JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Three Tests Proved Oswald's Innocence
Walt Cakebread:
--- Quote from: Denis Pointing on May 07, 2018, 01:16:14 AM ---Hmn, kinda reminds me of someone else..not sure who. lol
--- End quote ---
An intelligent and wise man readily admits that he is wrong when in fact he is in error. Admitting to being being wrong is the mark of a wise man, for no human is ever always right.
A man who cannot admit an error is a fool.....
Walt Cakebread:
--- Quote from: Matt Grantham on May 06, 2018, 11:53:31 PM --- Walt I am open to this question, but it did not seem like you answered this
Then where did the witnesses get the "7.65" part if they didn't read it off the rifle?
--- End quote ---
Do you now understand ?
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: Ross Lidell on May 05, 2018, 05:33:35 AM ---Splitting hairs John... and then splitting them again!!!
So what do you think Amos Euins saw... a pipe or a rifle?
So what do you think Bob Jackson saw... a pipe or a rifle?
--- End quote ---
It's not splitting hairs. You claimed that "several witnesses saw a man firing a rifle from the TSBD". That's just flat out false.
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: Walt Cakebread on May 07, 2018, 01:30:05 AM ---An intelligent and wise man readily admits that he is wrong when in fact he is in error. Admitting to being being wrong is the mark of a wise man, for no human is ever always right.
A man who cannot admit an error is a fool.....
--- End quote ---
You mean like admitting your error about "red signal rings"?
Matt Grantham:
--- Quote from: Walt Cakebread on May 07, 2018, 01:24:55 PM ---Do you now understand ?
--- End quote ---
Walt Yes thank you I assume close comparisons were done on the original police photo of what they called a Mauser and no expert has been able to prove it was such a Mauser?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version