Prayer Woman

[Larry Trotter]

As I have concluded, it is reasonably important to provide evidence of a valid identification of the LadyImages standing with/beside LadyImage, aka GloriaCalveryImage, on the Elm St sidewalk between the two FreewaySigns as seen in ZapruderFilm viewing the passing PresidentialMotorcade.
 Notebly, valid relative LadyImage identification evidence solidly enhances the reliable evidence indicative of PrayerPersonImage representing SarahStanton.
 Admittedly, when viewing CouchFilm and/or DarnellFim, I had originally thought that GloriaCalveryImage had encountered BillyLovelady Image when reaching the stairs. However, since indications are that BLI has just left the stairs/landing and is walking west on Old Elm St, I now believe GCI is closely behind another LadyImage, possibly aka KarenWestbrookImage, who appears to be wearing a light color headscarf. And, along side of GCI on her right, is a LadyImage, likely aka KaranHicksImage, who is apparently dressed in white with a white or light color headscarf.
 Additionally, it is my conclusion that RunningWomanImage, as seen in CFilm/DFilm, is most likely aka CarolReedImage, who appears in ZFilm to be wearing a light color blouse, and is either wearing a reddish headscarf, or possibly has red hair.

[Barry Pollard]

"Most likely" means he has no proof and is guessing, as do words like possibly, indicative and maybe, apperently he's the only one that doesn't realise this and that's why he can make conclusions based on guesswork.

When he joined in here I said that one of his fiirst statements sounded biased because as he wrote, he had "never not doubted" PM=LHO, that means, in basic English and as I pointed out, that he had never even considered it.  He then denied he was biased but yet repeatedly and again as I just responded to, pigeonholes people based on what side of the PM issue they are on.  Specifically now he wrote, some of us wouldn't contribute to a fund for better images because they'd have nothing to gain, so I repeat, this mindset is just whacky and akin to "all CT's have this basic need for there to be a conspiracy in this case".

Now you answer my question Larry.
What witness, or group of witnesses, ever PROVED anything by what they said alone?  Pick any case you like.

[Barry Pollard]

...
The PrayerPersonImage is no doubt to me, along with others, representing a female then employed at the TSBD Bldg who was, as most of the bldg employees, outside during lunchtime to view the passing motorcade.
...

He's never explained how or why "PMimage" looks like a female to him.  Never.  So is there a problem he won't admit to?

[Barry Pollard]

... Notebly, valid relative LadyImage identification evidence solidly enhances the reliable evidence indicative of PrayerPersonImage representing SarahStanton...

Utter BS.

[Barry Pollard]

About time we were reminded just what she looked like before she was scalped.

This is from Robin Unger's gif which was posted, I assume, using the best frames available which have yet to be bettered and prior to Davidson accidently creating more "detail" to a "face" he has yet to comment on.  When Chris went and deliberetly tried to bring out facial features from PM this scalping victim was nowhere to be seen.

Brian claims this is another person stood behind our girl who apparently sliced the top of her head off just from being there.
Was an uncut version shown to Wanda and Rosa?

Also Brian I asked you how you knew what Rosa was looking at when she muttered "She looked more like this".
What were the complete set of images they had in front of them?

[Barry Pollard]

Larry has never explained how "PMimage", LOOKS LIKE a woman and still hasn't.  He rejects the Weigman "enhancements" so is left with Darnell.. and he sees a woman but how, still remains a mystery.  Am I really asking that much?  Also, my other question still remains unanswered,
show us when and where a witness ever proved anything of significance just by what they claimed to have witnessed, ever, in the complete history of mankind.
"I think, therefore I am"?

Likes to quote the witness record where they weren't even cross examined but will not even touch, let alone delve into, how utterly unreliable that source of information has become to most modern scholars.

[Barry Pollard]

There is no reaction visible in Darnell from either PM, BWF or the person to his left, whereas everyone else on the steps has either moved position and/or is looking west.
There is no facial features visible either, that PM and BWF are looking in the general direction of each other is not disputed but what exactly they are looking at is pure guesswork, I get no sense they are looking directly at each other at all.
"There been a shooting, JFK 's been hit", that's not entered their conciousness yet, IMO based on the same images you use Brian, the one's that show no viasble reaction from those on the landing.

No chubbies allowed.