JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate

Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"

<< < (66/72) > >>

John Iacoletti:
Fallacious Bugliosi Argument #30

Like he knows what Oswald said throughout his twelve hours of interrogation.

Like "isn't that laughable" constitutes evidence of anything besides Bugliosi's insipid rhetoric.

Bill Chapman:

--- Quote from: Jack Trojan on July 19, 2018, 09:41:51 PM ---I suppose Ruby was just another psycho that killed Oswald to spare the Kennedy's a drawn out trial.  ::)

//www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zd4r4O0o_Y
--- End quote ---

Is that what you suppose? I can't recall ever saying that. Ruby said that.

Bill Chapman:

--- Quote from: Denis Pointing on July 18, 2018, 10:49:55 PM ---Check your facts. Ruby died in hospital, not in prison and he didn't die of cancer as you seem to believe. Ruby died from a blood clot in his lung. Maybe you need to watch a few more UTUBE vids.

--- End quote ---

From the 'Fun Being a CTroll' department, one of their crack(ed) investigators suggested that 'they' injected Ruby with cancer cells. Or something llke that.

Maybe Roger Stone(d) said that. He'll say anything.

Steve Howsley:

--- Quote from: Bill Chapman on July 20, 2018, 01:22:29 AM ---From the 'Fun Being a CTroll' department, one of their crack(ed) investigators suggested that 'they' injected Ruby with cancer cells.

--- End quote ---

It would have been smarter to have injected him with a couple of slugs in the basement car park. No, that's a terrible idea. How about we wait for three years then inject him with cancer? Great idea, that'll silence the blabbermouth ... can't take any chances.   Thumb1:

John Mytton:



31. I spoke earlier of the virtual impossibility of all the people involved in any conspiracy to kill the president keeping it a secret for even a few days, much less over forty years. But there?s a perhaps even more difficult, and related, reality that the original conspirators would have to overcome. Let?s assume, for example, that the CIA was behind the assassination. After the assassination, how could the CIA have gotten the FBI, Secret Service, Dallas Police Department, the autopsy doctors, indeed, the Warren Commission itself, to go along with the horrendous crime the agency had committed and do the great number of things the conspiracy theorists say these various groups and people did to cover up the CIA?s complicity in Kennedy?s murder? Wouldn?t that be an impossible task?* The only way (there is no other way) that agencies and people like the FBI, autopsy doctors, et cetera, would all agree to cover up the murder of the president of the United States for the CIA (or mob, FBI, military-industrial complex, etc.) would be if they themselves were part of the original conspiracy to kill Kennedy. And again, no rational person can possibly believe that these groups and people all got together to murder the president. The bottom line is that conspiracy musings of the conspiracy theorists are outrageously hallucinatory and bear no relation to reality.
RHVB



JohnM

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version