Oswald's lies proves his guilt.

[John Mytton]

Sure, is that why you're stuck on #1?

Good for you but it doesn't look like a 36 inch rifle to me....

Sure, is that why you're stuck on #1?

No, but beware of being stuck in number 2!

Good for you but it doesn't look like a 36 inch rifle to me....

Otto, it's a good idea to focus your questions instead of spinning around in riddles so let me guess, since you didn't post or refer to any any photogrammetry evidence which would be beyond your grasp anyway, you must be questioning the Kleins rifle order but when one takes a closer examination of the facts and subsequent timeline we find all is hunky dory A-OK. 

First of all, Oswald placed his order in mid March for a rifle advertised in a February issue and since there was no ad in the March issue the next relevant month must be April.



The April Kleins advertisement shows the same catalogue number as the February issue(C20-T750) so Oswald's coupon which was for C20-T750 was sent according to the stock shown in the April issue.



And the same rifle that Kleins sent to Oswald's PO Box and which Oswald was photographed with ended up on the 6th floor of Oswald's workplace and to top it off, the rifle had Oswald's prints and fibers which matched the arrest shirt. That's some powerful evidence that still after 55 years hasn't been refuted.



JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

“Mytton” still hasn’t learned the difference between evidence and claims/supposition.

“Oswald placed his order”

“Oswald's coupon”

“which was for C20-T750 was sent”

“according to the stock shown in the April issue”

“And the same rifle that Kleins sent to Oswald's PO Box”

“and which Oswald was photographed with”

“the rifle had Oswald's prints”

“and fibers which matched the arrest shirt”

LOL

[Walt Cakebread]

“Mytton” still hasn’t learned the difference between evidence and claims/supposition.

“Oswald placed his order”

“Oswald's coupon”

“which was for C20-T750 was sent”

“according to the stock shown in the April issue”

“And the same rifle that Kleins sent to Oswald's PO Box”

“and which Oswald was photographed with”

“the rifle had Oswald's prints”

“and fibers which matched the arrest shirt”

LOL

“and fibers which matched the arrest shirt”

This is one of my favorite rebuttals.....   If the fibers matched the arrest shirt they had to have been placed on the rifle AFTER  both the rifle and the arrest shirt were in the possession of the Dallas Police.    Here's why....   Lee went to his room and changed his clothes at 1:00pm ...AFTER he left the TSBD he could NOT have had contact with the rifle AFTER he left the TSBD..... So if there were fibers on the butt of the rifle, and Lee had had the rifle against his shirt at the TSBD, then those fibers should have matched the shirt he left in his room at 1026 N. Beckley, NOT the shirt that he was wearing in the Texas Theater.     

[John Mytton]

Where did JohnM go?

Let's try again,

First of all, Oswald placed his order in mid March for a rifle advertised in a February issue and since there was no ad in the March issue the next relevant month must be April.

So Klein's receives an order for a 36 inch rifle from a February issue (Dept. 358) in March but ships a 40 inch rifle listed in an April issue because "the next relevant month must be April."

Please provide quote(s) from the WCR to back up this claim and while you're at it how about some CE numbers for the ads you refer to?

Thanks.

Sorry Otto there's nothing to discuss, Oswald ordered C20-T750 and Oswald received C20-T750. 



JohnM

[John Mytton]

Well, at least I gave you the opportunity to back up your claims and like Von P you fell on your face as you always do when it comes down to the evidence.

The junk the WC presented has been destroyed a long time ago,

https://kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-articles/the-evidence-is-the-conspiracy-index (section 4)

A link to "kennedysandking"?, now I know you're joking. Thanks for the LOL's.

JohnM

[John Mytton]

“Mytton” still hasn’t learned the difference between evidence and claims/supposition.

“Oswald placed his order”

“Oswald's coupon”

“which was for C20-T750 was sent”

“according to the stock shown in the April issue”

“And the same rifle that Kleins sent to Oswald's PO Box”

“and which Oswald was photographed with”

“the rifle had Oswald's prints”

“and fibers which matched the arrest shirt”

LOL

Omg, not yet another "LOL" rebuttal, YAWN!

JohnM

[John Mytton]

Looking forward to your rebuttal.

Or will you prove to be a coward like Von P?

A rebuttal to what, you never post anything?

JohnM