Is the Zapruder film a composite or an original?

[Royell Storing]

Where did this come from: " He then made it publicly known that he gave ALL the money he had received for his film = $25,000 to the Police/Tippit Family. "

Everything I have read re: the donation to the Tippit family, he stated as having given a portion of what he made from his film, not "all of it".  Please point me to the citation for the exact words you are using to describe Zapruder's donation as to saying that he said he gave "all of it".

      Barber - This book by Trask goes into detail regarding Zapruder and his film. It even goes into Harry McCormick emerging from the shadows when Zapruder went to have the 3 copies made. You asked for my source, & I gave it to you. You simply do Not want to accept this from me. Why not buy, beg, borrow, or steal the book & actually read it? 

[Chris Scally]

Royall Storing -

Richard Trask NEVER, as far as I'm aware, said or implied or suggested either in writing or verbally, that Harry McCormick "emerged from the shadows" or words to that effect "when Zapruder went to have the 3 copies made". McCormick was the person who first spoke to Zapruder in Dealey Plaza, put Zapruder and Forrest Sorrels in contact with one another, and was then present throughout the processing of the camera-original film.

Please cite title, chapter and page number of any Trask book which claims otherwise.

Thank you.

 

[Royell Storing]

Royall Storing -

Richard Trask NEVER, as far as I'm aware, said or implied or suggested either in writing or verbally, that Harry McCormick "emerged from the shadows" or words to that effect "when Zapruder went to have the 3 copies made". McCormick was the person who first spoke to Zapruder in Dealey Plaza, put Zapruder and Forrest Sorrels in contact with one another, and was then present throughout the processing of the camera-original film.

Please cite title, chapter and page number of any Trask book which claims otherwise.

Thank you.

 

          I advise Everyone to actually READ THE BOOK. This is the Final time I will spoon feed you "chapter and verse". "National Nightmare" Page 112, Full paragraph 2.

[Chris Scally]

As I thought - Trask does NOT say that "Harry McCormick emerged from the shadows" - you are adding 2 + 2, getting 5 as the result, and then adding a dose of assumption, so that your total equals 8.

[Royell Storing]

As I thought - Trask does NOT say that "Harry McCormick emerged from the shadows" - you are adding 2 + 2, getting 5 as the result, and then adding a dose of assumption, so that your total equals 8.

             I have gifted you with some knowledge. You're welcome. You thought Harry was Only present, "throughout the processing of the camera-original film". Do Not feel bad. Nobody knows how everything went down in this case. There are Many areas that remain Murky and some just Completely Unknown. The location of the Officer Chaney/Lead Car Event being shrouded in mystery to this day. As for your math, you better stick to mistaken Zapruder time lines.

[Chris Scally]

             I have gifted you with some knowledge. You're welcome. You thought Harry was Only present, "throughout the processing of the camera-original film". Do Not feel bad. Nobody knows how everything went down in this case. There are Many areas that remain Murky and some just Completely Unknown. The location of the Officer Chaney/Lead Car Event being shrouded in mystery to this day. As for your math, you better stick to mistaken Zapruder time lines.

I am absolutely staggered that you could find the time to take a break from your research to 'gift me with some knowledge' from your vast and insightful understanding of the case. We can certainly agree that nobody knows how everything happened that awful day, as you yourself have so clearly illustrated on many occasions in the past.

As for my math, I was trying to show - by means of an obviously ridiculous example - how convoluted your "logic" was, and it seems I was successful, as you didn't "get it" at all, and like your reference to Chaney and the Lead Car, I don't know what your reference to "mistaken Zapruder time lines" means in the context of this discussion.

 I appreciate your taking the time to education me, but please don't feel under any obligation to respond, as I have neither the time nor the inclination to continue this exchange.

[Royell Storing]

I am absolutely staggered that you could find the time to take a break from your research to 'gift me with some knowledge' from your vast and insightful understanding of the case. We can certainly agree that nobody knows how everything happened that awful day, as you yourself have so clearly illustrated on many occasions in the past.

As for my math, I was trying to show - by means of an obviously ridiculous example - how convoluted your "logic" was, and it seems I was successful, as you didn't "get it" at all, and like your reference to Chaney and the Lead Car, I don't know what your reference to "mistaken Zapruder time lines" means in the context of this discussion.

 I appreciate your taking the time to education me, but please don't feel under any obligation to respond, as I have neither the time nor the inclination to continue this exchange.

           Your Now ducking out is right in line with your conduct when you were unable to document the source of power for the sign atop the TSBD. When pressed, you run.
           I understood your math.  Point is, there was Nothing "convoluted" in my logic. Trask Documented that Harry McCormick and Tom Dillard were both sent to Jamieson's lab, ".... for Another try to secure publication rights of stills from the movie". This was After 6PM on 11/22/63. It was during their conversation, after "coming out of the shadows", that Zapruder agreed to, "...meet McCormick in the morning to discuss possible film rights". You need to expand your research to Include the reading of this book.