidence against Oswald which they then universally attribute as the product of fakery and intentional lies. What the rest of us would consider a conspiracy position but without having to provide any explanation or evidence to support these baseless fantasies. Like Inspector Clouseau, John apparently suspects everyone and no one to maintain his circle of lunacy.
John Iacoletti:
"Reclaiming History": An exercise in arrogant verbosity and logical fallacies.
--- Quote from: John Mytton on July 23, 2018, 12:06:18 AM ---After over forty years of the most prodigiously intensive investigation and examination of a murder case in world history, certain powerful facts exist which cannot be challenged:
--- End quote ---
Of course your "facts" can be challenged, Vince.
--- Quote --- Not one weapon other than Oswald?s Mannlicher-Carcano rifle has ever been found and linked in any way to the assassination.
--- End quote ---
"Oswald?s Mannlicher-Carcano rifle". LOL.
--- Quote --- Not one bullet other than the three fired from Oswald?s rifle has ever been found and linked to the assassination.
--- End quote ---
Not one bullet from ANY rifle has ever been found and linked to the assassination.
--- Quote --- No person other than Oswald has ever been connected by evidence, in any way, to the assassination.
--- End quote ---
Other than Roscoe White, E. Howard Hunt, David Ferrie, Clay Shaw, James Files, Sam Giancana, Carlos Marcello, Santos Trafficante, Joseph Milteer, Gerry Hemming, Loran Hall, William Seymour, Lawrence Howard . . .
It's Bugliosi and his shameless sycophants who are engaging in "wild speculation, theorizing, and shameless dissembling about the facts of the case" and have been doing so since November 22, 1963.
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: Richard Smith on July 23, 2018, 04:51:58 PM ---I would suggest lazy, closet CTer. The laziest position for a CTer is to suggest they are not a CTer at all but are merely taking issue with the evidence against Oswald which they then universally attribute as the product of fakery and intentional lies. What the rest of us would consider a conspiracy position but without having to provide any explanation or evidence to support these baseless fantasies. Like Inspector Clouseau, John apparently suspects everyone and no one to maintain his circle of lunacy.
--- End quote ---
Says the guy who has never provided a single scrap of evidence to support his baseless fantasy. Just a repetitive litany of baseless claims about the evidence.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version