JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
Bill Chapman:
--- Quote from: Steve Barber on July 20, 2018, 05:17:01 PM --- "We" refers to those of us with common sense.
--- End quote ---
The thing about 'common sense' is that it's not 'common' at all. Yet both sides use the term as if it is.
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: Ross Lidell on July 20, 2018, 09:13:47 PM ---So John: What conspiracy (to murder JFK) do you believe in?
--- End quote ---
None. The time to believe a claim like "Oswald murdered JFK" or "there was a conspiracy to murder JFK" is when there is sufficient reason to do so. Bugliosi's arguments are still fallacious.
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: Bill Chapman on July 20, 2018, 10:51:55 PM ---
I noticed you didn't cite your post so assumed that everyone posting on this thread knew about the affidavit. My bad, though, for getting lazy about it.
Rotten tomatoes should be hurled at Iacoletti for throwing one of his own under the bus, in an abundantly transparent attempt to belittle LNers at all costs.
Iacoletti only comes here to gaslight.
--- End quote ---
I didn't throw anybody under the bus. Since a large percentage of your posts are lazy cut-and-paste jobs, the least you could do is give credit to the people who did the work.
Ross Lidell:
--- Quote from: John Iacoletti on July 21, 2018, 12:01:45 AM ---None. The time to believe a claim like "Oswald murdered JFK" or "there was a conspiracy to murder JFK" is when there is sufficient reason to do so. Bugliosi's arguments are still fallacious.
--- End quote ---
So John, you are:
- a fence sitter?
- a contrarian?
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: Ross Lidell on July 21, 2018, 02:28:09 AM ---So John, you are:
- a fence sitter?
- a contrarian?
--- End quote ---
I?m a skeptic. I see way too much handwaving and conjecture in the official explanation and not nearly enough evidence.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version