JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Autopsy proves SBT impossible
Royell Storing:
--- Quote from: Tim Nickerson on April 12, 2018, 03:59:31 AM ---Here you go ray:
--- End quote ---
The JFK Autopsy Photo clearly shows a wound in JFK's BACK. The Autopsy Face Sheet clearly displays a wound in JFK's BACK. Humes placed his finger inside a wound on JFK's BACK. The above illustration is pure Fiction.
Ray Mitcham:
--- Quote from: Tim Nickerson on April 12, 2018, 03:51:51 PM ---Ok, so they didn't measure themselves. Who did the measuring and what method and tools did they use to come up with the 45/60 degree figure?
--- End quote ---
Unfortunately, Tim, like you, I wasn't present at the autopsy, so I can't answer your question. However Sibert and O'Neill were and they reported what they heard. Or, because what they said doesn't agree with your bible, the Warren Report, maybe you think the FBI agents were just mistaken or lying,
Matt Grantham:
Have to add Silbert and O'Neil to WC's strange list of those not called before it
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: Tim Nickerson on April 12, 2018, 03:36:37 PM ---Did Sibert and O'Neill measure a downward angle o 45/60 degrees? If so, how did they manage to do it?
--- End quote ---
Did agent Bookhout measure Linnie Mae Randle's paper bag?
Matt Grantham:
--- Quote from: Tim Nickerson on April 12, 2018, 03:51:51 PM ---Ok, so they didn't measure themselves. Who did the measuring and what method and tools did they use to come up with the 45/60 degree figure?
--- End quote ---
Since Humes claimed to have stick his finger in the wound I assume it was an estimate It is a wide range which seems like a reasonable way to estimate
Not to mention that is of secondary importance to the findings of the location of the wound on the body and the wound's depth
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version