Prayer Woman

[Martin Weidmann]

There doesn't need to be a photo of Oswald at the window as the stack of evidence of his guilt towers over his lies of innocence. You though sure as hell need a photo of him on the steps. At the moment all there is to see is a blob.

Leaving aside all the speculative assumptions that have to be made to come close to some kind of plausibe narrative, please tell us what exactly is this "stack of evidence of his guilt".

It would be nice if at least one LN would support such a bold claim rather than just claiming it.

[Larry Trotter]

Indeed. 

"Indeed", and absolutely, there is nothing reliable to conclude PrayerPersonImage as representing any male, much less AccusedLoneGunmanAssassin LeeHarveyOswald.

I do conclude that the provided film frame/still indicates PrayerWomanImage to be in the corner, but with a head turn towards her right as if looking towards GloriaCalveryImage on the stairs, who as evidence indicates, as she is approaching/entering the stairs/landing, is 'announcing' to other stairs/landing occupants what she had just witnesses seconds earlier.

However, when viewing the actual DarnellFilm, PrayerWomanImage appears to be turning her head either towards, or away from BuellWesleyFrazier as if confirming what MsCalvery had just 'announced'.

And, the SarahDeanStantonImage face image insertion appears close to the as shown PrayerWomanImage head turn angle.

[John Iacoletti]

Apparently Dirty Harvey watched the parade, alright.
Well, at least until he was satisfied with what he saw.
Or so I hear...

As someone said elsewhere he watched the parade through iron sights.

Why is it that Lone Nutters can only contribute to a discussion by saying "Oswald did it" over and over again?

[Alan Ford]

Leaving aside all the speculative assumptions that have to be made to come close to some kind of plausibe narrative, please tell us what exactly is this "stack of evidence of his guilt".

It would be nice if at least one LN would support such a bold claim rather than just claiming it.

Don't hold your breath, Mr Weidmann! They have had 55 years to put Mr Oswald at that window at that time with that rifle, and they still come up short every time.

Speaking of plausible narratives: the official implausible narrative now, for the first time in those 55 years, finds itself confronted with a simple, concrete and plausible counter-narrative:



Courtesy of Mr Oswald himself

[Alan Ford]

The Coca cola was not brought up in the first interrogation, and that's the ONLY interrogation that Hosty attended.

More unadulterated nonsense from Mr Cakebread 

Agent Hosty co-signed the first report on Mr Oswald's first interrogation which contains the words:

Oswald stated that he went to lunch at approximately noon and claimed he ate his lunch on the first floor in the lunch room; however he went to the  second floor where the coca cola machine is located and obtained a bottle of coca cola for his lunch. Oswald claimed to be on the first floor when President John F. Kennedy passed the building.

[Royell Storing]

       The Hosty Notes which mention Oswald claiming to go outside and "Watched the P. Parade" are written on the Back Side of a DPD Affidavit Form. According to SA Bookhout's WC testimony, he was NOT on duty on 11/22/63. He was "On leave". Bookhout was physically there in Dallas and watched the JFK Motorcade pass by that day. When he was told by a passerby that shots had been fired, he called in and was at some point was directed to be on hand at the Oswald 3:15 Interrogation. Is it possible with SA Bookhout being "On Leave" that he was Not carrying his FBI Note Pad with him? Bookhout Not having his FBI Note Pad with him probably forced him to write down his Oswald Interrogation Notes on whatever paper was on hand = the Back Side of a DPD Affidavit Form. This would make these Notes to be the Original Bookhout Notes taken During the Oswald 3:15 Interrogation.

[Walt Cakebread]

       The Hosty Notes which mention Oswald claiming to go outside and "Watched the P. Parade" are written on the Back Side of a DPD Affidavit Form. According to SA Bookhout's WC testimony, he was NOT on duty on 11/22/63. He was "On leave". Bookhout was physically there in Dallas and watched the JFK Motorcade pass by that day. When he was told by a passerby that shots had been fired, he called in and was at some point was directed to be on hand at the Oswald 3:15 Interrogation. Is it possible with SA Bookhout being "On Leave" that he was Not carrying his FBI Note Pad with him? Bookhout Not having his FBI Note Pad with him probably forced him to write down his Oswald Interrogation Notes on whatever paper was on hand = the Back Side of a DPD Affidavit Form. This would make these Notes to be the Original Bookhout Notes taken During the Oswald 3:15 Interrogation.

Yes, I believe your right....I recall Bookhout saying that he jotted his notes on the back of a pad of DPD affidavit forms that he found in the Homicide office.

But I believe that the Bookhout notes are from the second interrogation ...... Hosty never recorded anything about the Coca- Cola, because that never came up in the first session.   That first session ended at 4:05 and Hosty was ordered to stay out of the interrogation because he had caused Lee to become angry by mentioning Mexico City...