Liebler's memo September 1964.

[Walt Cakebread]

Mr. Cakebread, I meant factual in the sense that a genuine document is presented, not hearsay or theories.

And yes, it's fascinating that Liebeler, a staunch WC defender/advocate I believe - correct me if I am wrong, please - is expressing such concerns about the report, in a private communication that he might (?) have believed would never be released to the public.

Mr Tonkovich,   Here's a statement by Liebeler that I find "fascinating"

In the last sentence of the second to the last paragraph in the section it says that Altgen's picture was taken about two seconds "after the shot which entered the back of the presidents neck". We should say after that shot was fired or heard or something. The sentence is not a good one as it now stands.

I believe that Liebeler was alert and recognized that if the Altgen's photo was taken "about two seconds after the shot which entered the back of the presidents neck "  Then Altgen's photo should show the gunman behind that window, because no human is quick enough to disappear from that cramped cubbyhole that was imagined to be a "Sniper's Nest" in a couple of seconds.

Up date.....

I was thinking of the Dillard photo when I posted the above....  I'm Sorry if I've mislead any reader.....

[Bill Chapman]

Bill,

Point being?

--  MWT   

Liebler made a good point about the relatively incomplete way the blanket thing was written

[John Iacoletti]

I believe that Liebeler was alert and recognized that if the Altgen's photo was taken "about two seconds after the shot which entered the back of the presidents neck "  Then Altgen's photo should show the gunman behind that window, because no human is quick enough to disappear from that cramped cubbyhole that was imagined to be a "Sniper's Nest" in a couple of seconds.

Huh? The Altgens photo doesn’t show that window at all.

[Thomas Graves]

Liebler made a good point about the relatively incomplete way the blanket thing was written

Bill,

Would it have been better if it had said, "Ruth and Michael were both asked if one or the other of them had checked every day to see whether or not that mysterious bundle was still there, and they both said (choose one): 1) "that they had," or 2) "that they had not"?

--  MWT   

[John Tonkovich]

Huh? The Altgens photo doesn’t show that window at all.

Mr. Iacoletti, I concur.
I found that response puzzling.

[Bill Chapman]

Bill,

Would it have been better if it had said, "Ruth and Michael were both asked if one or the other of them had checked every day to see whether or not that mysterious bundle was still there, and they both said (choose one): 1) "that they had," or 2) "that they had not"?

--  MWT   

See if you can simplify that in a manner that would be a better fit for what Lieber described.

[Walt Cakebread]

Huh? The Altgens photo doesn’t show that window at all.

OOPs!.... Yes, you're right...I was thinking of the Dillard photo.