Where is Dan Rather?

[Martin Weidmann]

Of Minnesota. Full of intellectuals. Okay, then.

Ex- Navy Seal; at least according to him. Found to be not quite true.
Ironically, made the 3 shots in 8.4 seconds while trying for 6

And what exactly did you do for your country?

[Ross Lidell]

Condescending to an entire state now.  Nice going, Bill.

https://sofrep.com/36086/truth-jesse-venturas-navy-seal-status

Why is that ironic?

Jesse Ventura is a known JFK conspiracy theorist. Virtually all theories say that Oswald is innocent... and never fired the shots that killed JFK. The ballistic evidence is ignored and instead the "time constraint" defense is invoked. This is subjective because the time for the shooting sequence is not known with absolute certainty. The shortest possible time frame is selected for tests. This was demonstrated in the 1967 CBS tests in Maryland.

When a person "tries" to achieve something in a particular time span--to prove it cannot be done--there's always the possibility that:

(a.) He (or she) is not trying hard enough "to" achieve the task.

(b.) He (or she) is actually trying "not to" achieve the task.

Jesse Ventura had trouble working the bolt-action of the rifle and (supposedly) gave up in disgust. It looked like a stunt.

Irony? Jesse Ventura was a professional wrestler. Persuasive "deception" is the prime skill of a "wrassler". The conclusion to most matches could be described as stunts.

Incredible coincidence? Ventura wrestled Backlund!!!

[Martin Weidmann]

Jesse Ventura is a known JFK conspiracy theorist. Virtually all theories say that Oswald is innocent... and never fired the shots that killed JFK. The ballistic evidence is ignored and instead the "time constraint" defense is invoked. This is subjective because the time for the shooting sequence is not known with absolute certainty. The shortest possible time frame is selected for tests. This was demonstrated in the 1967 CBS tests in Maryland.

When a person "tries" to achieve something in a particular time span--to prove it cannot be done--there's always the possibility that:

(a.) He (or she) is not trying hard enough "to" achieve the task.

(b.) He (or she) is actually trying "not to" achieve the task.

Jesse Ventura had trouble working the bolt-action of the rifle and (supposedly) gave up in disgust. It looked like a stunt.

Irony? Jesse Ventura was a professional wrestler. Persuasive "deception" is the prime skill of a "wrassler". The conclusion to most matches could be described as stunts.

Incredible coincidence? Ventura wrestled Backlund!!!

The ballistic evidence is ignored

What exactly is the ballistic evidence?

[Matt Grantham]

 The CBS demonstration only showed one person able to accomplish the feat so not much of confirmation Yes you do not want people with a bias if you can avoid it, but surely you are not going to suggest the CBS folks weren't trying  It seems the LN's only like experiments with melons, questionable recreations of simulated tissue etc , are the only preferable kinds of demonstration that are supposed to prove something hopefully scientist will not begin to go with your theorem of just because it has never been done doesn't mean it cannot happen someday

[Bill Chapman]

Condescending to an entire state now.  Nice going, Bill.

https://sofrep.com/36086/truth-jesse-venturas-navy-seal-status

Why is that ironic?

Add the States that voted Trump. Some have reversed that; more to come... thus gaining back their 'Sanity Card' status.

Your Special Ops seal site shelters their own of course. Others have differing views of the UD component.

You know what 8.3 refers to.

[Joe Elliott]

That's "Governor Ventura" to you.

Not to me. I?m not from Minnesota, ?The Land of More than Ten Thousand Bad Voters?.

I?m not certain that this recent trend in America, electing non-politicians to high office, is a good trend. It?s good to see how someone handles himself in other elected offices for many years to see how they do before electing them to a higher office. ?All politicians are scoundrels?. And Ventura and Trump are not?

[Ross Lidell]

The ballistic evidence is ignored

What exactly is the ballistic evidence?

CE399 matched to Oswald's Carcano to the exclusion of any other weapon ever made.

The Limo bullet fragments matched to Oswald's Carcano to the exclusion of any other weapon ever made.

We are off topic. But why not: Backlund has abandoned his own "subject".