JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
Bill Brown:
--- Quote from: John Iacoletti on May 11, 2018, 12:31:49 AM ---The Davises also could not identify the shells in evidence as the same ones they gave to officers.
--- End quote ---
So two young women couldn't positively state that the shells in evidence were the same shells they found. Boy, you sure got a blockbuster there.
This does not negate the fact that the two shells in evidence are the two shells the girls found.
Bill Brown:
--- Quote from: John Iacoletti on May 11, 2018, 09:33:40 PM ---
--- End quote ---
"He can bitch and holler all he wants to, but that's the man I saw running from the scene." - William Scoggins
Live with it.
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: Bill Brown on May 11, 2018, 08:31:59 PM ---The two Davis shells were linked, through ballistics, to Oswald's revolver to the exclusion of any other weapon. The chain of possession for these two shells is clear and perfectly intact.
--- End quote ---
"Oswald's revolver". LOL.
I think you mean the revolver that Gerald Hill pulled out of his pocket at the station two hours later which only then was initialed by any of the cops.
--- Quote ---Any issue (if there are any) with the chain of possession of the two Poe shells does not change the fact that the two Davis shells convict Oswald.
--- End quote ---
What is your evidence that the shells that the Davis women handed to cops came from the boy they saw crossing their yard?
Or indeed even came from the crime scene at all?
Richard Rubio:
--- Quote from: Jack Trojan on May 10, 2018, 07:10:06 PM ---No, Oswald was a sheep-dipped patsy that hoped he would be allowed to escape or else he was left in the dark, just like Thomas Arthur Vallee was in Chicago for plan A. Oswald was an Angleton singleton agent plucked from the false defector program. Every good coup needs a patsy and Oswald was plan B.
Whether Oswald shot Tippit, which is unlikely IMO, he didn't shoot JFK. This was a coup pure and simple and Oswald was the patsy and conspirators never rely on the patsy to do the shooting. As soon as you LNers get a grip, you'll see that everything you've been defending and obfuscating about for the last 50+ years fits perfectly into the patsy narrative. You will feel embarrassed re your naivety and you will feel violated that you were unwitting shills to the coup, but you will finally be able to sleep at night knowing you are no longer in the dark.
Cheers ;)
JTrojan
--- End quote ---
Not when you go making joke statements, like you think Oswald saying "I'm a patsy" is some sort of proof of a conspiracy, he likely said it because the feebeye had their eyes on him because of his activities like coming back from Russia and being involved in hands off Cuba.
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: Tom Sorensen on May 11, 2018, 09:24:10 PM ---OK, so you claim to have at least two good shells (Davis).
There were four shells marked Q-74, Q-75, Q-76, Q77.
Can we have the numbers of the Davis shells, please?
--- End quote ---
Don't expect a straight answer from Brown. Q-75 was either a Benavides shell or a Davis shell, depending on who you ask. So much for a clear and perfectly intact chain of custody.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version