JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
Martin Weidmann:
--- Quote from: Van Savant on May 10, 2018, 03:28:41 AM ---Then it appears to be fairly well-settled. Apparently Oswald killed Officer Tippet.
--- End quote ---
He may well have done, although I doubt it, but Brown's OP contains only part of the whole story and can not be relied upon.
For instance, Helen Markham testified she left home at "a little after 1". She had only one block to walk, yet according to the official story Tippit was shot at around 1.14 pm. That means that, for the official story to be true, Markham would have taken some 10 minutes to walk one block. Anything less than that would have placed her well beyond 10th/Patton prior to the shooting. Obviously, if the shooting happened earlier, it's just about impossible for Oswald to have been there on time to do the deed.
William Scoggins's testimony reveals that his timing was off and that he got to 10th/Patton earlier than the official story claims. Also, Scoggins, who is supposed to have identified Oswald at the DPD line up failed to identify Oswald as Tippit's killer to the FBI from a photo shown to him the very next day.
Domingo Benavides, who was closer to the actual shooting than anybody else, refused to participate in a line up because he felt he could not positively identify the killer, yet others, like the Davis sisters, who were indoors somehow can identify the man? Really?
There are so many things Brown doesn't tell you, that his entire OP is just a one sided dishonest presentation of what he wants to be the truth rather than the truth itself.
Bill Brown:
--- Quote from: Martin Weidmann on May 10, 2018, 05:10:01 AM ---He may well have done, although I doubt it, but Brown's OP contains only part of the whole story and can not be relied upon.
For instance, Helen Markham testified she left home at "a little after 1". She had only one block to walk, yet according to the official story Tippit was shot at around 1.14 pm. That means that, for the official story to be true, Markham would have taken some 10 minutes to walk one block. Anything less than that would have placed her well beyond 10th/Patton prior to the shooting. Obviously, if the shooting happened earlier, it's just about impossible for Oswald to have been there on time to do the deed.
William Scoggins's testimony reveals that his timing was off and that he got to 10th/Patton earlier than the official story claims. Also, Scoggins, who is supposed to have identified Oswald at the DPD line up failed to identify Oswald as Tippit's killer to the FBI from a photo shown to him the very next day.
Domingo Benavides, who was closer to the actual shooting than anybody else, refused to participate in a line up because he felt he could not positively identify the killer, yet others, like the Davis sisters, who were indoors somehow can identify the man? Really?
There are so many things Brown doesn't tell you, that his entire OP is just a one sided dishonest presentation of what he wants to be the truth rather than the truth itself.
--- End quote ---
--- Quote ---Helen Markham testified she left home at "a little after 1". She had only one block to walk, yet according to the official story Tippit was shot at around 1.14 pm. That means that, for the official story to be true, Markham would have taken some 10 minutes to walk one block.
--- End quote ---
You left out one option, which could exist for the official story to be true. Markham could have simply been incorrect about what time it was that she left home.
--- Quote ---Domingo Benavides, who was closer to the actual shooting than anybody else, refused to participate in a line up because he felt he could not positively identify the killer, yet others, like the Davis sisters, who were indoors somehow can identify the man? Really?
--- End quote ---
Indoors? You're not aware that the Davis sisters were standing at their opened front door as the killer fled across their front yard?
Each of the Davis sisters obviously got a better look at Oswald than did Benavides. Is that really so hard to believe?
Oswald cut right across their front yard as they (Barbara Davis and Virginia Davis) stood at the opened front door. Oswald even looked at them and kind of smiled (probably a nervous smile) as he fled across their yard.
Domingo Benavides was driving his truck toward the stopped patrol car and noticed the officer talking to a man. Benavides did not study the man who was talking to the officer. Benavides had his attention on the road when he heard the gun shots. He immediately ducked down in his truck, only looking up as the killer was running from the scene, away from him. Benavides did say that the killer turned back and looked at him, but that is not to say that he (Benavides) automatically got a better look at the killer than did each of the Davis girls.
Bill Brown:
--- Quote from: Van Savant on May 10, 2018, 03:28:41 AM ---Then it appears to be fairly well-settled. Apparently Oswald killed Officer Tippet.
--- End quote ---
Indeed.
By the way, the correct spelling is Tippit... and welcome to the forum.
Bill Brown:
--- Quote from: Tom Sorensen on May 10, 2018, 06:59:00 AM ---You have a chain of possession for those shells?
--- End quote ---
Can you make a case for a problem with the chain of possession of the two shells found by each of the Davis girls? For years I've asked conspiracy believers to do this but none ever have.
Bill Brown:
--- Quote from: Tom Sorensen on May 10, 2018, 08:21:23 AM ---Where did I say Davis girls?
Do you or do you not have a chain of possession for those shells?
--- End quote ---
Yes. The chain of possession of the two shells found by the Davis girls is intact. If you have a problem with the chain of possession of those two shells, then list it.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version