Lee Oswald The Cop Killer

[Bill Chapman]

There. Consider yourself schooled. Again.

As we now know that you post things you don't agree with, there's nothing really there for me to consider....

Keep dodging the fact that you cannot stand being mocked.

But keep twisting. It's very entertaining.

[Martin Weidmann]

Keep dodging the fact that you cannot stand being mocked.

But keep twisting. It's very entertaining.

Keep dodging the fact that you cannot stand being mocked.

Who is mocking me? What are you on about, Mr "my friends call me 'genius' and I don't even understand the irony in that"?

[Bill Chapman]

Yet you have repeatedly been quoting Whaley for picking the #2 man.

So let's try again:

The name of the #2 man was?

But that wouldn't be ID'ing the man, would it?

Is that so?

To correct this misunderstanding: I don't give a fxck.

But I suggest not showing them your "contributions" on this forum.

But I suggest not showing them your "contributions" on this forum
They'll love the graphic ideas, the hard-hitting concepts. Guaranteed.

To correct this misunderstanding: I don't give a fxck.
Yeah, you keep repeating that. Yet here you are.

The name of the #2 man was?
Ask Whaley. He was the guy who hauled the killer to Beckley. And I see you're messing with my blue box (bolding text that I did not bolden)
N'uh... don't do that. Bubba. But while I'm at it, you conveniently avoided bolding Whaley's "But he was the man that I carried in my taxicab"

Is that so?
Yeah, that's so. Now don't get me started on my talent on the sporting field, where I also had tons of compliments whether on the baseball diamond or  tennis court but especially as a hockey player.
Well, ok. ok.. I'll provide some proof:

[Martin Weidmann]

But I suggest not showing them your "contributions" on this forum
They'll love the graphic ideas, the hard-hitting concepts. Guaranteed.

To correct this misunderstanding: I don't give a fxck.
Yeah, you keep repeating that. Yet here you are.

The name of the #2 man was?
Ask Whaley. He was the guy who hauled the killer to Beckley. And I see you're messing with my blue box (bolding text that I did not bolden)
N'uh... don't do that. Bubba. But while I'm at it, you conveniently avoided bolding Whaley's "But he was the man that I carried in my taxicab"

Is that so?
Yeah, that's so. Now don't get me started on my talent on the sporting field, where I also had tons of compliments whether on the baseball diamond or  tennis court but especially as a hockey player.
Well, ok. ok.. I'll provide some proof:

Your desperation to "prove" yourself to others is getting beyond ridiculous.



Are you the only person in the world that's called Bill Chapman (if that's even your real name)?

If not, so much for your "proof".

[Bill Chapman]

Keep dodging the fact that you cannot stand being mocked.

Who is mocking me? What are you on about, Mr "my friends call me 'genius' and I don't even understand the irony in that"?

Point out where I said my friends call me 'genius

[Martin Weidmann]

Point out where I said my friends call me 'genius

Oh, I'm sorry, my bad. For a moment I believed that these "multiple art directors, clients, bosses and colleagues" who allegedly have called you 'genius' were your friends. Seems I was wrong. I really should have guessed.... who in their right mind would want to be friends with you, right?

[Bill Chapman]

Your desperation to "prove" yourself to others is getting beyond ridiculous.



Are you the only person in the world that's called Bill Chapman (if that's even your real name)?

If not, so much for your "proof".

You're a real piece of work, Martin.

Oh, wait.. I forgot about the CT credo:
Nothing is knowable.
Nothing is provable.
Nothing is believable.

[Martin Weidmann]

You're a real piece of work, Martin.

Oh, wait.. I forgot about the CT credo:
Nothing is knowable.
Nothing is provable.
Nothing is believable.

Against the LN credo;

Here's some guy's name in an article of an unknown newspaper with no indiction about which Bill Chapman they are actually talking about but let's accept what I say as true anyway because it "supports" the claim I am making.....