Prayer Woman

[Barry Pollard]

Aside from your apparent need to personally attack, just what is it in print that you are disputing? Just what is your claim? Evidence?

The reason you always add some flowery font to your posts is because you have nothing of substance otherwise.  That's the only way you can make your posts "interesting", with flowers.  And you refuse to engage your critics in a meaningful manner, something Brian could never be accused of(for the most part).  Grow up/a pair, engage and leave the daffodils at home, this is the internet, you will get crap from time to time, you can handle it.

[Larry Trotter]

No, LarryTrotterImage, these are your words as you keep re-posting "reminders" over and over again:

What research?  What evidence?

As stated, and copied by Iacoletti, Notably, research has now developed evidence indicative of SarahStanton as being the person represented by PrayerPersonImage, aka PrayerWomanImage.

So, is it your claim that there has been no research? Or, is it your claim that there has not been any evidence developed that is indicative of SarahStanton being the person represented by PrayerPersonImage, aka PrayerWomanImage?

If so, can you provide evidence indicative of the validity of said claim? You know, things like SarahStanton was not in that spot during the filming, because she was somewhere else, and because someone else was there at the time. Perhaps, you can review the almost 500 pages in this thread, just to make sure of the validity of your claim. And, try to pay full attention to Scully, especially when filing your repetitious claims.

[John Iacoletti]

As stated, and copied by Iacoletti, Notably, research has now developed evidence indicative of SarahStanton as being the person represented by PrayerPersonImage, aka PrayerWomanImage.

If you have any valid evidence of Prayer person being Stanton then either present it or stop claiming it.

[Larry Trotter]

As stated in the summation, Notably, research has now developed evidence indicative of SarahStanton as being the person represented by PrayerPersonImage, aka PrayerWomanImage.

So, is it your claim that there has been no research? Or, is it your claim that there has not been any evidence developed that is indicative of SarahStanton being the person represented by PrayerPersonImage, aka PrayerWomanImage?

If so, can you provide evidence indicative of the validity of said claim? You know, things like SarahStanton was not in that spot during the filming, because she was somewhere else, and because someone else was there at the time. Perhaps, you can review the almost 500 pages in this thread, just to make sure of the validity of your claim. And, try to pay full attention to Scully, especially when filing your repetitious claims.

If you have any valid evidence of Prayer person being Stanton then either present it or stop claiming it.

If indeed you can provide a specific quote regarding said specific claim, please do so, as I do not recall making it. As for research developed indicative evidence that SarahStanton is the person represented by PrayerPersonImage, it has already been presented!

[John Iacoletti]

If indeed you can provide a specific quote regarding said specific claim, please do so, as I do not recall making it. As for research developed indicative evidence that SarahStanton is the person represented by PrayerPersonImage, it has already been presented!

Presented by whom, and when?  Be specific.

[Tom Scully]

LOL.  I wish I had a nickel for everything you swear you saw once, but can't seem to find.
........

[John Iacoletti]

Again as it once was...Once again as it was...

Larry, give it a rest.