Dr. Malcolm Perry and the JFK head wound

[Matt Grantham]

  Mr. Barber is mistaken (again) when he asserts that Jackie clearly states where the head wound was. Uh, no...it is not at all clear and nothing she said made me believe the hole was anywhere but the same place the other witnesses say: the back of the head. There was no wound to the top of the head until Humes started his clandestine "pre-autopsy" surgery. Who at Parkland reports any wounds on the head except in the right rear? Nobody.

  On a personal note, I could not believe Nova used you as an expert witness on their very strange JFK show from the late eighties. I thought you came across as an ignorant buffoon and the least qualified person imaginable to speak on acoustics. Reading your posts on this site makes me want to wretch. You are one of the chief engineers on the Ignorance Express. Sorry to be so harsh. I hate disinformation...

 Lipsey describes  a wound just above the hairline Horne and many other researchers feel the v shaped wound near the top right of JFK's skull was made in an attempt to hide the entry wound of a bullet from the front

[Mike Orr]

As per Warren Commission Testimony given from Dr. Carrico to Arlen Specter :

Mr. Specter - Will describe as specifically as you can the head wound which you have already mentioned briefly ?

Dr. Carrico  -  This was a 5- by 71-cm defect in the posterior skull , the occipital region. There was an absence of
                     calvarium or skull in this area , with shredded tissue, brain tissue present and initially considerable slow oozing. Then after we established some circulation there was more profuse bleeding from this wound.
Mr. Specter  - Was any other wound observed on the head in addition to this large opening where the skull was absent ?

Dr. Carrico   - No other wound on the head .   

[Ray Mitcham]

In 1998, when he testified before the ARRB,  Dr Perry was 69 years old.

Agreed, I was talking about his earlier change of heart, after he was visited by Elmer Moore.

Elmer Moore, a Secret Service agent who worked with the commission and was later transferred to the service’s Seattle office, admitted he was ordered to pressure Perry to refute the two-gunman theory, according to a University of Washington graduate student who interviewed Moore and eventually testified at government hearings.

https://vincepalamara.blogspot.com/2017/11/secret-service-agent-elmer-moore.html

[Denis Pointing]

Agreed, I was talking about his earlier change of heart, after he was visited by Elmer Moore.

Elmer Moore, a Secret Service agent who worked with the commission and was later transferred to the service’s Seattle office, admitted he was ordered to pressure Perry to refute the two-gunman theory, according to a University of Washington graduate student who interviewed Moore and eventually testified at government hearings.

https://vincepalamara.blogspot.com/2017/11/secret-service-agent-elmer-moore.html

I think the keyword here is " according to". Any reason why you take the interviewer, James Gochenaur's claim as gospel?  None of Gochenaur's claims can be substantiated, virtually nothing is known about the man, yet you swallow everything he says hook-line-an-sinker. Seriously, why? For anyone interested, here's a link to Gochenaur's claims.  http://www.whokilledjfk.net/pressure_dr.htm

[Gary Craig]

Article from Washington Evening Star, 27 Nov 1963, page A-5

Excerpts: 

"White House Won't Talk on Kennedy Autopsy" 

By the Associated Press

"The White House has so far declined to say whether an autopsy was performed on the body of President John F. Kennedy. 

The body was at the Bethesda Naval Hospital for approximately nine hours last Friday night and early Saturday morning. 

Civilian morticians were called to the hospital to prepare the body for burial. 

....

Doctors in Dallas who administered emergency treatment to the President said yesterday they do not know whether one or two

bullets had hit him.  However, Federal authorities seemed fairly certain it was two bullets. 

One Washington source said, "There is some doubt whether the fatal bullet was the second shot or third shot.  The first shot is

believed to have hit the President, but we're not sure about the second and third." 

Thus, he indicated, the first bullet to strike Mr. Kennedy might not have been fatal. 

One bullet struck Texas Gov. John Connally, wounding him. 

Dr. Kemp Clark, a brain surgeon who was summoned to the emergency room of the Dallas hospital where the President was taken after

the shooting, said in Dallas yesterday that a bullet did such massive damage to the right rear of the President's head that the

attending surgeons could not tell whether it had entered or come out of the head there. 

"A missile had gone in, or come out the back of his head, causing extensive lacerations and loss of brain tissue, " Dr. Clark said. 

Dr. Clark said he was unable to say whether the wound in the President's neck, below the Adam's apple, was due to the same bullet

that had coursed through the President's brain.  He said there could have been two bullets. 

Dr. Malcolm Perry of Dallas, who also treated the President after the shooting, had said on Friday that he was unable to determine

whether one or two bullets were involved." 

[end of article]

[Ray Mitcham]

I think the keyword here is " according to". Any reason why you take the interviewer, James Gochenaur's claim as gospel?  None of Gochenaur's claims can be substantiated, virtually nothing is known about the man, yet you swallow everything he says hook-line-an-sinker.

You mean the same way you swallow everything the Warren Omission said?

Seriously, why? For anyone interested, here's a link to Gochenaur's claims.  http://www.whokilledjfk.net/pressure_dr.htm

"Miller, who later worked and taught with Perry at the University of Washington School of Medicine in the 1970s, says Perry told him there were entry wounds from both behind and in front of Kennedy, contradicting what he told the commission under oath. Perry confided similar details to an Alaska doctor as well."

What has what Dr Miller said, got to do with Gochenaur?

[Denis Pointing]

You mean the same way you swallow everything the Warren Omission said?
"Miller, who later worked and taught with Perry at the University of Washington School of Medicine in the 1970s, says Perry told him there were entry wounds from both behind and in front of Kennedy, contradicting what he told the commission under oath. Perry confided similar details to an Alaska doctor as well."

What has what Dr Miller said, got to do with Gochenaur?

You obviously have no idea concerning my opinion of the WC, if you did you'd know that I've openly stated, many times, that I believe some members of the WC were working to an agender to find Oswald to be an LN. I've also stated many times that IMO, the WR was full of mistakes. Why presumptively state other members 'opinions' if you have no idea what they actually are? The link I provided shows the " University of Washington graduate student who interviewed Moore and eventually testified at government hearings." that you referred to was in fact Gochenaur, not Dr Miller.