JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate

Malcolm Wallace's fingerprint from carton on 6th floor

<< < (8/11) > >>

John Iacoletti:

--- Quote from: Denis Pointing on May 07, 2018, 12:06:21 AM ---Royell, it's not as simple as that. To positively link a fingerprint to a suspect you need a certain number of identical marks (14 rings a bell but that may be wrong) Darby claims to have identified, (whatever) the number of identical marks needed for a positive ID, but other fingerprint experts disagree with him. If there were more fingerprints available for comparison then the experts could reach a consensus but there isn't. Larry's correct, a court would never convict a suspect on just one controversial fingerprint, a defence lawyer would just pull it apart. The 'Wallace' print is certainly tantalising but like so much in this case 100% certainty is out of reach.

--- End quote ---

How many points of identification were found on the magic palmprint?

John Iacoletti:

--- Quote from: John Mytton on May 07, 2018, 12:29:31 AM ---Not Wallace.

--- End quote ---

Mytton has a habit of thinking that colored blobs painted on low-res blurry images are enough to prove that he is correct.

Denis Pointing:

--- Quote from: John Iacoletti on May 10, 2018, 10:42:53 PM ---How many points of identification were found on the magic palmprint?

--- End quote ---

Eleven, John:

 

Before you ask I have no idea if that's enough for a positive ID in a court of law, sorry.

John Iacoletti:

--- Quote from: Denis Pointing on May 11, 2018, 10:05:36 PM ---Ten, John:

Before you ask I have no idea if that's enough for a positive ID, sorry.

--- End quote ---

Actually it's the partial palmprint that was allegedly lifted from the rifle that I was referring to.  I don't find Oswald's prints being on boxes where he works to be significant.

Bill Brown:

--- Quote from: John Iacoletti on May 11, 2018, 10:10:40 PM ---Actually it's the partial palmprint that was allegedly lifted from the rifle that I was referring to.  I don't find Oswald's prints being on boxes where he works to be significant.

--- End quote ---

You would find it significant if you knew the evidence, regarding Oswald's prints on the boxes.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version