James Leon Simmons.... Overpass Witness

[Bill Chapman]

More worthless rhetoric to try to distract from the fact that you have a lousy case.

More worthless rhetoric to try and distract from the fact that this case is a slam dunk and Oswald would have fried.

More worthless rhetoric from PaidToTrollHereJohnny, who tells us what witnesses saw or didn't see, LN posters what they meant or didn't mean, and that everyone who disagrees with him is a liar, lemming, and stupid. And throws his own kind under the bus in order to cover his own arse no matter what the cost. Sounds exactly like Trump, neither of whom I would ever go out on patrol with.



Face of the CTroll

[John Iacoletti]

Anyone who says that the case against Oswald for the assassination of President Kennedy is "lousy" simply is not familiar with all of the evidence in the case.  Oswald probably killed Kennedy and probably did it alone.

Anyone who says that the case against Oswald for the murder of J.D. Tippit is "lousy" is definitely not familiar with all of the evidence in the case.  Oswald definitely killed Tippit and he definitely did it alone.

Your problem; not mine.

Do you really think your rhetoric is at all compelling?  It's one thing to just declare that "Oswald probably killed Kennedy and probably did it alone."  Quite another to demonstrate that it's actually true.

[John Iacoletti]

More worthless rhetoric to try and distract from the fact that this case is a slam dunk and Oswald would have fried.

Unfortunately, your wishful thinking means nothing.
 

More worthless rhetoric from PaidToTrollHereJohnny, who tells us what witnesses saw or didn't see, LN posters what they meant or didn't mean, and that everyone who disagrees with him is a liar, lemming, and stupid.

Projection much?  Who was it that said Buell Frazier lied to cover his ass?  Hint:  it wasn't me

And throws his own kind under the bus in order to cover his own arse no matter what the cost.

You give yourself away here.  Why would your "own kind" make any difference at all if you are actually seeking the truth?

[Bill Chapman]

Says the guy who spent weeks arguing over the difference between "Brennan saw the man with a gun" and Brennan saw a man with a gun".

Same direction does not mean 11 degrees off.  Especially when that figure is just pulled out of nowhere.  Same direction means same direction.

Says the guy who argued ad nauseum about the 'difference' between Buell saying Oswald had the bag as he went in the door and not using 'saw'

That is nitpicking and hairsplitting taken to absurd depths.

[Bill Brown]

Do you really think your rhetoric is at all compelling?  It's one thing to just declare that "Oswald probably killed Kennedy and probably did it alone."  Quite another to demonstrate that it's actually true.

Do you really think your rhetoric is at all compelling?  It's one thing to just declare that "there is a problem with the chain of custody of the evidence".  Quite another to demonstrate that it's actually true.

[John Iacoletti]

Says the guy who argued ad nauseum about the 'difference' between Buell saying Oswald had the bag as he went in the door and not using 'saw'

That is nitpicking and hairsplitting taken to absurd depths.

Tom Meros: And when he walked on ahead of you could you even see the package?
Buell Frazier:  No

What was that you were saying earlier about people who tell us what witnesses saw or didn't see?

Bloody hypocrite.

[John Iacoletti]

Do you really think your rhetoric is at all compelling?  It's one thing to just declare that "there is a problem with the chain of custody of the evidence".  Quite another to demonstrate that it's actually true.

It's been demonstrated repeatedly.  Your response is to just bleat "there is no doubt of Oswald's guilt" over and over again as if your lack of doubt proves anything.

You'll never be able to show that the revolver Hill fished out of his pocket 2 hours later which was then and only then initialed by everybody at the police station (including by a guy who never supposedly even touched it to begin with) was ever at the Texas Theater in anybody's waistband.

You'll never be able to show that the partial palmprint that turned up on an index card in Washington a week later was ever on the barrel of CE 139.