JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate

Autopsy proves SBT impossible

<< < (19/49) > >>

John Iacoletti:

--- Quote from: Bernd Werner on April 30, 2018, 09:45:32 PM ---I know, that there was no analysis of the bullet path of the non lethal wound. If this path was not analysed, no definite assertion about the angle of the entering bullet could be made.

--- End quote ---

Then why did the autopsy doctors make that assertion?

Bernd Werner:

--- Quote from: John Iacoletti on April 30, 2018, 09:55:30 PM ---Then why did the autopsy doctors make that assertion?

--- End quote ---

I don't know, I don't even know, if they even stated it. All I know is, that the bullet path was not probed, and that guys, that refuse the single bullet theory use this as an argument, if it matches their believes. It is quite funny, that you ignore this now, as it doesn't fit!

John Iacoletti:

--- Quote from: Bernd Werner on April 30, 2018, 10:02:54 PM ---I don't know, I don't even know, if they even stated it. All I know is, that the bullet path was not probed, and that guys, that refuse the single bullet theory use this as an argument, if it matches their believes. It is quite funny, that you ignore this now, as it doesn't fit!

--- End quote ---

So if your point is that the autopsy doctors didn't know what they were doing, I'll go along with that.

Matt Grantham:
 Bernard  said

I know, that there was no analysis of the bullet path of the non lethal wound. If this path was not analysed, no definite assertion about the angle of the entering bullet could be made. If anyone cites this angle as evidence against the single bullet theory, I'd call this person disingenuous! I for myself try to relate on actual evidence.


 Matt replies  Who has ever asserted this? Folks cite that most of them thought it was an entrance wound, but the angle? I don't get it

Mike Orr:
 Specter asked Pierre Finck, " Could CE 399 have been the bullet which inflicted the wound on Governor Connally's right wrist?"

 "No," Finck replied, " for the reason that there are too many fragments described in that wrist," the problem being as Finck put it, " there was practically no loss of this bullet."

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version