JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Is the Zapruder film a composite or an original?
Steve M. Galbraith:
--- Quote from: Steve Barber on April 06, 2018, 07:35:09 PM --- So he didn't recall stopping his camera. Read his grandaughter's book. You might learn something.
--- End quote ---
Zapruder's granddaughter gives the following account of his filming (this is from her book):
Zapruder said in the Clay Shaw trial that the film shown to the jury (multiple times) was the same one that was developed in Dallas the day of the assassination. The trial film was one of the copies made by Time/Life of the original Zapruder film (which they had) and that was subpoenaed by Garrison. That copy that was shown in the trial was later bootlegged and released to large parts of the public.
From the trial:
Q: Mr. Zapruder, from having seen what was projected on this film, can you tell the Court whether or not it appears to be the same as you viewed your original film on November 22, 1963 in Dallas, Texas?
A: Yes, it does.
It seems obvious that if large parts were cut out or changed that he would have noticed it. Maybe not but we have lots of other evidence that is, for me, persuasive that the film wasn't deliberately altered.
The rest of his testimony is here: http://www.jfk-online.com/zaprudershaw2.html
James Dahl:
--- Quote from: Steve Barber on April 06, 2018, 07:35:09 PM --- So he didn't recall stopping his camera. Read his grandaughter's book. You might learn something.
--- End quote ---
Why do I have to read his granddaughter's book, she wasn't there. Zapruder was there and he said he never stopped filming. You are wrong
Royell Storing:
--- Quote from: Steve M. Galbraith on April 06, 2018, 07:52:49 PM ---Zapruder said in the Clay Shaw trial that the film shown to the jury (multiple times) was the same one that was developed in Dallas the day of the assassination. The trial film was one of the copies made by Time/Life that was subpoenaed by Garrison. That copy was bootlegged and released to large parts of the public.
From the trial:
Q: Mr. Zapruder, from having seen what was projected on this film, can you tell the Court whether or not it appears to be the same as you viewed your original film on November 22, 1963 in Dallas, Texas?
A: Yes, it does.
It seems obvious that if large parts were cut out or changed that he would have noticed it. Maybe not but we have lots of other evidence that is, for me, persuasive that the film wasn't deliberately altered.
The rest of his testimony is here: http://www.jfk-online.com/zaprudershaw2.html
--- End quote ---
Zapruder was Unable to ID Himself on the Zapruder Film Still Frames shown to him during his WC Testimony. Now, years later you want to swear by him when he is viewing a film in the middle of a packed courtroom? Zapruder was paid $150,000 for his film. This $150,000 would make it difficult for him to discredit an alleged copy of the film he sold to Time/Life for a small fortune. In 1963 when Zapruder sold his film for $150K, the average American was making roughly $4,000. $150,000 was a Ton of $$$ back in 1963.
Matt Grantham:
Royell Sterling that is a take I have never heard or considered I believe I also have heard that Greer had all kinds of problems making that turn and driving erratically during the time period in the lapse in the film
Royell Storing:
--- Quote from: Matt Grantham on April 06, 2018, 08:29:09 PM ---Royell Sterling that is a take I have never heard or considered I believe I also have heard that Greer had all kinds of problems making that turn and driving erratically during the time period in the lapse in the film
--- End quote ---
Yeah, there are stories that Greer almost jumped the curb as he steered a Hard left in order to correct the direction the JFK Limo was heading.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version