JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Autopsy proves SBT impossible
Ray Mitcham:
--- Quote from: Tim Nickerson on April 08, 2018, 05:59:32 PM ---Ray,
They had an entrance wound in the posterior at the base of the neck. The X-Rays revealed no bullet inside the body. After removing the breastplate they found a contusion on the apex of the upper lobe of the right lung. It was obvious to them that the bullet had gone over the top of that lung. They came to realize that the bullet had to have exited from the front of the neck. Humes' phone call to Dr. Perry confirmed it for them.
--- End quote ---
It was a cock-up of an autopsy. How can an incredible autopsy be considered as any evidence.
So the "bullet hit the top of the right lung" and exited through the throat? ;D
If that was the case then the bullet would have been travelling in an upward direction.
Tim Nickerson:
--- Quote from: Ray Mitcham on April 08, 2018, 06:52:16 PM ---It was a cock-up of an autopsy. How can an incredible autopsy be considered as any evidence.
--- End quote ---
It was an official autopsy. That the findings of it don't match up with your conspiratorial beliefs is your problem, not mine.
--- Quote ---So the "bullet hit the top of the right lung" and exited through the throat? ;D
If that was the case then the bullet would have been travelling in an upward direction.
--- End quote ---
The bullet never hit the top of the right lung. It passed over the top of the right lung. It did so in a downward direction.
Matt Grantham:
--- Quote from: Tim Nickerson on April 08, 2018, 07:38:09 PM ---It was an official autopsy. That the findings of it don't match up with your conspiratorial beliefs is your problem, not mine.
--- End quote ---
Well its been pretty polite up to this point , but I am going to object to this There is the logical fallacy of begging the question, and in my opinion it is particularly prevalent among those who official stories of some sort behind them Apparently this perspective allows them a free pass form this otherwise prohibitive fundament of logic based solely on the conclusion of organization Conclusion's, regardless of who came up with them, are not not allowed to explain debates at premises according to the rules of logic
Tim Nickerson:
--- Quote from: Matt Grantham on April 08, 2018, 08:34:26 PM ---
Well its been pretty polite up to this point , but I am going to object to this There is the logical fallacy of begging the question, and in my opinion it is particularly prevalent among those who official stories of some sort behind them Apparently this perspective allows them a free pass form this otherwise prohibitive fundament of logic based solely on the conclusion of organization Conclusion's, regardless of who came up with them, are not not allowed to explain debates at premises according to the rules of logic
--- End quote ---
Matt, I think that you may be speaking at a level that is above my pay grade because I'm having difficulty understanding what you just said there.
Tim Nickerson:
--- Quote from: Tom Sorensen on April 08, 2018, 09:05:53 PM ---
Mr. SPECTER - What specific experience have you had, if any, with respect to gunshot wounds?
Commander HUMES - My type of practice, which fortunately has been in peacetime endeavor to a great extent, has been more extensive in the field of natural disease than violence. However, on several occasions in various places where I have been employed, I have had to deal with violent death, accidents, suicides, and so forth. Also I have had training at the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, I have completed a course in forensic pathology there as part of my training in the overall field of pathology.
No experience in forensic pathology and you've asked for it.
--- End quote ---
Mr. SPECTER - Have you had any additional, special training or experience in missile wounds?
Colonel FINCK - For the past 3 years I was Chief of the Wound Ballistics Pathology Branch of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology and in that capacity I reviewed personally all the cases forwarded to us by the Armed Forces, and some civilian cases from the United States and our forces overseas. The number of these cases amounts to approximately 400 cases. I was called as a consultant in the field of missile wounds for this particular case, and also last year in February 1963, the Surgeon General of the Army sent me to Vietnam for a wound ballistics mission, I had to testify in a murder trial involving a 30/30 rifle in the first week of March this year, and I came back yesterday after one week in Panama where I had to testify. I was sent to Panama by the Secretary of the Army regarding the fatalities of the events of 9-10 in January of 1964.
Mr. SPECTER - Have you been certified by the American Board of Pathology, Doctor Finck?
Colonel FINCK - I was certified in pathology anatomy by the American Board of Pathology in 1956, and by the same American Board of Pathology in the field of forensic pathology in 1961.
...............................
Mr. SPECTER - Did you have occasion to participate in the autopsy of the late President Kennedy?
Colonel FINCK - Yes; I did.
Mr. SPECTER - And are you one of the three coauthors of the autopsy report which has been previously marked and introduced into evidence here?
Colonel FINCK - Yes, I am.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version