Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Non problematic evidence?  (Read 24378 times)

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3627
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #72 on: March 29, 2019, 10:16:32 PM »
Advertisement
Let's agree to disagree? you keep playing games and I'll keep on jumping to obvious conclusions that you don't like....

How many other people just ignore you?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #72 on: March 29, 2019, 10:16:32 PM »


Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7404
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #73 on: March 29, 2019, 10:19:07 PM »
How many other people just ignore you?

Other people than who?

Do you know and can you name one who does?

Here's a better question; just how many people do you think are taking you seriously after you have showed them your true colors?


« Last Edit: March 29, 2019, 10:22:06 PM by Martin Weidmann »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #74 on: March 30, 2019, 04:34:34 AM »
Can anybody name one piece of physical evidence conclusively tied to Oswald which is of such significance that it beyond reasonable doubt clearly points to his guilt?

Oswald himself.

« Last Edit: March 30, 2019, 04:41:05 AM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #74 on: March 30, 2019, 04:34:34 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #75 on: March 30, 2019, 04:39:12 AM »
How many other people just ignore you?

Never ignore the highest-paid trolls

Bill Chapman
Hunter of Trolls

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #76 on: March 30, 2019, 05:03:13 AM »
Sheesh Martin, you can't even remember your own OP.

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,638.0.html

I see what you did there, alas too subtle for these knobs.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #76 on: March 30, 2019, 05:03:13 AM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #77 on: March 30, 2019, 07:16:48 AM »
Have you asked a question without first telling me what you think my position is and how I arrived there? Perhaps I missed it.

I tried that once. I asked you what specifically convinced you that Oswald did it. You didn?t want to go there. So, yeah, I think you?re playing games too.

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3627
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #78 on: March 30, 2019, 01:02:54 PM »
I tried that once. I asked you what specifically convinced you that Oswald did it. You didn?t want to go there. So, yeah, I think you?re playing games too.

I have no desire to ?play games? here? I have better things to do with my time. If you can honestly say to yourself that you have given both sides of the controversy a fair consideration with an open mind, I respect your opinion. Even though I might not agree with your opinion. Only you know for sure whether you have. No matter what you might say to others.

The preponderance of the evidence is overwhelmingly convincing. People have tried to discredit the evidence and I believe that I give their opinions a fair, open-minded consideration. If you believe that you have and have a different opinion, then I respect that. That is my position.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #78 on: March 30, 2019, 01:02:54 PM »


Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #79 on: March 30, 2019, 01:37:29 PM »
I have no desire to ?play games? here? I have better things to do with my time. If you can honestly say to yourself that you have given both sides of the controversy a fair consideration with an open mind, I respect your opinion. Even though I might not agree with your opinion. Only you know for sure whether you have. No matter what you might say to others.

The preponderance of the evidence is overwhelmingly convincing. People have tried to discredit the evidence and I believe that I give their opinions a fair, open-minded consideration. If you believe that you have and have a different opinion, then I respect that. That is my position.

The preponderance of the evidence is overwhelmingly convincing.

That's true.....The preponderance of the evidence is overwhelmingly convincing...that there was a conspiracy behind the coup d e'tat....