JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Oswald's High School
W. Tracy Parnell:
The progression Marguerite went through (the aging process was probably sped up due to the fact she smoked) can be clearly seen at this site:
http://oswald-photos.blogspot.com/2012/09/marguerite-claverie-oswald-1907-1981.html
You would have to believe that these family photos were faked and the impostor substituted into family albums without anyone knowing, or that the entire family was in on it.
Matt Grantham:
--- Quote from: W. Tracy Parnell on June 17, 2018, 06:11:09 PM ---The progression Marguerite went through (the aging process was probably sped up due to the fact she smoked) can be clearly seen at this site:
http://oswald-photos.blogspot.com/2012/09/marguerite-claverie-oswald-1907-1981.html
You would have to believe that these family photos were faked and the impostor substituted into family albums without anyone knowing, or that the entire family was in on it.
--- End quote ---
W Tracy You have been exceptionally civil compared to the norm on this board and I respect that. I will also admit that due to my background I am very reluctant to get into comparing conclusion the latter sentence is clearly an allusion towards what I consider bringing conclusions into the premises Not that is not a fair question at some point, but I cannot answer the question because I do not have a clear conclusion If I am guessing I believe there was a better chance that the two families were connected in some way as opposed to faking photographs
In regard to Oswald's height as 5'10 coordinating to his passport A lot of debate has been made over the 5'10 versus 5'9 Arguing over an inch in height seems like small potatoes, yet according to researchers I believe even outside of of Armstrong, researchers claim there is somewhat clear demarcation of a 5-9 150 lb or less Oswald or a 510 165 lb Oswald An inch may not seem like much, but when trying to distinguish between two individuals who may only be 4 inches apart it become more significant going to check if the morgue had an official height for Oswald
Matt Grantham:
I do find it a little odd that there seems to be much about the two Marguerite's past 64
However
https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1920&bih=947&ei=ov0mW-WHB8KQsAXo5bi4DA&q=marguerite+oswald&oq=marguerite+oswald&gs_l=img.12..0j0i24k1l6.3179.9399.0.12800.21.12.1.8.8.0.108.995.6j4.10.0....0...1ac.1.64.img..2.18.928.0..35i39k1j0i30k1.0.BpkytKmQ1to#imgrc=dtqifAdS18gFPM:
Matt Grantham:
--- Quote from: Denis Pointing on June 17, 2018, 05:03:17 PM ---Have you actually ever read Julian's WC testimony? Here it is: Mr. EVANS - I think she's a fine woman, myself, a fine woman; intelligent, very soft spoken - a beautiful woman, with black hair streaked with a little gray, but when you saw her on television since this thing happened, she really looked awful; nothing at all like she used to look. She has really aged. She looked like a charwoman, compared to what she used to look like. She used to be a fashion plate. She dressed beautifully, but when we saw her on television just recently, after all this happened, she looked awful. There's no way to describe it, the change that has come over her. You wouldn't have recognized her if they hadn't told you who she was; she looked that different. Where her hair used to be black, now it's entirely gray, and she really looks Old
Mr. JENNER - Well, she's 57, I believe.
Mr. EVANS - That's right; she's the same age as my wife, but she looks about 70 now. That's about all I can remember about her, and then I saw this thing
--- End quote ---
So Steve's quote of him at the WC is incorrect?
W. Tracy Parnell:
--- Quote from: Matt Grantham on June 18, 2018, 01:44:53 AM --- So Steve's quote of him at the WC is incorrect?
--- End quote ---
The quote is accurate. However, it is incomplete and "cherrypicked" as is all of Armstrong's "evidence" for H&L. When read in context it is clear both the Evans' are talking about the Marguerite they knew and not an impostor. They are simply surprised at the change in her. But that is one thing you must learn about Armstrong and the H&L theory. The weight of the evidence is what professional investigators look at. Armstrong selects what fits his theory and ignores everything else or conveniently claims it is fabricated. He says there was a massive conspiracy involving the FBI, WC, HSCA etc. But when you look at the citations in his book (when they are actually provided) you will find references to those very same agencies. How does he determine which FBI reports etc. to believe and which were falsified? Of course, those that fit his theory are to be believed apparently and the others ignored or branded as fakes.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version