Oswald's lies proves his guilt.

[Vincent Baxter]

Yeah, I put words in your mouth.

Amazing... just how much of a hypocrite can this guy be?

Personally, I still don't think phrasing the question the way I did was exactly putting words into his mouth. Certainly it was something I wouldn't even have bothered mentioning or getting offended about if someone had done the same to me, but clearly there's no point me in trying to argue that case anymore as you've both already determined that I did so it's down to interpretation.
Thought I'd just concede in the hope that he might actually reply to the question now rather than go all round the houses about how I'm putting words in his mouth. Out of curiosity I really want to know now considering the whole bloody palaver its caused.

[Martin Weidmann]

OK, busted! Maybe an incy, teeny weeny bit of me did come on here just to pick immature fights but I swear that wasn't my intention when I signed up. I did honestly hope to enhance my knowledge but it seems that's not really how JFK forums work. Am I right to assume that American people can get pretty defensive and indiscriminately dislike someone entirely depending on what their views on the assassination are? Is it a bit like how British people are divided over Brexit?

I do apologise to Tom Scully if I picked a fight with him for no reason, but being civil doesn't seem to be the theme of this forum. And admit it, you enjoy it as much as me.

p.s. Are we Brits really that easy to detect?

being civil doesn't seem to be the theme of this forum. And admit it, you enjoy it as much as me.

Actually, no I don't enjoy that at all. I'd much rather discuss the case and the evidence.

p.s. Are we Brits really that easy to detect?

When you use words like "geezer" and write "defence" instead of "defense" it's pretty obvious.

[Vincent Baxter]

So far you haven't proven anything yourself so why would anyone waste their time proving you wrong?

I didn't say I'd proven anything myself, I merely stated one of my own personal opinions.
And anyway, since when did you have to prove something in the first place in order to be proven wrong? Do criminals prove that they were somewhere else at the time of an alleged crime before they can be proven they weren't?

[John Mytton]

OK, busted! Maybe an incy, teeny weeny bit of me did come on here just to pick immature fights but I swear that wasn't my intention when I signed up. I did honestly hope to enhance my knowledge but it seems that's not really how JFK forums work. Am I right to assume that American people can get pretty defensive and indiscriminately dislike someone entirely depending on what their views on the assassination are? Is it a bit like how British people are divided over Brexit?

I do apologise to Tom Scully if I picked a fight with him for no reason, but being civil doesn't seem to be the theme of this forum. And admit it, you enjoy it as much as me.

p.s. Are we Brits really that easy to detect?

Vincent, these clowns like Goth, Otto and Roger Collins are all created by the same cookie cutter and can't debate their way out of a wet paper bag, they all know there is a MOUNTAIN of evidence so they start attacking the messenger and try to make it personal, my advice is just present the facts and watch them all scurry away like frightened mice.

JohnM

[John Mytton]

Try posting supporting evidence.

Memory fading?

Instead of speaking in vague riddles that only you can understand, how about you map out your paranoid suspicions and then I can help you see reality.

JohnM

[Vincent Baxter]

being civil doesn't seem to be the theme of this forum. And admit it, you enjoy it as much as me.

Actually, no I don't enjoy that at all. I'd much rather discuss the case and the evidence.

Well then why don't you bugger off and discuss the case and the evidence instead of constantly replying to tedious posts that are getting more and more ridiculous the longer you fuel them.
I've already stated that I do it because I find it fun, but seeing as you don't why do you bother engaging in it all the time?

The fact that you had ample opportunity to discuss the case when I initially posted something which actually related to it but instead chose to be a dick and discuss pretty much everything BUT the case, suggests to me you're talking as much shit as me.

[John Mytton]

There are no suspicions just the plain fact that you posted nonsense.

Otto, explain why the evidence I supplied was nonsense?

JohnM