9/11/MLK/RFK

[Matt Grantham]

Matt,

Have you googled "william binney" "tim leonard" simultaneously, yet?

(You'll find several articles to choose from.)

--  MWT   

 Usually prefer someone making a claim at least gives a sentence or two summary of what they are claiming. then one can look to see those points reflected in the links


 Against my better judgement I looked at them anyway I looked at them anyway. Nothing there about any connection to Binney any assessment of VIPS main concerns about download speeds etc. Tim Leonard may be some disinfo agent, I have no idea But what the hell is he supposed to do with Binney

[Matt Grantham]

Yup. That’s good. Right there; that’s real good.

 Hey Micheal, I can tell you are all too familiar with this road. I think I see my exit dead ahead. Maybe see you around some day with someone who actually discusses things

[Matt Grantham]

 Got a rebuttal to the rebuttal?

https://disobedientmedia.com/2018/08/opinion-on-the-latest-establishment-attack-launched-against-wikileaks-independent-media/

[Thomas Graves]

Usually prefer someone making a claim at least gives a sentence or two summary of what they are claiming. then one can look to see those points reflected in the links


 Against my better judgement I looked at them anyway I looked at them anyway. Nothing there about any connection to Binney any assessment of VIPS main concerns about download speeds etc. Tim Leonard may be some disinfo agent, I have no idea But what the hell is he supposed to do with Binney

Matt,

Do you identify with the person calling himself restless94110 in this article?

Are you restless94110 ?

LOL

I love some of the comments others made to his little essay, "The Binney Retraction Is Untrue".

Did you read the article when it showed up at the top of your google search "hit list," and all of the other articles it "links" to, as well?

(Didn't think so.)

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20180802/07182740351/as-dnc-hacked-itself-conspiracy-theory-collapses-key-backer-claim-exposed-as-uk-troll.shtml


--  MWT   

[Michael Clark]

Thomas You chose to take the low road of nonsense awhile back, and now you are not even open to new ways of insulting one another. Disappointing

Yup. That’s good. Right there; that’s real good.

Hey Micheal, I can tell you are all too familiar with this road. I think I see my exit dead ahead. Maybe see you around some day with someone who actually discusses things

Yes, I’ll look out for you. If we see them come for Thomas, perhaps we’ll vouch for him, a bit. I wouldn’t want to see them rough him up too much.

[Thomas Graves]

Thomas, You chose to take the low road of nonsense awhile back ...

Matt,

What "low road of nonsense" are you referring to?

Care to be specific?

Can you, even?

--  MWT   

[Matt Grantham]

Matt,

What "low road of nonsense" are you referring to?

Care to be specific?

Can you, even?

--  MWT   

 Yo make a good point since their was an implication that at one time you were interested in discussing objective facts instead of your obsession with innuendo and outright slander. So yes in retrospect there was turning to the low road.