JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Malcolm Wallace's fingerprint from carton on 6th floor
Matt Grantham:
--- Quote from: Steve M. Galbraith on May 04, 2018, 08:35:56 PM ---What is the evidence that a supposed print of Wallace influenced LBJ?
From what I've read this alleged match of the print wasn't made until 1998 when a conspiracy researcher, Walt Brown, announced the discovery. LBJ died in 1973.
--- End quote ---
I suppose the idea would have been that the print existed in the files, and that it could have been used against LBJ regardless of whether it was publicly available information at that time
Larry Trotter:
Not that I am an expert, but I viewed a film about Mr Darby's "conclusion", and I must say, if I were on a jury, I just don't believe I could "rely" on said finding that it, just one finger, was solid as an indication that Mr Wallace had been on the TSBD 6th floor on 11/22/'63. And, said finding was, I believe over 20 years after the death of MalcolmWallace.But, to each their own, and so it goes.
Matt Grantham:
--- Quote from: Larry Trotter on May 04, 2018, 08:54:21 PM ---Not that I am an expert, but I viewed a film about Mr Darby's "conclusion", and I must say, if I were on a jury, I just don't believe I could "rely" on said finding that it, just one finger, was solid as an indication that Mr Wallace had been on the TSBD 6th floor on 11/22/'63. And, said finding was, I believe over 20 years after the death of MalcolmWallace.But, to each their own, and so it goes.
--- End quote ---
I guess a partial palm print would not be good enough to convict someone as well
Steve M. Galbraith:
--- Quote from: Mike Orr on May 04, 2018, 08:38:37 PM ---What would make Joan Mellen an expert on fingerprints ? I believe that Nathan Darby did his work on finding a 14 point match on a print that turned out to be the small finger fingerprint of Malcolm Wallace. Darby's identification was made " blindly "---that is , without his knowing the identity of Wallace .
https://www.lobster-magazine.co.uk/free/lobster68/lob68-mac-wallacepdf
--- End quote ---
But Mellen wasn't the one who analyzed the print. She said she obtained a clearer copy of Wallace's prints and a clearer image of the "mystery" print and showed them to a qualified expert, Robert Garrett, who concluded there was no match.
It is odd to hear conspiracy people say that JFK was shot by a person located in front of him yet also claim that Wallace, located in the sniper's nest, shot JFK. The sniper's nest was, of course, located behind JFK when he was shot.
Matt Grantham:
--- Quote from: Steve M. Galbraith on May 04, 2018, 09:28:29 PM ---But Mellen wasn't the one who analyzed the print. She said she obtained a clearer copy of Wallace's prints and a clearer image of the "mystery" print and showed them to a qualified expert, Robert Garrett, who concluded there was no match.
It is odd to hear conspiracy people say that JFK was shot by a person located in front of him yet also claim that Wallace, located in the sniper's nest, shot JFK. The sniper's nest was, of course, located behind JFK when he was shot.
--- End quote ---
I am not aware of any CT's that that think the back wound on JFK did not come from behind
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version