Can anybody provide proof of a successful reenactment of Oswald's feat?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Can anybody provide proof of a successful reenactment of Oswald's feat?  (Read 139186 times)

Offline Ted Shields

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 146
Re: Can anybody provide proof of a successful reenactment of Oswald's feat?
« Reply #126 on: January 31, 2020, 10:27:39 AM »
2 shots in 8 or 9 seconds, slow moving target, fired by a qualified sharpshooter from 190 to 265 feet. Yeah, not too difficult.

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Can anybody provide proof of a successful reenactment of Oswald's feat?
« Reply #127 on: January 31, 2020, 08:14:58 PM »
2 shots in 8 or 9 seconds, slow moving target, fired by a qualified sharpshooter from 190 to 265 feet. Yeah, not too difficult.
Why not really overstate it? A marksman..sharpshooter...expert sniper and give up another second or so?
One thing about bickering with the grubs...they will wear you down with experience :-\

Online Sean Kneringer

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
Re: Can anybody provide proof of a successful reenactment of Oswald's feat?
« Reply #128 on: January 31, 2020, 08:56:36 PM »
Nine seconds + Greer slightly taking his foot off the gas every time he looked back = easy peasy.

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1327
Re: Can anybody provide proof of a successful reenactment of Oswald's feat?
« Reply #129 on: February 02, 2020, 04:48:15 PM »
Two shots in 5+ seconds. The assassination took place the way Altgens described and Don Pardo of NBC read over the air. Altgens was the only news reporter, out of 70 news reporters present in Dealey Plaza, that was an actual eyewitness. He was standing along Elm Street by the car as the shots were fired. The shooting was no great feat of marksmanship. Only two shots were fired and at distances of 55 yards and 88 yards in 5+ seconds.  All the physical evidence indicates there was only two shots. A large majority of Eyewitnesses stated there was only two shots. The idea there was three shots is a Merriman Smith invention that was first read by Walter Cronkite. Walter Cronkite then read the entire Altgens bulletin but never read the number of shots stated by Altgens.


https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=https%3a%2f%2fwww.youtube.com%2fwatch%3fv%3dfgvwA8UUaC0&view=detail&mid=A3E008023258294CC728A3E008023258294CC728&FORM=VIRE

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: Can anybody provide proof of a successful reenactment of Oswald's feat?
« Reply #130 on: February 02, 2020, 08:27:43 PM »
2 shots in 8 or 9 seconds, slow moving target, fired by a qualified sharpshooter from 190 to 265 feet. Yeah, not too difficult.

How about with a wonky scope that no one so far has incorporated into their re-enactment? The FBI needed to add 3 shims to the scope mount just so they could hit the target, let alone thread the needle. And why would qualified sharpshooter Oswald not have sighted in the scope when he practiced his ass off, as ALL sharpshooters must do to keep sharp? Ans: because he never even fired CE 139, otherwise, he would have left at least 1 print on it that wasn't put there post-mortem.

Face it, CE 139 was the planted patsy rifle. They used it to shoot magic bullet CE 399 into a swimming pool so they could plant it on the wrong stretcher in pristine condition with no DNA on it. Yeah, not too difficult.

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1327
Re: Can anybody provide proof of a successful reenactment of Oswald's feat?
« Reply #131 on: February 03, 2020, 04:15:11 PM »
How about with a wonky scope that no one so far has incorporated into their re-enactment? The FBI needed to add 3 shims to the scope mount just so they could hit the target, let alone thread the needle. And why would qualified sharpshooter Oswald not have sighted in the scope when he practiced his ass off, as ALL sharpshooters must do to keep sharp? Ans: because he never even fired CE 139, otherwise, he would have left at least 1 print on it that wasn't put there post-mortem.

Face it, CE 139 was the planted patsy rifle. They used it to shoot magic bullet CE 399 into a swimming pool so they could plant it on the wrong stretcher in pristine condition with no DNA on it. Yeah, not too difficult.

Exactly how do you align a scope to a rifle configured in the manner the carcano had been configured in? The scope mounting is offset to the left side of the barrel. If you align it to be pinpoint with the rifle barrel it is only accurate at one distance. If you align the scope to be parallel with the barrel, LHO would have had to known to estimate the crosshair setting to the left for an accurate shot. 



These were short range not long range shot distances. The use of a scope was not required.

How could anyone possibly have known they would have to "plant" anything at the hospital?




Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Can anybody provide proof of a successful reenactment of Oswald's feat?
« Reply #132 on: February 04, 2020, 04:36:42 AM »
These were short range not long range shot distances. The use of a scope was not required.
Begs the question why was a scope left on the rifle then? It provided a distraction if anything.
Quote
How could anyone possibly have known they would have to "plant" anything at the hospital?
A nice juicy bullet that could be linked to that rifle was required to further convince the faithful that Oswald did it.