JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Autopsy proves SBT impossible
Gary Craig:
--- Quote from: Tim Nickerson on April 12, 2018, 09:57:08 PM ---Why should Sibert and O'Neill have been called before the WC? Should everyone who observed the autopsy have been called before the Commission?
--- End quote ---
"Why should Sibert and O'Neill have been called before the WC?"
They took notes and filed a report. And they didn't burn them and rewrite it after Ozzie was murdered by
Ruby.
The relevant question is; "Why weren't they called before the commission?"
The answer is, what they saw and put in their report was in direct conflict with the WCR, especially
Spector's "Magic Bullet".
They were called before the HSCA. They drew the illustrations below depicting JFK's wounds for that
committee.
Sibert
O'Neil
INTERVIEW WITH FORMER FBI AGENT JAMES SIBERT (JUNE 30, 2005)
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=AI8bbITdvsw
Royell Storing:
--- Quote from: Tim Nickerson on April 12, 2018, 09:57:08 PM ---Why should Sibert and O'Neill have been called before the WC? Should everyone who observed the autopsy have been called before the Commission?
--- End quote ---
FBI Agents that viewed the JFK Autopsy and filed a report citing "surgery to the head area" being present when JFK's body was initially removed from his coffin, should have been questioned by the WC.
Ray Mitcham:
--- Quote from: Gary Craig on April 13, 2018, 02:56:03 PM ---"Why should Sibert and O'Neill have been called before the WC?"
They took notes and filed a report. And they didn't burn them and rewrite it after Ozzie was murdered by
Ruby.
The relevant question is; "Why weren't they called before the commission?"
The answer is, what they saw and put in their report was in direct conflict with the WCR, especially
Spector's "Magic Bullet".
They were called before the HSCA. They drew the illustrations below depicting JFK's wounds for that
committee.
Sibert
O'Neil
INTERVIEW WITH FORMER FBI AGENT JAMES SIBERT (JUNE 30, 2005)
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=AI8bbITdvsw
--- End quote ---
Oops, their sketches seem to destroy Tim's sketch of the entry point. They MUST have been mistaken or are LYING.
Thanks for posting these, Gary.
Ken Jacobs:
Why don't you ask the man who stood at JFK's shoulder, helping move the body for photos, xrays, etc.? If he tells you he saw, from inches away, a small entry wound in JFK's temple, exactly where the Press Secretary pointed to as he announced JFK's death, how would this have occurred?
Tim Nickerson:
--- Quote from: Gary Craig on April 13, 2018, 02:56:03 PM ---"Why should Sibert and O'Neill have been called before the WC?"
They took notes and filed a report. And they didn't burn them and rewrite it after Ozzie was murdered by
Ruby.
The relevant question is; "Why weren't they called before the commission?"
The answer is, what they saw and put in their report was in direct conflict with the WCR, especially
Spector's "Magic Bullet".
They were called before the HSCA. They drew the illustrations below depicting JFK's wounds for that
committee.
Sibert
O'Neil
INTERVIEW WITH FORMER FBI AGENT JAMES SIBERT (JUNE 30, 2005)
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=AI8bbITdvsw
--- End quote ---
"Examination of photographs of anterior and posterior views of thorax, and anterior, posterior and lateral views of neck (Photographs 3, 4, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 17, 18, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 38, 39, 40, 41). There is an elliptical penetrating wound of the skin of the back located approximately 15 cm. medial to the right acromial process, 5 cm. lateral to the mid-dorsal line and 14 cm. below the right mastoid process. This wound lies approximately 5.5 cm. below a transverse fold in the skin of the neck. This fold can also be seen in a lateral view of the neck which shows an anterior tracheotomy wound. This view makes it possible to compare the levels of these two wounds in relation to that of the horizontal plane of the body. A well defined zone of discoloration of the edge of the back wound, most pronounced on its upper and outer margins, identifies it as having the characteristics of the entrance wound of a bullet. The wound with its marginal abrasion measures approximately 7 mm. in width by 10 mm. in length. The dimensions of this cutaneous wound are consistent with those of a wound produced by a bullet similar to that which constitutes exhibit CE 399. At the site of and above the tracheotomy incision in the front of the neck, there can be identified the upper half of the circumference of a circular cutaneous wound the appearance of which is characteristic of that of the exit wound of a bullet. The lower half of this circular wound is obscured by the surgically produced tracheotomy incision which transects it. The center of the circular wound is situated approximately 9 cm. below the transverse fold in the skin of the neck described in a preceding paragraph. This indicates that the bullet which produced the two wounds followed a course downward and to the left in Its passage through the body."
http://www.jfklancer.com/ClarkPanel.html
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version