Prayer Woman

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Prayer Woman  (Read 1110930 times)

Offline Frederick Clements

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 75
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1925 on: July 07, 2019, 11:10:42 AM »
You didn't "see" any of these "obese features" until you found out that Stanton was obese.  Funny that.

 He seems to have super vision. He can see all sorts of things that the rest of us cannot see. Purses, buttons, obese arms etc.

 Fred

Offline Matthew Finch

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 52
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1926 on: July 08, 2019, 12:02:26 PM »
He can't see much of anything at the moment it would appear as he seems to be suspended.

I agree fully though, one simply cannot suggest much about any of Prayer-man's / Prayer-woman's features from the photographic evidence we have available currently. ANY position put forward can only be considered a THEORY, not FACT.

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1927 on: July 11, 2019, 12:53:30 AM »
Y
[i}[i}i}[i}[i}{font=comic sans ms{{size=10pt][u} {b][b}[u}[i}[u} [b}[b}[u}[i} [i}[u}[u}[i}[i}[b}[u}As a reminder:[u}[b}[i}


I just want to show folks what you see when you go to quote one of our other Stanton supporters.  This is just one line, with three words in it.  What is he on?

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1928 on: July 11, 2019, 09:33:54 PM »
It's almost like they are the kooks and we are the straight one's.
We had people that knew Stanton personally, family members, tell us[Brian] that PM is not her.  Brian went into full denial mode as usual but with Larry, it didn't even register.  He claimed he'd never heard it despite listening to the taped interview, queried it when I brought it up but has never since actually admitted it's implications dispite me pointing it to him directly.  He appears to take himself seriously at least, his insights quoted by himself more often than not.

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1929 on: July 12, 2019, 10:36:57 PM »
Y
I just want to show folks what you see when you go to quote one of our other Stanton supporters.  This is just one line, with three words in it.  What is he on?

Aside from your apparent need to personally attack, just what is it in print that you are disputing? Just what is your claim? Evidence?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1930 on: July 13, 2019, 04:48:37 AM »
No, LarryTrotterImage, these are your words as you keep re-posting "reminders" over and over again:

Notably, research has now developed evidence indicative of SarahStanton as being the person represented by Prayer PersonImage aka PrayerWomanImage.

What research?  What evidence?

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1931 on: July 13, 2019, 08:18:04 AM »
Aside from your apparent need to personally attack, just what is it in print that you are disputing? Just what is your claim? Evidence?

The reason you always add some flowery font to your posts is because you have nothing of substance otherwise.  That's the only way you can make your posts "interesting", with flowers.  And you refuse to engage your critics in a meaningful manner, something Brian could never be accused of(for the most part).  Grow up/a pair, engage and leave the daffodils at home, this is the internet, you will get crap from time to time, you can handle it.