JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Plant CTs or LNers to perpetuate a Cover Up?
John Mytton:
--- Quote from: Bob Prudhomme on January 08, 2018, 01:58:23 PM ---Why don't we put it to a poll, to see which of us would likely be part of the coverup?
--- End quote ---
Plant CTs or LNers to perpetuate a Cover Up?
1. Planting a few LNers to reinforce the conclusions of the Warren Report is pointless because the "WC defenders" will always be outnumbered by the CT's and at first glance to any casual observer must be that majority rules. If anyone was going to plant LNers then it wouldn't be done in this piecemeal method on exhibition here but a full on army much like the organised CTs who gang up on the out numbered LNer day after day here in the trenches.
2. Planting CTs makes much more sense because you know who did what so you obviously steer the argument away from the "truth" into "Caprio country" and create so much messed up confusion by delivering a totally unrealistic 450+ threads all about nothing which presents contradicting ideas going in every way imaginable. Or like the other CTs who always focus on Oswald but don't seem to care about any conspiracy beyond that, so by focusing on only Oswald they dissuade any further exploration of the "truth" by purposely ignoring any discussion of who did what.
3. Planting Both seems like a waste of resources.
4. Planting None for an event that happened 54 years ago and which a fair percentage of the population considers to be ancient history is probably the most sensible answer but what fun is that? Also what reinforces this belief of nonchalance is that even only 15 years later when the HSCA said there was a possible conspiracy nobody really battered an eyelid and it was barely newsworthy, and now half a century later the public care factor must be practically zero and unless some CT can tie someone BIG like LBJ into the conspiracy then any lower pleb that may have pushed some buttons would be publically met with a "well that's interesting, yawn"!
Btw when I started here I always found it odd that I was immediately categorized as a LNer because much like the public news polls I thought Oswald was guilty but certain events beyond Oswald's control needed some clarification and could lead to a conspiracy. So in other words I have been shoehorned into a belief system that I never truly felt comfortable with, who invented the term LNer and to what end?
JohnM
John Mytton:
--- Quote from: Zeon Wasinsky on January 09, 2018, 09:33:39 AM ---so far, the poll results are 50% for CT and 50% for LN plants
--- End quote ---
Yep we have yours and one other opinion, WOW!
JohnM
Joe Elliott:
Having plotters post on forums makes no sense. Hiring employees to make false documentaries makes a lot more sense. You would be mass communicating then. You could influence the opinions of millions.
The most effective way to influence opinions is to have high school teachers teach false theories. Early opinions have the best chance of becoming permanent opinions. The government has made no effort to do this. A high school student is more likely to learn that there was a conspiracy than to learn there probably was not.
John Iacoletti:
John Iacoletti:
"to employ propaganda assets to answer and refute the attacks of critics"
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version