JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate

Oswald did NOT act alone

<< < (2/6) > >>

James Dahl:

--- Quote from: Matt Grantham on April 05, 2018, 06:58:30 PM ---  And the head going backwards question?

--- End quote ---

Irrelevant, cone shaped exit wound on the top right half of the head, bullet sized entry wound on the rear of the head.  Expanding bullet from the rear killed Kennedy.  You can even see Kennedy's head explode precisely from the exit wound in the film.  Bullet exit wounds explode out, not the entry.  If Kennedy's entry wound was in the front, you wouldn't see the front explode out like that.

Bill Chapman:

--- Quote from: Alice Thorton on April 05, 2018, 03:32:01 PM ---So you're saying that Oswald acted alone then?

--- End quote ---

I can't prove that it was Oswald
No one has proven a conspiracy

Matt Grantham:
 James apparently your claim is that your interpretation of what can be seen in the head wound in the Zapruder film takes precedence over the laws of physics?

James Dahl:

--- Quote from: Matt Grantham on April 05, 2018, 07:37:20 PM --- James apparently your claim is that your interpretation of what can be seen in the head wound in the Zapruder film takes precedence over the laws of physics?

--- End quote ---

First off the Zapruder film is suspect, and secondly the laws of physics don't contradict a shot to the rear.  The energy of the impact would be very small because it's a jacketed bullet, the explosive force of the exit wound would be greater than the force of the entry wound so physics actually says Kennedy's head should go backwards, not forwards.

But this is irrelevant anyways because Kennedy wasn't a test dummy but a human being, whos body was still alive when the bullet destroyed his brain and death spasms would cause more motion than any bullet impact, parsing small body movements is a fools errand.

James Dahl:

--- Quote from: Matt Grantham on April 05, 2018, 08:05:39 PM --- What makes you believe it was a jacketed bullet? Again any video to support your video I am sure there plenty of examples of peoples and animals bodies moving in the direction of the force applied to it, but I am yet to see bodies, or parts of bodies blown off by bullets, coming in the opposite direction of a bullet

--- End quote ---

Because it's not the 19th century?  All bullets are jacketed, that doesn't mean FMJ, I believe the lethal head shot was an expanding bullet for instance, but the entry wound is a small neat hole.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version