JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Oswald did NOT act alone
Bill Chapman:
--- Quote from: Matt Grantham on April 07, 2018, 05:29:01 PM --- Nothing like certainty of equivocation Maybe you were trying to be humorous?
--- End quote ---
Congrats, you're the first to recognize that.
You see, I can't prove it; but c'mon...
Matt Grantham:
There is some old expression like "closely gathered conclusions loosely held' that for me at least seems related to what you are trying to get at
Alice Thorton:
--- Quote from: Bill Chapman on April 07, 2018, 04:30:22 PM ---I'm 100% sure that Oswald probably did it.
--- End quote ---
Do you think Oswald shot all 3 shots? Or do you think he had help from another person?
Bill Chapman:
--- Quote from: Alice Thorton on April 09, 2018, 06:21:56 PM ---Do you think Oswald shot all 3 shots? Or do you think he had help from another person?
--- End quote ---
I see no evidence of a second shooter.
I see no evidence of Oswald needing help.
Jack Trojan:
--- Quote from: Bill Chapman on April 09, 2018, 07:03:49 PM ---I see no evidence of a second shooter.
I see no evidence of Oswald needing help.
--- End quote ---
What about the blow out in the back of JFK's head?
What about the entrance wound in JFK's throat?
What about the exploding head shot?
What about the bullet hole in the windshield?
What about the magic bullet's impossible trajectory?
What about Greer slowing the limo down to the "Turkey shoot point"?
What about 2 of 3 shots finding their mark looking thru a wonky scope?
What about Oswald keeping the useless scope on the MC after disassembling/reassembling it?
What about the Keystone DPD's handling of the crime scene?
What about there not being a single print on the MC after disassembling/reassembling it?
Etc...
How can you claim Oswald 100% probably did it when you can't explain a single "what about.." listed above?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version