The Magic Bullet

[Bill Chapman]

Hoffman changed his story over time

So did Brennan! Kinda destroys the point you foolishly tried to make.

Brennan's story remains consistent with his stated fear for the safety of his family. Show us third-party confirmation of any persons who knew Brennan (relatives, friends) as anything but truthful.

On the contrary, even Hoffman's own kin said he had a propensity for telling tall tales, FFS.

[Martin Weidmann]

Brennan's story is consistent with his stated fear for the safety of his family. Show us third-party confirmation of any persons who knew Brennan (relatives, friends) as anything but truthful.

Even Hoffman's own kin said he had a propensity for telling tall tales, FFS.

Brennan's story is consistent

Read his book and compare it to his initial statements.... maybe you learn something.

[Bill Chapman]

Brennan's story is consistent

Read his book and compare it to his initial statements.... maybe you learn something.

Do you mean the book ghost-written some 42 years after the fact? And here I thought you characters (Oswald apologists) were such champions of first-day (even first-minute, it seems) information

Why not pull out a statement of two from his book and show us how the basic conclusion changes what he swore to in his affidavit and WC testimony? Or are you taking what he said and deciding for yourself what he actually meant?

[John Iacoletti]

It had to have been the third shot. A fragment strike from the second shot is just not plausible at all.

Why?  Just because you believe that CE399 was the second shot?

[John Iacoletti]

Hoffman changed his story over time and even his brothers (and/or father) said he had a habit of telling tall stories.

And do you mean the Jean Hill who saw a small dog in the limo? Great eyesight there, huh.

What was that you were saying about proclaiming what witnesses saw or meant?  Your hypocrisy knows no bounds.

The "little white dog" was a lambchop puppet that somebody handed Jackie at Love Field.

[John Iacoletti]

Do you mean the book ghost-written some 42 years after the fact? And here I thought you characters (Oswald apologists) were such champions of first-day (even first-minute, it seems) information

Was this somehow supposed to refute that Brennan's story changed over time?

[Bill Chapman]

A different picture taken at a different time from a different angle is supposed to prove this?  But either way, Bill's attempt to mock and belittle Jean Hill for this falls flat.  It looks like it could be a little white dog.

Oh, so you've already walked back she was definitely handed a dog to 'could be' seen as a dog. By whom, exactly? Jean Hill? Are you going to afford Brennan such generous leeway?