Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"  (Read 117922 times)

Offline Ross Lidell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 451
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #21 on: June 10, 2018, 11:24:39 PM »
It's in the link, Bill.

**********

We simply do not know how a body reacts to shots to the head, Bill. I choose to believe that a frontal shot pushed his head backward and people down on the street ran up to the knoll area.  They didn't do that because they were sight seeing. *Something* made them run up there.

"I choose to believe". That say's it all.

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #22 on: June 10, 2018, 11:25:32 PM »
Nobody cares about your opinion.

Support your statements.


If you don't care about my statements, don't respond.

I believe there is a ignore button, use it.

Online Steve Howsley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #23 on: June 10, 2018, 11:28:10 PM »
Anybody know about whether anyone has challenged Bugloisi to a debate other than Wecht?

You might want to change that to the past tense 'had challenged' as VB died three years ago.

Online Steve Howsley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #24 on: June 10, 2018, 11:31:17 PM »
   Vincent Bugliosi's conclusion of no conspiracy should make you want to look at the JFK Assassination and dig in to the case . Reclaiming History and the Warren Report should be both in the Fiction section of the library. Now Dr. Cyril Wecht already told us that the Warren Report should be in the Fiction area of the Library and I think it is safe to say that Reclaiming History belongs in the fiction area also. I don't think there is one page in Vincent's book that does not refer to some disclaimer of conspiracy. I have the book & I have to make myself go back and pick up where I left off and read some more and then just set it down because it's a broken record . Have any of you tried to read this book? It's a mile long just like the Warren "26 volume" Report that Dr. Wecht says does not have an index.

I've read it cover to cover twice. I've tried to read Harvey & Lee several times but I burst into laughter by about the third page and have to put it aside.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #25 on: June 10, 2018, 11:41:16 PM »
It's in the link, Bill.

**********

We simply do not know how a body reacts to shots to the head, Bill. I choose to believe that a frontal shot pushed his head backward and people down on the street ran up to the knoll area.  They didn't do that because they were sight seeing. *Something* made them run up there.

What you mean 'we', Sherlock? There's plenty of research describing what happens when a bullet strikes a head or body. It's called science. Of course you self-appointed experts don't need to do any research... just look at all those movies showing people flying all over the place from shots... pick up a book FFS.

Online Steve Howsley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #26 on: June 10, 2018, 11:42:06 PM »

If you don't care about my statements, don't respond.

I believe there is a ignore button, use it.

It'd be better if you would simply support your statements.

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #27 on: June 10, 2018, 11:44:22 PM »
It'd be better if you would simply support your statements.

Point out what I didn't support.