Three Tests Proved Oswald's Innocence

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Three Tests Proved Oswald's Innocence  (Read 59586 times)

Offline Ross Lidell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 451
Re: Three Tests Proved Oswald's Innocence
« Reply #28 on: May 05, 2018, 05:35:23 AM »
Yes if we are to believe all the reports identifying the snipers nest

What reports?

What is it about these reports that concern you... specifically?
« Last Edit: May 05, 2018, 05:55:08 AM by Ross Lidell »

Offline Ross Lidell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 451
Re: Three Tests Proved Oswald's Innocence
« Reply #29 on: May 05, 2018, 05:36:28 AM »
Yes if we are to believe all the reports identifying the snipers nest

The Carcano rifle was not found in the sniper's nest.

The Carcano rifle was not left in the sniper's nest.

Neither was a Mauser!!!

Offline Matt Grantham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 902
Re: Three Tests Proved Oswald's Innocence
« Reply #30 on: May 05, 2018, 03:46:09 PM »
The Carcano rifle was not found in the sniper's nest.

The Carcano rifle was not left in the sniper's nest.

Neither was a Mauser!!!

 I did not said it was left in the snipers nest How far away was it?

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Three Tests Proved Oswald's Innocence
« Reply #31 on: May 05, 2018, 03:55:05 PM »
"The Dallas Police found Oswald's Carcano"

Actually a 7.65 Mauser was found by Sheriff Department Deputy Boone. The crime scene

was turned over to the (DPD) Dallas Police Department almost immediately. The rifle later became Ozzie's

Carcano.








There was no 7.65 Mauser found on the sixth floor at about 1:22 that afternoon.....The rifle that Boone saw a small portion of the butt of ...was a Mannlicher Carcano.

Any serious student who is searching for the truth is handcuffing himself by believing the mauser nonsense.....

This tale has become interwoven with the facts of the case and there's probably no way to remove the idea from the legend.....  A pity.
« Last Edit: May 05, 2018, 03:58:45 PM by Walt Cakebread »

Offline Matt Grantham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 902
Re: Three Tests Proved Oswald's Innocence
« Reply #32 on: May 05, 2018, 04:55:44 PM »
 If I understand you Walt you feel that Mauser was never found first? I have no opinion though I now there was a picture of the original gun that was being called a Mauser. I assume that photograph can be shown to be off the MC?

The second part is not really addressed to you, but if the rifle was found neatly tucked in the opposite corner of the sixth floor from the SN doesn't that increase the time it would have taken Oswald to get to the lunchroom?

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Three Tests Proved Oswald's Innocence
« Reply #33 on: May 05, 2018, 05:19:07 PM »
If I understand you Walt you feel that Mauser was never found first? I have no opinion though I now there was a picture of the original gun that was being called a Mauser. I assume that photograph can be shown to be off the MC?

The second part is not really addressed to you, but if the rifle was found neatly tucked in the opposite corner of the sixth floor from the SN doesn't that increase the time it would have taken Oswald to get to the lunchroom?

if the rifle was found neatly tucked in the opposite corner of the sixth floor from the SN doesn't that increase the time it would have taken Oswald to get to the lunchroom?

You're exactly right in your choice of words describing the way the carcano was found ....the rifle was found neatly tucked beneath boxes of books stacked on the pallet.  It was NOT hastily discarded by any fleeing person....

"if the rifle was found neatly tucked in the opposite corner of the sixth floor from the SN doesn't that increase the time it would have taken Oswald to get to the lunchroom?"

Absolutely right!!    IF? IF ? Lee had been on the sixth floor ( he wasn't)  at the SE corner window with that carcano at the time of the shooting...He could not have hidden the rifle in the manner it was hidden and reached the lunchroom in 75 seconds.....

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Three Tests Proved Oswald's Innocence
« Reply #34 on: May 05, 2018, 05:43:34 PM »
You are quoting an error caused by Deputy Sheriff Boone's cursory "look" at the rifle before it was examined. Boone later admitted his error: he assumed the rifle was a "Mauser" based on the bolt-action.

Like every other amateur attorney: you have no interest in explaining the whys and wherefores of the Mauser theory. Even the most obvious, rudimentary questions are never asked.

-- Was the German Mauser used to make the assassination shots?

-- Where is the ballistics evidence that links a German Mauser to the assassination shots?

-- Why was  Oswald's Carcano unavailable to make the assassination shots?

-- How did Oswald's Italian Carcano appear very soon after the Boone "find" for Captain Fritz and Lieutenant Day to examine the rifle?

-- Were Fritz and day part of a conspiracy to murder JFK? Before the fact? After the fact?

Well Mister defense attorney?????

You are quoting an error caused by Deputy Sheriff Boone's cursory "look" at the rifle before it was examined. Boone later admitted his error: he assumed the rifle was a "Mauser" based on the bolt-action.

This is a fact!.......


Were Fritz and day part of a conspiracy to murder JFK? Before the fact? After the fact?

I believe that Fritz was a key component in the coup d e'tat......   Day was his hand puppet.....