JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Autopsy proves SBT impossible
Howard Gee:
--- Quote from: John Iacoletti on May 11, 2018, 06:09:03 PM ---Can I use the same lame excuse? "Most likely it was never recovered".
What do you mean "we", kimosabe?
--- End quote ---
See if you can keep up. I said 'most likely hit concrete'. Not 'most likely never recovered'.
What do you think happened to the 'missed shot' ?
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: Howard Gee on May 11, 2018, 10:08:18 PM ---See if you can keep up. I said 'most likely hit concrete'. Not 'most likely never recovered'.
--- End quote ---
So the bullet that hit JFK in the back was never recovered. See how easy that is by your standards?
--- Quote ---What do you think happened to the 'missed shot' ?
--- End quote ---
What missed shot? How do you know there was one?
Howard Gee:
--- Quote from: John Iacoletti on May 11, 2018, 10:15:01 PM ---So the bullet that hit JFK in the back was never recovered. See how easy that is by your standards?
What missed shot? How do you know there was one?
--- End quote ---
No, the bullet that hit JFK in the back was recovered. CE399.
You're the one that asked about the 'missed shot'.
I responded.
Feel free to outline your sequence of shots fired, location of shooter(s), and where the bullets wound up.
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: Howard Gee on May 11, 2018, 10:34:10 PM ---No, the bullet that hit JFK in the back was recovered. CE399.
--- End quote ---
LOL. And your evidence that CE399 hit JFK in the back would be ...?
Matt Grantham:
Howard Welcome to the round and round
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version